Search News


Browse Archives

News

What the Morehouse Man Wears

October 19, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Since he was named as president of Morehouse College in 2007, Robert M. Franklin has stressed the importance of defining education broadly, well beyond courses. He has been talking about the social and ethical obligations of those who are studying at the elite historically black college. Of late he has been calling for students to have "five wells" -- to be "well read, well spoken, well traveled, well dressed and well balanced.”

Last week, the idea of being "well dressed" became much more specific, with the start of an "appropriate attire policy," under which Morehouse is joining a small group of colleges that have in recent years adopted dress codes. Morehouse's policy is generally being well received by students -- and college officials stress that 90-plus percent of students are already in compliance. But the policy is getting some criticism from gay students over the idea of regulating dress, and specifically for banning the wearing of women's attire.

Here are some of the policy's features:

  • Caps, do-rags and hoods are banned in classrooms, the cafeteria and other indoor venues. Do-rags may not be worn outside of the residence halls.
  • Sunglasses may not be worn in class or at formal programs.
  • Jeans may not be worn at major programs such as convocation, commencement or Founder's Day.
  • Clothing with "derogatory, offensive and/or lewd messages either in words or pictures" may not be worn.
  • "Sagging," defined as "the wearing of one’s pants or shorts low enough to reveal undergarments or secondary layers of clothing," is banned.
  • Pajamas are banned in public areas.
  • Wearing of "clothing associated with women’s garb (for example, dresses, tunics, purses, handbags, pumps, wigs, make-up, etc.)" is banned. (Morehouse educates only male students.)

William Bynum, vice president for student services at Morehouse, said that the clothing rules are part of a broader agenda to develop students' minds and "social consciences." He said that Franklin, the president, has pushed President Obama's idea that there should be "no excuses" for black men in an era when one of their own has been elected president of the United States.

Bynum said that while the clothing rules are capturing attention, it is important to view those rules as part of a broad set of values being promoted. For instance, on Saturday, 200 students spent the morning going door-to-door in area neighborhoods, briefing residents on tutoring and mentoring programs run by students, and providing information about nutrition, energy efficiency and job training.

Generally, he said, students have responded well to the clothing rules. And while there are plenty of examples of student attire in the past that would have violated the rules, most students won't have to change the way they dress. An unscientific review of Morehouse students' Facebook pages finds many posing in ties, not the drinking shots that are common at some institutions.

Cameron Thomas-Shah, co-chief of staff of the Student Government Association, said that he backs the new policy, and sees it as consistent with the college's values. "It's about the ideals of the school. If you come to Morehouse college, and want to become a Morehouse man, you should know these things. You should know you don't wear do-rags. You should know that you don't wear caps inside. You shouldn't deviate from the norms of what a man wears."

Many of the styles banned at Morehouse are popular at other colleges, and Thomas-Shah said that doesn't create any doubts in his mind about Morehouse's approach. "On other college campuses, this is common. Other campuses are common, but Morehouse isn't common. It's an institution founded on the principles of producing black male leaders. We have a legacy to protect."

The only vocal opposition to the new rules has come from some gay students on campus. Kevin Webb, co-president of Safe Space @ Morehouse, a gay-straight student alliance, said that under Franklin's leadership, the college has been more committed to equity for gay students than ever before, and that "as an openly gay student, I feel privileged to have matriculated now."

Webb said that gay students are divided about the dress code. But although he will not have to change his style, he said he was bothered by the new rules.

For many gay students, fashion is an important part of self-definition, he said. "Once you try to stop people's expression, everything that is unique about people is going to start to crumble, and you will produce robots, and we wouldn't want that, would we?"

A few gay Morehouse students do dress in women's clothing sometimes, and Webb said that should be allowed. While all Morehouse students are covered by the new clothing policy, Webb said he was bothered that a specific rule singled out a style popular only with some gay students. "I think this borders on discrimination," he said. "While someone can say that it applies the heteronormativity of other students in terms of do-rags and sagging of pants, I can also say that there are gay people who sag their pants and wear their do-rags, but you don't find people here who identify themselves as straight walking around in feminine garb."

If male students wear feminine clothing, he asked, "what impact does it have on how intelligent they are, their grade point average and how much community service they do?"

He also questioned the idea that someone who wears more formal clothing is necessarily a better person. "We are focusing too much on the exterior," he said. "If you put a clown in a suit, he's still a clown."

Bynum, the Morehouse vice president, said that he met with Safe Space before the policy went into effect, and he noted that many of the students there supported the change. He said that the policy isn't about gay students, but about standards for all students. "Morehouse is completely supportive of our gay students. This isn't about them, but about all students."

Two presidents of other institutions that have instituted dress codes in recent years say that they are glad they did so. (Both are coeducational and didn't ban women's clothing, but otherwise have policies similar to the one instituted at Morehouse.)

Richard Holland, president of the University of West Alabama, instituted the rules there in 2007, after he noticed some freshmen wearing caps and cut-off shorts to a performance by the Alabama Symphony Orchestra. He said he's pleased with the results, but added that regular attention is needed. "We have noticed that each fall semester we must remind the university community of the dress code," he said. "This is especially true with beginning freshmen, new transfer students and new faculty and staff."

He said that officials work with a variety of student groups to help in the "selling of the code" to other students.

Michael Sorrell, president of Paul Quinn College, which also adopted clothing rules in 2007, said that rules on clothing "changed the tenor of the campus." He noted that the college started stocking a closet with acceptable clothing, so that any students who need to borrow items may do so.

As president of another historically black college, Sorrell said he's been watching the discussions at Morehouse with interest and said he was "thrilled" to see that college adopt the rules. "I can only hope that more schools recognize the need for leadership in this area," he said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on What the Morehouse Man Wears

  • Dress Code
  • Posted by Dan on October 19, 2009 at 7:45am EDT
  • Kudos for a progressive president! He recognizes that for his graduates to successfully compete in the workplace, they're going to have to "fit" into an already-fully-established business environment. The "five wells" are dead on target.

    The Morehouse students are extremely fortunate to have a president with foresight and fortitude.

  • cross-dressing
  • Posted by Judith Shapiro , President and Professor of Anthropology Emerita at Barnard College on October 19, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • The argument between the administration and some members of the college's gay community (themselves divided on the issue of whether public cross-dressing should fall within the dress code) raises the distinction between sexual orientation and gender identity. The relationship between them is by no means simple or unvarying. The issue can be especially complex for a single-sex institution. Here, the message seems to be that, in a men's college, students can be gay, but not female-identified, at least in public. The sartorial issue is more easily avoided in a women's college: a woman wearing pants is not like a man wearing a skirt.

  • Posted by Kenneth Ray McKoy on October 19, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • I applaud the institution decision to move forward in such a positive, progressive and competitive manner. As one of the readers stated, Morehouse is not just a "common school", it's MOREHOUSE where more is expected from all of the member of the greatest institution of higher learning. If one is blessed, priveleged and or luckier enough to enter through the doors of this institution, he should very well be prepared to leave all his common things behind as he will no longer have need for them. He will be on an exploratory journey that will last the rest of his life. Therefore, he must be prepared and willing to do whatever it takes to preserve his and all future rights of young black men that have been choosen to lead this great nation into depts and hemisphere beyond our imagination as "PROUD YOUNG BLACK LEADERS" with a "STANDARD".

    Signed// proud father of a "Man of Morehouse" and godfather of a "Morehouse Man"

  • Ugh!
  • Posted by H. E. Baber , Professor/Philosophy at University of San Diego on October 19, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • Yes, I can understand the rationale for this dress code. But really...you don't have to "practice" dressing up at college to learn how to dress for business after graduation. I grew up with dress codes--the stress of meeting dressing and grooming and the plain physical discomfort of getting dressed up made my life miserable. Now as a faculty member I try dress up for the first class meeting or two to establish my authority with students, but it stresses me out and undermines my ability to teach effectively. I am not kidding here. I know many people, maybe most people, don't feel this way but I've never been able to get used to dressing up. I can only really do my thing in class effectively when I'm wearing jeans and running shoes so that I can get into what I'm teaching and bounce around.

  • More than two
  • Posted by Amy De Rosa on October 19, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • The article doesn't mention Christendom College (in Front Royal, VA) which also has a dress code as, of course, do the military academies.

  • "Heteronormativity"??
  • Posted by Cato on October 19, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • I must admit that, whatever the merits of the position stated, the speaker loses my interest by relying needlessly on pompo-jargon like "heteronormativity" -- especially in relation to "do-rags and [the] sagging of pants".

    I applaud the renewed interest in dress styles, as presented from both perspectives. But more important to the success of the individual is the ability to express oneself for the purpose of communicating to the listener, rather than trying to impress him or her with hyperpolysyllabic gobbledigook.

    Heteronormativity? Sheesh.

  • Thank you Morehouse
  • Posted by PG on October 19, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • I think this is an excellent idea and would be even better if they can take this message of appropriate attire on the road to those youth who do not have the benefit of parents who instill this type of standard at home. As far as those within the gay population who disagree, the reality is that in the majority of professional workplaces, cross dressing is not supported. This is something that can be done on one's own time i would think. The idea here is to prepare one for the professional environment. If one feels like this requirement is an inconvenience, another school might be an appropriate choice where no dress codes exists.

  • Cross Dressing at Morehouse
  • Posted by Kelly , Director/NA at N/A on October 19, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • I think it should be banned, someone in this article stated that "fashion is an important part of self-definition, he said. "Once you try to stop people's expression, everything that is unique about people is going to start to crumble", please, when you gradute how many if you are going to cross dress on that first interview, be for real, I know you want to be yourself, but if your going to be yourself be for real.

  • Means of Preparation
  • Posted by Kristina Williams , Student at Towson University on October 19, 2009 at 5:00pm EDT
  • I think that it is a great idea to have a dress code in every aspect of any public sector. Of course no one is relating how someone dresses to their intellect, however there is a time and a place for everything. And it is important as adults to be able to define where and when certain attire is appropriate. I went to Hampton, who has a dress code, and the atmosphere on campus was never uptight or lacking in creativity or fashion forwardness. People found a way to be themselves and feel comfortable in their clothes and be respectful to both themselves and their fellow students. A dress code is necessary in all situations. If I were a stripper, I would certainly not show up to work in jeans and a turtleneck.

  • Not so subtle discrimination
  • Posted by Marlow Darkseid , N/A at Texas A&M college station on October 19, 2009 at 6:15pm EDT
  • I think this policy is a bad policy because it contributes to a pervasive environment of discrimination against individuals who choose to wear "gender-inappropriate" clothing, whatever their reason may be. Such persons are subject to some of the worst discrimination(up to and including murder) seen by anyone today, and I find it troubling that this institution thinks it is OK to contribute to this, knowingly or not. I have a feeling that this policy has more to do about the personal tastes of those in charge rather than improving the character of the student body, and that is truly offensive to me. While it may be their right to do so, I don't think Morehouse should be in the business of making policies that target "homosexual"(I don't even want to get into that gender identity/expression can of worms, so for simplicity's sake I use that word, however inaccurate it may be) disproportionately. That is bordering on outright discrimination, and as I said previously, it is offensive.

    Naturally people have to follow a dress code when they go to some jobs, or even most jobs, but this is one of the easiest things to do when you start a job. If you have trouble adhering to a dress code and need 4 years of training to do so, maybe you should be looking for a different line of work.

    Also I'd like to throw a shout out to "Cato" he is right. Although, next time you try to "show someone up", you should at least make sure you spell the word "Gobbledygook" correctly, it helps immensely. ;)

  • A Professor?
  • Posted by Dr. Anonymous on October 20, 2009 at 2:15am EDT
  • Along with the majority of commenters, I salute Dr. Franklin and the dress code at Morehouse. I am puzzled by the professor who balks at "dressing up," that is, wearing pants and a shirt. He is only comfortable teaching in jeans and running shoes. I suppose I support his academic freedom. Yet I do question whether he has any business being in the community of scholars.

  • Posted by Barbara McKoy on October 20, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • Kudos to the president of Morehouse College! Your president is someone that knows the basic issues in wellness; there is a constant personal renewal where he recognizes and acts on the truth that each day is a miraculous gift and his job is to untie the ribbons. This is a historically all male Higher Learning Institution and each male student on that campus and off that campus has three important things to remember: Respect yourself as a male, Respect others and be responsible for all your actions as young men who chose to be at an All Male College. We need this same accountability (DRESS CODE) in all Educational arenas.

  • Morehouse Dress Code
  • Posted by Barbara McKoy on October 20, 2009 at 11:30am EDT
  • Kudos to the president of Morehouse College! Your president is someone that knows the basic issues in wellness; there is a constant personal renewal where he recognizes and acts on the truth that each day is a miraculous gift and his job is to untie the ribbons. This is a historically all male Higher Learning Institution and each male student on that campus and off that campus has three important things to remember: Respect yourself as a male, Respect others and be responsible for all your actions as young men who chose to be at an All Male College. We need this same accountability (DRESS CODE) in all Educational arenas.

  • College Experience
  • Posted by M.Sc. , Graduate Student on October 20, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • The college experience is a transition period. Proper dressing is important, but so is all aspects of dressing. During that time I grew my hair long, tried different styles because I knew beyond the borders was a 9 -5 and a monkey suit.

    let us not turn our kids into our parents, let them evolve into us naturally.

  • A Morehouse Man is a homophobe?
  • Posted by Howie Schaffer , Senior Director of Communcations at Cook Ross Inc. on October 20, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • I am confused by all the praise for this policy. Considering all the examination of homophobic behavior and beliefs among African Americans, the intolerance toward cross-dressing seems a bit extreme. I would think that African Americans would be the first to line up to extend a welcoming palm to cross dressers, transvestites, and transgendered people. However, many in the black community have been slow to extend to LGBT folks the civil rights once denied them. The overwhelming percentage of African Americans voting against marriage equality and other rights has its roots in the kinds of intolerance that Morehead seems intent upon promoting as a kind of gentlemanly protocol.

  • Practice Makes Perfect
  • Posted by Guiniviere , Former Career Counselor at DC on October 23, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • As someone who used to advise students on their preparation for the job search, practicing is very helpful to students. If I were working at a school with this type of policy, though, I would encourage the administration to partner with local men's clothing store (or a Men's Wearhouse) to provide these gentleman with discounts and advice as to what works on them. Nothing broke my heart more than seeing students coming into an interview room with a suit that was too big for them because it was the only one they had, or that they couldn't afford a better one.

  • Mooorehouse Dress Code
  • Posted by Dr. Annonymous III , Personal Banker on October 23, 2009 at 1:30pm EDT
  • While I understand Moorehouse interest in establishing a dress code, I am troubled by its approach. In fact they already had a dress code because everyone on the campus wear clothing. The isssue is the type. And they hide behind getting students ready for the work force. I say fuee! In the 70's during my time in college there was never a time when we were not rebebbing aganist one thing or another. Indeed, one was dress code. They were done away with for the most part and we turned out alright. Mandatory Chapel, Convocation etc. was all a part of our rebellion. Because we at the time did not want to be told that we had to go to chruch did not mean we would not figure out at some point we would choose to have God in our lives. Most of us have. I think a larger responsibility of the academy is to teach students to behave as they do not behave. The college should push students outside the box and their comfort zone so as to be able to see the big picture.This would do more that they could ever imaginein developing leadreship skills in the 21st century. I am afraid that they are promoting homofobia perhaps without even being aware that their focus is exculsively on Gay students. Morehouse is still suffering from a very bad situation that happen there about 5 years ago when a fellow student was brutually beaten by another student for no other reason than being Gay. This is wrong! To add insult to injury, the kid who did the beating was the son od a Minister. Morehouse ought to focus on how to make those gay men feel that they are a real part of the community rather than singleing them out. You see, when one feels and sense that he fits in a community there is no need to try and stand out.Why? Because they fit in. Establish a real Gay Club and invite Spellman women to join in the group. You would be amazed at how constructive this could be for all involved. This is a real opportunity for a black college to adopt a real policy of inclusion withen the black community led by an enlighten group of educators. We in the black community still have a long way to go in addressing same sex relationships. :(

  • No Relationship Between College Dress & Future Success
  • Posted by Former HBCU Alum at Traveling Abroad on October 23, 2009 at 2:15pm EDT
  • After hearing about the dress code policy at Morehouse, I couldn't help but think about the pros and cons of this policy. On a practical level, I'm sure 're-creating' the prototypical 'Morehouse Man' was at the forefront of this decision. However, there are several criticisms that deserve consideration.

    First, to my knowledge, there is no systematic correlation or causal relationship between college style of dress and future achievement. Indeed, MU has produced many successful students pre-policy, which undoubtedly includes a robust sample of graduates adhered to the same fashion styles that are now deemed inappropriate. Second, it is not uncommon to see eclectic styles of dress (e.g., excessive facial hair; tattered clothing) worn by students and faculty at some of the most rigorous universities in the US (e.g., Cal Berkley). In fact, these universities take pride in their diverse student body and its perspectives as a means of moving scholarship and thought forward. Third, I find it ironic that most of the 'old-guard' that likely generated this policy were probably folks who during the 60's and 70's took part in the 'Hippie' or 'Black Power/Pride' movements which featured eclectic styles (e.g., Dashikis, Huge Afros, tie-died shirts) and an ethos of free 'love', peace, and empowerment, respectively. Recall that some of the most towering figures in our society today (e.g., Nobel Peace Prize winners and/or political figures like Al Gore) were a product of the aforesaid culture. So why introduce this 'do as I say, not as I (did)' policy to the MU student body when the people who likely conceived it were the same folk that railed against such restrictions in their day?

    In sum, the points above beg the question of why this policy was needed. And despite a lack of scientific justification, potential hypocrisy on the part of those responsible for it, and clear examples of people who have achieved great success irrespective of how they dressed in college, MU still decided to move forward. At best the policy is myopic. At worst, it deprives students of a basic civil freedom.

    My how far we've come....

  • A Few Comments
  • Posted by Sully at Morehouse Man on November 9, 2009 at 10:00am EST
  • I have comments below, but first a couple of corrections and one amplification:

    1. Students of Morehouse College are Men of Morehouse. One must at least graduate (there are other requirements as well) to earn the moniker of Morehouse Man.

    2. Morehouse is a college, not a university. We are MC, not MU.

    3. Morehouse is not sponsored by any church, but was founded in the basement of the Springfield Baptist Church in Augusta, GA as the Augusta Institute in 1867--charged with the education of former slaves in education and religion (teaching and preaching). As such, Morehouse has a rich religious history having educated many of the best preachers and theologians of the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries. Students can have whatever sexual orientation they wish, but sex on campus is against the rules and, thanks to Dr. Franklin, wearing of inappropriate clothing is as well.

    As a stakeholder (Alumnus), I am happy to see Morehouse show some leadership by making this bold, yet not unprecedented, move toward cultivating an atmosphere of respectability and propriety. I applaud Dr. Franklin for his leadership and vision my prayers and my donations go out to Morehouse College.

    I invested over 4-years of my life on that sacred red clay hill in Georgia, and I am proud to say that I have been on both sides of the issue. As a teenage boy, I sagged my jeans a bit and expressed myself through fashions that might have ruffled Dr. Franklin's feathers a bit, but never to Crown Forum (Chapel to the old heads), or to a formal Morehouse function. I grumbled when we had to dress (wear shirt and tie) during Freshman Week and every Sunday in the campus dining hall. However, I grew out of that childish phase. By the time I became an upperclassman, I didn't have to be told to pull my pants up, or at least not to show my undergarments; not to use foul at inappropriate times; not to wear a hat or sunglasses indoors.

    The dress code shows that there is a time and place for everything, but some of us need to be told what time and place is proper. Morehouse is not your average college campus, and it needn't look like one through the impropriety of its students. At Army, Navy and Air Force students are told what is acceptable behavior and dress. They understand going in that there is a standard that they will be held to and failure to meet such will have consequences.

    Good going Morehouse!