Search News


Browse Archives

News

Lawmaker, University Get Caught

August 24, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Conflict of interest issues continue to befuddle universities and their legislative patrons.

Last month, The Virginian-Pilot ran an article raising questions about the hiring of Phillip Hamilton, a powerful Republican member of the House of Delegates, to lead a new Center for Teacher Quality and Educational Leadership at Old Dominion University. The reason for the questions was that Hamilton had been the key legislator in obtaining state funds for the center. Both Hamilton and the university denied that there was any conflict of interest, telling the newspaper that discussions of his working at the center came only after the legislation had passed, and that he was well qualified and so couldn't be excluded.

While that argument didn't satisfy everyone, it turns out the argument wasn't even true.

The Daily Press, another Virginia newspaper, obtained and published e-mail messages between Hamilton and the university -- sent before the legislation moved -- in which he expressed interest in a job and duties and salary were discussed. The e-mails back and forth feature the lawmaker and senior university officials discussing both the salary and the prospects for the bill that he subsequently got through the General Assembly. Hamilton talks about the need to supplement his salary; the university officials are always encouraging, and sometimes they discuss the lawmaker's overall financial intake from the likely Old Dominion job and his other employment.

After the newspaper confronted him with the e-mail trail on Thursday, Hamilton quit his Old Dominion job and told the newspaper that the record it obtained "clearly creates the perception of impropriety, absolutely." The newspaper reported that he "nearly broke down" during the interview, and that while he "took responsibility" for the situation, he said he didn't remember the e-mail discussions about the job he eventually took.

Old Dominion officials declined to answer directly questions about how the university could have declared there to have been no conflict of interest when it had in fact discussed salary for the job should the center be created, prior to the center being created. A statement from the university said only that the center itself was important educationally, that Hamilton and the university had "mutually agreed to end" his relationship with the center, and that a full investigation would be conducted.

The hiring of legislators for public college positions that they helped create or over which they have influence used to be common, but is increasingly the subject of scrutiny.

In April, the president of Northwest Florida State College was indicted on charges related to the hiring of a powerful state legislator who had sent large grants to the college. A Florida state senator last year gave up her $120,000-a-year position at a Florida State University reading research center that she was instrumental in helping to create, four days after Inside Higher Ed first publicized the arrangement. A series of articles by The Birmingham News about cronyism and other wrongdoing in Alabama community colleges won the Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting in 2007.

As for Delegate Hamilton, he's now running for re-election.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Lawmaker, University Get Caught

  • corruption
  • Posted by Gary Page , recent Ph.D. graduate at George Mason University on August 24, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • On my better days, this type of story makes me think the level of corruption in our society is beyond repair. Hamilton should resign from the House of Delegates. However, since he and most "public officials" are utterly shameless, I'm sure he won't. Given that, I wish I lived in his district so I could vote against him.

    Administrators of ODU should quit or be fired for their part in this travesty, as well.

    All this is not much different from campaign contributions. Apparently, the only way to move legislation is to pay for it directly. A pox on all participants in this game.

  • Amoral overpaid PR flack sycophants must go. too
  • Posted by Inside R on August 24, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • I could not agree more with the first post except to supplement it. Much of the problem in these and other cases of deliberate college administration duplicity are enabled by PR flacks fabricating and/or spinning stories instead of presenting the truth they know, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth as higher education instructs. When motive or chronology questions DO arise, these same sycophants rush in with their prepared "plausible deniability" tracts. Only leaked E-mail, Freedom of Information Act products, and courageous employees and sources occasionally ensure "truth will out." Usually the administrators get away with it.

    Some of these sordid sagas originate in pre-hiring personal relationships between presidents and their spokesperson and/or (as with the largest public system in the northeast) salaries for the flacks of well over six figures. Self-aggrandizing college presidents claim these marketing mavens are there to advance institutional goals and aid recruiting. Every analysis I have done (NEVER conducted or acknowledged by the presidents and PR flacks themselves) indicates enrollment at such schools parallels similar institutions where the PR staff are paid more in line with or less than profs with similar experience. In other words, external demographic/economic factors and internal professor and resource quality are the real drivers of enrollment. Additional content analysis of press releases from these overpaid unethical mouthpieces shows far more attention and praise lavished on even inconsequential activities of the president who hired them than all other programs and staff combined. At all public institutions (and some private) PR flack salaries are available for review at both campus and central HQ levels.. Sally forth. Research, expose and excise this corrupting cancer on the Academy.