Search News


Browse Archives

News

Tweeting in Class

November 5, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

DENVER — Do Twitter skeptics really believe the popular microblogging service offers no educational value, or are they just afraid of it?

For W. Gardner Campbell, director of the Academy of Teaching and Learning at Baylor University, there is no question that fear of straying from the status quo has inhibited the development of Twitter as a teaching tool. “I go to conferences like Open Education 2009, and I come back with T-shirts like this: ‘Reuse, Revise, Remix, Redistribute,’ ” he said Wednesday at the annual Educause conference here. “And all it adds up to is more punishment at the hands of well-meaning, sometimes, but ultimately self-preserving institutional structures.”

While some higher ed officials — including nearly everyone at Wednesday's debate between Campbell and Bruce Maas, CIO of the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee — use Twitter for fun, many balk at the idea of incorporating it into the classroom.

Not Campbell, who also serves as an associate professor of literature and media at Baylor. “This network has been vitally important to me as a professional,” he told a packed audience, many of whom were discussing the session live via Twitter on a projection screen near the stage. Eventually, after he realized how useful the site is as a real-time resource for feedback and information, “I think, ‘If this network is good for me as a learner, could it be good for my students as learners?’ ”

Maas, representing a more sober view of Twitter’s educational utility, pointed to studies indicating that young people have not been as active in the realm of microblogging as their older counterparts. He said the evidence that the site might prove more a distraction in the classroom than a resource was right there in the room — Maas gestured to the overwhelming activity on the session’s Twitter discussion thread (the number of comments approached 500 by the end of the 45-minute gathering).

Interested in Technology Issues?
Visit our "In Focus" page, which
features highlights of our coverage
on distance ed, teaching with
technology, and other topics. And
sign up for our Twitter feed at
http://twitter.com/ihetech

But Campbell had a different take on the implications of audience members feverishly typing away while a presentation is still in progress. “That’s a godsend!” he said. “Suddenly, I’m not just the one at the front just dispensing everything, and the students aren’t just sort of milling about doing their thing — we’ve actually got a team of people working together. And Twitter is the glue that holds the team together.”

It’s also a data-gathering resource. Live discussion threads, Campbell noted, give professors loads of data on the previously mysterious question of what exactly is going on inside the heads of students during a lecture. No longer is a student’s ability to participate in classroom discussions contingent upon whether he is willing to raise his hand and has the good fortune to be called on, he said.

Nor is this sort of interchange bound within the walls of the classroom. Campbell mentioned the case of Monica Rankin, a history professor at the University of Texas at Dallas, who invited real-time Twitter talkback in her lectures. That social media experiment, he said, begat others: A graduate student at another program documented the experiment and posted it to YouTube; the professor began blogging about the experiment. “It wasn’t within the silos,” said Campbell. “What you saw here in this experiment was a lot of people climbing out of their fallout shelters… What happened was an institution-wide conversation that they shared with the world.”

And that, Maas said, is where CIOs start to get uncomfortable. The CIO’s role in the Twitter debate is not really to argue against the effectiveness of the service as a teaching tool, but to worry about the security and privacy risks that might come with moving course discussions out of the walled garden and on to the open Web.

“Security people,” he said, “have come up from the technology path. They’re not really from the sociologist path. So we really have a long way to go in finding the right security balance.”

Campbell acknowledged that the idea of having students tweet during lectures can be a scary prospect, not just for CIOs and public relations managers, but for faculty. “What if something gets quoted incorrectly? What if somebody says something that you didn’t want to share with the world?”

“Well, what if?” he continued. “It’s a cost-benefit trade-off.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Tweeting in Class

  • There's A Reason They're Called Social Utilities
  • Posted by Mark Grimsley , Professor, Dept. of History at Ohio State University on November 5, 2009 at 8:00am EST
  • I'm in the second of a two year appointment as a visiting professor at the U.S. Army War College. It's taught me a couple of things about social utilities like Twitter and Facebook.

    First observation: Within the military there's been a fierce debate about the value of social utilities. Arrayed on the one side are those who are enthusiastic or at least willing to experiment with them. They see them as ways by which deployed service personnel can stay in touch with friends and loved ones, and even more so as a means of "strategic communication" -- recently described as the art of "persuading allies and friends to stand with you, persuading neutrals to come over to your side or at least stay neutral, persuading adversaries that you have the power and the will to prevail over them, persuading the nation’s citizens to support the policies of their leaders so that a national will is forged to accomplish national objectives." On the other are those opposed to social utilities because of fears -- sometimes well grounded, sometimes not -- about security concerns.

    That debate has largely been won by the enthusiasts. Several months ago the Army lifted a long-standing ban on being able to access Facebook, etc., using military PCs, a reflection of the direction the Defense Department was moving as a whole. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen has a Twitter account. In August, when the Marine Corps suddenly announced a complete ban on social utilities, his next update read, "Obviously we need to find right balance between security and transparency. We are working on that. But am I still going to tweet? You bet."

    Second observation: By comparison, academics remain enormously hidebound about social utilities. I routinely hear academics who have never laid eyes on Twitter or Facebook dismiss them with would-be clever put downs based on sheer ignorance. Such people sound like nothing so much as medieval scribes grousing about the advent of movable type. I see articles like the one above, that debate the use of Facebook, etc., by students or as pedagogical tools. I have never seen one that discussed Facebook as a tool by which to maintain or enhance academic community.

    Faculty at the war college routinely talk and socialize with one another the old-fashioned way--face to face--which goes a long way to make it easier to talk through issues and disagreements when they arise. In contrast, colleagues at my home department exemplify a widespread pattern in academe. As the pressures of research, family, etc., lead them to minimize their time on campus, they socialize with one another less and less. As a result, an astonishing amount of business--much of it quite contentious--is transacted via email.

    Most of my colleagues at the war college are active duty or retired officers who understand the value of teamwork and strong personal relationships. When I tell them about my department's extensive use of email--a medium notorious for the ease with which messages can come off as brusque or rude, by which the "cc" and "bcc" features can be exploited in Machiavellian ways, and with which the mere existence of the "reply all" key is an invitation to disaster--they just wince.

    Academics, particularly at research institutions, are never going to abandon the advantages of being able to work off campus, and most seem either oblivious to the attenuation of community that results or else resigned to it. An available solution--social utilities like Twitter and Facebook, particularly the latter--is staring right at them. It's amazing how well these utilities foster a sense of community, which is the reason for their popularity in the first place. Millions of people have figured this out. It's a pity academics haven't.

  • Tell Me I'm Not Alone Here
  • Posted by Anonymous on November 5, 2009 at 9:15am EST
  • What astounds me is that those debating this topic (Web 2.0 and Social Media in Academia) are obsessed with finding a universal best practice--as if any such thing could possibly exist. Each institution's population is going to respond to this differently--the internet is about choice. Make all the observations you want about your generations of students and strive to find a single, archetypal way to deal with this question, but in the end you have to realize that each of your students approaches this from their own, unique "Point A" in the "Point A to Point B Journey" that is their education. You can chose to be learner-centered in your approach or you can entrench in the "old headed" teacher-centered model.

    And Security? Please! Tell me the last time an institution was sued over posting information on their own Web site and I'll show you how the professional who posted it was at fault for the security breech rather than it being the fault of the delivery tool. Worried about being mis-quoted? Set up a Google news feed with your name as the delimiter--as soon as you're misquoted, get out there and correct the public record. Does this make your life easier? No. Does it make your professional profile more relevant in this century? To quote the most recent Windows 7 ad campaign, Abso-freaking-lutely!

     

  • Twitter has worked for my students
  • Posted by Dr. V , College of Technology at Purdue University on November 5, 2009 at 11:30am EST
  • I've been using Twitter as an educational tool for about two years now. I think it has worked very well for my students. Here is some informal assessment from my students:
    http://prconnections.net/pr-students-on-learning-twitter/

    That being said, I don't think the tool is the secret sauce. It may work for some, it may not work for others. We can't assume that in every single class that Twitter may be used, it will help students learn. We need research to look into that.

    In certain fields, such as media, communication, and related ones, I think it's the professor's duty to try out Twitter and other social media, and to include them in the class. Not doing so is ignoring enormous changes in the media landscape, and doing a disservice to students. In other fields, it may not be imperative that professors teach with and about Twitter. Though I, too, wish they kept an open mind about it.

    I am an advocate of Twitter - I love it, and I love what it has enabled me and my students to do. But as a researcher, I can't advocate that everyone use Twitter. We need evidence to see when it works, and how to use it so that it helps students learn.

  • Posted by Thomas on November 5, 2009 at 11:45am EST
  • I'd love to use Twitter in the classroom, but I know that 85% of the students tapping away on their cell phones would be socializing, and completely distracted.

  • What if the answer is no?
  • Posted by Steve Taffee , Director of Technology at Castilleja School on November 5, 2009 at 11:45am EST
  • Educators keep arguing about the utility of social media tools in the classroom. OK. Let's assume that you decide that they are not appropriate. What next? Not allow students to use their computers in class? Pat them down at the door to make sure there's no contraband smart phones? Line the lecture halls with copper shields to prevent wireless signals?

    The train has left the station. Get on it, get run over by it, or get left behind.

  • how to tweet?
  • Posted by bradley bleck , English Instructor at Spokane Falls CC on November 5, 2009 at 11:45am EST
  • I have been thinking about how to tweet with my students in support of class activities. I'm still not sure how. In some ways, it's a little like using a MOO, MUD or other chat function, where everyone can participate, where the non-talkers can add their thoughts to the conversation. Stuill haven't figured out a good way to do it. If folks have ideas to share, I'd like to hear them.

  • Posted by WTF on November 5, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • One is left to wonder how often a "director of technology" actually teaches in a classroom with a throng of tweeting students who seem incapable of following a discussion or comprehending the material to be assessed.

    While I concede I can imagine many ways technology like Twitter can be used to enhance teaching, this mad dash to exclaim the fait accompli of technological invasion is irritating.

    So, yes, Mr. Director of Technology, I will ban cell phones, laptops, and their various iterations if I believe it is in the students' best interests to pay attention to me, to each other, and to the classroom. I am running the course. I (supposedly) have academic freedom. And, unlike you (perhaps?), I see the (almost universally negative) results of student distraction by the big, flashy technotoy.

    Another point that often gets lost in these debates:

    Let's try to remember that the majority of faculty in the US do not have tenure, do not make much above poverty wages, and often do not even have access to the same resources (like offices) that are necessary to embrace the cyber-love needed for all this technophilia. One must wonder if the money used to buy all the new, fancy toys bought for campuses should have been used to stabilize the faculty staffing.

  • technological sublimity
  • Posted by George T. Karnezis on November 5, 2009 at 1:45pm EST
  • “Suddenly, I’m not just the one at the front just dispensing everything"

    Oh, really? And what sort of impoverished notion of teaching is in play here in such language? Dispensing? Many of us, who have never characterized themselves this way as teachers, may have doubts about the bells and whistles that are supposed to make us all better teachers and students Lewis Mumford, I think, coined the term "rhetoric of the technological sublime": It referred to that habit of of verbal enthusiasm for the latest gizmo that was supposed to make our lives so much better, and how any challengers to it were simply Luddites. Later, as more experience with the bells and whistles happened, doubts about their impact and virtues claimed for them grew.

    The beat goes on.

  • Posted by talleyrand on November 5, 2009 at 2:15pm EST
  • I'd be interested in studies, even informal ones, that show that using Twitter in class has educationally meaningful outcomes when you're teaching something other than how to use Twitter, which it appears is what Dr. V was doing.

  • Posted by Raoul Ohio on November 5, 2009 at 5:30pm EST
  • I am not in favor of students reading newspapers in class. I must be a Luddite.

  • I can empathize...
  • Posted by Rebecca Wood , Political Science at University of Nevada Las Vegas on November 5, 2009 at 5:30pm EST
  • I can certainly empathize with professors who worry that in-class tweeting will lead to chaos. The same can be said for allowing students to take notes on their laptop computers during class. Several of them are taking notes diligently, while others are buying shoes or playing Bejeweled or looking things up on Wikipedia in an attempt to prove their professor wrong.

    That said, the use of social networking tools outside the classroom can help to create very powerful connections between the student and the course content. Professors might create course pages on Facebook, where students can become "fans" and create mini-dialogues around the articles that the professor and other students post. This brings information to the students where they already are. It allows the professor to say, "Hey! Look! This stuff that's happening in the real world is relevant to what we're learning in class!" This is an important way to help students connect their classroom experience to their experience as citizens.

    In my role as the university's only prelaw advisor, I have used social media as a tool to provide information to students at my university and around the country. Instead of answering the same questions over and over again, I can communicate with the whole lot of them at the same time. This allows me to reserve my scarce face-to-face time for students with questions that need individualized attention. I'm also able to forward relevant articles, blog posts, videos, etc. to the students effortlessly. To see the results, view the feed at my website (http://faculty.unlv.edu/rwood), and follow the link to the Facebook page.

    In my opinion, though, the most important advantage of using these resources is the ability to socialize students into the practice of engaging in substantive conversations outside of the classroom. Sure, they will spend a significant amount of time "Kanye Westing" their friends on Facebook, but they will also spend time looking for, thinking about, and discussing the important events of our time.

  • Nice post.
  • Posted by Wayne Francis , Adjunt Professor of English & Reading at Florida State College at Jacksonville on November 7, 2009 at 4:45pm EST
  • Thanks for this. I wish the debate mentioned in the post centered around twitter's general value to college students, not simply twitter's use during lectures. Web 2.0 changed the authority structure of news and information; now anyone can join the conversation. No leaders. In social media, anyone can vote/recommend/digg a story up or down. So a "lecture" with audience members on twitter seems like putting a circle in a square hole.

    In fact, if the class in which twitter can be used to record notes does not have its course outline, assignments, and videos of all the professor's lectures online for the general public, then is the course ready for incorporating technology that embraces openness and freedom of expression? In a class of that sort, I don't see why a traditional classroom lecture would even be necessary. Couldn't the students watch all the lectures online beforehand, and then use the classtime to openly discuss--on twitter or any other social media platform--their struggles with the material?

    When you invite real-time talkback on Twitter, you open the floor to everyone, and when a single lecturer dominates the entire conversation, you've misapplied the technology.

  • WTF makes great points
  • Posted by DFS on November 11, 2009 at 12:00pm EST
  • And I would just like to add that technology is supposed to add to the ability of learning and teaching.

    If it does not do one or the other, then it is in our way.

    Sometimes we must just require the students to put pen or pencil to paper and exhibit their actual knowledge.

    Consider this: It might be discovered that beating actual drums is a better form of communication. The classrooms will then become very noisy, I think.

    Or, in a creative writing class, it is judged 'imperative' that students can Tweet. Exactly how 'creative' will that be?

    And, on and on and on. Let's just stop masturbating over each and every new technique.