Search News


Browse Archives

News

The Equal Opportunity Library

July 30, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

WASHINGTON -- Google's ambitious book digitization project will democratize access to knowledge for members of minority and other underrepresented groups, said scholars and activists gathered at the Howard University School of Law on Wednesday.

Here at the historically black university, panel members applauded Google's plan to scan and index 10 million books for the Web. Among those who will benefit are African Americans and Latinos who attend inner-city schools and lack a quality education, said Wade Henderson, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights.

"This project is so incredible because it helps level the playing field at the fundamental intersections of rights, knowledge and advocacy," he said.

Throughout history, society has seen fundamental shifts in the way works are used and distributed, said Lateef Mtima, a law professor at Howard and director of the campus's Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice. Critics have called Google's project a dangerous corporatization of content, but Mtima said it merely represents the latest such shift: "The public has to have access to those works -- to read them, to build on them."

Google's plan to build an online library follows October's $125 million settlement of copyright challenges brought by authors and publishers. The search engine giant is pledging a free "preview" of all books in the collection and inexpensive ways to purchase electronic access to full books. Authors and publishers can either set the price or allow Google to do so, using an algorithm based on factors such as genre, popularity and length, said David Drummond, Google's senior vice president of corporate development and chief legal officer. For individual users, book prices are expected to range between $2 and $29, with a median price of $6 to $7, he said.

Colleges, universities and other organizations will gain access to the collection via subscriptions, the price of which will vary according to each institution's size. Those that have made books available for digitization will receive heavy discounts or pay nothing, while people at other institutions will be able to view a free "snapshot" of the content. In May, the University of Michigan announced that it will be the first institution to allow Google to scan and index its books. (Though Howard hosted Wednesday's panel, it has not entered into such an agreement.)

Google is also pledging to make material accessible to the visually impaired through screen enlargement and Braille display technologies. In this way, it will open doors to unprecedented volumes of knowledge, said Charles Brown, Esq., an attorney who has served as president of the National Federation of the Blind of Virginia. "There is an alarming lack of equal access to the written word that inevitably translates into inequality."

Rebecca Tushnet, a professor of intellectual property at Georgetown University, said she is concerned that many of the digitized books will lack essential images. The company will probably not have permission to display photographs or illustrations that are copyrighted by outside or unknown artists.

But Rhea Ballard-Thrower, director of the law library at Howard, said that over all, the pluses of Google's endeavor far outweigh its minuses. "The beauty of the book project is that we can still scan and digitize these books, make sure these books are protected and have access to them," she said, adding, "We should not feel a big threat from the book project."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Equal Opportunity Library

  • Posted by eBookReader on July 30, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • Google's plans are to digitize the content, and then sell it, either one piece at a time through subscription based programs. It is not going to be free.

  • Google's digitalization plans...
  • Posted by Jan Bone , adjunct faculty, English composition at Roosevelt University and Harper College on July 30, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • What an ambitious undertaking! As an English-composition instructor assigned to teach a Roosevelt University F09 class in Writing Social Justice, I'm thrilled, especiall when I look at the Pew Research Reports on http://www.pewinternet.org/ (Pew Internet and American Life Project). It's full-speed ahead on writing lesson plans...My students and I should be having, as they say, a truly "engaging" semester...

  • privacy concerns
  • Posted by a librarian on July 30, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • Google may also retain the rights to sell the browsing history to relevant interests.

  • google isn't going to be free
  • Posted by s choi , librarian on July 30, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • It's very sad to read so many applauding google's digitization project. It isn't going to be free folks. Providing free access to underprivileged? You gotta be kidding. They are going to charge per view, I guarantee!

  • Free or not?
  • Posted by Sandy Thatcher at Penn State University Press on July 30, 2009 at 12:30pm EDT
  • Those who comment should take the trouble to read the settlement agreement first. Contrary to what #1 and #4 suggest, in fact the settlement provides that each public library will be able to have one terminal that will offer free access to the entire database for viewing online. It is printing out that will cost money. And for other institutions there will be a subscription fee.

  • Computers necessary to access Google books
  • Posted by CReid on July 30, 2009 at 12:30pm EDT
  • To gain access to digitized copies of books (whether the access is free or not) one must use a computer. Do you think people who don't have the resources to purchase books have the resourses to purchase computers or other electronic "book-readers." Anyone can use computers for free at most local libraries. So libraries are still providing books to the literate, just in a different way.

  • Better than paying for copying
  • Posted by Conor King , Australian higher education consultant on July 30, 2009 at 8:15pm EDT
  • Copyright arrangements vary around the world. In Australia universities, schools and other education bodies pay very large amounts to copy material for students. Much of this came about because students could not afford each to buy all the books (plus use of any particular title could be small).

    Access to reasonable printed and on line copies for a reasonable price (which the quoted figures suggest) is one step to allowing students to purchase and own what they need and be able to afford it.

    And for readers more generally, 'free' is not the point: affordable is.