Search News


Browse Archives

News

Colleges Review 'Community'

August 24, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Some loved it. Some hated it. But everyone is a critic.

Last week, community college employees and attendees got their first look at “Community,” NBC’s new sitcom about a group of students at a fictional two-year institution. Ever since the network announced in May that it would be airing a new comedy focusing on life at a community college, many in academe expressed concern that the show might unfairly characterize this set of institutions and its students. Among those in the community college world who do not like what they have seen in the show's early ads, there has been some debate over whether to actively fight the show, ignore it or try to make something positive come out of it.

The pilot was available as a streaming video on Facebook for a limited amount of time to hype the show's Sept. 17 television debut. The only catch was that users of the social networking Web site had to become "a fan” of the show to view the pilot, a viral marketing technique making users open to communications from NBC about the show. The full pilot episode has since been taken down, but some scenes are available online.

Inside Higher Ed asked a cross-section of community college presidents, faculty members and students to view the advanced screening of the pilot episode on Facebook and write their impressions, and a number took up the offer.

Not surprisingly, opinions about the show are mixed. For all those who overlook the lowbrow humor and laud what they see as the show’s ultimate, encouraging message, there are others who insist that the sitcom is chock-full of gross exaggerations and has no redeeming value.

One of the most eager to comment about the pilot episode was Betty K. Young, president of Houston Community College’s Coleman College for Heath Sciences. You might know her as the motorcycle-riding president, then at Northwest State Community College, who made a cross-country trip in 2005 to appear on “The Tonight Show” to set Jay Leno straight for making jokes at the expense of community colleges. Still, for those expecting a harsh review, Young may disappoint.

“The show is a comedy, so it takes a few jabs at the perceived community college experience, but not in a mean-spirited or spiteful way – more like the way life takes jabs at all of us,” Young writes.

Jeff, the show’s main character (played by Joel McHale), is a lawyer who has recently been suspended by the state bar because his degree was discovered to be fake. He turns to Greendale Community College, the show’s fictitious campus in Colorado, to make his way to a legitimate degree. Still, he has a cynic’s attitude about his time at the college and asks his old friend, Duncan, a psychology professor (played by John Oliver), to help him get the answers to all of the tests he will take during the semester. When Duncan questions whether this is the right thing to do, Jeff retorts, “If I wanted to learn something I wouldn’t have come to community college.”

“The main character’s philosophy on a community college education seems to reflect the misunderstanding some people have about what a community college can do,” Young writes. “But 25 minutes later, with the magic of television and a dose of reality, Jeff is beginning to understand what all community college graduates know: a good education is a great equalizer.… Having been a community college faculty member and president of three colleges, I’ve seen my fair share of disbelieving Jeffs walk through the door – looking for the path of least resistance, and like Jeff are quickly humbled and accepted into a community of learners that care about them.”

Most of the episode centers around Jeff's Spanish study group, which consists of a hodgepodge of characters from all walks of life – labeled by the college dean in the episode as “remedial teens, 20-something dropouts, middle-aged divorcees and old people keeping their minds active as they circle the drain of eternity.” In this study group, however, there is not much studying being done.

Reviews from the faculty ranks of these scenes are mixed. Some said they thought the show’s producers, who said at a recent press top that they would not mock community colleges and play into negative stereotypes, failed to hold up their end of the bargain.

“Now, as a teacher of literature, I recognize that Jeff is a flawed character who, by episode end, begins to sense his limitations and, we assume, mature through the encouragement of his ‘study’ community,” writes Howard Tineberg, English professor at Bristol Community College, in Massachusetts, and former editor of Teaching English in the Two-Year College. “Much of the cynical representation of the community college is offered through Jeff’s rather warped perspective. But there is really no hint of irony that I can see because not one character so far is a trustworthy purveyor of the truth about community college.… I see much to be offended by in this premier episode.”

Other faculty members expressed similar criticisms.

“Unfortunately, the pilot of ‘Community’ perpetuates stereotypes of two-year colleges as consolation prizes for students and faculty who do not 'make it' into four-year institutions,” writes Sandie McGill Barnhouse, chair of the Two-Year College English Association (TYCA) and English professor at Rowan-Cabarrus Community College, in North Carolina. “The opening scene manages to portray the dean as a bumbling administrator who cannot even explain to a gathering of students what a community college is without his note cards. The only professor we meet seems to be willing to sell test answers and spends his office hours swilling wine. What ‘Community’ does do is illustrate the broad range of students who attend community colleges, but the pilot misses the point. Our colleges are not second rate — but they often give a second chance to the unemployed, the returning veterans, the working parents, and the financially strapped.... This nation’s community colleges students should not be demeaned or portrayed as losers; in fact, they should be applauded for their choice to choose cost-effective, responsive education that meets their needs.”

Students were the most generous critics of the show, though much of the pilot episode lampoons them.

“Although some of the points made seemed a bit exaggerated, I found the show to be quite humorous,” writes Giovanni Garcia, a student at San Diego City College. “Some of the comments made toward community colleges had some truth behind them, but seemed to be a little far-fetched. The cast is a pretty accurate representation of a community college setting and is amusing to watch because it makes the show very easy to relate to.… I look forward to the upcoming season.”

Other students hope the show will give them an opportunity to tell others about the value of their institutions, but they acknowledge that all of the jokes at their expense will not make it easy.

“I think the show is pretty clever,” says Wendy Hamilton, president of the American Student Association of Community Colleges and a student at Hillsborough Community College, in Florida. “I can see where some offense can come in, to the bias of what type of people community college students are. I know this is show, but I want people to know that the majority of community college students are people who couldn't afford the luxury of a 4-year college, are not prepared to enter a 4-year institution, or are trying in these hard economic times to gain the knowledge that will help them attain a better job in our society. I believe the show is going to be great, but I still believe that it will not help change people's perception of our community college systems.”

Most of the reviewers of the pilot episode say they will be sure to watch the show again at some point this season, whether in an attempt to find redeeming value or further criticize. For instance, Young writes that she has even planned to have a group of faculty and students over to her house to watch the premiere in a few weeks as a way to start a dialogue with them about her institution.

Of the pilot and the community college world’s response to it, Richard Dittbenner, public information and government relations director of San Diego Community College District, frames it this way: “It is a show loaded with inaccuracies, misrepresentations, half-truths, stereotypes, and just enough truth in it to make it funny and engaging."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Colleges Review 'Community'

  • That's comedy.
  • Posted by T on August 24, 2009 at 8:30am EDT
  • When Dittbenner describes the show as "loaded with inaccuracies, misrepresentations, half-truths, stereotypes, and just enough truth in it to make it funny and engaging," he is describing comedy. Poking fun at people in authority - college administrators and professors, for instance - is always good for a laugh. So what did the critics think a comedy set in a community college was going to be like? A public relations piece for community colleges?

  • NBC Community Comedy Show
  • Posted by Charles Harris , Director / Global eCollege at Mississippi University for Women on August 24, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • Personally, I have no problem with this program. Since it is on NBC, so few people will see it there will be no long-term effect on the public perception of community colleges.

  • Posted by Jeff on August 24, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • Sounds like an entertaining and funny show.

  • if you can't laugh at yourself, somebody else will
  • Posted by DS on August 24, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • Colleges have been lampooned before...watch The Marx Brothers' "Horse Feathers" and you'll be amazed at how little it's aged even though it was made nearly 80 years ago. Not that I'm comparing Chevy Chase to Groucho and his siblings, but I'm eager to see how much of the show mirrors what I see every day. And if it's inaccurate, well, just think how all those lawyers and doctors must feel when they turn on the TV and see their professions all portrayed as a bunch of oversexed hotties.

  • You cannot make this stuff up...
  • Posted by University Staffer on August 24, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • The antics, meetings and people at all levels of the university’s I’ve worked for absolutely have their moments some are flat out funny and some are so stupid they’re hysterical. I don’t know how many meetings and things I’ve seen and heard and thought, "You cannot make this stuff up!" Of course everything is exaggerated because it’s a sitcom. Relax here folks, nothing hateful is coming out of this show from what we know so far. If you cannot poke fun at yourselves life is no fun at all. People need to quit worrying about the politically correct message here.

    I’ve love to know how I could get in touch with this show’s writers. I am full of stories of what happens at a regular university level which could be put in a community college setting.

  • Posted by Community College Veteran on August 24, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • While I sincerely believe in the mission of community colleges (I started my own career at one), treating this sitcom as a serious critique of 2-year schools is akin to decrying Animal House for ruining the reputations of small liberal arts colleges nationwide.

    Or we could freak out at all the "Everyone Loves Raymond" and "According to Jim"-type shows that portray husbands as dopey and wives as shrewish. Poking fun - at anyone - is the bread and butter of sitcom writers.

    As a student of pop culture (believe me, as a rural Southerner by birth, I'm well-accustomed to some mass media mockery).

    I'm not usually one to say "Oh, it's just a TV show, let it go" - but in this case...it's just a TV show, let it go.

  • Posted by bored at predictable outrage on August 24, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • Let me just go ahead and get these out of the way for everyone else:

    Chevy Chase sucks and is not funny!
    Community colleges deserve more respect!
    This is an outrage and a disgrace!
    Next thing you know they'll be making a show that glamorizes drinking, sex, and stupidity!
    They canceled Jericho for this?!?!
    I work at a CC and that's not how it is at all!
    I go to a CC and that's not how it is at all!

    There. More efficient that way, don't you think?

  • Excited about Community
  • Posted by communitynbc on August 24, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • We at http://communitynbc.com are very excited about the show.

  • Who cares?
  • Posted by earl , Prof at CC on August 24, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Who really cares? It's TV! Does anyone think the Office is accurate? Or 30 Rock. Or even ER? If people really believe it's a real representation of CC's let them.

  • This show hurts more than helps community colleges
  • Posted by edquest on August 24, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • The problem that I see in some of these comments, in the story as well as outside, is that the show is permeating a stereotype, answering unasked questions about community colleges. It's true that shows like The Office are not meant to be "accurate," but most people who watch them have already formed their own impressions of a corporate workplace from their personal experiences. So, when we watch a show like the The Office, we're laughing at something that we already know something about.

    This show reinforces a perception about community colleges that college leaders and students don't want, because politicians consider perception to be reality. The last thing television should portray about an unfamiliar institution--the audience is likely to include people who know nothing about community colleges--is that it is a joke.

    The joke becomes all they know. I liken this show to comments that were repeatedly made about Newark, New Jersey. Its current and previous mayors always took exception to comics who joked about the city. It was not that the mayors had no sense of humor. It was that the jokes obscured the positive things they were trying to do.

    This show has given community college leaders a tougher job as they try to convince the politicians and the public that they are worth funding.

  • they don't call us comedy college for nothin'
  • Posted on August 24, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • Lighten up, folks, it's a comedy. Students quoted seem to get it. If you are offended, maybe its time you learn to quit taking yourself so darn seriously and learn to laugh at yourself. It's quite healthy, you know.
    As a 30 year veteran of cc's, like university staffer I too have seen way too many things that just couldn't be made up. Wonder how you go about submitting a screenplay?

  • Not an 'equalizer'
  • Posted by Ira Shor , Professor of English at City Univ of NY on August 24, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • Comm coll students are hard-working, busy, underfunded, smart folks who bring much unacknowledged intelligence to the crowded campuses and classrooms built for them. CC teachers are equally heroic, overworked and often underpaid, as many are part-time adjuncts(60% or more). The students and teachers at CC's have always deserved better but higher education policy segregates students by race and class, keeping existing inequality in place. CC's are not a "great equalizer" as our esteemed colleague Dr. Young claims. Income inequality has widened grossly in America despite the vast spread of CC's since the 1960s. The affluent who won't send their kids to CC's have grown vastly richer, while working-class families have lost ground despite millions of them enrolling and graduating CC's in last 40 years. CC's expanded enrollment from 400K in '59 to 4 million in '71, now about 6-7 million, but fair and democratic choice would be open access for all to better-funded 4-yr colleges to avoid what is called "the community college effect"-a higher risk of dropping-out--that is, two students with same economic and academic background perform differently if one goes to a 4-yr coll while the other goes to a CC, with 4-yr coll student doing better. CC's have offered a low-budget, degraded educational process to working-class students, producing more drop-outs than grads, an outcome called "the cooling-out function in higher education" by sociologist Burton Clark 50 years ago.

  • And your point is...?
  • Posted by Prof Challenger on August 24, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • So, let's stipulate that this network comedy does not accurately portray real life at a community college.

    It might be fair to ask, though, whether those glossy photos on community college promotional literature and course catalogues provide an accurate portrayal...

  • Get a Grip
  • Posted by superdude on August 24, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • Geez, people. It's not a documentary. It's a lousy sitcom that probably won't last more than a few weeks before it's canceled. Don't you have real issues to worry about?

  • NBC show "Community"
  • Posted by John Poole , Assistant Campus Dean for Student Services at University of Wisconsin-Richland on August 24, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • Seems to me we need to take it for what it's worth--a comedy on television, not a true and accurate portrayal of life at a community college.

    Comedies do, in fact, poke fun at different groups. My wife is a nurse and has for years been upset at some of the characterizations she's seen of nurses on television.

    It's like most things: people will believe what they want to believe. And, to paraphrase a well-known Shakespearean line ... let us not protest too much, lest we give the program credibility.

  • Low-level humor
  • Posted by GDP on August 24, 2009 at 12:59pm EDT
  • Comedies are supposed to be funny. The "teasers" touting Community that NBC has been showing aren't. They're just dumb, perhaps because many if not most sit-com writers are not writing for mature or sophisticated television audiences. Nor do these writers respect the abilities of television audiences to appreciate smart humor.

    I recall the treatment of Bunker Hill Community College in "Good Will Hunting." The classroom scene took a humorous shot at the level of academic interest exhibited by the students, but the community college teacher/psychologist played by Robin Williams was given depth and substance as the film went on. Of course, this was Hollywood at its best, working to make us laugh, think and feel. Not just a sitcom settling for laughs.

    Television has a tradition of giving us some great sitcoms. All in the Family. M*A*S*H. Cheers. Seinfeld. Frazier. Most sitcoms, however, are satiated with low-level humor. Dumb rules!

  • what good?
  • Posted by ron p , payroll supervisor at ccm on August 24, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • Almost 20 years at a CC in charge of payroll there is not an underpaid teacher/professor.

    It's TV; if it was real nobody would be interested- except maybe the taxpayers.

    What good has been done to Newark, it still deserves all the jabs.

  • About the comments
  • Posted by Hunterwali on August 24, 2009 at 2:15pm EDT
  • I find it surprising that so many of the comments rely on the feeble defences of "It's just a comedy" or "It's just a television show" demanding that critics "lighten up." I wouldn't have expected this from people who would frequent a site about Higher Ed. I expect to disagree, yes, but I don't expect to see such a staggering refusal to engage in critical thinking.

    As Edquest noted, the problem with the show is that it reinforces problematic and misguided perceptions about community college rather than plays with truths. Negative representations affect impressions of groups of people, particularly when those representations are accepted already by many to be reality. These characters do not have to be virtuous or brilliant, but how can they more reflect the life of a community college without relying on pernicious, and apparently misguided attitudes? Can they confront these tedious stereotypes and seek out ways to critique and mock the world of the CC? It would likely make for better television (and yes, there is such a thing as excellent television which takes the piss out of many institutions and scenarios-- Office UK, The Thick of It, etc.) Otherwise, we spend our time gawping at the television, "It's funny because he's stupid! It's funny because she's poor! It's funnier because he's old... and foreign!"

    It is perfectly legitimate to critique television programmes and ask what kind of attitudes and perceptions they perpetuate as we also investigate their overall failings to provide humour or insight.

    Answering "lighten up" serves little purpose other than to indulge complacency, hostility, and wilful ignorance. And yes, other programmes bother me as well. But no, I don't expect them to be discussed here since the topic is "Community".

  • Has anyone explained the purpose of television to you?
  • Posted by Dwight Podgurski , Long-time associate professor at multiple universities and community colleges on August 24, 2009 at 2:15pm EDT
  • In the 1970's, a number of us who were competing on college debate teams examined the nature of television in order to determine whether it had, in fact, sacrificed quality for entertainment. The seminal conclusion that emerged at the end of the year was that the predominant purpose of quality television was TO ENTERTAIN. Any reasonable viewer who has an ounce of reasoning ability would not expect Boston Legal to provide a realistic apologetic for the courtroom or the attornies that protect our constitutional freedoms. I do not select my health provider based upon their ability to recreate the treatment processes I see on ER or Grey's Anatomy. I remain unconcerned that the police officers I know are nothing like the detectives on The Closer or Law and Order. As you might already discern, I will likely watch Community without anxiety or dissonance because it fails to provide an accurate represenation of the community college environment. Whether I continue to watch, however, will depend entirely on whether it entertains me, which is ultimately all I ever ask of any sitcom and television programming in general.

  • It is just TV...
  • Posted by R.F. on August 24, 2009 at 4:30pm EDT
  • breath in....breath out....no more and no less.

    I fully expect that next year some enterprising CC Faculty member will use footage from this "comedy" in one of their courses to make some point or another. Art imitates life...or was it the other way around...I forget.

    Oops, time to go home to watch the news. Oh yeah, that is not an accurate portrayal either.

  • Geez...
  • Posted by Superdude on August 24, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • Hunterwali, you need to calm down and stop being so paranoid. It's a TV show for crying out loud. You must be exhausted, defending Higher Ed from all the attacks by the entertainment industry, from Animal House, to Old School, to Community.

    Sigh.

  • Posted by Fred on August 24, 2009 at 8:15pm EDT
  • Chevey Chase is the lead? Really? Because Bob Newhart was too old, maybe? Not to worry, colleagues -- this show is so cancelled.

  • The Audience for the Show could be Big
  • Posted by Richard Dittbenner , Director of Public Information and Government Relations at San Diego Community College District on August 24, 2009 at 10:30pm EDT
  • Of the 12.5 million students enrolled in community colleges in the United States, 2.7 million of them are attending one of the 110 community colleges in California. I would expect that if the first shows light up Twitter messaging and draw rave reviews on Facebook, Ning, and other social networking sites, it could become a big hit in California among the largest group of community college students in the nation- who average in age 29 years. The challenge for the producers is to draw students who spend little, if any time, watching TV. They will need to keep the scripts focusing on the nature of edgy Generation Y communication and cultural issues/clashes with those of us who are Generation X and Baby Boomers- and who will be running things for another 10 years. And, keeping the show non-regional in character will be a challenge to keep it funny. Generation Ys are alike in many ways, but there are differences that cut across ethnic, socio-economic, gender/sexual orientation, and global outlook issues. In a nation which has elevated community colleges to the forefront of national higher education concern, many in the community colleges still do not yet accept that "our" time as arrived. It has. So, move over "Survivor" and "Project Runway." Community college are also ready for prime time!

  • Posted by WTF on August 25, 2009 at 5:15am EDT
  • I am amused that Dwight Podgurski actually wrote on an Internet forum that his college debate team from the 1970s conclusively uncovered that television's sole purpose is to entertain.

    Considering the sub-field of Television Studies really didn't even come into its own until the 1980s, it's nice to know the conclusions of a group of undergraduates trumps the many contested, competing theories of the media's impact that have emerged over the past 40+ years.

    I won't go into detail here (after all, you all are capable of reading up on the concept of "media effect" on your own), but few scholars whose expertise lies in media studies would agree that "to entertain" is the sole purpose of the television industry. I mean, let's be brutally honest: the primary purpose that broadcast TV serves is actually to sell products via commercials and product placement.

    The programming (of whatever quality) is just some attractive filler...

    So, is Community good or bad for community colleges? Watch the first episode, pick a media effect theorist, and analyze on your own. The impact won't be discernable until we see what actually gets presented, how the audience reacts, and whether there are changes for CCs connectible to those reactions. A 5-year longitudinal study should suffice.

  • Suderdude- Huh?
  • Posted by Hunterwali on August 25, 2009 at 5:15am EDT
  • How is remarking upon the limited critical facilities of the posters paranoid?

    And why are representations in popular culture not worthy of discussion or critique? There are implications and it's worth considering them, or at least understanding the stakes that lend to the complaints we noted above.

    Also curious is that while my tone was measured, and exploring the reasons why someone might wish to engage in critique, you chose to treat it as some freak out, squealing insults ('paranoid'?) and returning to the very lame defence I protested in the first place ('It just TV'). Really, can't do any better than that? The bar must be set awfully low for 'super' in your part of the world, dude.

  • Over-thinking
  • Posted by Superdude on August 25, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • Demanding critical thinking about the cultural impacts of throw-away TV show? Please. Not everything needs to be analyzed, particularly something like this show. If you want to navel-gaze, that's fine, but if the rest of us would rather direct our energies to something more productive, don't scold us.

    And you lose points for the pathetic ad hominem attack at the end, particularly because my screen name refers to the deceased class hamster from the Simpsons. You take things way too seriously. Lighten up a bit, and you'll find that not everyone is out to get you.

  • Our official assessment
  • Posted by Cindy Lawrence , web manager, college relations at Centralia College on September 15, 2009 at 3:30pm EDT
  • We figure it will last two years, then people will graduate to something better.

  • Superdude remains a tit, but Community is awesome
  • Posted by Hunterwali on September 27, 2009 at 6:00am EDT
  • Superdude's insistence that I think everyone is out to get me is puzzling given that there's not evidence within anything I wrote that I even think one person is out to get me.

    But forget superdude and his pathetic insistence that cultural product does not demand critical thinking (one would think that he's working for the Tories and their planned redrafting of the University).

    No, I just thought I'd come back to say that having seen two episodes of 'Community' that I think it's hilarious. It is sharply written and truly enjoyable (even if flawed in its assumptions that professors get better parking than students). Fears that this demeans the institution of community colleges are unfounded as the overall humour manages to encompass all institutions of higher learning.

    (Also superdude, thanks for telling me the origins: if only you would follow in your namesake's tiny little path...)