Search News


Browse Archives

News

Sophie's Choice for 2-Year Colleges

October 5, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Throughout the last year, leaders of many four-year colleges have adopted the mantra that their institutions can "no longer be all things to all people." This has led to efforts to identify areas of strength, to carve out niches, and to drop programs best offered elsewhere.

Last week, leaders of San Joaquin Delta College announced a similar philosophy. Having gone through rounds of across-the-board cuts already (1,000 individual courses have been dropped), and facing more reductions in state support, the college announced plans to eliminate entire programs to try to avoid or at least minimize additional cuts to others. This approach is a bit shocking to many at the community college in Stockton, Cal., even though they are aware of deep and continuing budget cuts facing the institution.

While community colleges don't have the graduate and research programs one would find at a university, they have tried to be all things to all people. If local residents want more recreational offerings, they can have them. If many students get through the local public schools without mastering basic skills, the community college will teach them. If local officials need new programs for welfare recipients, for helping local business, for immigrants, the community college won't say no. At least that's the way it's been at many institutions -- and given the word "community" in their names, the philosophy has been a point of pride.

But at Delta, that's not something that can be sustained, officials say.

"We've done the across the board cuts, but you can only do that so far. If you keep doing across the board, you will damage every program," said Raúl Rodríguez, the president. Many of the programs being cut are inherently good and build community support for the college, but that can no longer be the deciding factor, he said.

"We love to do those kinds of things, but when the budget gets cut, we're not going to take away a slot for a student who wants to transfer to a university over a senior who wants to exercise," he said.

His example isn't random. Each semester, almost 1,000 senior citizens take recreational, non-credit courses at the college that are slated to be eliminated now, and these students have been among the most vocal critics of the changes. But Delta is also eliminating academic programs that don't fit into the two missions that are being protected: pre-transfer programs and job training.

What will go? A lot of remedial education. The college will keep remedial courses for those who need just a course or two to be ready for college level work. But for the courses that enroll hundreds of students a semester who need years of remedial education to get ready for college, Delta is going to say no.

"Over the years, there's been a movement to get to lower and lower levels of basic skills, so we now serve some students at first, second and third grade levels" of math and reading, Rodríguez said. In most of these courses, very small percentages (well under 10 percent, and sometimes closer to 1 percent) ever make it into college level work, he said. "We just can't afford to offer these extreme remedial levels any more."

Similarly, there is English as a Second Language. The college will still offer courses for those who need one or two courses to be ready for Delta's other courses. But the ESL offerings for those just starting to learn English will be eliminated. Many weekend and evening classes will be eliminated, as will some courses offered off campus, in a further effort to centralize offerings and focus on "protecting the core," Rodríguez said.

How did it come to this? Last year, the college had to cut $8 million out of its $100 million budget due to state cuts, all while enrollment has been increasing steadily (total is now about 22,000). Those cuts were across the board, but Rodriguez said the new approach will be used for another $3.6 million that must be cut in the next few months. Rumors from Sacramento suggest that additional cuts are in the offing, and Rodriguez said he sees no sign of the kinds of political or economic changes in the state that might encourage him to wait for a recovery.

"I think it's going to get worse," he said.

Already the college has eliminated many adjunct positions, and there have been staff layoffs. He said that some of those teaching in the programs being eliminated -- including most of those who aren't adjuncts -- will get new assignments. But he said that more adjunct slots are likely to be eliminated.

Jeff Hislop, president of the faculty union at the college, said that he and his colleagues are "ambivalent" about the college's approach to the budget situation. For many who teach in programs that would be protected by the policy, he said that the philosophy understandably makes more sense than it does to those whose courses would end.

But he said that sympathy for the cuts comes from the reality that those in the "protected" areas haven't actually been protected. Hislop's situation illustrates just how bad things are right now. He teaches administration of justice, with some students seeking job training and others planning to transfer to four-year institutions, so his students should theoretically benefit.

But in the last year, as adjunct jobs have disappeared from the department, he and the other two full timers in the program have had to adjust. Hislop's schedule changed from five to six courses a semester. And his class size has gone from 60-80 per course to 95-100, with dozens more on waiting lists for each course. (Classroom size, he said, acts as a limit on enrollments.)

"We are right on that abyss, and the slope is that we have to look closely at what one instructor can do with these class sizes," he said. "If we push these high enrollments this high, we are jeopardizing the quality of education."

National experts on community colleges are not surprised to see the kinds of actions coming now in California.

Steve Katsinas, director of the Education Policy Center at the University of Alabama, and the co-author of a recent report on declining state support for community college, said that he was troubled by these trends, but that colleges are simply not getting adequate support.

"I am afraid that if we continue to get cuts at the level we are seeing, we may see a very quiet and disturbing transition from comprehensive, open door community colleges to niche colleges that are not comprehensive in their missions."

Thomas Bailey, director of the Community College Research Center at Teachers College of Columbia University, said that he also expects to see more colleges make choices like those at Delta, but he sees this as a break from what has been standard practice. As community colleges have taken on new roles in adult basic skills education, he said, there has been an assumption that some funds accompanied the new responsibilities. Even if not all costs were covered, there were additional funds coming in, and economies of scale and a strong commitment to serving students allowed community colleges to add more and more roles, he said.

What's going on now in California and elsewhere is that "the head count-revenue link has been broken," so colleges like Delta are finding themselves unable to serve those already enrolled or who want to enroll.

Bailey said that he was torn about the idea that a college is abandoning remedial education for those who need a lot of remediation, and said he hopes that there are alternatives available near the college. He said that his center's research on remedial education shows that Delta officials are correct about the low success rates with those needing extensive remediation.

"It is true that very few people who start three or four levels below [college level] actually emerge from that," he said. But that doesn't mean that those who never reach college work are not being well served. "if you get someone from 5th grade to 10th grade, even if that's not college level, that's still a useful function" for the college to perform, he said.

"It makes sense for colleges to set priorities, especially when they are subject to such drastic cuts in resources," he said. "Across the board cuts don’t make sense. Colleges should look for programs that do not lead to good jobs, transfer, or subsequent education. I also think that colleges, when possible, should coordinate and perhaps consolidate programs, especially when they are costly. This would require some coordination across colleges and it seems to me could be done within the California district system."

Advocates for ESL also fear that the trend at Delta is going to spread. John Segota, director of advocacy for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, said that community colleges play a key role for immigrants seeking to get a better education. Even if basic literacy can be found elsewhere, he said that there is a distinct advantage to offering these classes at a community college. As students start to succeed, they are much more likely to move into the college's courses than if they are studying elsewhere, he said.

ESL is frequently a target, Segota said, because its is perceived wrongly as remedial, when its students never had the chance to learn English in the first place. And an unfair reality that makes ESL vulnerable, he said, is that so many instructors are adjuncts. "So people think they will be easy to cut," regardless of the importance of their work, he said.

Patrice Burke, the student body president at Delta, praised the president and other administrators for "doing the best job they can in a very challenging time." But she is opposed to the new plans, which will eliminate the remedial courses in English and mathematics in which she is enrolled.

Supporters of the cuts say that Burke and similar students should be learning from adult education programs. But she noted that she earned her G.E.D. at a local high school's adult ed, and then learned that the college thought she needed remedial instruction. As a 40-year old single mother, there were not other good options, she said.

She said that the college is using too limited a definition of success by focusing on those who transfer to a university or complete a job-training program. While she still needs more remedial help after two years at the college, she said she has learned much more than she knew coming in, and considers that a success. "If one of our ESL students is here for a few months, and can then get a job, isn't that success, even if he never transfers?" she asked.

"I believe every student is part of this community and the college should be there," she said. "It doesn't matter if you are a level one student or a level three student. You are a human being."

Rodríguez, the president, said he feels he has no choice but the one he is making. But he said he has been moved by the stories of students who have talked to him about the impact of losing their programs. "You hear these stories," he said. "Your heart goes out to them."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Sophie's Choice for 2-Year Colleges

  • Sophie's Choice
  • Posted by Sally at Chicago City College on October 5, 2009 at 7:15am EDT
  • Is there a reason why California is used as a barometer in these stories to measure cuts or news about colleges?

  • A true loss or readily available elsewhere?
  • Posted by T on October 5, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • What I find missing from this article is the answer to the question, "Are there other avenues for this level of remediation and ESL?" If the California CC's are merely duplicating services found elsewhere, they never should have started offering adult basic skills education. And I don't buy the arguement that if the courses are taken at the college, those students are more likely to continue at the college. I also agree with the previous poster that this is not a nationwide issue. In my state, there are adult reading academies that teach ESL and basic skills education to adults. The community college's remediation is focused strictly on making students program-ready. The loss of recreational education is also probably not as bad for the community. My local art museum, historical society, children's museum, hospitals, and even local high schools are in the recreational education game. Apparently the California CC's got into the market to make money, and what they are really bemoaning is the loss of tuition and state enrollment funding. That is a game that I have to sadly admit my local CC also plays to a degree, but apparently the California CC's based a large part of their growth funding on basic skills and recreational courses. And do I get the sense that the faculty took advantage of the extra adjuncts that were available to help them teach other sections? California's issues are not the nation's issues. I feel badly that they find themselves in this situation, and I know they have the experience and knowledge to get through to the other side. But this is not a nationwide problem.

  • What a Shame
  • Posted by CC Prof on October 5, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • I attended American River College in Sacramento, California in the mid-80's. My class sizes were 30 or lower, and the chemistry lecture hall crowd was broken up into 3 or 4 labs. Basically, we had excellent access to our professors, and they gave us excellent, passionate teaching. In particular, two of the very best professor that I have ever seen taught there. Their courses were difficult but great, and one of them would finish a course with about 15 students because 10 had dropped. Sometimes he would get so excited while teaching that he would stand on a chair. Apparently, those were the good old days.

    But currently at Delta College they have professors teaching 6 courses each with nearly 100 students? I teach at a CC where we teach 6 courses, but I have 25 students per section. I'm very busy, but I know everyone's name and I assign papers. I don't even see the point of such large class sizes. And going online or hybrid won't help either. With that many students, there is simply no way to pay attention to any of them.

    That is such a far cry from the individual attention that I received from my community college professors in California 25 years ago. And it was the passion with which they taught that led me to think about graduate school where I completed a doctorate in philosophy. I can't imagine many students being inspired by Delta College today.

    What a shame.

  • Partnership
  • Posted by Stephanie at Bowling Green State University on October 5, 2009 at 9:00am EDT
  • Is it possible to work with the local vocational schools to share in the cost of adult remedial classes? Most of these schools offer adult classes. A partnership would be beneficial to both institutions.

  • The obvious point...
  • Posted by Qjersey , Asst. Professor at Community College on October 5, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • While my students who have had to take remedial courses perform quite well, this always begs the question...why aren't the community colleges putting pressure on the public school system to better instruct students. It's a travesty of public education that students have to spend their first year in college (and paying for it themselves or through loans) learning what they didn't in high school.

  • Reality check please!
  • Posted by Evelyn Burg , Associate Professor/Communication Skills at LaGaurdia Community College on October 5, 2009 at 11:30am EDT
  • I teach developmental or remedial reading. There are a myriad of difficulties in a pluralistic yet tax averse society that doesn't place as high a priority on education and civic responsibility as it does on making money, which is believed to be able to solve all problems. We have been shaving off the "bottom end" or weakest students for years supposedly, but my students seem to have as many problems as they ever did. The fact is that we need those people who are "remedial" in the workforce and as generally constructive members of society. Thus we imagine we will eliminate these courses but we will need to compensate in other ways. Since colleges get less funding if they enroll fewer people, we will still enroll these students and make promises to them that we cannot keep -- they will drop out if they can't make it or we will give them degrees though they really can't read or write, and that will again make the community colleges look like they failed the public. The public and administrators may imagine that this is making the community colleges more middle class, yet the less people they serve, the fewer people have a stake in their continuance and well-being. We are sawing the branch on which we ALL sit, not just developmental faculty and students.

  • Buts in Seats
  • Posted by DFS on October 5, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • That's why, Qjersey, I suspect that not enough pressure on public education has come from the CC's. They get their bread and butter through FTE, and they are also thus tasking themselves towards much more developmental efforts because of this.

    Money talks.

  • Why aren't we questioning the government for making these cuts?
  • Posted by advisor , International Studet Advising on October 5, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • I find it very disturbing that we are questioning if community colleges should offer remedial education instead of questioning the governance trends that is leading to cutting these programs. How can we as a society continue to cut education? How will it help us prepare for the future? Other countries are investing while we keep dreaming that low taxes is the best way forward. When does the mania stop?

  • It's Time to Contextualize
  • Posted by Jan on October 5, 2009 at 12:30pm EDT
  • Could it be that success rates for remedial/ESL students are minimal because this curriculum is disconnected from any meaningful or relevant educational goals? How can we expect these students to be sustained by learning basic skills out of context? Ask any student in a course 3 levels below transfer about why they're taking the course and they'll say, "..because it's required." If you probe deeper, you'll find that students don't have any truly meaningful sense about WHY these courses are required. Consequently, most successful students at these levels often memorize or charm their way through courses with little intention of transferring knowledge or skills to subsequent courses. Few independently apply what they've learned in basic skills. Contextualizing basic skills within Career/Technical and Transfer courses is a paradigm shift that addresses this wasteful disconnection.

    At my community college (in CA) 80% of entering students begin below college level, many well below. Basic Skills has become a primary mission and it does no good to blame students or K-12. The viability of our State rests with its capacity to develop the talent, commitment and participation of its residents. Community colleges have never been more important to the State's viability.

    Before we cut "remedial" education, we owe it to these students, our communities, our State and ourselves to shift to a contextualized education paradigm.

  • By the way,
  • Posted by DFS on October 5, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • It's no wonder that Jan would capitalize 'state.'

  • Who gets cut?
  • Posted by Philip on October 5, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • "'We've done the across the board cuts, but you can only do that so far. If you keep doing across the board, you will damage every program,' said Raúl Rodríguez, the president."

    I wonder if these "across the board cuts" extend to mamagement? My SoCal community college is struggling with the same problem as San Joaquin Delta. Our solution has been to reduce class sections by about 25% for the Spring semester. Hundreds of adjunct teachers will lose their jobs. Thousands of students will lose classes. But not a single management employee will lose even one thin dime.

  • Who owes it, Jan?
  • Posted by DFS on October 5, 2009 at 3:45pm EDT
  • It's public eduation who owes it.

    Refer to chronology in everyday life, as a reference. All spin boils down simply to that.

  • The Mission??????
  • Posted by Jameel and Kia , Student at Univ. Penn on October 5, 2009 at 3:45pm EDT
  • The American Community College serves a specific purpose, one that is different from a typical 4-year private or public institution. Unlike other schools, community colleges get the majority of their funding from the community members. For this reason alone, it is important that community colleges meet the needs of their constituents by providing programming that are most beneficial to those individuals. Be they ESL course, computer literacy workshops, or remedial classes, the curriculum of a community college should reflect the needs of its people.

    Budget cuts are causing schools like Delta to have to phase out remedial courses, but if the community colleges do not offer such classes, won’t they be leaving behind generations of individual learners that could use all such support systems? Now we understand that the community college does not bear all of the responsibility for “fixing” the problem of under prepared students. These sort of issues need to be corrected at the elementary school level. Research conducted by many educational scholars tells us that after the 4th grade, black students at underprivileged schools often pale in academic achievement when compared to their white counterparts. In the case of Delta Community College, there is more at stake here than simple budget cuts and the end of a few courses for the elderly. We are talking about a vicious cycle of mis and mal-education, a cycle that is repressing people across racial and socioeconomic lines. We cannot turn a blind eye to the individuals who will be most affected by these changes.

    Furthermore, how will these schools make enough money to keep themselves going if they call a moratorium on their most beneficial and sought after courses? In some ways, this ideological shift is a representation of elitism at its best. “Let each school specialize in its own area—they have theirs and we have ours. If you don’t have what you need, go elsewhere because we can find plenty of students who like us just fine.” Maybe this is how we get to quality education for all?

  • Basic Skills
  • Posted by frankly speaking on October 5, 2009 at 4:15pm EDT
  • Another problem associated with remedial education at Community Colleges has been the high cost of teaching basic skills over and over again in the educational system. Basic composition and math skills should have already been acquired via high school, prior to entering community college. Unfortuately, we have inadvertently sent the message, over the years, that mastering basic skills in high school isn't that important. There is always another chance and another chance for students to catch up at the taxpayer's expense. I spoke a few years ago to an 8th grade algebra teacher. Half of all his students didn't turn in one assignment by Christmas break. More than two-thirds were on track to fail the course. He explained to me that in our state, algebra taken in high school counts toward graduation. However, algebra taken in junior high does not count toward HS graduation. By taking algebra in junior high, students are "forced" to take an additional higher level math course later in HS to graduate. So students routinely elect to fail the course in junior high and take it the next year for credit. If this is the attitude of our stronger academic students, we have serious problems. I spoke to an Academic Dean recently at a nearby community college, he told me that 60% of all incoming students needed remedial math and 50% need remedial writing. There may be a silver lining in the educational budget cutting. It may cause parents and students alike to treasure academic opportunity. We must overcome a culture wide acceptance of academic underachievement, especially in basic reading, writing and math skills, or continue to suffer the larger economical and social consequences.

  • Posted by Greg on October 5, 2009 at 6:30pm EDT
  • I'd like to know what classes the college is keeping? The one's they want to drop are the biggest cash cows at most CC's, and represent the largest population. They drop ESL and Dev. classes, they might as well just lock the doors and walk away............

  • State Cuts
  • Posted by Seriously Speaking , teacher at West Hills on October 6, 2009 at 6:15pm EDT
  • The problem for the Community Colleges in California is a State problem of its citizen's own creation. For too long we have been a state that votes for every crazy multi-billion dollar bond and re-elects the same government officials with no understanding that they have placed our futures in peril. Many of these bonds and entitlement programs are well meaning and seemingly excellent ideas but the consequences, (that cause and effect concept), let's call it critical thinking, (we were supposed to learn that in school) Consequence #1: now the state spends a considerable amount of our tax dollars to pay the interest on the debts we have incurred. Consequence #2: no more basic skills for the students who cannot read, write, add, subtract, multiply or divide. Consequence #3: Limited access for those students who are actually prepared to tackle college level course work or vocational training. - If we "save" basic skills, where do we make cuts, Calculus, English 1A, Biology, The Arts Vocational programs like Nursing???? When one has no money one must stop spending.

  • No money, No problem
  • Posted by LAJerry , NSCS on October 7, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • "When one has no money one must stop spending."......Try telling that to the federal government; Or, to many in higher ed.

  • Low Tuition and Football
  • Posted by Another CC Prof at not in California on October 7, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • I had to go to the college web site and look at the budget to get some key information not in the story. The most important fact is that their per-credit tuition is only $26, set by the Governor's budget. So those 600 students in that professor's classes are paying $46,800 toward salary and (very high) medical and retirement benefits if we assume they are 3 hour classes.

    Almost all of that college's income comes from local property taxes and state appropriations. That would explain why locals are upset (they pay a lot for the college), but also why adding an exercise class (or maybe any class) could be a money-losing proposition. At our CC, tuition covers the cost of an adjunct teaching a typical class if we need to add a section due to enrollment increases.

    I also could not help but notice that they have a football team, along with many other sports. Their "phys ed" budget is almost half of their budget for all of science and mathematics.

  • Funding for Sports Programs
  • Posted by Anna on October 7, 2009 at 4:30pm EDT
  • At my college, sports programs are virtually untouchable; they are generally funded at whatever level they request. Meanwhile, we have also cut classes in basic skills, ESL, as well as many sections in other departments. But we can't blame the colleges; these are societal priorities. Change will need to begin with voters and their priorities.

  • Not everyone is 18
  • Posted by Math Instructor at Community College on October 8, 2009 at 7:45am EDT
  • I am concerned that a large segment of the population seems to be being ignored by this school, this article, and all the commenters. Not every student at a community college is fresh out of high school. At my community college, developmental classes are about half kids who ought to have learned more in high school, but the other half is older people who may or may not have learned it 20 years ago but sure don't remember it now. Making remedial courses unavailable means not only are the young affected, but we make bettering yourself impossible for anyone who doesn't fit the "high school honors student direct to college graduate" profile. That's called classism. It reinforces all the negative consequences of one's birth. It makes it impossible for a family to ever escape poverty. It shows up the hollowness of the supposed American Dream. And I think that's exactly what a lot of people want, and why this is happening.

  • Obama to the rescue?
  • Posted by Paul E , CEO at UltraNet Media on October 13, 2009 at 5:45pm EDT
  • I've been following the stories about Community Colleges for some time now and with great interest. It is obvious that state and local government can no longer support these institutions due to a severe depletion of tax revenues.

    There is one problem with these cuts: Many people need the remedial services given the current level of the undereducated. If they are to get ahead and even as Patrice Burke says, just to get a job, then the Community College has achieved success. Furthermore, there is a significant group of students who are underprepared and ill-equipped for higher education and there is a serious need for providing those students with remedial services as well.

    I do not profess to have the answers, however there is help on the horizon in the form of $12 billion that will be coming from the Obama administration. I guess the only challenge now is to get that money into the hands of Community College staff members so they can turn this debacle around.

    What can be done in the interim? Does anyone have any ideas? Perhaps this is a forum for creating some type of bridge solution until help arrives. What about getting volunteers from the local community to pitch in and provide resources such as facilities, and people to help teach remedial courses? I am sure there are other ways to make this work and avoid a complete shutdown. Certainly this will not help rebuild the community and our economic base.