Search News


Browse Archives

News

The Humanities and the NEH

September 2, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

WASHINGTON -- The National Endowment for the Humanities doesn't need "radical change," but may see some subtle shifts in emphasis, according to James A. Leach, the new chairman, who discussed his plans with Inside Higher Ed in this podcast interview.

Leach stressed the importance of the humanities as "bringing perspective to living," and cited the lack of perspective in so many contentious political debates these days, when partisans throw around political insults like "fascist" and "socialist" without knowing what the words mean. Leach urged humanities professors to share their expertise more broadly -- not just with their colleagues, but with the public.

To promote that idea, Leach said he would be starting a "bridging cultures" effort in the endowment, in which some grants in the various existing divisions would be devoted to research and public programs that help Americans better understand the rest of the world. In an era of "globalism," he said, it is dangerous for Americans to have so little understanding of cultures and ideas outside of their own. And that is but one of the "imperfect dimensions of our own culture" that he said he would like to see the humanities address.

Leach frequently talks about the issue of perspective, citing the power of The Alexandria Quartet, a series of novels by Lawrence Durrell in which the same period of time is explored from the perspectives of different characters.

This is an ideal time to lead the NEH, he said, because in President Obama and others, we have "the most instinctive national humanities leadership than at any time since Lincoln." While President Obama doesn't use the word "humanities" much, Leach said, the ideas of the humanities infuse his speeches. He cited as an example the president's June talk in Cairo, both analyzing the relationship between the United States and the Muslim world and suggesting ways that relationship could change. "That was all about the humanities," Leach said.

Leach served in Congress for 30 years, representing an Iowa district as a Republican.

Among other topics he discussed:

  • The importance of promoting public access to government records. He said that declassification systems shouldn't be used to delay the work of scholars, and that fewer documents should be classified in the first place.
  • Peer review should be treated as an "absolute hallowed aspect" of the endowment, without interference -- interference, for instance, in the form of earmarked grants from lawmakers.
  • In discussions of digitization of scholarship and the push to require free online access to such work that receives federal support, Leach said he understands the importance of copyright, but that he leans "toward open access" and wants "maximum availability" of scholarship.
  • He views one of the great strengths of American higher education as its "decentralized greatness," in that many public universities have departments that rival the excellence of those at top privates.
  • Befitting an Iowa City resident, Leach said that he loves college towns.
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Humanities and the NEH

  • NEH and the Human Condition
  • Posted by Jerry Pattengale , Assistant Provost for Scholarship & Public Engagement at Indiana Wesleyan University on September 2, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • Mr. Leach is spot on with his connection of the great questions of the human condition to resolving the chaotic conditions of many of humanity’s institutions. The very moniker of Obama’s campaign that resonated with voters is inextricably linked to such a notion – the courage to hope. I recall the struggle of accepting a NEH to Greece during the aftermath of the first news of the Rwandan massacres. “How will my commitment to research the details of ancient Isthmian social structures help children being maimed, and my students to help them?” In the end, the award (administered by Ohio State) helped me to study one of education’s largest questions, “Why do some civilizations excel and prosper while others struggle and collapse?” And, in turn, to help our students to answer such questions for the benefit of their generation. It’s in line with Leach’s concern in the podcast that if the nation “ignores the humanities the costs can be stunning.” I wish more educators could benefit from intensive NEH programs, or at the least, extended workshops that deal with such questions and the curriculum. I appreciate Kronman’s recent book, the candid Education’s End: Why Our Colleges and Universities Have Given Up on the Meaning of Life (Yale), even though I disagree with some of his key appraisals and main conclusion/suggestion. (See forthcoming Books & Culture, Nov. ’09 issue.) My hope for the NEH is that the same questions that Thucydides and the Dramatists ask of the human condition are used in our understanding of other (global) societies as well. Thanks for this piece, and for the podcast that allows us a glimpse of Jim's approachable spirit.

  • Great Question
  • Posted by James W. Gettys on September 2, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • Prof. Pattingale,

    "Why do some civilizations excel and prosper while others struggle and collapse?”

    That's an interesting question. Your answer in a nutshell? Surely you don't mean to suggest that some civilizations excel and prosper AT THE EXPENSE OF others that struggle and collapse!

    Where may I find your research? Forgive me if it appears in your response. I'll look again.

  • NEH funding
  • Posted by Marcus on September 2, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Now if only NEH could rise as a priority for Congress and the President and get more than a token increase. NEH gets crumbs from the budget table.

  • globalism
  • Posted by Jake on September 2, 2009 at 1:15pm EDT
  • The first comment praises President Obama's "hope" and "change" regarding the new NEH priority on globalism. How does the "Buy American" rhetoric coming out of the White House fit this new priority? It feels more like isolationism to me. I'm not trying to be confrontational. I just want to hear other opinions on the subject.