Search News


Browse Archives

News

Free, But at What Cost?

September 24, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

A program promising free digital textbooks to Florida’s college students has won early supporters, but it’s also sure to worry faculty who fiercely guard the right to select their own course materials.

The University Press of Florida, partnering with a state-supported digital library called The Orange Grove, is building an online catalog that the two groups hope will dramatically ease the cost burden on students purchasing textbooks. In addition to allowing students to download textbooks in the digital library for free, the system will also permit them to order a custom printed copy of any book for no more than half the cost of the traditionally printed edition.

The library, which now features fewer than 100 titles, includes only those materials licensed through Creative Commons, a nonprofit organization that allows authors to grant copyright permission to their works. The textbooks may have been created as open source documents from the start, or they could be books that were once released by a commercial publisher that has ceased printing editions. Under preexisting agreements, authors will collect royalties only for the printed editions of their work -- not the downloaded copies.

While the library features 89 titles now, the five-year goal is to supply textbooks suitable for all of the general education courses offered in Florida’s colleges and universities. There is no discussion of mandating that professors use the library’s textbooks, although organizers are already brainstorming ways to make the library more appealing. Meredith Morris-Babb, director at the University Press of Florida, said additional grant funding could help broaden the selection -- and perhaps there are other lures available. Might department chairs offer perks to faculty who used the library?

“We understand this is a cultural shift, and faculty just don’t change that fast,” Morris-Babb said. “And what we want as part of our funding is to incentivize faculty to make that shift.”

As appealing as reduced textbook costs sound, there are potential red flags for faculty members, according to Jack Mecholsky, chair of the University of Florida’s Faculty Senate. If the state amasses a library of free books selected without faculty input, it may be only a matter of time before some lawmaker with a populist streak tries to mandate that faculty assign only those books in their classes, Mecholsky said.

“That’s the danger, and I could see that happening,” said Mecholsky, a professor of materials science and engineering. “What happens [when lawmakers intrude] is they have just made an academic decision that that textbook is right for all professors and all students taking that course, and that’s wrong.”

“It sounds so good the way they present it,” he added, “but then you say what are the unintended consequences? And they don’t think about that at all. We’re constantly fighting things like that.”

Mecholsky still sees potential positives coming out of the project, however. One of the aims of the library is to allow professors to weave together chapters from several different textbooks, helping them build customized coursepacks at low or no cost to students.

“That would be very attractive, I think, to many, many professors," he said. "Because a lot of times they borrow information from different texts."

Supporters of projects like the one in Florida say it represents the wave of the future, and there are plenty of examples of other institutions using digital textbooks and print-on-demand technology. The University of Texas at Austin announced a pilot program last year that would shift certain classes completely to e-textbooks, and the University System of Ohio gave professors incentives to help create free materials for the system’s most commonly taught courses.

Supporters See Acceptance Growing

So how can a program like Florida’s ensure quality? Organizers of the project say they have no intention of entering into licensing agreements with commercial publishers, so that leaves a library largely populated by out-of-print books and those that were created with the intention of free online distribution.

Dave Dawson, an instructor of engineering and computer technology at the University of West Florida, says any concerns about quality are rooted in an outmoded way of thinking. There’s a growing acceptance that good scholarship doesn’t require a large commercial publisher’s name below its title, Dawson said.

“I think that university institutions as a whole are coming to recognize that they have to begin to recognize digital content creation as a legitimate form of academic pursuit,” said Dawson, who serves on a task force advising Florida’s book project.

Acceptance of digital works in the scholarly community is sure to grow when a more formalized peer review process spreads across the digital world, and that’s already happening, Dawson added.

A digital library like the one Florida is building doesn't have to be just for textbooks. Indeed, there are many common materials used by professors -- particularly in general education courses, Dawson said. Dawson regularly contributes screen animations and other graphical tools to The Orange Grove, placing the materials in a digital warehouse that students and faculty members can use in their own classes. That kind of sharing of material is increasingly commonplace, and only stands to benefit higher education, Dawson said.

“People are just used to distributing content in a collaborative atmosphere, and there’s much more of that happening,” he said. “And now it’s becoming an integral part of the way people do things.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Free, But at What Cost?

  • Publicly-financed textbooks are not free
  • Posted by Frank on September 24, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • Thanks for the dose of skepticism in this piece. Too often the media is seduced by the "free" headline in these initiatives and does not look further at the consequences.

    I think Prof Dawson's quote frames the debate very well:

    “I think that university institutions as a whole are coming to recognize that they have to begin to recognize digital content creation as a legitimate form of academic pursuit”

    In my view, for this type of initiative to be successful universities would necessary need to recognize this fact and, importantly, invest in in. For faculty members to do a good job of creating quality teaching content, they will need time and resources in which to do it. That will mean additional investments to cover the things they are currently doing (e.g. teaching and research).

    So what we are talking about here is not "free" textbooks, but publicly-financed textbooks with funding from increased taxes or increased tuition . Let's have that debate instead of the "textbooks can be free for students" red herring.

  • Open Access Textbooks
  • Posted by Carole Hayes , Policy Analyst at Board of Governors, State University System of Florida on September 24, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • The open access textbooks available for free online or at a reduced cost through Orange Grove Texts Plus are available for instructors to adopt and assign, if they so choose. Furthermore, they may revise, recombine, and contribute original works to open access textbooks within the Orange Grove Digital Repository. Each version of a textbook will be assigned a unique ISBN. This is an option provided to faculty for use in instruction, publication of original works, and scholarly collaboration. The state of Florida has had the University Press for over 60 years; the Orange Grove Digital Repository is a project within the Florida Distance Learning Consortium that is closer to 4 years old. The existence of these entities and the recent textbook affordability legislation led to the realization that a real option could be provided to students and faculty. It is now in the hands of faculty to discover, use, or ignore.

  • cost?
  • Posted by Alex , professor at wmu on September 24, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • I think we are losing perspective on the cost and sidestepping the issue of copyright and compensation for one's work.

    I don't believe the rising cost of universities is solely (and not even disproportionately) due to increase in cost of textbooks. There are many other reasons including reduction in state funding, largesse of administration, etc. etc.

    This is what I call not being able to see the forest from the trees.

  • low cost print also available
  • Posted by Jeff on September 24, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • About 10 years ago, a colleague and I decided to write our own textbook. This effort was the result of at least 3 factors: high cost to students of current books; dissatisfaction with what was available; and the the sheer size to which books had grown (and therefore students could hardly be expected to bring them to class). We still publish this books, actually separate volumes for each semester, which are printed at the university print shop and sold to students at cost (no royalties). We have been delighted with the reception, and the ease of teaching the courses from our own materials makes the effort worthwhile. Putting them online would be an option, but I suspect most students would still print the books, which ultimately wouldn't save money or trees.

  • 21st Century
  • Posted by Adam DeWitt , Principal at Marinette Middle School on September 24, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • Great discussion.

    I'm glad to see the discussions as they relate to copyright and the intellectual work of the author. We must respect that realm. We must also remember that "the" curriculum is not just a textbook. We have been battling that change for years in K-12 education. Our students read and write more than ever before, but it is through the use of mobile tools and digital media. I'd be happy to pay $9.99 for book required for a class that I can read on my Kindle. Thanks Florida for pulling us into the 21st century.

  • Digital and Open Textbooks: Benefits and Business Models
  • Posted by Jacky Hood , Director at Open Textbook Collaborative on September 24, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • Digital textbooks offer benefits beyond lower cost and less weight. Currency is one; the textbook can be constantly updated and also versioned so that it is fixed for an academic term. Links to other resources (tests, quizzes, flash cards, movies, references) are another major advantage difficult to achieve in physical books.

    The most distinguishing feature of open textbooks is modifiability. This allows an adopting instructor/professor to tailor the textbook to the students in his/her class. A modifiable textbook can be written once and used anywhere in the English-speaking world. It can be translated and used anywhere. While open textbooks are usually digital, they can be printed and bound at a fraction of the cost of traditional textbooks.

    Modifiable textbooks can be shortened to only those chapters, sections, or paragraphs needed in a particular class. This means that a biographical sketch of a person could be used in any class from 4th grade to graduate school. Repurposing materials reduces the cost of development. Like computer chips and software objects, knowledge units have much larger markets and are therefore less expensive and more reliable.

    Many business models exist for low-cost textbooks both digital and printed: grant-funded, advertising supported, rented, free-textbook-with-paid-accessories-and-support (like RedHat and IBM provide for open source Linux software), and more. Tax-supported or author-donated are weak and non-sustainable models.

    For an example of an outstanding open, free textbook that is grant-funded and rich with links to museums, movies, and other resources, see http://www.smarthistory.org

    The open textbook movement can be 'no victims, no enemies'. There is room for campus bookstores and traditional publishers in this new era. Campus bookstores can provide kiosks and print-on-demand facilities; they can also replace textbooks with higher-margin products. All of the traditional textbook publishers are examining and embracing new models so they can escape the fate of many newspapers.

    Best regards,
    Jacky Hood
    Director, Open Textbook Project http://www.collegeopentextbooks.org/
    Director, Open Educational Resources Consortium http://oerconsortium.org/

  • No Need to Fear Open/Free Texts
  • Posted by Steven Zucker , Executive Editor at Smarthistory.org on September 25, 2009 at 5:45am EDT
  • Articles such as this tend to cite budget woes and the price and weight of the traditional textbook as a rationale for exploring the adoption of free web-based texts. Unfortunately, these pieces tend to be quite vague about what the digital texts might look like. At Smarthistory.org, we hope that Florida and others look beyond the familiar organizational structure of the bound textbook and its analogue finding aids. Open textbooks ought to take advantage of the web’s inherent strengths and allow users to organize material in numerous ways while pointing outward to high quality resources elsewhere on the web. Hopefully, these new resources will seamlessly incorporate multimedia allowing users to listen, read, watch and most importantly respond. Here is an opportunity to directly engage students, allowing them initiate or join conversations both in and outside the confines of the text. Lastly, I would suggest to Jack Mecholsky and others that it is the faculty themselves that ought to be creating a multitude of high quality digital resources. Take a look at the award-winning site Smarthistory.org and let us know if we can help.

  • Quality control?
  • Posted by Sandy Thatcher , Penn State University Press on September 25, 2009 at 12:30pm EDT
  • The commentators so far haven't raised the issue of quality control here. I'm all for using the versatility of the Web to create more multi-dimensional textbooks, and I'm all for the idea of making these "open access." But I wonder who is responsible for quality control and, in particular, design and copyediting? "Jeff" does not tell us who did the design and copyediting for his online text. I hope he didn't just do this himself because he is likely not a skilled professional in either design or copyediting. To the extent that UPF's new program draws upon out-of-print, previously published textbooks, this is not an issue. But it certainly is for newly created texts. As a former copyeditor, I would shudder to think that professors are posting these texts without going through the processing that publishers have traditionally offered as their "value added." And I also wonder, if this work is being done, who is paying for it? It is not a negligible cost.---Sandy Thatcher, Penn State Press

  • Quality control; textbook teams; peer reviews; user input
  • Posted by Jacky Hood , Director at CCOTC/CCCOER on September 25, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • Sandy's issue (Quality control) is crucial. An outstanding textbook is the product of many professionals in addition to the author(s). Photographers, illustrators, editors, copy editors, proofreaders, and technologists contribute.

    For quality control, an adopting professor/instructor will examine a resource for content, appropriateness, and quality. S/he will also want to see 4-7 peer reviews. The Open Textbook Project has funded more than 20 peer reviews and will fund an additional 100 in the next 20 months. The reviewers rate every chapter on 11 criteria. Several open textbooks have been rejected.

    FlatWorld Knowledge and FreeLoadPress have outstanding quality control on their textbooks. Once a textbook is open, the authors receive far more comments and corrections than they do with traditional textbooks and the corrections are easier and faster. Barbara Illowsky and Susan Dean received and made more corrections to Collaborative Statistics in the year it has been open than in its 15-year life as a traditional textbook. Linux, Apache, and other open-source software are more robust than commercial software because of the dedicated users. Open educational resources can be the same.

  • Clarification on the role of Creative Commons
  • Posted by Peter Murray , Assistant Director, New Service Development at OhioLINK on September 26, 2009 at 2:15pm EDT
  • The article says:

    The library, which now features fewer than 100 titles, includes only those materials licensed through Creative Commons, a nonprofit organization that allows authors to grant copyright permission to their works.

    Better than "allows" is "facilitates." The authors already have the inherent copyright rights to grant permissions for their works. Creative Commons has created a set of model agreements that enables authors to specify how others can make use of their works. (Reuse unmodified and/or not for profit and/or with attribution and/or "share alike" terms.)