Search News


Browse Archives

News

Evaluating Teacher Ed

July 24, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Many teachers who have recently entered the field feel prepared for their jobs, but still seek training in crucial areas such as classroom management and teaching non-native English speakers, a new study says.

The report, released earlier this month by Eduventures, a consulting firm, surveyed 1,504 teachers and 130 administrators nationwide who have started to work in the last five years. Seventy-eight percent of the teachers said they felt prepared or well-prepared, and 91 percent initially plan to remain in the field. Despite such intentions, the report notes, other studies have shown that, in fact, one-third of teachers leave the field annually.

Successes aside, teacher education programs still have many gaps to close, according to Eduventures' poll. For example, more than half of the teachers polled said they desired more professional training to learn how to manage a classroom and integrate technology into the curriculum. Teachers in suburban school districts reported feeling slightly more prepared overall than their counterparts in urban and rural areas.

Meanwhile, 41 percent reported feeling unprepared to teach non-native English speakers -- but only one-third said they wanted to receive professional development to teach those students. Kristen Fox, the study's lead researcher and program director of Eduventures, said teachers may not prioritize that type of training once in the classroom because English-language learners are not common in their districts or are primarily taught by language specialists.

Regardless, educators should learn how to meet those students' needs, Fox said. "We know there are more and more students who come into school systems who don't speak English as their first language. There need to be teachers who will be able to support students," she said.

Teachers who trained through nontraditional programs, such as Teach for America, reported feeling better prepared to instruct English-language learners and integrate technology than those coming through traditional university programs. The survey did not gather information as to why. However, it found that it made no significant difference in educators' levels of preparation or plans to stay in the field.

Overall, the best way to train future educators is to place them in real classrooms for extended periods of time. While only 64 percent of teachers with no field experience reported that they felt prepared when they started teaching, 81 percent of those with at least six to 12 months of experience felt prepared.

Sharon Robinson, president and CEO of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, said the report's findings match the many concerns her organization is grappling with. She especially agreed with its emphasis on clinical training.

"Programs have to prepare for the realities in schools, and that means schools will face diverse learners, they will need to use technology and they'll need to prepare all students with more rigorous content, to master skills and content that have never been expected of us before," she said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Evaluating Teacher Ed

  • Foreign Languages and Teacher Training
  • Posted by Dr. K on July 24, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • There are so many required classes for teacher training that, in my state at least, education curricula leave little or no space for foreign language courses or study abroad. This is a huge mistake when so many of our future educators will have students for whom Enlgish is not the first language. Over one fifth of children in the U.S. today are Hispanic, and this is only one of the linguistic minorities new teachers will encounter.

    It's not that teachers should learn a foreign language in order to be able to to, say, communicate with a Chinese student in Mandarin. The point is that without significant study of or immersion in a foreign language, the teacher doesn't have a clue as to what that student is dealing with or what types of approaches might be helpful. Unless you've ever put yourself in the position of the foreigner having to learn and interact in someone else's idiom, you don't really understand how language works or the degree to which learning is culturally informed.

  • Feelings, schmeelings
  • Posted by DrRingDing on July 24, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • In my view, this is more of the kind of teacher education research that is unnecessary, and reminds me of Daniel Fallon's emphasis on the importance of evidence in academically-based teacher education ('The Buffalo Upon the Chimneypiece'). While it may be nice to know how teachers feel about their preparation, it's vital to know the actual learning outcomes of their teaching skills. How do Eduventures and AACTE propose to translate these feelings into educational interventions to improve instructional practice?

    John Lombardi said it best on this website in 2007:

    "The least useful testing, of course, is indirect measurements where we poll our students and ask them how they feel about their education. The very popular NSSE surveys are a prime example of this kind of test. We know that students who feel good about their education may have had a good learning experience, but absent a test of their actual academic achievement, we really don’t know what they learned as they enjoyed the learning process. Also, asking people whether they think they studied hard or think they had a good interaction with their professor, among other questions of this type, tells us about customer satisfaction, but it doesn’t tell us much of anything about what students learn. This is reminiscent of student evaluation of teaching, a process that has almost nothing to do with learning but much to do with enjoyment and perception. We know what the student learned in class when we give a rigorous test that asks questions about the material. If the student passes the test, we know what the student learned. The relationship between enjoyment or satisfaction and learning is tenuous at best."

  • PA now requiring ELL education
  • Posted by Patricia R. Kelvin , Coordinator of Teaching and Learning at Thiel College on July 24, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • New regulations of the Pennsylvania Department of Education will require all teacher ed students to take a course in teaching English Language Learners.

  • Yet another report on teacher education...
  • Posted by Sheldon on July 24, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • The Eduventures survey of teacher attitudes shows for the Nth decade that the same issues continue to plague teacher training. Luckily more and more schools, school districts, charter groups and others have stopped waiting for the teacher education establishment to wake up--even Rip van Winkle only slept for 20 years. These organizations and schools are committed to student learning and academic achievement as the core outcomes of teaching, and have begun their own efforts to recruit, train, and support new teachers.

    Even though these groups may not get everything right in their efforts to find effective teachers for today's schools, they are subjecting themselves to high quality studies by outside researchers (e.g., CALDER, the New York Pathways group and others) to figure out what works and why. In the meantime, the teacher education establishment crowd has switched over the last decade or so from outright opposition to meaningful reform to making sympathetic noises when yet another critique of their failures is made public. Perhaps they will actually change something that matters in another 20 years.

  • Posted by bystander on July 24, 2009 at 4:30pm EDT
  • Why are we always so quick to blame the "Teacher education establishment" for foolish notions of what a teacher should do to get certified in a particular state? Teacher educators do what their State Board of Ed says they must do in order to be permitted to recommend certification candidates to the State. In some situations, the colleges have a lot of input into State requirements. But sometimes the State Board seems to be acting out of total disregard for what colleges, school districts, and individual teachers tell them, in favor of rubberstamping a Commissioner's recommendation. (And commissioners range from wonderful to terrible.)

  • Posted by Kristen Fox on July 24, 2009 at 4:30pm EDT
  • I am pleased to see the dialogue that this study is creating, which is one of the intents of investigations like this. However, I would just like to clairfy a few points regarding study findings and methodology.

    I would be the first to point out that this data has advantages and limitations in that it does rely on self-reported information from program completers. As a field, we don't want to stop at just asking new educators how well their prepararation program prepared them for specific challenges, but to go beyond this to measures of classroom performance. There is no shortage of states (e.g. LA) and consortia (e.g. Ohio's TQP) that are doing some innovative work in this area and we at Eduventures continue to work with Schools of Education across the country to expand the tools and methods available to assess student learning. However, self-reported information has been shown to be a valuable and valid input when based on a clear, well-designed survey instrument. For a helpful overview beyond my brief comments here of this topic of the research on self reported student data - complete with information about strengths and weaknesses - I reccomend that you look at the NSSE literature review on this topic available here: http://nsse.iub.edu/html/PsychometricPortfolio_Validity.cfm

    In addition, it is important to note that this study was developed and executed in collaboration with ~50 deans at schools of education across the U.S, reflecting the commitment that these teacher preparation programs have to ongoing program improvement and to preparing high-quality educators. This supports Sheldon's point that the field is subjecting itself to third party scrutiny in an effort to uncover strengths and weaknesses and to make improvements accordingly. This investment in self-reflection and improvement is incredibly important as we seek to better prepare teachers to have a positive impact on student learning.

    This study is not the end of a dialogue or investigation, but the beginning. There is an incredible amount of innovation occuring at teacher eduation programs, states, and organizations across the country to successfully address the gaps in their preparation that new teachers point to (in this study and in others). As a field we have an opportunity to work together to identify and share those innovations in practice being implemented to produce more effective teachers.