Quick Takes

October 1, 2009

'Score Choice' and the Common Application

The Common Application has had to adopt a temporary policy to deal with the dispute over "score choice," the controversial rules change by the College Board that allows applicants to college to decide which of their SAT scores they want to report. The change allows students who take the test repeatedly to hide that fact, while the old policy would have required all scores to be reported. Some colleges are going along with the change, but others are insisting that all SAT scores be reported. While colleges'evaluate students based on official scores received from testing agencies, some application forms ask students to self-report, so admissions offices can have that information while awaiting the official scores. Parts of the Common Application allow applicants to send different information to different colleges, but the test score question is part of the completely shared application. The Common Application's board has adopted a policy for this year that allows applicants to skip the testing question -- without penalty -- so they can submit some scores to colleges that permit score choice and all scores to those that do not. Rob Killion, executive director of the Common Application, said that its board plans to spend time over the next year developing a long term solution.

Court Rules Against Stanford in Patent Dispute

A federal appeals court on Wednesday directed a lower court to dismiss a patent infringement challenge that Stanford University filed against Roche Pharmaceuticals, finding that the university had not sufficiently protected its rights to an HIV-related technology that one of its researchers developed, in part, while doing work for an outside company that has since become part of Roche. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit partially overturns a lower court judge's 2005 ruling that invalidated the patents in question; the appeals panel's ruling says the lower court should not have reached that point, because Stanford had essentially let its rights to the invention pass to the researcher, who in turn assigned them to the Roche-owned company. Officials at Stanford did not respond to a request for comment.

Building Occupied by Protesters at Santa Cruz

Students have been occupying the Graduate Student Commons at the University of California at Santa Cruz for a week now, protesting deep budget cuts being carried out at public colleges and universities in California. University officials have to date expressed concern about the situation but have not attempted to remove the protesters, The Santa Cruz Sentinel reported. A statement on the protest Web site, Occupy California, says: "We are occupying this building at the University of California, Santa Cruz, because the current situation has become untenable. Across the state, people are losing their jobs and getting evicted, while social services are slashed. California’s leaders from state officials to university presidents have demonstrated how they will deal with this crisis: everything and everyone is subordinated to the budget. They insulate themselves from the consequences of their own fiscal mismanagement, while those who can least afford it are left shouldering the burden. Every solution on offer only accelerates the decay of the State of California. It remains for the people to seize what is theirs."

Farewell to the Book Review Course

James Shapiro, a Columbia University English professor, has long been known for his course on the art of the book review. But The New York Observer reported that he is declaring an indefinite hiatus for the class. The reason? Shapiro said: “There are intellectual reasons to teach the course again.... But what’s no longer there is the possibility of training a generation of book reviewers, since, as you know, newspapers around the country are shedding their book reviews, or shrinking these sections.... I see a lot of talent pass through my classrooms, and little opportunity for those talented students to have the opportunity early on … to review and get paid for it.”

Binghamton AD Resigns

Joel Thirer resigned Wednesday as athletic director at the State University of New York at Binghamton, following a series of incidents involving the institution's basketball team, The Press & Sun-Bulletin reported. The Binghamton basketball team reached the National Collegiate Athletic Association tournament in March, but has faced questions about whether the athletic success was coming at the expense of the university's outstanding academic reputation. In the last week, six members of the basketball team were dismissed, one of them after being arrested on charges of selling cocaine. Lois DeFleur, president of the university, issued a statement saying that she would hire an external consultant to conduct an audit of the athletic program, and that she has directed Kevin Broadus, the basketball coach, to provide her with "a recruitment and supervision plan" for the team, including specific "criteria, processes and practices that will reflect the university's academic and behavioral standards."

SMU Sees Some Progress in Fighting Substance Abuse

Southern Methodist University, which enacted numerous new policies in the wake of a series of student deaths related to substance abuse, has made progress but still has problems, according to a new report explored in The Dallas Morning News. For instance, some students have been using a new "amnesty" policy in which students who seek medical help for themselves or a friend do not face sanctions for violating various rules. But many students are unaware of the policy. The report also notes that some academic departments have made a strong push to add Friday class times, as part of an effort to avoid making all weekends last at least three days.

Bethune-Cookman Fires 2 Dorm Managers After Brawl

The day after a large student brawl at Bethune-Cookman College, two dormitory managers were fired after being blamed for a role in the incident, The Orlando Sentinel reported. The brawl -- termed a riot by some local reporters -- took place after a sprinkler system went off and students were prevented from returning to their rooms. A statement from Trudie Kibbe Reed, president of the university, said that the university's surveillance video and student video revealed the employees "exacerbated an already tense situation" and that some students charged the employees fought a student and later sprayed students with a fire extinguisher. "While I would prefer that other measures were used in crisis situations, I cannot fully blame students for taking action when one of their own was in harm's way. I do not have students who are thugs, who 'riot' with no provocation," the statement said.

U. of Phoenix in Talks to Settle False Claims Lawsuit

The University of Phoenix is in discussions aimed at settling a lawsuit filed by former employees who accuse the for-profit college of violating federal law by paying incentives to its recruiters, the institution's parent company, the Apollo Group, announced Wednesday. The lawsuit, which accuses Phoenix of defrauding the federal government and was brought under the federal False Claims Act, is pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals, and the university potentially has billions of dollars at stake. Apollo's announcement said that the company and lawyers for the plaintiffs had requested a 45-day stay of all proceedings in the case. Lawyers for the plaintiffs could not be reached for comment.

Congress Passes Measure to Keep Government Operating

The Senate on Wednesday joined the House of Representatives in approving legislation that will keep all federal agencies operating through October at their 2009 budget levels, while lawmakers continue to work on spending bills for the 2010 fiscal year, which started today.

New Oxford Chief Wants American-Style Student Aid

Andrew Hamilton, the new vice chancellor of the University of Oxford, wants to bring major scholarships to the university to assure access at a time of rising tuition, The Guardian reported. Hamilton, formerly the provost at Yale University, said that the aid policies of elite American institutions should be a model for Oxford, but the newspaper noted that his embrace of the approach of private American universities may raise fears of also following that model on tuition rates.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Around the Web

Teaching lecture courses, in Tenured Radical.... The profit motive in education, in Eduwonk....

FREE Daily News Alerts

Comments on Quick Takes

  • Hooray for Binghamton
  • Posted by Leonard Martin on October 1, 2009 at 5:30am EDT
  • Getting into March Madness is not the
    goal of a university that is striving to
    be the a Public Ivy.
    This mess should be cleared up as quickly
    as possible, no matter where it leads.

  • Farewell to book review course
  • Posted by Betzi Bateman on October 1, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • So, classes should only be offered now if they provide students with a discrete, marketable skill that will enable them to make money? Shapiro even admits that there are "intellectual reasons" to teach the book review course. Shouldn't those trump money-making skills? I didn't know Columbia had turned into a vocational school.

    Also, yes - newspapers are cutting back on book reviews. But there are many online outlets for book reviews. The writers at online pubs like Salon and Slate get paid.

    And what about people who would like to learn more about how to critique a work for their own gain?

  • Score Choice and the Universal College Application
  • Posted by Joshua Reiter at Universal College Application on October 1, 2009 at 9:00am EDT
  • Applicants who use the Universal College Application may provide any information (including SAT Scores), submit to a college that requires all scores be reported, then copy/edit the information (remove SAT Scores) for colleges who do not require all scores be reported.

    The UCA has always allowed applicants to edit/modify any parts of the application and submit different applications to different member colleges and universities. We believe this allows the applicants to provide the most up to date and accurate information.

    If you have any questions about the UCA policies or features and functions, send a note to applywithus@universalcollegeapp.com and we will be happy to respond.

    Josh

  • Posted by Adjunct George on October 1, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • If Santa Cruz is anything like our campus at CSU Long Beach, the students are being egged on by the faculty. The little socialist republics don't get it. The state is out of money. Period. The students and unions elected the free spending democrats and then are surprised when the bottom falls out of the economy. The students do not get any economic education. My students do not know what the Laffer Curve is and are surprised when they find more high wage earners are leaving California than entering it. Businesses are leaving do to the poor economic climate and the high tax rates. The businesses are being treated a prey rather than being encouraged. All the "green" environmental decisions cost the taxpayer money and now the bill has become due. There is probably not one professor willing to stand up and explain to the students that unlike the Federal Government, you cannot print money in California to pay the bills. The students need to look to further cuts and higher prices. This economic disaster is personally costing me over $10,000 a year because I am supporting my granddaughter at a CSU. Stop complaining and start educating the students on the negative effects of the economic policies pushed by the Democrats.

  • More of the same?
  • Posted by theron on October 1, 2009 at 1:15pm EDT
  • Far from teaching MORE capitalist economic policies to students, it might be better to teach students how to critique the systems in place: to see the economic structures beneath the current behaviors and to seek who is making the money and how. Most Econ and Business departments continue to teach capitalist theory as fact, ignoring the human costs of such theory. All contraditions are passed off as incidental or accidental or short term or the result of an imperfect system. They teach the human construction of capitalism as 'natural' and outside human control. All human systems are imperfect and constructs; to so state simply begs the question. Unfortunately, only in rare cases do departments present critical theory of any stripe..or move beyond the orthodoxy.

    The current and various cries of Nazi, socialist, communist etc. during the health insurance debate reveal just how bankrupt this economic and social education has become. Perhaps the Santa Cruz protestors see no other way to make a point about an inbred system other than be direct action. Sad if true.

  • Yo! "Adjunct George"
  • Posted by Victoria , Unemployed California Adjunct on October 1, 2009 at 2:30pm EDT
  • George, instead of blaming the Democrats for the state's ills when it could easily be argued that Republicans are equally responsible, why don't you brush up on your English and proofreading skills, so that when you write " Businesses are leaving do to . . . " you'll see the word should be DUE, and such sloppy writing sets a poor example for your students. And "businesses are being treated a prey rather than being encouraged. . . "? What does that mean? If you're going to whine about California's economic problems, at least do it in a manner that allows the reader to understand what you're talking about! BTW, I've got 2 grad degrees, and I don't have any idea what a "Laffer Curve" is! I found it easily via Google, but I doubt I'm alone in my ignorance. I'm a Reading Specialist, not an Economics instructor! So stop showing off.
    And theron, your message isn't entirely clear, either. I apologize for being critical – and don't mean to be rude –, but the comments in IHE are often the most interesting part of an article and it's frustrating when they don't make much sense! Hello!

  • Santa Cruz traditions
  • Posted by UCSC alum on October 1, 2009 at 3:45pm EDT
  • UCSC has a long tradition of political activism -- both sensible and senseless. This current manifestation appears to fall somewhere in between. In fact, we are a capitalist society, and we will remain so. To quote Randy Newman: "If Karl Marx were alive today, he'd be rolling over in his grave." The responsibility for our current economic morass can be equally shared by Republicans and Democrats, Federal and State legislators, hedge fund and bank managers, regulatory agencies, and the everyday citizens who got so far "over the tips of their skiis" in terms of buying on credit that they couldn't actually afford to pay their bills when their was a hitch. And it all snowballed. A higher ed degree is still a bargain, even at today's inflating prices. Longitudinal research shows that lifetime earnings for people who hold at least a baccalaureate degree to be 1.75 times higher than those of people whose schooling stopped at the high school level or earlier. My solution to the sit-in: let them get bored. Those floors are uncomfortable -- and I speak as someone who knows from experience.

  • Economics Does Lead to the Real Culprits
  • Posted by Phyllis on October 1, 2009 at 6:15pm EDT
  • Eight years of greed, deregulation, and lax enforcement of existing laws led directly to the national economic collapse. Econ 1A and 1B.

    On the revenue side, when businesses and individuals lose their incomes, the state loses its tax base; hence the need for budget cuts. On the expense side, boom times lead to the swelling of bureaucracies and waste. Economic down times are part of the evolutionary cycle that requires us to clean house periodically to strengthen our institutions and weed out the obsolete.

    The Laffer effect is indeed a factor for businesses deciding whether to stay or leave California, but the point at which an increase in taxes causes a decrease in tax revenue is based on opportunity costs and elasticity and is not well understood. If tax reductions for the wealthy were such a wonderful idea, why didn’t George W. Bush push for more tax cuts when the economy was collapsing under his feet instead of implementing his socialist investments in the private sector?

    An extremely important factor compelling businesses to stay in California is our highly educated work force. You don't see businesses flocking to red states where taxes and education rates are lower. If it weren't for Federal government handouts, most red states would be part of the third world.

    It is no coincidence that California has both the best education system on the planet and the largest economy in the country. Cutting the state education budget so deeply and so quickly will reverberate throughout the economy for decades. To be prosperous, California needs more and better educated workers, not fewer.

    To be fair to George, there is a lot of waste in the state education system and these budget cuts are going to ferret out some of that waste. I think a saner approach would have been to phase in budget cuts over a period of years, but I understand something needed to be done quickly and unfortunately, it may have been at the expense of California's prosperous future.

  • More Educated Workers Needed
  • Posted by Phyllis on October 1, 2009 at 7:30pm EDT
  • This from the Community College Leauge of California (www.ccleague.org) today.

    "As you likely know, California is facing a workforce preparation crisis that threatens our economic vitality. While the state made significant progress in college-degree attainment (workers with college degrees increased from 28% to 34% from 1990 to 2006), the respected Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) projects that the state will need 41% of its workforce to possess a degree by 2025, while only 35% will have attained a degree under the current trend."

  • Posted by Adjunct George on October 2, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • Phyliss: How convenient. Blame the Republicans again. How about putting the blame where it really stands. Barney Frank and Chris Dodd pushing loans for everyone whether they can afford it or not. The Democrats with an overwhelming majority pushing their socialist agenda's in the California Legislature and overspending. You neglect that politics is the art of the possible and George Bush had a highly partisan Democrat congress during the last two years. President Bush could have pushed all he wanted and all the press would have done was laugh at him. Yes, you do see business flocking to Republican blue states like Texas and leaving the socialist red states like California and NY and Michigan. (I am protesting the change of Republican Blue to the color red by the major media. Blue was the color of the Republican Blue uniforms and Red is the color of the leftists such as the communists.) California had the best college system but that was because everyone tried to be best in their class. Now the CSU system wants to become like the UC system by emphasizing research, the junior colleges want to become like the CSU system by becoming 4 year schools, and the colleges set up to meet in the high school building want top become like the junior colleges and build facilities. A real waste. Instead of becoming best in their class, they want to be worst in the next higher class. As for the high school system, it is a mess, as the grades on standardized tests show. The system is being cut in wrong ways for the benefit of the tenured faculty and not for the benefit of the students. For that the students should recognize the problem and protest the issue in sensible ways. Sit ins are not sensible.

  • Score Choice and the Common Application
  • Posted by Nancy Griesemer at College Explorations on October 2, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • I am very unclear on what you mean by "without penalty" in your report on the change in Common App test score policies. Would "without prejudice" be more accurate? And, how is this temporary policy being communicated to members of the Common App? As of now, there is no guidance on the Common App website indicating that students may skip these questions without penalty (or prejudice). In fact, the guidance provided to-date reads as follows:

    "While the Tests section does not offer you the ability to differentiate your score reporting to reflect conflicting requirements, leaving this section blank or incomplete will not prevent you from submitting your application. Please understand, however, that colleges and universities may use the information provided in the Tests section to assist in the processing of an application before official results arrive."

    As you may know, this is a terrifically complicated question on which I have been working for months. Earlier advice from the Common App recommended creating "alternate" applications to reflect differences in score reporting policies among colleges. I guess I'm more confused than ever.

    Nancy Griesemer, College Explorations

  • Posted by Phyllis on October 5, 2009 at 7:15pm EDT
  • George,

    By all accounts, the financial system began to crash in 2006. The Democrats did not take control of Congress until 2007.

    George Bush enjoyed six years of Republican control of Congress and decision making. During that time, they worked hard to dismantle the Bill of Rights and run this country into the ground. Republicans want to shift millions of taxpayer dollars to the private education system where they can cloister themselves from the rest of us. Republicans state loudly and proudly that their goal is to dismantle our government. What do they plan to replace it with?

    It is a common myth [Big Lie repeated often and loudly] that Republicans are more fiscally responsible than Democrats. If you look at the timeline of the national debt, it tends to go up during Republican administrations and down during Democrat administrations. GDP growth also favors Democrat administrations and far more recessions have occurred during Republican administrations in the last 50 years.

    The Great Depression and the 2006 Financial Meltdown were brought to you courtesy of Republicans and their economic policies. The Republicans controlled both houses of Congress during the Republican Hoover administration. (It is common myth [Big Lie repeated often and loudly] that Roosevelt's Depression Era economic policies did not work and that WWII saved us. If you look at the timeline for unemployment and GDP, both were vastly improved after Roosevelt took office and before WWII took place. According to the US Bureau of Census the unemployment rate hit its peak in 1933 at 24.75% and was down to 9.66% by Pearl Harbor. According to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis, GDP hit a low of about $56.4 billion in 1933 and hit $126.7 billion by Pearl Harbor.)

    You are right, there have been jobs lost from California, but the net negative is negligible at about 0.05 percent of total employment. According to the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC), "Claims that California is losing employment because its businesses are choosing to expand in other states – rather than staying put – are inaccurate. While some California firms have moved operations to other places in the nation, the effect is more than offset by companies based in other states moving operations and jobs into California – especially recently."

    Sit-ins are the exercise of free speech.

    I agree with you that competition makes education, businesses, and the economy better.