Search News


Browse Archives

News

The Influence of Higher Ed

August 12, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

SAN FRANCISCO -- Higher education has always been celebrated by some (and criticized by others) for exposing students to ideas that may conflict with those with which they were raised.

Scholars here at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association presented data suggesting that this shift in attitudes (a liberalizing one) applies to evangelical Protestants who either earn college degrees or live in areas with many college graduates.

Seth Ovadia of Bowdoin College and Laura M. Moore of Hood College write in their paper that evangelical Protestants make up more than a quarter of of the U.S. population, and that they have become an important political force, making it important to understand both the way they influence society (a topic much studied) and how they are influenced (a less studied topic). They note that evangelicals are not a uniform group and not an isolated group -- nor are they (as some stereotypes have it) uneducated.

For their study, the authors used national surveys that focused on evangelicals' attitudes about gay people and atheists, by looking at the views of those surveyed on whether members of those groups should be allowed to make a speech, teach in a local college, and/or have an authored book in a public library. They then looked at patterns in the attitudes of evangelicals and found the following:

  • College-educated evangelicals have "significantly higher levels of tolerance" toward atheists and gay people than do those without a college education.
  • Evangelicals -- college educated or not -- show higher levels of tolerance based on whether they live in areas with more college-educated people.
  • Evangelicals without a college education are more likely to show more tolerance based on the education level of their areas than are college-educated evangelicals.

Moore said that the data do not distinguish -- either for the evangelicals or those in their surrounding communities -- whether the colleges attended were religious or secular, so it is not possible to measure the impact of one or another type of higher education.

The authors conclude their paper by noting that increased college participation rates -- both of evangelicals and the population as a whole -- could thus have an unexpected change in social attitudes, with potentially important impacts.

"Should college participation rates continue to increase for both evangelicals and the larger U.S. population alike, we would expect evangelicals’ less tolerant attitudes towards 'threatening' outgroups, such as homosexuals and atheists, to continue to decline. Such attitudinal shifts could make evangelicals more wary of organized attempts to restrict others’ civil rights and increase adaptation of a 'live and let live' philosophy. Increased tolerance could yield greater civil rights protections for groups such as homosexuals who have to date experienced major opposition from the Christian Right," write Ovadia and Moore.

Citing other sociologists' work about the way many religious groups define themselves in part through opposition to others, they add that as a result of higher education, "the evangelical movement may be weakened by decreasing subcultural distinction and tension between itself and relevant outgroups."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Influence of Higher Ed

  • Resources on evangelical students
  • Posted by Jerry Pattengale , Ass't Provost at Indiana Wesleyan University on August 12, 2009 at 7:15am EDT
  • Scott, Those interested in the college experience’s influence on evangelical students may want to consult the data base of Dr. Bayard Baylis, Provost at Cornerstone University (MI). Through a FIPSE grant his team interviewed several thousands of evangelical students at Christian universities within the CCCU (1st and 4th years, same cohort). They also videotaped interviews of 3,000 at the beginning of their college experience, and 1,000 (those remaining) during their senior years. The data is at least a decade old, but still ripe for study. One of the key finds that surfaced was that although the students’ values remained largely unchanged during this time, they entered college with borrowed values (from parents/churches) and left owning them. In addition to the work of the Astins, researchers may also want to contact Dr. Laurie Schreiner at Azusa Pacific’s Ph.D. in Ed. program (and I believe she’s still a senior scientist at Gallup, and a key developer of StrengthsQuest), as she remains rather current in her national research (see: http://www.cccu.org/migrate/a_conversation_with__dr_laurie_schreiner ). Also, George Barna has a taxonomy of studies of evangelical patterns (recent interview: http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2006/january/13.69.html ). Thanks for combing these conferences and bringing this study to our attention. JP

  • Gay/straight student alliances at Christian colleges
  • Posted by Kathryn Lee , Professor of Political Science at Eastern University on August 12, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • Some member institutions of the Council of Christian Colleges and Universities (CCCU) have clubs specifically addressing the issue of homosexuality. Both gay and straight students belong. These clubs serve as a safe and open forum where gay students can talk about issues and straight students can offer support and learn about matters of concern to gay students. Such clubs may or may not receive official support, i.e., recognition and/or finances, from the student life department of the respective institution.

  • Posted by stm60 at UConn on August 12, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • Isn't this true for any group? The more education and the more exposure one has, the more tolerant of others one is.

  • ???????
  • Posted by Jameel A. Scott , PhD student at University of Maryland on August 12, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • Like the previous comment, I am wondering is the statement true that "the more education the more tolerant a person/persons are?" This seems to be true for any group.

  • Nonsense
  • Posted by Jonathan Cohen , Department of mathematics at DePaul University on August 12, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • This article is absurd. The article displays a level of liberal condescension that is spectacular in its shamelessness. The most intolerant people I know are liberal faculty members. FIRE (the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education) has amassed a library full of case histories of restrictions on free speech and religious freedom by so-called tolerant universities and colleges.

    When it comes to looking for intolerance, the creators of this study need to take a look in the mirror.

  • Educated are Intolerant of Intolerance
  • Posted by M W on August 12, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • In response to the comments above, I would say there is a difference between uneducated intolerance and educated intolerance. I think educated people are more likely to be intolerant of intolerance (like the FIRE example above) and uniformity/conformity, whereas uneducated people are more likely to be intolerant of tolerance and diversity.

    However, politicians and other leaders that support and propagate intolerant views are usually educated people. Especially in the case of politicians, they are likely to be in places where there are many college-educated people around them (like, Washington DC, state capitols, large urban areas, etc). Perhaps there is a caveat in this research to allow for the shepherds of the sheeple?

  • Well, duh...
  • Posted by LogicGuru on August 12, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • So what else is new? Social (and political) liberalism/conservativism, including attitudes to gays and atheists, is determined primarily by CLASS. Evangelicals as a group are more conservative because the conservative white working class is more heavily represented amongst them. As more Evangelicals go to college proportionately fewer of them will be working class so the group becomes in the aggregate less conservative. What do you expect. And of course those exposed to college educated people will become less conservative as their values "rub off" on them.

    It's all that C word that no one wants to talk about.

  • Posted by Adjunct George on August 12, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • Define tolerance. If you mean a live and let live attitude, then I agree with the article. If you mean the active support of and active encouragement of the homosexual lifestyle, I don't think a strong evangelical will change.

  • Defining tolerance
  • Posted by Prof Challenger on August 12, 2009 at 1:30pm EDT
  • Adjunct George, who on earth would ever define "tolerance" as "active encouragement of the homosexual lifestyle"? Tolerance is, well, tolerating something, not "actively encouraging" it. Otherwise you'd have to classify the most rabid, tendentious, narrow-minded dogmatists as "tolerant."

  • What do you mean by tolerance?
  • Posted by frankly speaking on August 12, 2009 at 1:30pm EDT
  • One of the challenges in tolerance studies is a definition of tolerance as a civic virtue. Practically speaking, tolerance is demonstrated in the ability to live and work with people with whom one deeply disagrees. However, tolerance, more often than not, is used to describe solidarity, moral acceptance and support of various peoples and causes. A person who fully embraces a position, for instance a straight person who wholeheartedly supports gay causes, same sex marriage, who "swings both ways," etc., is not necessarily tolerant. No tolerance is necessary to stand with one's friends and moral soulmates. As a virtue, this person's tolerance might better be measured in terms of his treatment toward an Evangelical who rejects these views. At about 26% of the population, Evangelicals are a minority in the US. I wonder if there are any studies that measure gay or atheist tolerance of these folks? I wonder how many gays and atheists think Evangelicals should be allowed to teach in college from their moral center and defining world view.

  • Prof Challenger
  • Posted by DFS on August 12, 2009 at 2:45pm EDT
  • K-12 systems everywhere.

  • Social Benefits of Tolerance and Higher Ed
  • Posted by Ken Udas on August 12, 2009 at 4:45pm EDT
  •  

    Having not read the published study I am probably not in a position to comment with any real authority. That said, if the study suggests that engagement in higher education or being surrounded by those who have enraged in higher education increases tolerance (behaviors and attitudes) that allow for better representation and trust between the groups studied, it points to some social (and perhaps indirect private) benefits of higher education. If we value the civic capacity benefits that tolerance of this nature provides, then we can potentially measure it in some way. As these are public benefits, perhaps the study points to an argument for policy that better aligns public benefit with public support for higher education.

  • DFS --
  • Posted by M W on August 12, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • Can you elaborate on how K12 systems define "tolerance" as the "active encouragement of the homosexual lifestyle"?

  • Lifestyle?
  • Posted by Bear , Student Retention on August 12, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • I live an American, middle to upper middle class lifestyle. Aside from the fact that my spouse is also male, there is absolutely nothing about my lifestyle that is "homosexual." The denigration of an intrinsic part of who I am, a male sexually attracted to other males, by calling that part of me a "lifestyle" demonstrates a level of willful ignorance that baffles me. I have yet to meet anyone in my personal or professional life (including Evangelicals) who has used that expression to my face. I don't know how I would react. However, when supposedly educated people use that expression in forums such as this, my reactions are dismay and anger. People who still refer to a "homosexual lifestyle" know by now that the expression is an insult and continue to use it (now you're supposed to say, "Get over it," right?). Perhaps the Evangelicals discussed in the study found through education and interaction with other educated people a fuller understanding of Jesus' teachings with regard to how we treat one another, including acceptance of others as human beings first.

  • Posted by WTF on August 12, 2009 at 8:30pm EDT
  • Bear, if it makes you feel any better (or worse), I once had to correct a young male student about 5 times when he kept referring to being a housewife as a "lifestyle."

    That's when I realized that education has its limits when meeting the willfully ignorant and intellectually obtuse.

    Empty rhetoric is so much easier to spout reflexively than actual understanding of (often not so) complicated sociological phenomena.

  • Ironic
  • Posted by WinstonSmith on August 14, 2009 at 3:45pm EDT
  • As has been noted, check the success in having open discussion questioning evolutionary or climate change orthodoxy among the enlightened higher ed community.

    Then you'll get a feel for the level of tolerance among the "well-educated".

  • Tolerant of What?
  • Posted by HRG , Emeritus Professor of Sociology at University of Southern Indiana on August 17, 2009 at 8:15pm EDT
  • I must add my assent to the other posters who have noted the limits of ideological tolerance in American higher education. Many of same academics who smirk at the Creationist evolution-deniers are intolerant of the idea that evolution affects human behavior. It is common among sociologists to deride the evangelical position that homosexuality is merely a "choice," while simultaneously attacking the notion that gender is influenced in part by biology (e.g., hormones, for Pete's sake). Sociology texts rarely fail to mention the unequal distribution of American wealth and income and just as rarely acknowledge the unequal distribution of the income tax burden. Having spent more than 40 years there, I state flatly that higher education, and sociology in particular, is as orthodoxy-bound as any church or political party