Search News


Browse Archives

News

The New Diagnostics

October 30, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

About a week into any class at Rio Salado College, officials can make a pretty good guess as to which students will succeed and which ones will not.

The Arizona community college, where more than half of the 64,000 students pursue their degrees online, has devised a system of predictive modeling that officials believe can forecast, with 70 percent accuracy, how likely it is that a student will achieve a “C” grade or higher (the threshold for transferable credits) in a given course. The tool -- one of several of its kind -- is intended to help instructors to identify at-risk students early enough that they can intervene.

“We’re trying to really understand the true behavior of the student based on reality,” says Adam Lange, the programmer analyst at Rio Salado who designed the system, “and then use that information to be able to make informed, data-driven decisions about how we can help students.”

At a time when higher education is increasingly taking place online (even when students are in a traditional classroom), colleges have more data on student engagement than ever before. Learning management systems are widely used, in online and classroom-based courses alike, as places where students interact with their professors, their course materials, and each other. But unlike traditional classrooms, these environments can keep a detailed log of everything that happens there, providing information for these new diagnostic tools.

“We’re dealing with a virtual mountain of data,” says Lange. “And a lot of these data are behavioral data… real-time data that comes from our LMS. This is really valuable information. It tells us a lot about the students.”

Such as when, and how frequently, students are logging into the course home page. Rio Salado uses more than two dozen metrics during that first week to predict how well that student stands to fare over the entire course, but some of the most effective are the most basic: Has the student logged into the course home page during that first week? Did she log in prior to the first day of class? Other predictive metrics, such as whether a student is taking other classes at the same time, whether she has been successful in previous courses, and whether she is retaking the course, are culled from the college's student information system.

The predictive modeling system uses these metrics to separate students into three color-coded categories: high-risk (red) students, medium-risk (yellow) students, and low-risk (green) students. The instructors of each class are notified a week in about the “yellow” students in their class, so they can then reach out to those students and try to get them on track. The college says it does not currently intervene in the cases of “red” students, citing limited resources (although officials there say they are working on developing a system to address the needs of those students).

While intervention methods among faculty vary, this can entail making themselves available for questions and extra help, encouraging the students to check the course page more frequently, pointing them to tutoring and other support services, and even contacting them by telephone, according to Shannon Corona, chair of the physical science faculty at Rio Salado.

What the professors don’t do is tell the students whether they have been labeled at-risk. "If we alert students directly, they may not know intuitively what they need to do to improve within our online learning environment," said Lange. "On the other hand, faculty can lead at-risk students down the right path and find the best strategies for each student."

Rio Salado differs in that respect from Purdue University, which has run similar predictive modeling program since 2006, and does keep students in the loop. At an "actionable analytics" symposium last month, John Campbell, the associate vice president of Purdue’s advanced computing center, said the “at-risk” students generally took that information as either a motivational kick in the rear or were prompted to quickly drop the class -- and were grateful in any case. A double-blind study conducted during the first two years of the Purdue's program, called Signals, revealed that 67 percent of students who learned they were in the middle- or high-risk categories were able to improve their grades.

On Thursday, SunGard Higher Education announced it is partnering with Purdue to market the Signals system to colleges everywhere.

Like Rio Salado, Capella University, a for-profit online university that has used a comparable system for the past three years, does not tell students about their risk status. Kim Pearce, the director of assessment and institutional research at Capella, says low national graduation rates suggest that students might not be vigilant enough to redirect themselves on their own. “I think the general national dissatisfaction with our graduation rates … is partially based on the idea that [students] are exclusively in charge of their own learning experience.” However, Pearce does predict that Capella will eventually start informing students when its computers forecast a bad outcome. Lange says Rio Salado will likely do the same. Neither has yet gathered enough data to quantify the effect of their inventions on student success.

Still, "We're confident enough in the modeling and the interventions that we're going to continue," Pearce says.

Rio Salado, Purdue, and Capella appear to be at the front end of what campus computing expert Kenneth C. Green this week called the “third phase” of e-learning: the point at which colleges and technology companies shift their attention toward finding ways to mine and utilize all the data created by interactions between professors and students on virtual learning platforms. That technology, Lange says, is changing the practice of predicting student success from instinct and generalization to genuine science.

“The knowledge of predictive modeling and of data driven approaches just wasn’t out there, and now it’s just sort of creeping its way into higher ed, especially in distance learning,” he says.

“Online is a data rich environment,” says Pearce.

“It’s just a matter of time before everybody starts using the data that are available to them,” she says.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The New Diagnostics

  • Not just for on-line courses
  • Posted by David Shupe , Chief Innovations Officer at eLumen Collaborative on October 30, 2009 at 8:30am EDT
  • The data-richness of on-line courses (e.g., the system "knows" which students have logged on and when) certainly differs from the general lack of analogous information in face-to-face courses. However, it only takes a small amount of real-time information to provide a similar effect in face-to-face courses. For example, at Kirkwood Community College, instructors are noting on an electronic roster of their students which ones have not yet shown up at the end of the first week, and Student Support Services immediately has a college-wide list of such students and contacts them. There are other examples. The article gives the impression that this capacity to respond is only for on-line courses, when that is not the case.

  • Not the case
  • Posted by Charles Dull , eLearning and Innovation at Cuyahoga Community College on October 30, 2009 at 9:00am EDT
  • I'm not sure the point was disparaging, however the fact does remain you collect higher quality data when the actual data comes from the action of the participant. What is described at Kirkwood is another entering data, which is subject to error and error in interpretation. I think this comment misses the entire point and does not see the critical importance of using analytics in success modeling. We've always entered data about students at the face to face level and made assumptions on observation, what we have here is data based on actual actions that form predictive modeling. Rather than subject this to notions that it has always been done in face to face we should be looking into how we better track face to face in the same way, maybe through library access or access to portals, maybe face to face begins to use electronic tests to collect data. What is amazing is if this was already being done where are the results and why is there so much discussion on how this can be done? The data would suggest it was not being done.

  • Professors should not be told which students are at risk
  • Posted on October 30, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • Professors should not be receiving a list of which students are at risk. It creates a negative bias against those students immediately, particularly where grades are based on subjective criteria such as essays. Perhaps if the grades are earned through multiple choice tests (such as in a math course) would letting the professor know the student is at risk be appropriate.

  • Postsecondary's Are Finally Getting It!
  • Posted by Paul , CEO at UltraNet Media on October 30, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • Too many students are ill equipped and under prepared for higher education. I am glad to see there are steps to segment students into categories of who are at risk. I disagree with the writer who stated that professors should not be apprised of at risk students.

    It is time to start treating students on a 1 to 1 basis in an effort to turn around the attrition of students who attend not only higher education institutions, but at the K-12 level as well. The earlier the intervention, the better chances are that students will develop the appropriate skills and motivation to succeed.

    We are all fortunate that technology is capable of supporting our efforts to help students achieve success. With aggressive intervention, we all stand a chance of making this country's education system shine once again.

  • Machines and people need to work together
  • Posted by David Yaskin , CEO at Starfish Retention Solutions, Inc. on October 30, 2009 at 5:45pm EDT
  • For the last year Starfish has been helping colleges identify at-risk student in order to get them into interventions earlier. We support both data mining of systems (course management systems, SIS, etc) and using a student’s human network to report areas of concern. Colleges and universities need both types of alerts.

    Even when every student is online, human behavior as complex as learning, can’t always be automatically analyzed. We are helping Kettering University automatically detect students who are doing poorly in exams. We are helping Tulsa Community College automatically identify which students aren’t participating in online classes. Finding these problem automatically is a huge time saver. But at the same time, the flag raised by an instructor who is looking at the student’s diverse classroom activities is most highly regarded. Our approach is to provide advisors and counselors a chorus of useful information about a student – from the presence of poor tests and quizzes to notes of concern shared by a tutor. Instructors should not have to and will not process huge amounts of data to spot a problem student, that’s why we have computers. But they are invaluable in knowing their students, which ones need help and which ones, while struggling, will be fine.

    Of course, the work really starts at finding the problem. Motivating the student to do something about the concern, tracking that student's issues till they are resolved, and assessing what is working are a whole other set of important challenges that technology can also help with.

  • Math is not multiple choice!
  • Posted by Ed , Assoc Prof, Comp. Sci at NCSU on November 1, 2009 at 3:00pm EST
  • As a former math major, I am offended that anyone thinks that math classes are graded based on multiple-choice tests!