Search News


Browse Archives

News

Online Learning, at a Pace

August 5, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

As the demand for online education grows, so does the number of companies that brand themselves as simple and effective teachers. Among the latest is SpacedEd.com, a Web site based on research developed by a professor at Harvard Medical School.

Launched in May, SpacedEd allows users to develop courses on topics ranging from "Core Cardiology for Medical Students" to "Bartending 101." Enrolled students receive a set of questions as frequently as once a day, via e-mail or RSS feed (text messaging and instant messaging are in the works). All the teaching is done through a trial-and-error testing method: Answer a question wrong and it repeats; get it right and it repeats less often; get it right multiple times and it disappears. An algorithm adjusts for the student's level and content knowledge, based on his or her score as it develops.

One question from "Core Anatomy for Medical Students" reads: "A patient with long-standing poorly-controlled diabetes can no longer plantarflex her right foot but can still evert it. The nerve that is most likely affected by her diabetic neuropathy is the ...". Possible answers: the sciatic nerve, superficial peroneal nerve, deep peroneal nerve and tibial nerve. Should a student choose incorrectly, the following page reveals the correct answer (the tibial nerve), explanations and related links, as well as a note that the question will repeat in the future.

The research behind SpacedEd was developed by B. Price Kerfoot, an associate professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School. His previous research had demonstrated that people are more likely to retain information when they see it periodically and are tested on their knowledge, rather than simply provided with reading material.

Kerfoot said he has tested the method in more than a dozen trials with 7,000 medical students, doctors and other participants. Overall results have indicated that it helped them boost their knowledge and retain it for up to two years. In one study, two randomly divided groups of 240 physicians each took a course about clinical practice guidelines in urology. One group was presented a section of the material three times at spaced intervals over 20 weeks. By the end, that group demonstrated a 50 percent increase in knowledge of that material compared with the control group.

Kerfoot said that the method has also proved to be an effective teaching tool for medical students from Baylor University, the University of Pittsburgh, Harvard and several other institutions. Beyond medicine, Kerfoot said its testing method can be applied to fields across higher education.

SpacedEd currently has more than 2,000 users and two dozen courses, all of them free (though authors can charge and earn a slice of the revenue) and none of them for academic credit. Any registered user can construct lessons about anything, including non-science subjects like bartending, music theory and copyright law. Site administrators rely on users' comments to check for accuracy and clarity, Kerfoot said.

"Core Anatomy for Medical Students" was designed by Kitt Shaffer, vice chair for education in the Department of Radiology at Boston Medical Center. A colleague of Kerfoot, she said she does not usually use online education systems, but likes being able to embed images and audio on SpacedEd. Above all, she said, the site simplifies the learning process.

One of Shaffer's students at Boston University School of Medicine, Rob Gordon, recently signed up for her anatomy course and is planning to develop a radiology course."Each day, I think about what I read and learned and see the same questions over again," he said. "I think it is a great supplemental way of learning."

Web-based learning, which is gaining momentum among colleges and universities, got a boost from a report released by the U.S. Department of Education in June. The study found that students who received their instruction online performed better, on average, than those who took the same class through face-to-face interaction. Those who took courses that combined online learning and face-to-face instruction performed best of all .

The technology based on Kerfoot's research is patented by Harvard. SpacedEd is likely the first online educational-product company Harvard has patented, said Daniel Behr, the university's director of business development. He did not disclose the costs involved in the licensing agreement, but said Harvard will benefit financially; most of the revenue will be funneled into research efforts.

John Bourne, executive director of the Sloan Consortium, a group of colleges and other organizations that promotes online learning in higher education, tried some of the courses on SpacedEd. Overall, he said he was not totally impressed.

"It's difficult to really characterize this as an online learning system," he said. "There's very little activity in it in which you interact with people or talk about things." He added that the site's question-and-answer format seemed "good for facts and less good for discussion"; that is, more conducive to teaching science rather than the humanities.

"It's an interesting start," he said. "But at first blush, it doesn't seem to me to be a whole lot different from computer-aided instruction."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Online Learning, at a Pace

  • Posted by cu em , Freshman at Nanyang Technological University on August 5, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • I suppose this is essentially an online version of spaced repetition software like Anki, Mnemosyne, Supermemo etc.

    I have to agree that such a format seems "good for facts and less good for discussion". I guessed it's only suited for certain courses. I suppose time is saved by putting effort to remember what you've forgotten instead of going through the whole lot.

  • what has "education" become?
  • Posted on August 5, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • If all there is to education is memorizing facts without context, this site has solved the problem. It works just as well as, say, reading and re-reading the same text with your hand over the key words, and it only costs a few hundred dollars for a computer and a connection.

    Meanwhile, the idea that education is about learning to ask questions and to evaluate evidence rather than to fill in the blanks loses even more traction.

    --Math Prof

  • Moving in the wrong direction for authentic learning
  • Posted by Jan Connal , Counseling at Cerritos College on August 5, 2009 at 1:15pm EDT
  • Going the wrong direction with this approach. Been there, done that with Skinner's Teaching Machine (http://www.coe.uh.edu/courses/cuin6373/idhistory/skinner.html).

    Learning facts, definitions, figures without a context does not build the necessary skills, facility, or flexibility for problem solving or advancing understanding of content.

    Ed Psychologist

  • Learners are smarter than you think
  • Posted by David Hawthorne at HCI LearningWorks on August 5, 2009 at 2:45pm EDT
  • I'm amused by the kneejerk response to this item by some educators. Learning is not changed by using this method. Look, learning is not what happens inside your head. It is your ability to express it effectively in the external world. (I'm not impugning the learning ability of people whose expressive capacity is severly impaired. That's a different issue. Stephen Hawking seems to have done o.k.)

    Learning this way (or anyway) will work for some people, some of the time, and not for others, some of the time. Those who see such innovations as 'bad things' are just bad teachers. Good teachers do what works, and they know what works because the "student" is able to demonstrate his/her command of the knowledge by doing something useful with it, including doing something with it that has never been done before. Ease up.