Search News


Browse Archives

News

Economy Sinks, Default Rates Rise

September 15, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

By last September, the economy had taken a dive, leaving many Americans in significantly worse financial circumstances than they had been in just a few months before. So it was little surprise that when the federal government presented its latest data on student loan defaults -- which focused on a period ending in September 2008 -- the numbers showed a sharp upturn reflecting borrowers' increased economic distress, rising to their highest level in a decade.

The U.S. Education Department reported Monday that the 2007 "cohort default rate" -- the proportion of federal loan borrowers who began loan repayments between October 2006 and September 2007, and who defaulted on their loans by the end of September 2008 -- had risen to 6.7 percent, from 5.2 percent the year before.

For-profit colleges and universities had by far the highest default rates, but rates rose by roughly the same amounts across sectors, suggesting that the economy affected borrowers similarly at different types of institutions.

“The economic downturn likely had a significant impact on the borrowers captured in these rates,” Education Secretary Arne Duncan said in a news release about the rates. “The department is reaching out to make sure current and prospective student borrowers are aware of the many flexible repayment options designed to assist them with their financial obligations," including the income-based repayment plan created as part of last year's Higher Education Opportunity Act.

(That law also made changes that will almost certainly cause institutions' default rates to rise beginning in 2012, when the government starts calculating the rates over a three-year rather than two-year window; the change was made because of the perception that the short window of time failed to capture the true rate at which borrowers are struggling to repay their college debt.)

As has historically been true, students at for-profit colleges defaulted at the highest rate -- 11 percent. Two-year public college students followed at 9.9 percent.

Cohort Default Rates from 2005 to 2007, by Type of Institution

  2005 2006 2007
Institution Type Default Rate No. of Borrowers Entering Repayment Default Rate No. of Borrowers
Entering Repayment
Default Rate No. of Borrowers
Entering Repayment
Public 4.3% 1,803,195 4.7% 1,988,185 6.0% 1,721,629
2-3-year 7.9% 463,007 8.4% 523,749 9.9% 483,721
4-year 3.0% 1,332,621 3.4% 1,456,258 4.3% 1,230,076
Private 2.4% 950,819 2.5% 1,055,567 3.8% 778,296
2-3-year 6.7% 21,819 6.1% 18,278 8.1% 14,798
4-year 2.3% 924,566 2.4% 1,033,700 3.6% 759,960
Proprietary 8.2% 730,385 9.7% 855,523 11.1% 838,328
Less than 2-year 8.9% 141,953 10.9% 140,302 12.0% 129,627
2-3 year 9.3% 240,545 11.1% 267,869 12.5% 262,640
4-year 7.2% 347,887 8.4% 447,352 9.8% 446,061
Total 4.6% 3,495,584 5.2% 3,911,640 6.7% 3,345,534

Two vocational institutions -- Healthy Hair Academy, of Dallas and Jay’s Technical Institute, of Houston -- face penalties from the government because their cohort default rates exceed 40 percent.

Defaults have fallen significantly since they peaked in 1990, before regulatory and other changes made by the government, lenders and colleges brought them down, as seen in the chart below. But until this year, they had not climbed above 6.0 percent of all borrowers since 1998, when they were 6.9 percent.

The rate was higher among borrowers at colleges in the Federal Family Education Loan Program (7.2 percent), compared to 4.8 percent for those in the competing direct loan program. The department explained that that was at least in part because the guaranteed loan program "has a larger percentage of proprietary schools, which have higher default rates, and a lower percentage of public and private 4-year schools, which have lower default rates."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Economy Sinks, Default Rates Rise

  • You ain't seen nothin' yet
  • Posted by Ken D. on September 15, 2009 at 12:30pm EDT
  • We learn from the article that "“The department is reaching out to make sure current and prospective student borrowers are aware of the many flexible repayment options designed to assist them with their financial obligations," including the income-based repayment plan created as part of last year's Higher Education Opportunity Act."

    In fact, when student loan borrowers do become aware of these new flexible options, non-repayments of student loans are going to go through the roof. Essentially the new income-based repayment plans create for students a new "heads I win, tails you lose" student loan market.

    The new system will allow students to borrow recklessly, knowing that any and all investments they make in higher education, whether prudent or foolish, will be backstopped by the Federal government, yet another example of this Administration's indifference to what economists call "moral hazard".

  • Moral Hazard
  • Posted by Ben on September 15, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • Your are exactly right, Ken. Just like the mortgage crisis. Responsibility, accountability, prudence, due dilligence...what are those? I guess it isn't fashionable to have any real standards anymore. In a few years, everyone will wonder what the heck happened, the government will ride to the rescue, and the taxpayer will be totally screwed once again.

  • po9nit the finger where the finger needs to point
  • Posted by Alan Collinge , founder at Studentloanjustice.org on September 15, 2009 at 9:45pm EDT
  • Two points:

     

    1. The fact that default rates are, and have been, astonishingly high to begin with has been conveniently suppressed for many years. Etimates by the Inspector General circa 2003 (based on actual default data) point to overall default rates close to 33%. This is higher than subprime mortgages, credit cards, payday loans, or any other type of loans in this country. Why was this fact not brought out into the open? Because EVERYONE was making money from defaulted loans, and to lowball the default rate (as is done here again today) gave ED cover for being non-existent when it came to real, meaningful oversight (i.e. encouraging the u8niversities to provide a high quality education, at low cost, and in a reasonable amount of time).

    2. Appeals to moral hazard arguments are insulting, and self serving well past the point of ridicule. What is most relevant here are the lending, academic, and governmental moral hazards that were so readily cast aside as universities continued to raise tuition massively, Congress continued to raise the loan lmits, The Department of Education personnel (former Sallie Mae and NCHELP executives in particular), and the lenders guarantors, and collection companies whose combined political and financial wherewithal paved, with gold, the way to inevitable collapse.

    People like "Ben" are free to point the finger every which way like scarecrows in the wind, but those of us who are honest see them for what they are. If Ben had any self-respect, respect for students, respect for higher education, or concern for the welfare of this country beyond their self interests, he would either go away, remain silent- or what would be most appropriate- apologize for his hand in this debacle.

  • income contingent loans and moral hazard
  • Posted by conor king , Australian Higher education consultant on September 16, 2009 at 5:15am EDT
  • The earlier comments could do with a look at the actual experience of income contigent loans around the world - Australia created the concept which has been picked up by many other countries. Despite the allegations students are mostly concerned to acquire a degree and then enter the labour market, not endlessly pursue study. Those few who do are nothing to the total cost.

    The system works best where the student charge is moderate or capped - along the lines of US public institution charges. Hence most Australian students will accrue a debt of between $20,000 and $50,000. Those operating in the private market have the amount of the loan limited (to about $60,000) covering mostly postgraduate awards. That avoid the moral hazard point of incurring debt way beyond most people's likely lifetime repayments. In Australia where the system has been in place since 1990 most people pay off their debt by 10 years from graduation.