Search News


Browse Archives

News

Survival -- Through Open Access

November 4, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

For the last nine months, the survival of the Utah State University Press has been in doubt, with fears that deep cuts being made to public higher education in Utah would end up killing off the publishing outlet.

This week comes news that the press will survive -- in part by embracing a new model of organization (becoming part of the university library) and a new business model (embracing open access, in which most publications would be available online and free). While both of those changes are significant, key aspects of the press's identity and mission will not change. It will continue to be a peer-reviewed scholarly publisher, and plans to continue its highly regarded work in fields such as composition studies, folklore, poetry, environmental studies, and the history and culture of the West.

"This is going to be a way for us to extend our reach and build momentum," said Michael Spooner, director of the press.

The Utah State operation is small as university presses go; last year it published 21 books and this year it will probably publish fewer, due to budget cuts. But Spooner said that the press can now hope to return to 21 a year, or even grow, through the new model of university support. By becoming part of the university library -- as several other university presses have done -- the press will gain support for much of its overhead operations and thus reduce costs.

But the more significant philosophical shift is to open access, with digital publication as the norm, in which Utah State is embracing a model being pioneered by the University of Michigan Press. Michigan announced in March that it would convert most of its monograph publishing to digital formats. Spooner noted that Michigan has always said it would continue print on demand, and that Utah State plans to do so as well. The key difference is that there will be no presumption that publication is in print form.

Spooner said that the Utah State press had just been starting to experiment with digital publishing, and that the budget crisis led to an acceleration of plans to look for a new economic model.

A statement from the university noted that budget considerations played a role in the shift, but stressed that the university and the press believed that the time was right for it.

Spooner said that he believed that what was most important was that the press will survive and that in digital format its books will have "the same rigorous scholarly peer review" as print books.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Survival -- Through Open Access

  • Great News
  • Posted by Jason Baird Jackson , Associate Professor at Indiana University on November 4, 2009 at 8:15am EST
  • As a folklorist (Utah State University Press is an active and important publisher in this field), as an advocate for reform in scholarly communications, and as a supporter of university libraries (and presses), I am very happy about this news. The press has moved from a position of (budget-based) doubt to one of strength and is now (with Rice and Michigan) in a position of leadership in charting a positive new course. While the real test is in the details of implementation, this is a major opportunity for my field and for non-commercial and open publishing. Thank you to the Utah State University leadership for taking this step and preserving a great small press in a way that also positions the university to be a real leader in the years ahead.

  • Ditto "Great News"!
  • Posted by Cheryl E. Ball , Assistant Professor of English/New Media at Illinois State University on November 4, 2009 at 9:45am EST
  • As a rhetoric and composition scholar specializing in new media, I ditto what Jason said in his comment. In my opinion, USUP is *the* university press in digital writing studies, and their association with Computers and Composition Digital Press (<a href="http://ccdigitalpress.org/">http://ccdigitalpress.org/</a>), which publishes open-access books composed in multiple media, will create the basis for a more stable publishing future in this field. Thank you to USU administrators, and to Michael Spooner and the press staff, for coming up with a great plan.

  • OA & POD
  • Posted by Sandy Thatcher , Penn State University Press on November 4, 2009 at 2:45pm EST
  • It's good to have another press join in the experimentation with an OA model for monograph publishing, which was actually pioneered by National Academies Press in 1995, long before Michigan and Rice picked it up and our press at Penn State introduced the model for a Romance Studies series in 2005. As Michael Spooner rightly observes, the stories about Michigan's going digital have overlooked a key fact about such experiments, viz., that they depend vitally for revenue support from POD (print-on-demand) sales. The jury is still out, however, on whether this kind of model can succeed in the humanities over the long haul. Only universities supporting presses fully to cover all initial publishing costs could guarantee success of the OA model completely, and no university has yet showed signs of being willing to go in that direction. --- Sandy Thatcher

  • A Great Tradition Continues
  • Posted by Edward M. White , Visiting Scholar, English at University of Arizona on November 4, 2009 at 4:00pm EST
  • Great work, Michael. I've watched USUP for the fifty-plus years I've been teaching, and it is consistently the best publisher in the field of comp/rhetoric. All of us in the field are grateful to your inside work (which must have been hazardous to your health) to keep that tradition going.

  • bravo USUP!
  • Posted by Carl Whithaus , Associate Professor, Writing, Rhetoric, and Composition Studies at Univeristy of California, Davis on November 4, 2009 at 6:15pm EST
  • The open access (OA) model for scholarly publishing is an important move. In composition studies (and many other fields), we've already seen some of the best journals (_Kairos_, _Vectors_, _Enculturation_) appear in open access online formats. I'm delighted to see Michael Spooner and USUP move into that format.

    It will be interesting to see how libraries pick up and catalogue book-length studies published through OA models. The WAC Clearing House has a number of valuable composition studies monographs available (http://wac.colostate.edu/books/). I wonder how many university libraries link to them?

    It seems that getting into libraries catalogues will be the next challenge for OA publishers of scholarly material.

  • Open Access Publishing
  • Posted by Bennett Lovett-Graff , Project Manager at Archaeology of the Americas Digital Monograph Initiative on November 5, 2009 at 11:30am EST
  • An open access publishing program by a press that now has had its budget folded into the library would be entirely viable if, in fact, its entire budget were financed under the library.

    True this would make the press no more than an extension of the library's operations, but then again, maybe academic libraries are themselves fated to become instead scholarly communications hubs that merge the functions of traditional academic libraries with the additional duties of serving as institutional repositories, data hubs, and university press operations.