Search News


Browse Archives

News

When Is a Suspension Not a Suspension?

November 2, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Officials at Southwestern College, a community college outside San Diego, moved Friday to explain why three faculty members have been barred from teaching or stepping foot on the campus for more than a week, but the answers aren't quelling faculty anger.

The college has been facing scrutiny over its action against four professors (one of whom was soon permitted to resume teaching) the day after a student-organized campus protest against budget cuts, and about how the administration has responded to them. While the college didn't explain why it barred the professors -- including the president of the faculty union -- from the campus, officials denied that the move had anything to do with the protest.

On Friday, Angelica L. Suarez, vice president for student affairs at the college, contacted Inside Higher Ed to say that reports on this Web site and elsewhere that professors had been suspended were incorrect. She said that because the professors have not been formally charged with anything or found to have done anything wrong, they can't be suspended, because that would be punishment. She said that barring them from their classrooms (while paying them) isn't a suspension or a punishment.

Suarez also said that -- while the situation had nothing to do with the rally -- the college was investigating incidents that followed the formal rally, when some students walked to the president's office to demand answers to various questions. Campus police officers blocked the protesters from actually reaching the office.

The investigation centers on questions over whether any professors incited the students to continue their rally, whether they showed "disregard" for campus officers and whether they had a "physical confrontation" with the officers. Asked if there was any evidence that anyone at the protest had even touched a police officer, Suarez declined to answer.

The college sent an e-mail to all employees on Friday that also described the situation. Anger has been growing on campus not only over the suspensions, but the lack of clarity over why they were ordered. Suarez said that the decision to take action against the professors was made by the college's president, Raj Chopra, but that he started a vacation the next day and will be out of the country until Nov. 13.

The college's latest action has prompted some college employees who witnessed the really to publish accounts in which they say none of the allegations being investigated are true.

One faculty member, in answer to the information given out by the administration, wrote: "Your hair-splitting pettifogging spin on this series of events is spitting into the wind. Nobody is convinced that you did this for the protection of anyone, except yourselves. And for you administrators to hide behind the fine SWC police department, who were surely just following your orders, is sheer cowardice. Why not admit you haven't a case and immediately reinstate the 'not suspended just-prohibited from doing their job' professors? And then open some REAL action towards solving our problems together?"

Philip Lopez, an English professor who is president of the faculty union and who is one of those being investigated and barred from campus, said that he and his colleagues feel like they are experiencing "something out of Kafka" in that they are being assumed guilty of rules they didn't violate and aren't officially charged with violating.

"It seems like the college believes in trying us by e-mail," he said.

Lopez scoffed at the idea that he and his colleagues haven't been suspended, given what has happened to them.

As to what the college is investigating, he said that there was no contact at all between those protesting and the police officers, and that faculty members followed the students, and didn't lead them. Lopez noted that physically clashing with a police officer would be a crime, and that police officers were present and could have arrested anyone who broke the law, yet they made no arrests.

Anyone who knows the professors, Lopez said, would know that they aren't people who could physically challenge police officers. "The only exercise I get is running off my mouth," he said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on When Is a Suspension Not a Suspension?

  • Send these folks a dictionary, stat!
  • Posted by Professor G on November 2, 2009 at 7:45am EST
  • It sounds as though this incident is full of obfuscation. Suarez' attempt to characterize three professors' exile from campus and their being barred from practicing their professions, however, sure sounds like both "suspension" and "punishment" to me. (That they continue to be paid does not change the apparent fact that they're denied access to their place of employment, including classrooms, offices, university facilities such as labs, and to their students.)

    And what kind of college president takes this kind of inevitably controversial action and then goes on vacation for several weeks? (Isn't the college in the middle of its term? Aren't there scheduled breaks in the college calendar that would be more appropriate for leisure travel? ) Chopra's behavior, while not conclusively damning -- he could have had this trip planned for months -- sure looks bad here. And as we know, perception is a powerful thing.

  • Tragic yet not unprecedented
  • Posted by Pith, E. on November 2, 2009 at 9:15am EST
  • First a simple exercise of academic and personal freedom in dutiful compliance with "walk the walk" professional responsibility. Met swiftly by cold steel. The unkindest cut of all: Professors barred electronically and physically from beloved students (now palely loitering) and a once-nurturing (now dead, fetid) campus. From free expression. From free association. Calculated, rehearsed retaliation. Deliberate. Chillingly sadistic. Un-Constitutional. Un-American. Perpetrated by an absent coward. One demanding unquestioning fealty. Wielding absolute power . And now (as Night followeth unto Day) commences the March of the Sycophants.

  • Fiction is stranger than truth, apparently
  • Posted by Idealist on November 2, 2009 at 11:30am EST
  • A suspension that’s not a suspension! No crime, no arrests, no charge of wrong doing, no suspicion of wrong doing, the president on vacation the very next day, no reasons, no answers, and to top that “officials denied that the move had anything to do with the protest.” Wow! Is it possible to calculate the probability of this convenience?

  • Glaring Omission by SWC Adminstrators
  • Posted by Southwestern Truth-Seeker on November 2, 2009 at 1:30pm EST
  • In none of the explanations shared by the Southwestern College administrators has the issue been addressed that one of the original four suspended faculty members was not in attendance at the student rally or the post-rally stroll to the president's office.

    Is it sheer coincidence that this professor who was not in attendance at these events was also served papers intrusively at her home by the Human Resources Director and a uniformed law enforcement officer is the past president of the faculty union?

    This was an intentionally malicious act on the part of Raj Chopra to humiliate and antagonize this past president of the faculty union.

    When will the administration under the iron fist of Raj Chopra address this matter? Was this a targeted attack on this individual? [Yes, that's a rhetorical question with an obvious answer.]

    Why was a person who was not at the rally singled out for embarrassment and harassment of such magnitude? Why were her students deprived of her instruction in the classroom?

    This college president and the three members of the trustees (or are they MIS-trustees?) up for re-election in November of 2010 must go!

  • HR help
  • Posted by Dunder Mifflin on November 3, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • It would be considered "job abandonment" if the four were to voluntarily not report to work and HR would move immediately to terminate.

    Big Brother speaks again.

  • Free Speech
  • Posted by chula vista mom of 3 on November 4, 2009 at 11:45pm EST
  • Why on earth has no one heard from the very absent Supt/Pres of Southwestern College in these times of crisis? Where on GOOGLE-EARTH is he that he has not responded by blackberry, email, voicemail, twitter, fax, letter or telephone?

    How can someone be incommunicado because they are --out of the country on vacation-- in this day and age?

    This is a very hostile message.