Search News


Browse Archives

News

If It Can Happen To Him ...

July 22, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

For many, it was a startling portrait: the normally reserved Harvard University professor, Henry Louis Gates Jr., standing on his front porch in handcuffs, appearing to yell as police officers surrounded him. Yet those were the images that circulated Tuesday, as news of Gates’ controversial arrest – and the subsequent dropping of charges against him – circulated on Web sites and television.

Stephen L. Carter, a Yale University law professor and novelist, felt like he was watching a scene unfold from one of his own books. Carter has written scholarly works along with bestsellers about the lives of upper-class African Americans, including those in academe, and his fiction often illustrates how wealthy blacks draw suspicion in posh environs like private beaches or Ivy League campuses.

“If it can happen to Henry Louis Gates, possibly the most prominent black scholar in the country, and in his home town, then it can indeed happen to any of us,” Carter, author of The Emperor of Ocean Park, wrote in an e-mail to Inside Higher Ed.

“Odd, isn’t it? Here we are in the age of Obama, and some things haven’t changed. Blackness is associated in the public mind with wrongdoing; if we are spotted in an unexpected locale, we must be up to something.”

Echoes of Carter’s words could be heard across academe Tuesday, as professors discussed Gates’ assertion that he had been the victim of racial profiling, and recalled their own similar experiences. The story, which had drawn significant media attention by Monday, began early Thursday afternoon when officers responded to a possible break-in at Gates’ Cambridge, Mass. home. Gates had been spotted trying to force open his own jammed door, and when confronted by officers he accused them of racism, drawing a charge of disorderly conduct, according to a police report.

Amid public outcry, however, the police dropped the charges, and all those involved – including Gates – called the incident “regrettable and unfortunate” in a joint statement.

“This incident should not be viewed as one that demeans the character and reputation of Professor Gates or the character of the Cambridge Police Department,” the statement reads. “All parties agree that this is a just resolution to an unfortunate set of circumstances."

For Gates, director of the W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African and African American Studies, the incident was a bizarre case of life imitating scholarship. The longtime academician readily drew parallels between his interaction with police and larger issues of race relations, yelling “This is what happens to black men in America” on multiple occasions during the incident, according to the police report.

“It’s one thing to write about it, but altogether another to experience it,” Gates told The Washington Post Tuesday.

Stereotypes Still a Struggle

As news of Gates's arrest spread among college professors, the irony was seldom lost on any of them. Gates has spent much of his life writing and thinking about race, garnering the respect and attention of fellow scholars and pop culture icons like Oprah Winfrey, whose genealogy he helped explore in a PBS documentary and subsequent book. Yet, here Gates was in handcuffs on a front porch.

Jerlando Jackson, an associate professor of higher and postsecondary education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said he found the entire incident very troubling – and even thought the story wasn’t true when he first heard about it. Gates’ arrest highlights, however, the struggles even the most esteemed black professors can have overcoming the perception of black males as criminals, Jackson said. The work of a scholar and teacher is one that requires legitimacy, something black men struggle to attain because others may impose stereotypes upon them, he said.

“This incident confronts that challenge,” Jackson said. “Here is one of the best scholars in his field – who happens to be an African American male, who has studied and taught in the best institutions in the world, and is largely known outside of the academy as well as inside – experiencing an exchange with police officers and mistaken identity that you often would not associate with a professor at a world class institution.”

“We as African American males are very concerned about the images that are imposed on us as professors,” he added.

Struggles with stereotyping are so common that some black males in the professoriate sometimes make overt attempts to undermine those images. Michael Cuyjet, acting associate provost for student life and associate professor of education at the University of Louisville, said he and his wife were just recently discussing how “she and I get dressed up and go to the mall.”

“Our experience is if you go in [wearing] jeans or cutoffs you get followed around by security people, or clerks don’t treat you well,” said Cuyjet, who edited and co-wrote an essay collection called African American Men in College.

When Cuyjet heard about Gates’ arrest, he said he was disappointed but hardly shocked to learn Gates was an apparent victim of racial profiling

“When incidents like this occur it lets the greater population become aware of something that most black men are aware of simply by nature of having been black in America,” Cuyjet said.

Juan Gilbert, president of a group of black male academics called Brothers of the Academy, was similarly unsurprised.

“This isn’t anything new,” said Gilbert, who was recently named professor and chair of Human-Centered Computing at Clemson University. “ 'Skip' [Gates] has written about this; Skip knows about this.”

Jack Levin, a professor at Northeastern University who has written extensively about race, said the main issue the incident highlights actually has little to do with whether Gates was in fact a victim of racial profiling. Levin, who is white, said the take-away from the incident is that Gates and other black men live in a world where racism is prevalent enough that Gates would reasonably conclude he was targeted because he’s black.

“Even in liberal Cambridge, Massachusetts, the idea of racial victimization has to be a part of the everyday thinking of black professors,” said Levin, a professor of sociology and criminology. “I mean that even where you’d least expect it – in a liberal environment where there is tremendous tolerance for difference – black professors still in the back of their minds have to think they might be the victims of racism. Even here, because it’s part of our culture. It’s part of the air we breathe.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on If It Can Happen To Him ...

  • Wny assume racism?
  • Posted by LSG on July 22, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • I live in a town that is 90% white. If any of my neighbors saw some appearing to break into my home--whether they were white, black, green, or orange, I'd be glad if they called the police. The problem here is Mr. Gate's overreaction--why didn't he just say he lived there? I'm sure that would have been the end of it.

  • America still divided
  • Posted by Jeanne Phoenix Laurel , Assoc. Prof. & Chair, English at NIagara University on July 22, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • I'll be interested to watch how this plays out. Already, Twitter & Facebook, Black America up in arms; white America downplaying it as legitimate use of police to "secure the peace." I'm willing to bet money it will be mostly ignored in the non-academic white press.

  • Posted by Ellington Graves on July 22, 2009 at 8:30am EDT
  • To LSG: Dr. Gates DID show his ID to the officer who responded to the call. He also reiterated exactly your sentiment, hoping that the neighbor who called 911 in this case would do so again. Gates's issue was the officer's response once his identity was confirmed - lack of responsiveness to Gates's questions, an inappropriately belligerent demeanor, and continuing to confront Gates inside his own home once proof of identity had been provided. So, that wasn't the end of it....

  • Posted by Shared pain on July 22, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • "black professors still in the back of their minds have to think they might be the victims of racism"

    It is much simpler for white and Asian male professors; they can keep in the front of their minds that discrimination against them is the law of the land thanks to affirmative action.

  • Get real
  • Posted by Hoosier Prof on July 22, 2009 at 9:00am EDT
  • LSG, black men also know how to deal with the police. The question is, do police know how to deal fairly with them? News accounts suggest that Gates repeatedly asked for the officer's name and badge number (denied), and also that the Cambridge Police (among many police departments) are known for slapping disorderly conduct charges on civilians whenever they don't approve of their behavior. Apparently, Gates was not arrested for trying to break into his own home, nor for failure to show ID, but for getting uppity with the police when they showed up. I wonder if I, a white female professor, who displayed a similar level of indignation with the police, would have been treated in a similar manner.

  • Believe the life story
  • Posted by P. Sundet , Director at Cook County Higher Education on July 22, 2009 at 9:00am EDT
  • The response, "just tell them he lives there" is a sad and classic example of how most white people do not believe the truth of someone else's life story of racism. Of course he told the police he lived there! That's the point -- they didn't believe him because he is black. One of the many hardships in the narrative of racism is getting white people to believe the truth of the black (or Latino, or Native American) experience. White people don't have to think about being white -- have you, as a white person, ever asked yourself what you like about being white? As a white woman I can truthfully answer that I like being white because I don't have to think about my color when I am in most social situations, or when I go to the bank to apply for a loan, or when I am shopping at the mall. The only time I think about it is when I am in mixed groups or when I am, for a change, in the minority. My small measure of discomfort is just a small portion of what our nation's people of color experience almost every moment of every day.

  • Doing their job
  • Posted by Diane Levy at University of Maryland, College Park on July 22, 2009 at 9:00am EDT
  • Gates was arrested for disorderly conduct, not breaking and entering. He should have thanked the police for doing their job, explained that he lived in the house and shown them a family photograph on the mantel. Shame on Gates, cyring "racism". Had an actual thief broken into his home, wouldn't he want the police to ask some questions? I've lost a lot of respect for a great scholar.

  • Posted by SAB on July 22, 2009 at 9:00am EDT
  • According to the news stories (of which I have read many in the "non-academic white press"), he absolutely identified himself as the homeowner and showed Harvard i.d. and perhaps another form of i.d. I am white and live in a state with a vast white majority, but I would have to have been hermetically sealed somewhere for my lifetime to believe that Dr. Gates's race was not THE principle factor here. The old "white, black, green, or yellow" argument doesn't cut it, and the sooner we white people stop proferring it, the sooner we can deal with our inbred prejudices.

    Last night an alarm went off in my house because of smoke from the stove, but that alarm is identical to the one that would sound if someone broke in to my house. If authorities had responded, I know they would have assumed that I lived there, no questions asked, because I am white and so are my neighbors. A black professor who lives one neighborhood over? I can't be remotely sure that he woudn't find himself in handcuffs while everything was sorted out.

    It's wrong. We need to admit that. That would be a start.

  • Politeness goes a long way
  • Posted by SB on July 22, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • Most people know that when an officer comes to your house to see if there's a break in (or stops you in your car, etc.), politness is key. They deal with fools, cheats and criminals on a regular basis, and everyone (even a white blond) is suspect prior to being innocent. Mr. Gates should ask himself what would have happened if he politely agreed to step outside and talk with the officer (who, if you think about it, would have no idea of knowing whether others accompanied him in the house and were ready to ambush him). The fact that you are a Harvard professor probably allows you to get away with a lot and be rude to many due to your wonderfully prestigious position, but frankly doesn't mean a lot to the average Joe police officer. In fact, if anything, my guess is that the Cambridge police department has its fill of dealing with arrogant "world famous" professors. As a white person who has been stopped, yelled at, and given a "warning" while following traffic signs that a black policer officer later admitted he hadn't read, I can tell you that rude treatment by cops is not race-specific. Still, I would never refuse to step out of my house if a police officer explained that someone had seen me "break in" to my house -- fully understanding the office had a job to do -- and not being nearly as arrogant as Mr. Gates seems to be. But then, I'm not accustomed to special privilege in most things, and I know that creating a scene generally would never work to my benefit.

  • Charges seem to be warranted
  • Posted by Common Sense on July 22, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • I can find no fault with the actions of the police; their charges of disorderly conduct seem fitting and should not have been dropped due to political pressure. How much longer can we accept that the black community will always blame personal shortcomings and everything else on racism? Drugs and violent rap gangster culture? Racism. Poor grades, test scores, and overall lack of work ethic? Racism. Got fired for poor performance? Must be racism. Multiple children out of wedlock? Racism. Breaking into an apartment and then being foul mouthed when the blue's finest show up? Racism. Committing crimes and getting caught? Racism. It seems the police have become more of a scapegoat for the professor's race based paranoia and general bad attitude towards people with less melanin in their skin than he has. I'm tired of people playing the racist card every time something doesn't go their way. Its a blame shifting technique. Its making a statement about someone's personal character and moral values when you know little to nothing about them.

    There are some undisputed facts in this case, which justify the officer's action and the professor's arrest. 1)Two men (regardless of color), were witnessed breaking into a home with backpacks on. I would hope any cognizant neighbor would call the police and I would also hope the police would respond and be diligent in their duties; 2) The professor initially REFUSED to give any identification when questioned by the police, and immediately cried out racism. Refusing to give ID to an officer when requested is grounds for arrest on its own. The professor, finally relenting, then gave a COLLEGE ID (which is not a legal, government issued form of identification). The college ID did not have the professor's address listed, which prompted further questioning; 3)The professor was uncooperative, deamining, screaming, beligerent, and defensive. He often times screamed obscenities along with race accusations and repeated demands for the officer's name and badge number. For fear of the officer's personal safety, I certainly commend him for NOT giving this information to someone who was obviously in a rage filled fit. As an officer, would I TRULY believe the person acting like a deranged out of control lunatic in front of me is an esteemed Harvard professor? I would have my doubts. I would also now be fearful of the poison this professor has been injecting into the minds of our youth.

    It seems to me that common sense would dictate that the professor should have remained calm, given the proper identification when requested, obeyed the officer's commands, and easily explained the situation, even making a few laughs about forgetting his keys. Seems it would have been a better outcome for all.

  • Use of the word "profiling"
  • Posted by Bob on July 22, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • Is anyone else disturbed by the fast and loose use of the word "profiling"? Lets be precise please! Profiling implies that someone was "looking for" a black man. There was no checkpoint pulling over only black motorists! This was a neighbor who did not recognize another neighbor who was breaking into a house. The officers were responding to a legitimate citizen complaint. If it were me I would be calling the police as well.

    Gates escalated it by accusing the officers of racism, when they were just trying to protect someones house and investigate the incident. Maybe he was tired from his trip, but he made the mountain out of the molehill by his own angry actions.

    I read lots of empathy for gates. The officers deserve some as well.

  • Posted by K. Ward at New York University on July 22, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • @ Ms. Levy: Dr. Gates did show the police officer his identification and proof of residence. He was arrested, as others here have noted, for the "attitude" he displayed towards the officer. Dr. Gates asked the officer for his name and badge number and got more and more upset when the officer would not comply with the request (which they are bound to do).

    It would be very naive to think that we live in a post-racial society. Race is still very important in this society, both for pride of heritage and for prejudice.

  • Posted by K. Warrd at New York University on July 22, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • @ Common Sense: Dr. Gates provided two forms of identification -- his driver's license with his home address on it and his university ID because he told the officer that he taught at Harvard and the officer wanted proof.

    Also, Dr. Gates had just returned from a multi-day engagement in China, which is a long trip through multiple time zones; so, I think anyone would get upset when they are trying to return home and our being questioned by police.

    When the police arrived they asked Dr. Gates to step out of his home. Dr. Gates did not have to step out of his home and rightly refused. When he then went to get his ID the officer then entered his home, uninvited, which is not legal. The police acted inappropirately in this matter and that is why so many people have no sympathy for them.

  • Typical for Middle-Class Black Men
  • Posted by Biodun , Lead Analyst on July 22, 2009 at 9:57am EDT
  • This is a typical example of what most middle-class black men face regularly in this country, especially the educated black men. If a black man is seeing in upper-class neighborhood, whether he lives there or not, the first reaction is suspicion. I had similar experience last month when my wife and I went on vacation and decided to spend 4 days in a 5-star Hilton resort/hotel. As though something was wrong with a middle age black guy staying in a 5-star resort, everytime I worked out of my room to go to the beachside, this particular security guard would always ask for my room number and key. I didn't think it was offensive at first, but the next day he stopped me again and requested for my room key and room number. I noticed each time that he never asked other people that walked behind me or in front of me. The only time he wouldn't ask for my room key is when I'm walking with my wife. Yet, I didn't see anything wrong with his continous demand for my room key, until my wife and I went for lunch with another black couple who were also vacationing at the resort. I heard the husband expering frustration to his wife about how the security guard always stopped him and demanded his room key and room number everytime he walked outside their room. Then I realized it wasn't just me. I felt very bad. Spending thousands of dollars staying in this resort, only to be treated like an invader or a potential criminal. I have experienced several of such treatment. To my white colleagues, I will advise that you shouldn't jump into conclusion about playing race card in this Dr Gates incident. Someone might say, what is wrong with a police officer coming to your house and asking for a proof that you live there, afterall a neighbor had just reported a possible break-in? Well, you've never been in his shoe to know how it feels for people to treat you with disdain. You don't know how it feels to be a middle-class black man in enviroment that question your mental capability, where if you are an educated black man, then you are viewed as beneficiary of affirmative action and if you're not educated, you are viewed as a potential criminal.

  • Racism More Complex than Cancer
  • Posted by Karin Foster , Research Fellow at Institute for Alternative Economics on July 22, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • It has been said you can't have an overclass without an underclass. Gates is upper middle class and therefore belongs to the majority of us. See Howard Zinn's A People's History of the U.S., notably Chapter 3 "Persons of Mean and Vile Condition" in which the English poor are vilified, stereotyped, outcast and scapegoated by their social superiors. These folks came over (often kidnapped, some in chains) as indentured servants and formed often affectionate bonds with Africans, with whom they also planned to revolt against their common masters. That is, until the masters invented institutions like "whiteness" and the one-drop rule.

    In this incident a working class, or lower middle class police officer confronts a stereotyped black man, who happens to be an affluent, famous, high status professor at Harvard. It stirs up differing kinds of pain, as the blogs will show, including class resentment. It reveals a complex dynamic not just in this incident but in our very daily lives. Classism tells an all-"white" nation, like 17th c. England, to "stay in your place." (Sexism has always told women that, too.) In an ethnically, "racially" mixed history like ours we can seemingly 'forget' the classism and just tell racial others, "stay in your place." We do this, as the article points out, by putting people of color under surveillance, via stereotypes, regardless of class gradation. (But don't forget all the people of color populating our largely for-profit prison industrial complex precisely due to this extra surveillance while white folks go free for many of the same, mostly drug-related offenses.)

    A wider view may overwhelm us with the mind-boggling complexity of all this. Yet Terry Eagleton writes, "In the current preoccupation
    with minorities, one vital insight is in danger of being obscured. The astonishing fact about global capitalism is that it is the MAJORITY who are dispossessed. There are, to be sure, degrees of dispossession, and shipyard workers are by no means destitute. But while the idea of a social order which excludes certain vilified minorities is familiar enough, and these expulsions are visibly on show, the mind-shaking truth of a class analysis is that social orders have always invisibly shut out the majority. This is so paradoxical a fact, as well as so impalpable one, that we have failed to be sufficiently struck by it. It carries a double message: that a system entranced by success is in fact a miserable failure . . . ." This, I think, may be the larger, painful container of all the different hurts you will observe on the blogs.

  • Surprising Higher Ed Article
  • Posted by Jeff on July 22, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Shame on you Inside Higher Ed for publishing such an uninformed, biased article that doesn't even get the facts right. I live in Boston and if you want the real story look at Boston.com.

  • Gates DID Provide Police Drivers License
  • Posted by NYCEdPhD on July 22, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • The police did get the professor's drivers license. You can look at the police report online which confirms they were able to positively identify the professor using his drivers license. So commenter Diane Levy should appreciate that the professor DID give the police his ID, and should also consider why one of the THREE officers that responded didn't go inside and look for a family photo or piece of mail.

    To be clear, for Ms. Levy and Common Sense and others, this isn't about Gates making a mountain of a molehill or "deserving" to be arrested because of his actions - the police could have easily deescalated the incident - as most are trained to do - once they realized the professor and taxi driver were not trying to break into the house. And let's be clear folks, the police knew they weren't. Gates can't be weigh more than 150 and he looked dressed to go on a golf outing. The police were embarrassed plain and simple by a professor who was tuned up by the fact a neighbor - someone else at Harvard! - called the police on him for trying to get in his own front door. ...with the assistance of a taxi driver.

    Do others here truly believe the police thought a taxi driver (or limo driver) would pull right up to the front of a house in broad daylight, saunter up to someone's front door, and try to break in? Did the police not consider pulling the taxi driver aside? Did the taxi driver not say, "Whoa, hey, I was just trying to help this guy get in his house ...he said his door was jammed!"

    Did the taxi driver also not furnish identification? Now that is something I'd find hard to believe. So once the police confirmed the taxi driver and professor were not in cahoots, and once they did receive identification from the professor, why was he arrested? For being p!sssed off?

    No one deserves to be arrested after providing identification to police for trying to get into their own jammed front door. No one deserves to have their credentials criticized for being wrongly arrested.

    As to the snarky comment about affirmative action, the presumed discrimination you believe exists allegedly keeps you from getting a job or getting into the grad school of your choice. A completely different kind of discrimination is alleged in this incident (and in the murder of Sean Bell by the NYPD, for example). I am dissapointed anyone would attempted to conflate the two, but then again, these comments and the comments on the Chronicle have overwhelming criticized a professor arrested at his own house who did provide identification to the police.

  • Another angle
  • Posted by Another angle on July 22, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • I agree with a lot of what's already been written... both sides of it... maybe everyone was having a bad day. Maybe both parties could have been more polite... One thing no one has talked about that it was a neighbor who called the police. It is sad that people don't take the time to at least notice who lives in their neighborhoods. As one who has lived in NYC and smaller places, I can attest it doesn't take a lot of effort to look around. I would like to assume that the person who called was new to the area and had not yet seen Dr. Gates coming and going from his home. Instead of calling the cops maybe they should have come outside and asked if they could help or offer the man a glass of water...

  • Posted by GD on July 22, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Rather than critique/guess about an incident I did not witness, or about which I did not hear first-hand sworn testimony, I'd rather comment on your story, which seems radically different from the reader's comments here in toto. Drastically one-sided in favor of the notion that "racial profiling" MUST have been the root cause of a complex human interaction, your story seems to ignore the incident's complexity and variation from the norm when ANYONE interacts with the police. And finally, please remember what happened at Duke when the lacrosse team was unjustly painted with presumed guilty behavior by those who did not know the facts of the situation. While this situation is trivial by comparison, your story bears similarity in supporting implicitly a rush to uninformed judgment.

  • Thoreau's Night in Jail
  • Posted by Thomas Lawrence Long , Associate Professor-in-Residence at University of Connecticut on July 22, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • "When I came out of prison—-for someone interfered , and paid that tax—-I did not perceive that great changes had taken place on the common, such as he observed who went in a youth and emerged a gray-headed man; and yet a change had to my eyes come over the scene—-the town, and State, and country, greater than any that mere time could effect. I saw yet more distinctly the State in which I lived. I saw to what extent the people among whom I lived could be trusted as good neighbors and friends; that their friendship was for summer weather only; that they did not greatly propose to do right; that they were a distinct race from me by their prejudices and superstitions, as the Chinamen and Malays are that in their sacrifices to humanity they ran no risks, not even to their property; that after all they were not so noble but they treated the thief as he had treated them, and hoped, by a certain outward observance and a few prayers, and by walking in a particular straight through useless path from time to time, to save their souls. This may be to judge my neighbors harshly; for I believe that many of them are not aware that they have such an institution as the jail in their village." --H.D. Thoreau, "Resistance to Civil Government"

  • Now I see....
  • Posted by Critical Scholar at Southern Methodist University on July 22, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • Reading the earlier comments, I began to wonder where the members of our academy where who could think critically (or at least beyond their own context). To see early comments referring to Gate's need to be polite or to be grateful showed the incredible gap of reality which continues to pervade even the ivy lined halls of academy. When I saw the comment that White and Asian men of the professorate are victims of discrimination because of affirmative action--well honestly, all I could do was realize that nothing in deed ever changes at the foundation of America.

    I will not discuss the numerous times I have been questioned by my own campus police as an African American woman-so many that we on campus actually have a running joke about it because after all, one's relationship with the police or any social institution is contextual. Nor will I mention the fact that African Americans make up less than 5% of the PhD's granted in the US and make up no more than 6% of any non-HBCU faculty in America (JBHE, 2006)--let's see every 100 faculty seats, these lazy blacks who have to write dissertations and pass comps like everybody else; be subjected to the same standards of tenure; ARE given 5 seats in the faculty lounge- that Affirmative Action is really working!

    No, my concern is this: that the attitudes by in large reflected by my peers in their comments highlights the danger of the 'Liberal' self-declared non-racist in the academy. Given a choice between the 'out' Klan member and the colleagues who have commented thus far on this story--I would rather take my chances with the Klan member. Because after all, the Klan member is true to his convictions.

  • Disheartening
  • Posted by subterraneanne on July 22, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • It is disheartening to read some of the reactions posted here. As I understand it, by "stepping outside" Prof. Gates made himself vulnerable to arrest, something the officer apparently knew. There was no reason for him to step outside his own home after showing two forms of identification. Seems to me his speech, even if irritable, annoyed, and even (gasp) impolite, was protected, especially in his own home. He did not threaten the officer. I disturbs me that members of te higher ed community would support his arrest in these circumstances.

  • Ok
  • Posted by Ok on July 22, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • Step 1: See police pull up.
    Step 2: Stop trying to break into your own house.
    Step 3: Swallow your pride - you are embarrased because you locked yourself out of your own house. Everyone has done it.
    Step 4: Comply with police.
    Step 5: Show them your i.d.
    Step 6: Answer their questions.
    Step 7: Be patient.
    Step 8: Give the police the benefit of the doubt that they are doing their job.
    Step 9: Go to a neighbor and call the lock smith.
    Step 10: Go into your house with the new key.
    Step 11: Have a beer and unwind after a hard day of thinking.
    Step 12: Write a note to the Mayor thanking him for the professional way the police handled the matter and helped you get into your residence.

  • Quick to judge
  • Posted by Gene S , Dean, College of Behavioral Sciences on July 22, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • I can't believe how many people are so quick to judge the actions of the police. Has it occurred to anyone that the police may have received a call of suspicious activity or if a man, regardless of color, is observed by the police fiddling with the lock on a door that those actions may be construed as an incident worthy of inquiry? This was not a racial incident at all...though the good professor and some of his colleagues are trying to make it one.

    Also, might it ne possible that when the police approached the good professor that he was uncooperative and verbally aggressive? This isn't TV folks...wake up!

  • How to react when confronted by police
  • Posted by massmetz on July 22, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • I have advised my children (now grown) always to be polite, cooperative and deferential to police if they are stopped or confronted. The police don't know what situation they are facing, don't know who you are, if you are armed, etc. I explained that this was particularly true for teenagers, and especially true for teenage boys with long hair, baggy pants, etc.

    This advice was very useful when my teenage daughter forgot our house alarm code one day and police arrived at the house. She came out with her arms raised (probably unnecessary but she wasn't taking any chances) and asked politely to explain.

    The advice was also helpful to my teenage son who was stopped by police for speeding. He remembered the lesson, spoke respectfully and calmly to the officer. He received a speeding ticket but no other trouble.

    My other teenage son, who forgot or disregarded my warning, was riding as a passenger in a car that was stopped. He mouthed off to the officer, demanded to know what he was being charged with, and ended up in handcuffs and taken to central lockup.

    We are white. Regardless of one's race, it matters how one reacts when confronted by a police officer. Some police officers are afraid, some are bullies. There is a safe way and a stupid way to handle the situation.

  • Police Behavior
  • Posted by Joe , Professor at VCU on July 22, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • Most police are courteous and do their jobs professionally. There are some who have a preconceived assumption and rough you up especially if you happen to be black. Last week, I was driving through South Carolina from Florida and a state trooper followed me for about ten miles because of among other things for driving a nice car, and wearing a beach shirt and to make it worse for being black. If I have to guess: he had an assumption that I could not possibly be driving my car, assumed that I am a bad person, or transporting something illegal... If he was to stop me, my strategy was to be nice to him, courteous and provide all the information he needs and go by my business. Was he profiling me? You bet. Was there any thing I could do then? Very little. That is how professor Gates should have handled it. Later on he could have complained, sued, and publicized the incident since profiling of minorities is a major problem in the US.

  • PhD in White People
  • Posted on July 22, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • This is too funny. I grew up in inner city areas of NY and Washington, DC. Because I had good grades I was always put in more advanced classes - earning my way to a scholarship in a private (mostly White) high school and then going to a mostly White University. I earned my PhD in White People before I graduated college. What I find hilarious and sad is that White people can be ignorant of the Black experience in America. They don't need to earn a PhD in Black people. They can continue to live in their view of the world. Like Pat Buchanan saying only White people built this country. I know things won't really change in my life time. I know Black folks must be 10x better than White folks to land the same job. Yes Obama is president - that proves my point. He was >10x than his rivals and still White people can't get over the fact that he is our president. The "birthers" are still in denial. Until White people become enraged at discrimination and hold themselves accountable, things won't change. I'll remain an intelligent angry Black woman.

  • GD
  • Posted by Karin Foster , Research Fellow at Institute for Alternative Economics on July 22, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • "P]lease remember what happened at Duke when the lacrosse team was unjustly painted with presumed guilty behavior by those who did not know the facts of the situation."

    Yes. The Duke case further underscores my point above in "Racism More Complex than Cancer."

    It is a good thing for the lacrosse players that they were well connected, had highest priced lawyers, friends in the mass media, and just plain money power, etc. Just look what it took to get them off the hooks of an overzealous prosecutor!

    But don't you know that countless more working class Black and Latino men have been simiarly and prejudicially prosecuted with no such resources to save them? And many such are languishing in the above-mentioned prison-industrial complex as I write. Anyone who sympathizes with the Duke lacrosse players, I should think, could likewise identify with anyone of any color who has been wrongfully accused, much less actually and falsely convicted!

    Also, does not all the reaction to the Duke case betray the very class resentment of which I write above?

  • Posted by John Doe on July 22, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • It is an unfortunate event in which no side wins. However, it has nothing to do with how many degrees Professor Gates had received. In general, many are genuinely curious on the path a minority individual gets in a school or receives a degree because they know for sure some unqualified ones get through the system thanks to the current quota system. The current quota system is unfair to everyone.

  • Embarrassed
  • Posted by Rob , Professor at Harvard on July 22, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • I am embarrassed by Professor Gates' comments towards and about the police who were simply doing their job. Every day in this country, police put their lives on the line responding to calls very much like this one. It's about time we start showing them the respect they deserve.

  • who called 911?
  • Posted by Kate on July 22, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • In addition to the shameful travesty of the police arresting Dr. Gates after he presented them with both his Harvard ID and his driver's license (according to his statement on theroot.com), I don't understand who would have called 911. I don't know what the neighborhood is like, but if I saw someone breaking into a house in my neighborhood, I'd know right away if I recognized them. If I saw a neighbor breaking into their own house, that wouldn't warrant a call to the police, would it? Is Dr. Gates' neighborhood one in which no one recognizes their own neighbors, or are Dr. Gates' neighbors unable to recognize him personally?

  • You're Still Missing the Point
  • Posted by NYCEdPhD on July 22, 2009 at 11:30am EDT
  • According to the police report, the police were able to identify Gates using his drivers license. Doesn't matter how "mouthy" or not polite he was, he didn't deserve to be arrested.

    Many of those who have commented here want to assume Gates did not provide the police identification. He did. The police admit so.

    Gates is a 50+ year old professor who frequently uses a cane, who had a licensed livery cab driver assisting him. Even if Gates was being obnoxious, the police could have deescalated the situation. And should have.

    If you're annoyed by this incident, be happy it didn't happen to Cornell West.

  • PC At Its Worst
  • Posted by jm on July 22, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • LSG has it exactly right! If this story did'nt identify the race of Dr. Gates, this would be a non-issue. Most reasonable people who observe someone attempting to break into a home, would call the Police and the Police would rightly take appropriate action to prevent a possible felony.

    None of the articles or press accounts on the subject presents all the facts. And without complete information, an objective, open-minded person could not possibly make an accurate determination that this incident exemplifies "racism." But that hasn't stopped some in the PC crowd, which includes many who submitted posts on the subject, to jump to that very conclusion.

  • Quota System and Police
  • Posted by Critical Scholar on July 22, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • I promised myself that I would read and not comment but I just can't stand it any longer. First to John Doe: What quota system are YOU talking about?! Again, there is a fundamental arrogance to assume that by right ALL faculty positions belong to White Scholars and those inhabited by non-white scholars is due to them being GIVEN the position at the faculty table. Incompetence in the academy is seen at every level and is exhibited by every color of colleague. Statistically speaking, given the fact that 85% of faculty positions in America are held by White men it is more than likely that White men will exhibit a greater proportion of the incompetence in the Academy. Again, if a quota system DOES exist in the American Academy then faculty of color need to be really ticked off because it only ALLOWS us 5% of the faculty positions (most times only 2% at the top 10 Universities with the exception of Emory and Mount Holyoke).

    Basic Schema theory tells us that we enact the scripts that have been formed through our everyday interactions. Therefore, I recognize that many of my colleagues view the police by and large as wonderful public servants who risk their lives everyday for their community. I, too am grateful for those officers who day in and day out protect and serve. However, the 'officer friendly' of the White context is not the only lens through which African Americans and Latinos experience the police and our public justice system. Our script of the police both in the historical and lived context is one of suspicion and fear. Therefore, when encountered by our 'Brothers in Blue', we are forced to ask, "are they here to help or to hurt?" The police asked and were given the requisite and requested identification. Even if Dr. Gate's was angry and outraged, he complied with the request which should have been the end of the story. He might have reacted differently, if he had been told that one of his neighbors was concerned, they just needed to check it out, and they would be on their way if the rec'd the confirmation of ownership. Instead, even by their own report, they treated him as a suspect in his own home. Last time I looked, that was wrong in America.

  • Speaking of Cornel West
  • Posted by Alan Desland on July 22, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • Go to democracynow.org for an interview with him this day.

  • Collective responsibility
  • Posted by Professor G on July 22, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Within the last three years in my city, we've lost a staggering number of police officers killed in the line of duty.  I have great respect for the police and believe that it is a difficult, often thankless job. I have no doubt that many of the people who choose to serve do so because they truly want to protect and improve the community.  At the same time, it's clear (from my own experience, from my neighbors' experiences, from multiple local sources of info including the media) that some cops here are bullies and bigots who regard those whom they allegedly serve, particularly those in African-American neighborhoods, as animals -- and are forthright about saying so.

    Regardless of the particulars of the incident with Dr. Gates, today's article is about the larger context -- the reality for many people of color that regardless of their achievements or intellect, they're seen first and foremost as potential threats.  I said it here yesterday but it clearly bears repeating:  if I were Professor Gates and had put up with 58 years of racist crap, I'd be frustrated, angry, and probably loud as well.  There is a context of racism in America that cannot be overlooked or set aside by wishful thinking.  There is a particular context of racism in Boston and at Harvard which also add to this mix.  Is every problem in a Black person's life due to racism?  Of course not.  But this one -- a prominent scholar harassed and arrested in his own home -- may well be.  And set alongside the similar experiences of so many other academics and professionals of color, the likelihood grows. 

  • Posted by Mark , Pfor of English at Emory University on July 22, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Shouldn't this piece appear in the op-ed page, not the reporting page?

  • Just a thought...
  • Posted by Ted on July 22, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • A North Carolina mall kiosk owner sells posters and bumper stickers with sayings such as “Impeach Obama” and “Work Harder. Obama needs the money.” This week he discovered that his lease would not be renewed. Charges of bigotry and racism seemed to have played a part in his ouster. One can only wonder if the outcome would have been different had the proprietor been black and her message clearly anti-Bush.

    It’s incredibly easy to throw around the words “racism” and bigot” and deflect the real issues at-hand. And when Gate’s attorney, and fellow Harvard scholar, Charles Ogletree was asked if he believed the incident was racially motivated he simply responded, “I think the incident speaks for itself." Of course there are those of us that need the rest of the story.

     

    In this particular case the outcome was this – the police and Gates agreed that dropping the charge was a "just resolution." Perhaps there’s enough blame to go around? Just a thought…

  • Like a snail's shell, the "ghetto" goes with you
  • Posted by Jim Musgrave , English Professor at Grossmont College on July 22, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • At least Professor Gates was able to "make it" up the food chain in this country. The Blacks who still live in the ghetto have to face death more propbable than in Iraq and Afghanistan and most of them still never make it out. However, I have seen more Black males showing more pride in the classroom because of people like Mr. Gates and Mr. Obama. That's real progress.

  • It happens everyday...
  • Posted by DM at USC on July 22, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • Unless you have lived it...you just won't "get it". When you were in grad school did your professor leave you notes in Spanish because he wanted to practice for better communication with his maid? I was his grad asst. on full fellowship (not a minority fellowship either for those who assume so)and here the only person in his life who looks like me is his maid? Have you ever been accused of plagiarism because people "like you who grow up in Spanish speaking homes usually don't have such a strong command of the English language"? English was the only language spoken in my home – he didn’t even ask. Have you ever walked into a store to pick something up, with a receipt, and they told you - "how do we know you are telling the truth?" Or have you been driving down the street in your Mercedes Benz and been pulled over for looking “suspicious”? Has an officer ever asked you if you were in a gang – as you are in your brand new $80,000 car that was your MASTERS DEGREE graduation gift? Racism is alive and well...only now it is just not blatant - which is worse. No matter how many degrees I have...at the end of the day I don't wear them on my forehead...I wear a beautiful caramel brown that some unfortunately see as anything but... And we are not supposed to be a bit upset when we spend our careers dedicated to educating others about access, equity, social equality, progress, etc. only to see in a blink of an eye how the social realities of our lives are in direct opposition to the progress we teach and lecture about...

  • Pointlessly, and without much patience left, I have to just say:
  • Posted by JJS on July 22, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • The 'bias' in this article is that it represents the police officer's fabricated 'reasoning' for his illegal actions as if those 'reasons' were accurate or legitimate rather than dishonest justifications invented after the fact to try to diminish his own liability. Read what actually happened.

    Gates did not yell, was not inappropriate, and frankly, even if he had been, he'd have been entitled: the cop entered the house without permission, arrested Gates on the porch for 'disorderly conduct' the red-hot instant Gates made the mistake of entering public space, ie: his own front porch, he did this in direct retaliation for Gates' repeated request for his name and badge number - which he is required to give.

    Ie: this cop received clear information that he was speaking to the homeowner, continued to aggressively question and harass him *iinside his own house,* realized he was going to be penalized for his breaking of both legal protocol and basic decency, and took an opportunity to punish a rich, Harvard Black man for being 'uppity.'

    In addition to the racism of the assumptions and treatment of Gates vs. how a white man would have been approached in the situation, the class wars in the area and the historic resentment of Harvard people by working class cops in Boston & Cambridge play a large part in this.

    2. The readiness with which a number of people in this thread leap to the conclusion that Gates 'deserved' this, or is somehow responsible for it or diminished by it, or patronizingly suggest GATES could have 'handled it better' illustrates nothing but bigotry waiting for outlet in the speaker.

    The degree of racism, sexism, anti-affirmative action hysteria and general conservatism regularly expressed in comments on Inside Higher Ed makes this thread unsurprising, but even so, I remain astonished by the sheer level of obstreporous stupidity coming from people whose presence here at least suggests some interest in/capacity for critical thought and analysis of media reportage.

    Check your assumptions:

    Gates describes what happened:
    http://www.theroot.com/views/skip-gates-speaks?page=0%2C0

    Lawyer's statement:
    http://www.theroot.com/views/lawyers-statement-arrest-henry-louis-gates-jr

    A response by one of Gates' colleagues:
    http://www.theroot.com/print/19053

    And if you're unwilling to examine it from Gates' perspective by way of these articles, you might ask yourself why that is, since he is the one who was arrested on his own front porch for the crime of opening his own sticky door - oh wait, right, it wasn't that. It was that he didn't immediately come out onto the porch so the officer could cuff him before he had a chance to get his ID from his own kitchen.

    The police report said it was 'two large Black men in backpacks attempting to break into a house' for heaven's sake. Gates is tiny, and walks with a cane. He came back from his trip with a bronchial infection which made him lose his voice (so much for 'yelling'). Both Gates and the driver were wearing suits. And who cares what they looked like, what they were wearing? It was his own front porch. He was talking on the phone to Harvard maintenance about his broken door when the cop showed up. What the officer should have done is ask a question and accept the proof. What the officer did was retaliate when Gates didn't accept his abusive behavior and violation of any homeowner's rights.

    The cops fabrications are ridiculous, and people's instant and uninformed acceptance of them is wildly offensive: it illustrates what bigots want to believe, not what happened.

    I'm disappointed in all the bias here, too.

    I just have a different perspective on what that bias is, given that I took the time to read what actually happened.

  • Posted by RM on July 22, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • There was a very similar incident in the white, liberal, yuppie college town where I work: An African visiting professor in my dept., on his first day in town, was on the street across from the university looking for his rental car. After he walked up and down the block several times, not remembering where he'd parked the car, someone called the police. Everyone was more polite than they were in the Gates incident: the visiting prof. was afraid rather than belligerent, and the police were apologetic. When the host went to make an official complaint at the police station, they explained that they had to respond to any call of "suspicious behaviour." I can't balme the police, but it was very clear to me that the caller wouldn't have called the police if the visiting prof. had been white. As a white person, I cannot imagine living with this kind of inherent suspicion every day. To further put yourself in Gates's shoes, imagine it happening when you've been traveling for 30 hours, arrive home late exhausted, can't get into your house, and the police are at lot more suspicious than they would be if you were white. Gates is guilty of nothing more than "trying to enter your own house while black."

  • Un believable for anyone
  • Posted by mary zamon on July 22, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • This is shocking- on several counts. Why did not the neighbor know his neighbor??? Go over & offer to help???
    Why did anything at all happen after id proving it was his house was produced? Police gentleman & ladies, just say hope your day goes better- please do not follow person into his own house when nothing is happening! It brings to mind the story in Maryland where SWAT teams broke into a mayor's house, killed his dogs, restrained his elderly mother in law etc. All for a miss-delivered package and without any previous investigations. And I do understand the concerns of black men in particular about attitudes in others. I do hope we will get to a point when we can give every person the dignity that should be taken for granted. And please no race involved at all.
    I wish the professor better days, and ask fellow Americans to be good neighbors, and our mostly great police to be polite and sensible.
    mz

  • Racism and Gates Incident
  • Posted by GV on July 22, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • The response by OK is right on, but add - be smart and less impatient to gain access into the house (unless that was Mr. Gates' intent to have a police interaction). CALL the security company from his cell - everyone has them. WAIT for the alarm security company, don't attempt to break into a wired window. The police were doing their job. Mr. Gates has cerebrally concentrated on profiling issues and racism for so long, he lost his cool. Not everyone in this universe has seen his face on TV, in a classroom or on a book cover. Was it an incident he wished to happen? He is a smarter man then his actions and verbal showed. Now it's collateral damage, the PC two-step time. I have no sympathy for him or any minority that does not think first.

  • Posted by Ed Nuhfer on July 22, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • This unfortunate incident humiliated all involved, but I cannot help but think: "What a sad commentary on the way Americans live."

    Whoever reported the "break-in" likely was a resident who had lived near Dr. Gates, perhaps for years, without even recognizing Dr. Gates as her/his own neighbor. Is the importance of simply walking next door or across the street, introducing self, and occasionally actually talking with neighbors--maybe even learning to CARE about them, a little too difficult to grasp?

    This incident could have happened anywhere to any member of any race because of lack of learned ability to function responsibly within a community. People who actually live this unconsciously of others around them really do seem unfit to teach young adults how to live. They are to demonstrate just as much isolation from one another in their universities as they display in their neighborhoods. That's no way to live.

    Those willing to actually DO something effective to prevent such incidents will go out and meet one new neighbor a day for the rest of this week.

  • Posted by Mark on July 22, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • A sad incident, but let's not skip over the prejudice quoted in the article--that highly educated people of any race are somehow less criminally minded than less educated people:

    “This incident confronts that challenge,” Jackson said. “Here is one of the best scholars in his field – who happens to be an African American male, who has studied and taught in the best institutions in the world, and is largely known outside of the academy as well as inside – experiencing an exchange with police officers and mistaken identity that you often would not associate with a professor at a world class institution.”

  • Will the Real Story Please Stand Up?
  • Posted by Susan , IR on July 22, 2009 at 3:45pm EDT
  • Who ever knows which publication relays the sequence of events both accurately and completely, as close as one could come to observing the scene first hand? I read an account in one publication (sorry, can't remember which, but it's suppposed to be "reputable" -- aren't they all? :) ) that had details that present a different picture. As the saying goes, "You had to be there." Another saying also comes to mind: "There are three sides to a story -- Yours, his and the right one." That must be why witnesses are viewed as so valuable.

  • Facts, People
  • Posted by NYCEdPhD on July 22, 2009 at 3:45pm EDT
  • @ GV, no Ok's post was not "right on" because Gates did provide identification. He lives in housing provided by Harvard, so he provided his Harvard ID. Read the report: he wasn't tampering with a "wired window", he was shoving his shoulder into the door, which had been broken by, ironically enough, a previous burglary. GV and Ok should both note that Gates was already INSIDE the house by the time the police arrived. The professor's account is that he actually went through the back door of his house and turned off the alarm. Read the report, available online, and you will see that Ok's post is incorrect in many regards.

    I don't disagree Gates should have left it alone when he had the chance, but I will never give the police the power to arrest any person because that person has embarrassed them in front of others. Read the report and it's pretty clear that's what happened. Of course several of those who have commented here get it, and think the man deserved to be placed in cuffs and perp walked from his own house.

    What this is really about then is who deserved to be humiliated more, or who was more rightgeous in their indigation. Gates of all people should have known right makes right. I expect to get arrested in this situation, but not for Gates - that is, I would have completely flipped my lid, and have actually, and officers with cooler heads have deescalated the sitaution. Unfortunately for Gates, none of the THREE officers that responded could summon a cooler head. And I still don't think what they did was right.

    He called the officers racist. Did the rantings of a 50 y.o. man really constitute a public disturbance? Were the officer's feelings really hurt that bad? So badly he couldn't make it to the end of the sidewalk? If this were an episode of The Simpsons or a skit on 30 Rock, we'd be rolling with laughter.

    Only it wasn't, and instead many here are insistent on ignoring basic facts (Gates did provide ID, he was already in his home when the police arrived) or summon basic empathy.

    Regarding whether Gates knew his neighbors, the person who made the call to the police is also a Harvard employee. She was walking by, observed two black men trying to break in and called this police. Let's stop making this an indictment of whether Gates knew his neighbors.

  • dismay
  • Posted by Will on July 22, 2009 at 4:00pm EDT
  • Having briefly been a colleague of Gates's, I have followed this story and the comments in several publication with increasing dismay. Large numbers of people, without bothering to fully read the details, seem to assume that Gates was an "uppity" black man who was arrested for not following the ojustified rders of the police. I have read hundreds of thinly veiled racist comments. The slimy stuff is really coming out from underneath the rocks.

    Let's imagine a distinguished, older, lame white professor, named by Time magazine one of the 25 most influential Americans, who answers the door (that's right, he had used his key to come in the back door and had been trying to unstick the front door when a person called the police). The police say they have received a report. He shows them several forms of id conclusively proving he is in his own house and is a Harvard professor. 99.9% of the time the police say "Sorry to trouble you Sir" and leave very quickly. But suppose they continued questioning suspiciously this older, lame, distinguished white professor, and he got a little irked, having just come back from a trip and being tired and a little sick. The police are now in a private home with no legal justification. What happens next? They ask him outside, take his cane, slap the cuffs on, and take him to the station?

    That's absurd--if it happened everyone would agree: rogue cop. But when it happens to Gates, it seems, many people assume that it was fully justified. What other than race explains it?

  • It Happens to Whites Too
  • Posted by Laura T. on July 22, 2009 at 5:00pm EDT
  • I don't believe this is racism, because a similar incident happened to a white friend of mine who was visiting his mother in suburban Washington, DC. She was at work when he arrived. He had a list of to-do items that she had sent to him in an email. One of the items was a leaky window on the side of the house. A neighbor saw him, a strange, lone male peering in a window, and called the police. By the time they had arrived, he also was inside the house. The police were very aggressive and high strung, believing they had interrupted a burglary in progress. He produced ID and did not get arrested. Of course, he is still very angry with them for the way he was treated.

    I have read the account online regarding Dr. Gates. He did not produce ID immediately when asked, and instead turned to go to the kitchen to get it. How could the police officer possibly know if he was telling the truth, or what he was trying to do by going to another room in the house? He had no way of knowing at that point if he could trust him to be telling the truth. Also, there is no information about questioning the taxi driver, so we have to assume he was already gone. That means the police officer has to be wondering what has happened to the other suspect. Perhaps that is why he was also insisting that Dr. Gates come outside of the house. Could it possibly be that it was safer to have one suspect outside of the house, than for the officer to go in only knowing where one was and not having a clue if another one was waiting around a corner with a gun?

    After the incident was over and the officer was leaving, Dr. Gates followed him outside accusing him of racism. Does anyone believe he was saying that in a polite, respectful manner? He was throwing some real attitude back at the policeman because he was upset.

    I can only imagine what would have happened to my friend if he had done the same when the officers came to his mother's house. He would have ended up in the backseat of the squad car, as well. This isn't racism. It is not exercising common sense.

  • Posted by Laura on July 22, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • "PhD in White People
    ... I earned my PhD in White People before I graduated college... Yes Obama is president - that proves my point. He was >10x than his rivals and still White people can't get over the fact that he is our president... I'll remain an intelligent angry Black woman."

    Well, intelligent angry Black woman, please explain how Obama was able to win the presidency without White people voting for him. Why would White people vote for him, and then not be able to get over the fact that he is our president?

    I am white, I didn't vote for him, and I got over the fact that he was going to be president as soon as the economy tanked and it became clear from the polls that he was going to win. So I don't know where you got your PhD in white people, but I suspect you got ripped off.

  • Stereotypes are still a MAJOR problem!
  • Posted by Faith on July 22, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • Stereotypes are still a major problem in our society, but it seems especially true with law enforcement. Whether you are an african-american male, a hispanic, a white male with long hair, or many other possible stereotypes, you may fall victim to profiling or harassment.

    People are often treated very differently and unfair because of appearance. While others are able to get away free after committing a crime because they fit another stereotype or have certain social status.

    When will we come together and stop seeing our differences and recognize we are all the same.

  • Shame on the Police
  • Posted by Phred on July 22, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • The joint statement says, "This incident should not be viewed as one that demeans the character and reputation of Professor Gates or the character of the Cambridge Police Department.” The only reason the incident would not demean the character of the Cambridge PD is that it already has a reputation for racist behavior. If Gates had not been black, I doubt very much that the incident would have unfolded the way it did. I've read African-American commentators who say that the problem was that Gates was behaving like an arrogant Harvard professor, not that he was black. Professors at Ivy League universities do not tend to be humble and certainly do not learn it on the job. My reaction that argument is 1) how many incidents of this nature show up in the higher ed press about white Harvard professors, 2) Gates has as much right to act like an arrogant donkey as any white professor at Harvard. When we hear about white Harvard professors being arrested for disorderly conduct (which should show up in IHE or CHE), I will believe that race is no longer an issue in Cambridge.

    While there are decent individuals on the law enforcement agencies in the cities in which I have lived, I've had my fill of arrogant police of all races. There is something about the position, as with those of district attorney and judge, that is conducive to bullying and abuse. Cops may be on the front line, but they make their work harder and more dangerous than it need be when they act like they are above the law.

  • Posted by Boom on July 22, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • On the photograph showing Dr. Gates being led handcuffed out of his house, the leading policeman facing the camera is black. Somehow this has been ignored by all those who rushed to declare this a racist incident.

  • Didn't take long
  • Posted by Miranda on July 22, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • Gotta love it how posters like Will are quick to break out the "racist" charge against anyone with opinions that differ from their own. Congratulations on raising the level of discourse, Will!

  • common sense
  • Posted by Will on July 22, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • " This isn't racism. It is not exercising common sense."

    That's right. The police office didn't exercise common sense. Gates's taxes pay his salary.

  • Don't blame the victim
  • Posted by Hoosier Prof on July 22, 2009 at 6:00pm EDT
  • It's interesting to observe how many of those who criticize Gates' behavior have never met him, but still feel comfortable judging him. My recollection of him is that he wouldn't lose his temper without a very good reason.

    But what distresses me most is that so many readers have suggested that Gates just needed to say the right things, act the right way, present the right non-threatening demeanor for the police to treat him well.

    This is strikingly like the way victims of abuse are blamed for the actions of their abusers -- "if only I hadn't been provocative, s/he wouldn't have hit me"; if only I hadn't yelled back at him/her, he/she wouldn't have hurt me".

    So can I get a restraining order against you bigots? Please stay away from my T&P committee, my affirmative action committee, or anywhere 100 miles from me.

  • Black Man's burden
  • Posted by Yolande M. Agble , PhD at Rtd on July 22, 2009 at 6:15pm EDT
  • I often have discussions with family/ friends as to which is the more racist environment- the USA or the UK ( having a foot in each camp).The police in the UK are far more aggressive, arrogant and less willing to apologise for their mistakes. In Professor Gate's case he might well have been taken to the cells and booked on some trumped up charge or another had this happened there. I am reminded of comments made by our youngest son as a teenager when he said to us in a very resigned way, on being stopped by the UK police for the umpteenth time for no other reason than they were looking for some young 'black' suspect or another, that he realised his was a different world from that of his friends (who were mainly white and always jumped to his defence when such incidents ocurred, like vouching for the fact that he had been with them)I recall the deep sadness I felt then and some anger, too. Now a very successful young professional despite the police harassment, I am sending this story to him and look forward to reading his views.

    Yolande M. Agble

  • Troubling
  • Posted by Laura T on July 22, 2009 at 7:30pm EDT
  • The only racism being exhibited here was by Dr. Gates for assuming that he was being singled out because he was black and for haranguing the officer about it, even as the officer was trying to leave. Fact: A woman did not call reporting that she saw a black man in a nice neighborhood, and the police did not go to his house for that. She called reporting that she saw two people breaking into a home. The officer asked Dr. Gates for ID, a reasonable request since any burglar could lie and say he lived there, but Dr. Gates responded by giving the officer a lot of attitude, failing to see that the officer would have responded to a similar call about two white guys breaking in and would have asked THEM for ID, as well. As I wrote above, this did happen to a white friend of mine who was visiting his mother. He was visibly shaken and upset about how he was treated, but we both are of no doubt that if he had followed the officers back out to their car giving them a lot of lip and attitude, he would also have been arrested. This whole story is like the little boy who cried wolf. It minimizes the REAL cases of racism that do happen. This is not one of them.

  • Gates DID Provide Identification
  • Posted by NYCEdPhD on July 22, 2009 at 8:00pm EDT
  • Laura T., you are wrong. The incident report submitted by the POLICE (caps for emphasis) states that Gates did provide his Harvard ID. The POLICE REPORT also states the officers were able to verify the professor's identity using his drivers license. The Gates haters want (need?) the professor to have been uncooperative for their version of the narrative to work or to feel secure in their argument or criticism. Sorry folks, the police have confirmed Gates provided ID. Haggle about whether Harvard ID is acceptable if you want, but it was actually acceptable to the officer, who left after seeing it... (yes, the officer walked away after seeing the Harvard ID, but came back to arrest Gates after the professor allegedly yelled from the porch)

    So, you see, it really isn't about the "break in" (which there wasn't, because Gates used his house ke to get in the back door), it's about whether Gates deserved to be arrested for allegedly yelling from his porch "You're racist", or something similar. If you really, truly, honestly believe that he deserved to be arrested - a 58 y.o. man who uses a cane to get around, mind you - then I had better see a much higher level of discourse on these pages about conservatives, liberals, Dems, Republicans, et al in the very near future.

  • JJS, RM and Hoosier Prof Got it Right!
  • Posted by No longer Pollyanna , Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies, Ph.D student at University of Exeter on July 22, 2009 at 8:30pm EDT
  • JJS, RM and Hoosier Prof, Critical Scholar and Don't Blame the Victim! A number of others also acknowledge, based on the facts of the case, that a deep racism lies at the foundation of this and so many outrageous affronts to black people in the US today, and especially to black males. Stereotyping, profiling, always assuming the worst, of black and Hispanic males is rampant among criminal justice and judicial people in the states. Anyone at all can make a preposterous claim against them and the claim is believed, without any examination of facts--and even when the facts ARE clearly presented by the black male--the tendency is to find him guilty of something--anything--no matter who he is. Had I not seen this over and over again in the lives of black men of various backgrounds that I personally know, I would not have believed it--for I too was once Pollyanna. I know it is impossible for white people to believe if they have not seen at close range what black men go through in America at the hands of police and the judicial system. Where IS critical thought, higher ed people in America? Why so eager to deny the obvious? This case should cause us to ask questions about the nature of exactly what happened here-- and not to simply respond with pat answers about how glad we should be that the police are "doing their job." Is our number one job in American colleges and universities not the development of the critical thinking ability in our students? Shouldn't WE be the role models of this ability? This is a wonderful case study in the making.

  • Bigotry and Racism Lives
  • Posted by ldyqtee6@aol.com on July 22, 2009 at 8:30pm EDT
  • Let's be real here; if it had been a white person, the police would not have acted in the way they did. Even without being there to witness the incident, only an idiot would believe that the police in any locale operate
    on principles of "fairness" and "color-blindness". The profile of any criminal always includes "African-American or Latino male (but sometimes female)" unless we are talking about something that is deemed "terrorist" in which case the profile includes "Muslim or Arab male, with the exclusion of fair skinned American Muslims". We cannot assume that just because Obama (the
    first visibly black president) is now in office that bigotry and racism are dead; if anything as a result of his election which has upset a lot of people and the post 9/11 hysteria, racism and bigotry are alive and well and becoming more open and obvious.

    As a society we still have rights and among them is to not be falsely accused of anything. I find it highly unlikely that his neighbors didn't recognize him so there would have been no reason to call the police for a
    possible break-in UNLESS there is a neighbor that simply doesn't like him because of his race and status and so seized upon an opportunity to make trouble for him. What I wonder is why was his door jammed in the first place? Did someone try to break in during his absence but no one bothered to call the police then? It couldn't have been mail jamming his door since I'm sure he had the post office hold his mail since he was going to be away for more than a few days.

    Quite frankly I probably would have reacted the exact same way as he did because there is still this undeniable concept of privileged whiteness and the belief that "white is right and innocent". Case in point: a white
    woman was letting her Hispanic boyfriend drive her car although he had a revoked driver's license. He drove head first into my car (right in front of two State Police officers mind you - one white the other black). She jumped out and began yelling at me as if it were my fault and figured she
    could do it because I'm brown-skinned (mixed race) and also thought I would pay for the damage to her car. Didn't happen because they were at fault and with the boyfriend's license status, her insurance company had to
    reimburse mine for the damage to my vehicle instead. She got nothing for all her whiteness except higher insurance premiums (or possibly the cancellation of her insurance) and her boyfriend got a serious ticket and even more problems for unauthorized driving. So ha-ha on her.

    I don't think there will be a color-blind society in my lifetime and possibly not in my children's either. Yet the US thinks it's tops in the world. Arrogance knows no bounds I guess.

  • Thin Blue Line
  • Posted by Dr. Anonymous on July 22, 2009 at 11:15pm EDT
  • I respect our police officers. They are the thin blue line protecting us from the barbarians, criminals of all races and classes, the barbarians who within the gates. The Harvard professor was arrogant and impertinent with the police. "Don't you know who I am?" Why should they? So, every bleeding-heart do-gooder whines about racism and profiling. Like other commenters I accuse IHE of a biased article, assuming and proclaiming racism when none may have existed.

  • Missing the point:
  • Posted by Wiser as a result , Psychology dept on July 23, 2009 at 5:30am EDT
  • Dr. Gates did not break any law. Therefore, an arrest was not warranted.

    Those who justifiy the arrest based on the fact that an officer in the photo was Black, know nothing about police procedure. He was not the lead officer.

    Successful police officers don't get their knickers in a twist, and prefer to resolve issues instead of stir them up. The arresting officer needs to find a new job because police work is too stressful for him.

    Why are so many posters so angry at Dr Gates? Makes you wonder! Hmmmm . . . .

  • Posted by CFL on July 23, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • I agree that it was appropriate for the police to respond to this call. Gates may have "over-reacted" but no one is claiming that he did anything other than yell at the police officer. Let's believe the police officer's version of events. Since when does someone get arrested in their own home for yelling at someone? Police officers are trained not to respond to verbal provocation. Clearly, the police officer did not do his job properly in this sitation.

  • To NYCEdPhD
  • Posted by Laura T on July 23, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • Yes, Gates did produce an ID (see my first post (It Happens to Whites Too). The point is that Dr. Gates did not produce the ID right away, but instead turned around to go to the kitchen to get it. The entire time he was accusing the officer of racism for asking for the ID. He refused to come out of his house. Dr. Gates automatically assumed this was racist, but it wasn't. As I wrote in my first post, this happened to my white friend, too, at his mother's house. The officer was right to ask for the ID, because he was responding to a call of a break-in. The fact that somebody called 911 to report two men trying to break in the front door and that the door showed evidence of such would obviously lead the officer to ask for ID. He wasn't responding to a call that a "two black men were in the neighborhood." He was responding to a call that "two black men were seen BREAKING into a house." There is a BIG difference. Accusing the officer of being a racist and screaming at him that he doesn't know who he is dealing with was out of line. He was simply doing his job. Anybody, no matter what his/her color, who yells and harangues at a police officer during such an incident would likely face arrest. It is simply not smart to yell or scream at the police.

  • disgusting
  • Posted by disgusted on July 23, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • The fact so many of you yammering idiots and closet bigots are honestly taking the position that the police are justified in detaining a man because they don't like his "attitude"--in his own home--makes me want to effing puke. It does not matter if you are rude, disrespectful, impolite or downright hostile. The police aren't justified in detaining citizens as a way of enforcing deference, and police do not deserve our obedience under all circumstances.

    If you folks were around in 1775, you'd be making excuses for the Redcoats: "They're not so bad if you don't give them any lip." In 1855? "Negroes can be happy, if they stay in their place!" In 1955? "These civil rights agitators need to respect the law."

    The fact that (presumably) many of you have tenured positions despite the clear lack of rationality or fairmindedness is enough to make me reconsider my support of tenure as a whole. Thanks IHE!

  • Thanks, Everyone!
  • Posted by Nels P. Highberg , Associate Professor of Rhetoric at University of Hartford on July 23, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • I have just converted this page to a PDF so I can have my students read it when we discuss fallacies of argument in my classes. It is absolutely stunning to read the kinds of attacks that supposedly professional academics are making against each other. The power of anonymity is certainly strong. It's amazing what people will say when they do not have to attach their name to their ideas.

    And just so people won't make the wrong assumptions about my position, I have been following this since the start, reading and listening to a range of accounts, and though I am white, I believe that Gates' actions were logical. I can't say I'd act the same way he did because I'm not convinced I'd be treated the same way he was, but what he did makes perfect sense to me.

  • Learning So Much
  • Posted by NYCEdPhD on July 23, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Now that Obama has (foolishly, I think) weighed in, the issue has officially jumped the shark. Thankfully. But in response to Laura T, I find it absurd that having to go to the kitchen to get identification is seen to be uncooperative. Should I infer that you contend we should all have identification on us at all times? Or that you think Gates was making some sort of political statement by going to the kitchen? "I'll show this officer! I'll go to another room to where my ID is and get it! That'll learn 'im!"

    I have to search 10 minutes every morning to find my wallet before leaving for work.

    I don't deny it's foolish to yell at the police. But if Gates was in fact yelling at the police, the Cambridge PD had a dream scenario on their hands: a prominent Black Studies scholar shouting "Racism!" and the police taking the high road and coolly walking away. They would have "won" insofar as there may be "winners" and "losers" in an instance such as this.

    Instead, the officer arrested Gates because Gates embarrassed him. Had the officer not made the arrest, which some apparently think was justified, Gates would have had another anecdote for the talk show circuit, but this incident wouldn't have generated nearly the attention it has.

  • Behavior
  • Posted by LA Jerry , NSCS on July 23, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • Disgusting.....apparently it does matter in that community if a person is "rude, disrespectful, impolite or downright hostile", as Dr. Gates was being charged with "exhibiting loud and tumultuous behavior".

  • living in Boston
  • Posted by foreigner , physician at self employed on July 23, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • You can live in Boston for several years and NOBODY speaks to you and recognizes you. (I did for 2 years - thanks I don't live in Boston and in MA anymore!)

  • One More Thing About Police Officers
  • Posted by Nels P. Highberg , Associate Professor of Rhetoric at University of Hartford on July 23, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • A followup to my previous comment: Saying that most police officers do their jobs well is true, but it is often said in a way to say that no police officer can be questioned. Just because 99% of a group acts appropriately does not mean that the remaining one percent cannot be critiqued.

    For example, "A Denver police officer has been charged with felony menacing for allegedly brandishing his gun at a McDonald's restaurant after getting tired of waiting for his food. Derrick Curtis, 29, Saunders also face charges of prohibited use of a weapon, reckless endangerment and disorderly conduct."

    http://www.caller.com/news/2009/jul/23/tired-wait-mcdonalds-cop-accused-pulling-his-gun/

    What this Denver officer did was wrong. What the Cambridge officer did was wrong, though we can certainly argue about that further. We can point out the wrong things that police do without saying they all do this.

    If we can't critique that actions of a few because of the actions of a majority, what are we allowed to critique?

  • To Dr. Anonymous
  • Posted by Alan Desland on July 23, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • I, too, respect the police. Up to a point, as all responsible citizens should. Otherwise they, along with the military, can be used by certain sectors of our society to enforce tyranny.

    Study, say, the past 30 or 40 years of corporate crimes and malfeasance. I'm glad you mention barbarianism "within us." Or keep a scrapbook of news clippings over the next five years of every corporate crime or instance of wrong doing. Remember: not all gets reported. You'll have a thick book which is actually only the iceberg tip. We live in a corrupt civilization. Nor will any "thin blue line" save us.

    We may find much art that is generated from societies' instinctive sense that a class-based social structure is dysfunctional--hence the feeling that there are those among us who are unworthy and who need to be cast out, sacrificed, kept behind a "thin blue line." When a few folks behind that line turn to the underground economy they're only emulating what goes on that the top. True, we're all responsible for our choices, as Cornel West says. It's just that under certain conditions it becomes harder and harder to make good choices.

    In art this phenomenon is often manifest, oddly enough, in "the tragic hero" (See Terry Eagleton's _Sweet Violence: The Idea of the Tragic_). (And see Karin Foster's comment above, 10:00am July 22.

    But what if society as a whole is creating a strong "need" for a thin blue line in the first place? In the modern era "society" refers to various social formations produced by capitalism, that new, inherently exploitive mode of production. The Corporation is today's feudal manor. Capitalism cannot succeed unless it exerts powerful pressures on whole sectors to fail. Hence the Greek concept of the pharmakos--or scapegoat.

    Who, then, are the barbarians? Not just capitalists. Let's don't, as Cornel West insists, demonize anyone. Rather, it's all of us for turning the political economy over to the economic elites exclusively, for refusing democracy, for refusing to see color in positive ways (I don't believe in color blindess) and refusing to see that "Everyday People" of all colors are the majority. It is not at all a tautology to propose that transformation would bring transformation.

    Lincoln was at first influenced by the business elites. Then he was awed by the abolition movement. The question, as Cornel West puts it, is which Lincoln will Obama be? Without grassroots organizing by "everyday people," he'll continue to be be appropriated by Wall Street and the imperialists.

  • Karin Foster, Institute for Alternative Economics
  • Posted by GD on July 23, 2009 at 7:00pm EDT
  • This is GD again. Ms. Foster, I’m not going to let you get away with your lynch mob mentality, even if it is directed at a police officer, likely a lower middle-class civil servant. The Duke lacrosse players were declared INNOCENT by the state authorities. Your claim that this was principally because of money and connections is ridiculous. It was principally because they were innocent. If money and connections were so critical then why would they have been charged in the first place? Everyone in Durham would know that Duke students were likely to be wealthier than the stripper who brought false charges against them. Now, you could wish that others of lesser circumstances are able to obtain similar resources to withstand false prosecution, but your screed seems to go well beyond this. And it becomes particularly laughable in the case of someone like Skip Gates, who is probably wealthier than all of the white lacrosse boys’ families put together and the possessor, if he needed it, of resources for in excess of those that were available to them. Given this, your exhortation comes down to pure racism. For whatever really happened to Skip Gates likely is not known by you or anyone else writing here. Yet, your rush to judgment replicates EXACTLY what happened in Durham, N.C., no matter the color of the lacrosse players’ skin or their socio-economic b.g. You should be ashamed of yourself, but from the way you wrote and what you said, I doubt that you will be.

  • GD: Lynch Mob? Screed?
  • Posted by Karin Foster on July 23, 2009 at 10:30pm EDT
  • I wrote, "Gates is upper middle class and therefore belongs to the majority of us. . . . In this incident a working class, or lower middle class police officer confronts a stereotyped black man, who happens to be an affluent, famous, high status professor at Harvard." To be sure, I could have said "possibly stereotyped." Yet I hardly see how that is a screed or a lynch-mob statement, but take it as you will (although I think you're too sensitive, something of which people of color likewise, all too often have been accused.

    Or maybe it was my quoting Terry Eagleton: "But while the idea of a social order which excludes vilified minorities is familiar enough, and these exclusions are visibly on show, the mind-shaking truth of the class analysis is that social orders have always invisibly shut out the majority." . . . "It carries a double message: that a system entranced by success is in fact a miserable failure . . . ."

    Your own references, i.e. the police officer, the stripper, the Duke athletes, Dr. Gates attest to class and gender pain as much as that of race, the problem of historical pain I also mentioned above.

    You are dead right to feel outraged at any false accusations levelled against affluent, young white men. What I never saw during the whole, drawn-out discussion of the Duke rape case, however, was an equal passion applied to the same things happening many times over to countless innocent young black and Latino men and women. (Then do you wonder if some reverse prejudice might have occurred in the Duke case?) Please, do your homework. Learn some history. I beg of you. Do you wonder? Nor does your latest post express anything but the most dismissive attitude toward that.

    That worries me. If you can't feel that injustice as viscerally as you do the Duke case then, as Alan Desland has suggested, we have a dysfunctional society on our hands. It is one in which we the people, the majority (of all colors), are not only shut out of the political process on the basis of class, but have been rendered all but helpless to work together due to historical divisions foisted on us in the interests of economic elites.
    White males' discomfort is not coming from women or people of color. It must really seem that way. But such folks are not the real enemy.

  • Wait-a-minute
  • Posted by SadFrightenedandSleepless on July 24, 2009 at 7:15am EDT
  • As some others have said, this incident is surreal. The two parties have issued statements that are contradictory. One thing they do have agreement on is that Dr. Gates indicated that the presence of the officer was racial profiling. In an interview with CNN, Dr. Gates indicated that the police officer were looking for a black man and the officer found him, a black man, there. Ironically--I am sure I am using this word incorrectly--the police did find one of the suspects of the reported incident, Dr. Gates. That is one of the persons that were trying to break in(unjamming the door). From both testimonies, Dr. Gates indicated that the presence of the officer was racially motivated. Both indicated that the police officer seemed confused while looking at the Dr's id.
    The Dr. seemed to attribute it to the officer biases. The officer indicates in his report that he was confused that if this was the living quarters of the man--than why is he, the officer, being verbally attacked?

    At this point, I want to note that in many occupations the charge of racist behavior is grounds for reprimand, possibly even, firing.

    I image the situation is very volatile at this point.

    Both of them have a lot of reasons for feeling wronged.

    Why did not the police officer just walk away at that point, the incident was investigated, Dr. Gates had established his id.

    I do not know.

    But I have one thing that bothers me, if he had would Dr. Gates have dropped the matter?

    The presence of the police in the first place seemed to be sufficient grounds for him to charge racial profiling.

    The arrest: well this seems the only fitting ending to a totally hopeless situation.

    The media gets ahold of the story; reports inaccurate and misleading stories; and there it is: racial tension kicks in the afterburners.

    I have seen many post to articles on other sites that bother me by the shear hatred and anger expreseed on both sides.
    Congratulations gentlemen (and the media), you have just set back any progess made in the area of race relations many years! (sorry for the vent, I am sure I will get flamed, but I have wanted to say this for so long)

    I am pretty disappointed by both of these men.

    That Dr. Gates is going to use this incident as proof of racism, appalls me. There are more compelling and obvious examples--examples given in many of these post indicate.

    That he is considering possible legal action saddens me. What purpose will extracting money from the local government or police department do other than make the economic situation of those entities worse paying legal costs and then damages if he succeeds?
    If he files a suit and loses, what kind of backlash are we going to see.

    Sorry, but one more off the wall comment: Since Dr. Gates called the maintenance people anyway, would not if have been nice if he had done so before he tried to unjam it himself?

    History turns on quirky things, heh!

  • my thoughts
  • Posted by szelenz at Miles Community College on July 24, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • It seems to me that Gates didn't handle the officer's correctly. Someone down the street saw someone "breaking into" a home. Now Gates obviously had a door that was jammed. Anyone would have thought it could be a break in regardless of race. When the officers came and told him this, he could have clarified that his door was jammed and that he was the resident owner. This would have cleared the whole thing up without any arrests or drama. If the officers had arrested him after his calm clarification, that would have been different. However, he chose to be defensive immediately - this ALWAYS sets police off.

  • 99% of police officers...?
  • Posted by RCH , Professor at Minnesota University on July 27, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • Sorry, but I lost my respect for the police when, as a legal clerk, I saw state troopers and local constables outright lie on the witness stand until they were proven to be doing so.

    That being said, the police do deal with a wide variety of folks involved in crimes ranging from minor to major, and to simply let someone walk away on their say-so can be a disaster (see the story of Jeffry Dahmer's "domestic dispute" when the abductee fled his abbatoir). I want to know more...

  • Charges Dropped???
  • Posted by JS on July 27, 2009 at 1:15pm EDT
  • If the conduct was disorderly, then this person should have been arrested. The officers acted appropriately. Why not comply with the officer's requests? Regardless of color - just do as your asked and provide an explanation. Provide identificaton, proof of residency, whatever. Do that and this never happens. It's not hard, folks. And I would have thanked my neighbor for calling the police and for keeping an eye on my house. What is a disgrace is the fact the charges were dropped. What is a disgrace is that this person immediately played the race card. What a great way to escalate a situation. And for Obama to say what he did upon learning of the arrest - well, that's just as inappropriate. Let those in law enforcement do their job.

  • Give Both Men Benefit of the Doubt
  • Posted by James W. Gettys on July 28, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • Immigrants to America always learned, as soon as they stepped off the boat, how to succeed in America: Shun this country's prime scapegoat, African Americans. It seems very important to some folks to establish that this particular case was not racially motivated almost in order to deny that racial profiling helps constitute our very society. Historically, the race card has already been played.

  • Update that PDF
  • Posted by Susan in IR , IR on August 4, 2009 at 12:30pm EDT
  • To "Thanks, Everryone", who stated:

    "I have just converted this page to a PDF so I can have my students read it when we discuss fallacies of argument in my classes. It is absolutely stunning to read the kinds of attacks that supposedly professional academics are making against each other."

    I hope you updated that PDF.

  • To Laura T
  • Posted by Rain , Asst Profsr at Clarion Univ on August 6, 2009 at 1:00pm EDT
  • Laura,

    You keep pointing out that Gates didn't give the id right away because he was going to another room to get it. Well, if he didn't have his id on him, what else was he supposed to do? Wouldn't he have to go and retrieve his wallet (from wherever he left it) in order to get id? What is the point of that minute detail since he clearly produced id?

    Since you are in to details, why is it "not smart to yell and scream at police officers?"