Search News


Browse Archives

News

New GI Bill Becomes Law

August 4, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

FAIRFAX, Va. -- A much-expanded Post-9/11 GI Bill is, as of Saturday, newly law in the land. President Obama marked the milestone in a celebratory ceremony at George Mason University Monday.

“This is not simply a debt that we are repaying to the remarkable men and women who have served -- it is an investment in our own country," Obama said. "The first GI Bill paid for itself many times over through the increased revenue that came from a generation of men and women who received the skills and education that they needed to create their own wealth. The veterans who are here today -- like the young post-9/11 veterans around the country -- can lead the way to a lasting economic recovery and become the glue that holds our communities together. They, too, can become the backbone of a growing American middle class.

“And even as we help our veterans learn the skills they need to succeed, I know that all of us can learn something from the men and women who serve our country. We have lived through an age when many people and institutions have acted irresponsibly -- when service often took a backseat to short-term profits; when hard choices were put aside for somebody else, for some other time. It's a time when easy distractions became the norm, and the trivial has been taken too seriously. The men and women who have served since 9/11 tell us a different story. While so many were reaching for the quick buck, they were heading out on patrol…. And now, with this policy, we are making it clear that the United States of America must reward responsibility, and not irresponsibility.”

And a generous reward it is. The new GI Bill provides for eligible veterans’ tuition and fees, with the maximum benefit pegged to the highest undergraduate, resident tuition rate in a given state, plus a monthly housing allowance and an annual $1,000 stipend for books. In addition, more than 1,100 colleges are participating in the Yellow Ribbon program, which stretches the tuition benefit at private colleges, in particular, by allowing colleges to enter into a matching program with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to cover any difference between the maximum benefit and total tuition and fees assessed. In another important departure from past policy, and in a bid to increase retention in the Armed Forces, the new bill allows for transfer of benefits to spouses and children when those who have served six years commit to another four.

The primary champion and lead sponsor of the new GI Bill, Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), spoke at Monday’s ceremony, as did former Sen. John Warner (R-Va.), who advocated for inclusion of the Yellow Ribbon program. VA Secretary Eric K. Shinseki estimated Monday that about a quarter of a million veterans will benefit from the newly expanded GI Bill by 2011.

As of now, the Monday morning celebration over, attention will shift back to the administration of the program and how quickly and efficiently those checks get in the mail. Fall semesters, after all, will soon be starting. Receiving GI Bill benefits under the new program is a two-step process: First, veterans must attain certificates of eligibility from the VA, and, second, a college must certify a veteran's enrollment in order for the benefits to start flowing. Tuition benefits are paid directly to the college, and housing and book benefits directly to the veteran.

So far, the VA has received about 140,000 applications for certificates of eligibility and has processed about 112,000 of them, according to a VA spokesman, Steve Westerfeld. Not everyone who’s signed up for a certificate of eligibility plans to enroll in college this fall, however; eligible veterans have 15 years after their last period of active duty to use the benefits. In terms of veterans whose colleges have so far certified them as attending this fall, the VA has received more than 5,000 enrollment claims “and counting," Westerfeld said. The VA anticipates the number of claims will grow substantially throughout August and September, peak times for enrollment.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on New GI Bill Becomes Law

  • Equal indebtedness to and equal treatment of GI's
  • Posted by Russell Kitchner , Assoc. VP for Governmental and Regulatory Affairs at American Public University System on August 4, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • Ms. Redden states that, “. . . the Monday morning celebration over, attention will shift back to the administration of the program and how quickly and efficiently those checks get in the mail.” Actually, there are a few other post-celebration issues that are waiting in the queue, perhaps the most significant being the Post 9/11 GI Bill’s exclusion of a living allowance to over sixty percent of those military personnel who should have the option of continuing their education via exclusively on-line programs. I will admit to being unabashedly focused on this issue, and not simply because I work at an on-line university. Rather, I am advocating for the interests of literally thousands of the veterans to whom the President assigned the right to choose. In his speech at George Mason University Monday morning, Mr. Obama cited the original GI Bill signed by President Roosevelt in 1943, and noted the bill’s stipulation that “You pick the school, we'll help pick up the bill.” That original bill and every successive reauthorization included a living allowance to which all veterans were entitled. The Post 9/11 Bill redefined that provision, calling it a “housing allowance,” and excluding from eligibility all veterans who enroll in on-line institutions. Do you see the ashes resulting from a vet’s right to “pick the school?”

    The rationale for this statutory provision has escaped me from the outset, particularly given that the Department of Education specifically stipulates that Federal financial aid should not be contingent on methods of delivery. That said, I take some solace from the fact that, during the past 6 months I have not met anyone else on Capitol Hill for whom the logic holds water either. Moreover, I was not able to find anyone (and I include Sen. Webb’s staff ) who could provide a coherent argument in support of the premise that veterans who take courses on line do not have living/housing expenses comparable to those attending community colleges or other brick and mortar institutions. This leaves me to conclude that this provision, inter alia, either reflects a disingenuous and artificial predisposition to traditional learning models, or it represents a case of promoting legislation before it has been fully vetted and thoughtfully reviewed to ensure that it performs as intended. I am inclined toward the latter being the case, as the fiasco related to fees versus tuition in California attests.

    Legislative design and administrative implementation need to be congruent, and clearly, the Post 9/11 GI Bill, for all its lofty intentions and worthy objectives, simply misses its target in the case of the majority of veterans to whom Obama referred on August 3rd. Hopefully, upon reconvening in September, Congress will both recognize its past error and grasp its present opportunity to refine this GI bill. History awaits Congressional and White House action that reflects America’s desire to be truly supportive of all veterans. Our government’s appropriate commitment to affirm America’s indebtedness for the sacrifices of our nation’s veterans carries with it the responsibility to confirm those veterans’ individual rights to engage in educational opportunities that reflect personal learning styles and career objectives. While acknowledging and respecting the fact that everyone does not recognize the value of on-line learning, it is my abiding hope that no one will want to remain on the record as denying fundamental living benefits based on specious notions of imaginary differences in expenses.

  • Discrimination against vets choosing to study online
  • Posted by Cristy Passman , Compliance Officer, ADA Coordinator at Los Angeles City College on August 4, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • I've been a proponent of on-line education for many years and also a firm believer in doing everything possible to support veterans. In this case, I prefer to assume, without researching the matter, that the omission of vets in full-time online programs was an oversight and hope that Congress will soon remedy the situation. This is particularly important because, in my experience, some individuals with disabilities find online education much easier and more approachable than education which requires classroom attendance and navigating a large, often crowded and noisy campus. These factors may also apply to a segment of veterans who ended their time in service with mobility impairments or PTSD or TBI. Excluding online education from GI benefits effectively prevents these vets from getting their education in the environment that is most comfortable or accessible to them could be considered discriminatory.

  • G.I bill for online learning
  • Posted by Kevin Dean , Academic Assessment at Empire State College on August 5, 2009 at 5:00am EDT
  •  

    There have been two major shifts in military postsecondary education over the last few years. The first major change is in post secondary military education is the advent and acceptance of online learning. The second major shift is a more recent change and the effects have yet to materialize but they may have a great effect on veterans and that is the advent of the new G.I. bill for military/veterans. There is a perception in higher education that many more veterans will attend college with the new GI bill and colleges should be prepared for the influx of this population that has many special needs.

     


    I agree wholeheartedly with Dr. Russell Kitchner that regardless of the reasoning behind the decision the housing stipend must go to those in online programs. Sloan consortium studies year after show that every type of institution is adding online programs.

     


    The Department of Veterans Affairs (V.A.) G.I. Bill website states that “by the time the original G.I. Bill ended in July 1956, 7.8 million World War II veterans had participated in an education or training program” (V.A.). It is unknown exactly how many or if there will be an increase as many colleges but believe but it important to have the necessary tools in place to deal with any influx of Americas veterans into higher education.

     


    About 94% of veterans singed up for the last G.I bill and of those only 20% went on to use the benefit at all with only a small percentage of those using the full benefit. What are the barriers to veterans in our higher education system? Certainly not allowing them the fiscal freedom to learn as “non traditional” students with multiple obligations that almost have to attend an online college or training program should be rectified.