Search News


Browse Archives

News

Money, Mentors and Love

September 1, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The top factors in helping graduate students complete a Ph.D. are financial support, mentoring and family support (the latter meaning non-financial), according to a survey of new doctorate holders by the Council of Graduate Schools.

The survey is part of the council's Ph.D. Completion Project, which is trying to improve graduate education and to increase the completion rates of doctoral programs. Initially the council wanted to compare the responses of those who completed and those who did not, but response rates from those who left doctoral programs were too low to draw conclusions. The council also analyzed some of the responses by disciplinary groups and found potentially significant differences in the types of financial support offered and the grad students' satisfaction with the support. (Humanities students generally got the short end of the stick.)

Across the board, asked about the factors that contributed to the ability to finish a program, here are the top reasons (Ph.D. recipients were able to pick more than one reason):

  • Financial support: 80 percent
  • Mentoring and advising: 65 percent
  • Family support (non-financial) 57 percent
  • Social environment / peer support: 40 percent
  • Program quality: 36 percent
  • Professional / career guidance: 29 percent
  • Program requirements: 22 percent
  • Personal circumstances: 18 percent
  • Other: 11 percent

With regard to the top issue identified (financial support), the survey found differences by discipline. Overall, 76 percent were satisfied, but that was higher in some disciplines (life sciences, engineering and mathematics and physical sciences were all 80 or higher) than others (the level was only 60 percent for the humanities).

Those satisfaction differences may be explained by other findings in the survey showing that -- among doctoral students offered multi-year financial support at the time of admission -- those in the humanities and social sciences are less likely than others to receive offers covering six or more years, even though many humanities Ph.D.'s take longer than six years to complete. Humanities doctoral students were more likely than those in other fields to receive offers covering only two or three years.

Duration of Financial Support in Admissions Offers, by Discipline

Discipline 2-3 Years 4-5 Years 6 or More Years
Humanities 28% 64% 6%
Social sciences 25% 73% 2%
Mathematics and physical sciences 13% 65% 22%
Life sciences 26% 58% 16%
Engineering 19% 68% 13%
Total 22% 66% 12%

Doctoral students in the humanities and social sciences were also much more likely than those in other disciplines to work outside the university during doctoral studies, or to take out private or student loans to support doctoral study.

Financing Graduate Study With Outside Work or Loans, by Discipline

Discipline Non-University Job Loans
Humanities 57% 68%
Social sciences 63% 51%
Mathematics and physical sciences 32% 41%
Life sciences 21% 37%
Engineering 28% 30%

Some of the other notable findings of the survey include the following:

  • Although many disciplinary organizations have been urging departments to tell prospective students more about completion rates and job prospects, many new doctorates don't remember seeing that information when they were applying to or selecting programs. Only 26 percent reported seeing information about job placement rates and only 36 percent reported seeing information about Ph.D. completion rates. Much larger percentages reported seeing information on program requirements.
  • Generally, the new doctorates reported that they had good access to their academic advisers during their programs, although that goes up as the students progress. During coursework, 81 percent reported good access, while the figure hit 90 percent for the dissertation writing and defense stages.
  • While most of the doctoral graduates appeared to think that the difficulty level was appropriate for their programs, some did not. With some variation by discipline, between 28 percent (life sciences) and 38 percent (engineering) thought their programs were somewhat or too difficult. Between 5 percent (social sciences) and 14 percent (life sciences) thought their programs were somewhat or too easy.

Robert S. Sowell, vice president for programs and operations at the Council of Graduate Schools, said that he was not surprised that financial support and mentoring were the top two items in helping graduate students finish their doctorates. But he said he was surprised that non-financial family support finished as high as it did.

Given that many graduate schools are pressed for funds right now, Sowell said it was all the more important for graduate schools to focus on issues such as mentoring, and to "emphasize the other things students say are important" that are not costly.

A number of top universities are shrinking the sizes of their incoming graduate classes this year, responding to budget cuts that limit funds for stipends. Sowell said that this may be a logical response, and better than providing low levels of support, given the relationship between being well supported and "higher completion rates."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Money, Mentors and Love

  • Give me a break.
  • Posted by DFS on September 1, 2009 at 4:15pm EDT
  • "The top factors in helping graduate students complete a Ph.D. are financial support, mentoring and family support (the latter meaning non-financial), according to a survey of new doctorate holders by the Council of Graduate Schools."

    How about actual knowledge and demonstrated proficiency?

    There's nothing like a self-reporting effort. (It's anyone's fault but my own! How dare they? After all, I've "paid" (or had someone "pay") pay 'my' money!

  • Posted by Recent PhD Drop-out on September 1, 2009 at 6:45pm EDT
  • DFS, sweetie, when were you last in grad school?

    I have proficiency (as evidenced by winning several blind-reviewed contests in my field) but had zero support from my family (none of whom had even gone to college), had a very hands-off mentor (who often thought of me as her 4th choice for jobs and other mentoring opportunities), and had 3 years of guaranteed funding for a degree program that habitually required 6 years to complete.

    I had to quit because I ran out money, my mentor started ignoring me, and my family got tired of hearing me complain. After talking to all the other "losers" in similar situations, I discovered most of us had similar stories. Our profs all seemed to have internalized that anyone who cannot finish the PhD just isn't good enough. They cannot seem to open their eyes to the fact that they are underfunding us and tossing us to the wolves of adjuncting instead of supporting us.

    This may indeed be anecdotal, but the stories are too common for it not to be considered truthful.

  • Fund by completion
  • Posted by Gavin Moodie at Griffith University on September 1, 2009 at 8:15pm EDT
  • In 2001 the Australian Government started allocating half institutions' funding for PhD candidates by the number they graduate. This has improved completion rates markedly, mostly by deans of research insisting on candidatures being managed properly with more careful review of candidates' admission, annual reviews of progress, asking dissertation advisers to account for slow or no progress with dissertations and other measures.

  • It's been a while, 'dropout,'
  • Posted by DFS on September 7, 2009 at 5:00pm EDT
  • But I hear you. I took breaks between degrees, painting houses, hanging wallpaper, and tending bar, as I did initially to afford to be a full-time student.

    What irks me is how some will simply mega-analyze (just a huge book report) and then become 'Doctor.'

    BTW, one thesis advisor accepted a position elsewhere and no one else in the department wanted to pursue my first topic, another died and no one wanted to pursue my necessary second topic, and I suppose it was the 'third which was the charm.'

    All along, I had to generate new material.

    Sweetie. :)

  • Posted by ABD and proud on September 9, 2009 at 5:00pm EDT
  • Here's another anecdote from the disaffected. I completed my courses (4.0) as a part-time student (strike 1) but moved a few hours away to live with my husband and kids (strike 2), landed a great new job (strike 3)with plans to continue my dissertation part-time--all "approved" by my advisor. When I returned a month after the move for my final exam before officially starting my prospectus -- I was told I wasn't a suitable student and only cared about credentials not scholarship (ironic since my new research job was in a well respected think tank with lots of refereed publications). I was stunned when one committee member told me I had the knowledge to hold a doctorate but he didn't care for my mannerisms! As if that wasn't enough, my advisor then informed me that I needed to change my long planned (and agreed upon)topic since the department was no longer interested in it. I was stunned. Who needs that? Hell- I'm making at least 15% more income than the committee members were anyway and have more access to some of the powerful thinkers in my field. Higher Ed earned its reputation for arrogance that day.