Search News


Browse Archives

News

Rocky Road in Chicago

November 2, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Zafra M. Lerman, a longtime chemistry professor at Columbia College Chicago, has won dozens of awards for her work promoting science education. She's secured millions of dollars in research funding from the National Science Foundation and the state of Illinois. But, for decades, she's had a contentious relationship with her institution.

In 1991, Lerman was removed from her job chairing the college’s science and math department and instead given leadership of the Institute for Science Education and Science Communication there. In 2005, she protested a midnight raid on a lab she oversaw and the resulting firing of a researcher who created a Web site critical of the college’s president, Warrick L. Carter.

Now, Columbia has pulled its support of one of her pet projects, the Malta Conference -- a biennial meeting of Middle Eastern scientists aimed at promoting peace through collaboration -- and appears to be attempting to stall her work on the event, set to convene November 14 in Amman, Jordan. Lerman and her supporters say the college is blocking her from using donations from sources other than the college to pay for the event.

The root of the college’s most recent actions, said Laurel Bellows, Lerman’s lawyer, is the professor’s history of criticism of Carter and the college’s Board of Trustees. She filed a complaint earlier this year after finding evidence that suggests the college “discriminates in its employment practices." Bellows would not elaborate on the complaint before its resolution.

“She’s been critical for a long time and they want to get rid of her, but she’s tenured so it’s much tougher,” Bellows said -- but the college seems to think it has evidence against her. "There's at least one specific person who wants to see Zafra removed from the school," she said, declining to say who other than someone "at the highest levels" of Columbia's hierarchy.

Diane Doyne, a Columbia spokeswoman, wouldn’t comment on Lerman’s employment status or complaint, saying she can’t speak on personnel matters.

The latest round of tensions came to the fore in early October, as soon as Lerman returned to Chicago after delivering a speech at the Norwegian Nobel Institute in Oslo. “She came back to find this failure of support,” Bellows said, “she couldn’t get things done, she couldn’t access the Malta Conference bank account.”

Bellows said Columbia has slowly paid conference bills in the last few weeks but is, essentially, “holding this money hostage.” The account, she said, houses contributions from the college but also includes funds donated by UNESCO, the American Chemical Society, the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry and other sponsors. “They have not refused to give Zafra control of the account, but they have not taken steps to give her control, either.”

Doyne said the college “continue[s] to provide the administrative support – including payment of invoices -- that makes the conference possible.” She did not address the question of whether Lerman has access to the account.

As October went on, Bellows said, the situation got worse. Lerman’s international calling account was canceled and the lock on her office door was changed. By October 25, “someone had instructed the institute staff not to talk to Zafra, to do nothing more on assisting with Malta.” Her assistant was told that Columbia was no longer financing his travels to Amman for the conference and that he’d have to take vacation days to attend.

Doyne would not comment on whether a college administrator had instructed Lerman’s staff not to talk to her or assist her, again citing the confidentiality of personnel matters.

Doyne did confirm, though, that the college would no longer be providing financial support for the Malta Conference, but pointed to the economy, not the back-and-forth with Lerman. “Given the challenging economic times, we’ve chosen to focus on activities that support the core mission of the college,” she said. “We continue to support the conference’s ideals and we do continue to provide nonmonetary support.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Rocky Road in Chicago

  • Russia?
  • Posted by Roger on November 2, 2009 at 9:00am EST
  • Sounds like a Russian institution. Russian government tactics.

  • Posted by jim on November 2, 2009 at 9:45pm EST
  • "Power Corrupts; Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely"

    (I wish I knew who I am quoting.)

    "Speaking Truth to Power" is always a choice where the speaker must weigh personal security against the chance that a corrupt power may be changed. If there's no chance, self-immolation is useless although it usually makes the speaker feel better (temporarily) for having spoken.
    Contrary to the usual story, keeping one's "head down" is often the better choice and leaves one "alive to fight another day". Choose your battles!

  • Posted by Mike on November 3, 2009 at 12:15am EST
  • Jim, you're almost quoting Lord Acton:

    "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men."

  • "keep your head down"!!
  • Posted by Bob on November 3, 2009 at 12:45pm EST
  • Wow, with that thinking we would not be a country today. The minutemen could have stayed home in their Jammies. Some rag tag colonists decided to take on the largest empire in the world.

    Keeping your head down...well, If I am going to get mine chopped off anyway by some despot, I will keep my head up, Thank You!

  • Carter is not allowed to be Wrong
  • Posted by DFS on November 3, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • About his apartheid portrayal of Israel:

    Promoting Middle East peace through collaboration of scholarly thought, and
    dare to be critical of opponents of this for a long time, and you must just have to go away and not bother scholars any longer.

    “She’s been critical for a long time and they want to get rid of her, but she’s tenured so it’s much tougher.”

    OMG, there's "one specific person [at the highest level] of Columbia's hierarchy' who wants her to go!

    Well, that's it, then. No matter how well-founded the professor's arguments, no matter how well-intentioned, she must go because one person's thongs are in a wad.

    So much for Academic Freedom, here. No contrary views are allowed, here.

    I suspect that the Center for American Progress has a hand in this abomination.

  • Institutional Mission
  • Posted by former Columbian on November 4, 2009 at 3:00pm EST
  • Columbia College Chicago is essentially an art school. I suspect that the reason that the Institute for Science Education and Science Communication is losing support is because this particular institute really never fit well in what Columbia College Chicago is supposed to be. While such an institute would be perfect for many other schools, it isn't even possible to do a traditional science education at Columbia College Chicago. It's an art school, not a research university. The liberal arts and science classes that are taught there - while good - allow the students to complete their liberal requirements. Having an institute of this type at Columbia College Chicago - while laudable - is an example of mission creep, and I expect it was something that just could no longer be afforded in today's economy. This is sort of like having an Institute for the Study of Early Music at Purdue. It just isn't a good fit institutionally.

  • Rocky Road in Chicago
  • Posted by Eli Pearce , Research Professor at Polytechnic Institute of NYU on November 5, 2009 at 5:30pm EST
  • I know Zafra Lerman,---I really never knew Columbia College in Chicago until I met her. Zafra is a creative scientific educator who has incorporated many things from the liberal arts curriculum into science classes which go along with the mission of the college ---a very creative approach! She developed and followed thru on the Malta Conferences with Middle East chemists who politically would not be able to meet in a science forum because of the politics involved. Many Nobel Laureates attend and spoke and she was able to accomplish this even though as a leader in the Ameican Chemical Society , I was sceptical about pulling this off. This was and is a significant accomplishment and we in chemistry thank her for her efforts in developing chemistry without borders.
    Eli Pearce