Quick Takes

November 6, 2009

Controversial Emory Professor Lands Job at Miami

Charles Nemeroff, an Emory University psychiatrist whose work has been highly influential and who has been at the center of a conflict-of-interest scandal, is moving to the University of Miami as its new psychiatry chair. Nemeroff resigned from the chair's position at Emory in December, amid growing Congressional scrutiny of payments he received from GlaxoSmithKline and did not report -- in violation of university rules, which are designed to ensure that federally supported research is not tainted by unknown financial conflicts of interest by researchers. The Miami Herald quoted Pascal Goldschmidt, dean of the University of Miami medical school, as acknowledging the controversy, but also calling Nemeroff "an extraordinary psychiatrist and scientist."

Community College Sued Over Limits on Rallies

Two students -- backed by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education -- are suing the Tarrant County College District, charging that its limits on rallies are violations of First Amendment rights, the Associated Press reported. The college permits protest activities only in a limited free speech zone, and requires advance permission to schedule events there. College officials say that the rules are consistent with federal and state requirements. But the students say that they are being blocked from engaging in legitimate protest. The students want to rally on behalf of the right to carry concealed weapons on campus and they say that they are being barred from wearing empty holsters on campus as an expression of their views.

New Database for College Information

The Institute for College Access and Success on Thursday unveiled a new Web site, College InSight, designed to provide a wide range of data about colleges -- information on prices and financial aid, socioeconomic, racial and other diversity, and student outcomes. The site, a resource for parents as well as policy makers, allows users to build their own data sets based on the institutions and data elements of their choosing.

Maryland's Minority Students Rally for Diversity Official

Hundreds of students at the University of Maryland at College Park, in one of the larger rallies in many years on the campus, on Thursday protested the elimination of a full-time position devoted to diversity efforts, The Washington Post reported. Cordell Black, associate provost for equity and diversity, will lose that title, but will remain as a tenured faculty member. University officials attributed the change to budget cuts, but students said that the move reflected a dangerous lack of commitment to diversity issues on the campus.

Senate Approves Spending Bill for Science Programs

The U.S. Senate on Thursday approved a 2010 spending bill for many federal science programs that would provide $6.9 billion for the National Science Foundation, including $5.55 billion for research, $122 million for research equipment and facilities; and $857 million for the agency's education programs. In passing the bill, the Senate rejected an amendment that would have eliminated funding for the NSF's political science program -- though the amendment garnered 36 votes.

Vermont Committee Doubts Wisdom of Higher Ed Merger

A state panel has concluded that the University of Vermont and five state colleges in the state should not be merged, the Associated Press reported. The idea of a merger has been much debated in the state as a way to save money, but the panel concluded that the cultures of the university and the state colleges are too different. Instead, the panel suggested that they look for new ways to collaborate on selected programs.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Around the Web

Philosophers shoveling snow, in The Duck of Minerva.... Dual authors in anthropology, in Savage Minds....

FREE Daily News Alerts

Comments on Quick Takes

  • Ring Wing Agitation Handbook Lesson One
  • Posted by Diogenes on November 6, 2009 at 10:00am EST
  • If you don't like a reasonable policy that doesn't agree with your canned ideology, claim it a free speech issue even though its not and grab as many headlines as possible. And before all the lefties out there start crowing "amen," they learned this from you in the 60's. Behind every right wing agit-prop activity is a little bit o' Mao. Just ask $600,000 a year David Horowitz.

  • Posted by Steve Foerster on November 6, 2009 at 11:15am EST
  • Of course it's a free speech issue! When you tell students they can't wear t-shirts and empty holsters as a way to express their views, what could that possibly be other than censorship? And when you have tiny free speech zones, what else could the rest of the campus be other than a place where speech isn't free?

    If you want to disagree with these students on this issue, that's fine. But they have a right to be heard, and that right is being systematically disrespected here.

  • Vermont state college recommendation misses the point
  • Posted by Sue Metzner on November 6, 2009 at 1:15pm EST
  • The commission studying possible consolidation recommended against it because there were no siginificant savings in eliminating duplicate programs. They miss the fact that the savings would be achieved by eliminating duplicate administrative salaries. With a consolidated system, you do not need five presidents, for example.

  • Posted by Thomas on November 7, 2009 at 5:00pm EST
  • The notion that consolidation brings about efficiencies is an urban legend. Consolidation rarely saves money. Recall how the Department of Homeland Security was supposed to save money by consolidating processes under one roof? They actually waste a lot more now than the the separate agencies ever did before.

    When higher ed systems consolidate, they simply reshuffle positions and salaries into a highly centralized and more authoritarian bureaucracy. It doesn't save money, and it usually results in less accountability for incompetent administrators.

  • Free Speech Zone
  • Posted by DFS on November 8, 2009 at 10:00pm EST
  • Let's make sure, Diogenes. Is this a free-speech zone? Are all of the requisite signs appropriately displayed? If they can be reasonably seen from some distance, what is this distance?

    If someone is offended by displays visible from some unrealistic distance, then how about all of those offensive displays taken by communication professors -- or even worse, by psychology professors -- in their classrooms? Were those classes "displayed" only in the free-speech zones? If not, someone's head needs to roll.

    Since we now require such 'zones,' let's use them appropriately. Else, the campus is taking some particular position.

    I hope this position falls within the realm of free speech, versus academically free speech.

    Let's now try to draw that line, somewhere.