Search News


Browse Archives

News

Shifts in Grad Enrollments

November 10, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The number of international first-time students at American graduate schools is flat this year, following four consecutive years of growth, according to a study being released today by the Council of Graduate Schools. At the same time, enrollments of American students are up 6 percent in a year.

For both groups, the numbers do not seem to reflect any single trend but rather a combination of circumstances.

For instance, among the graduate schools in the survey, some are seeing larger increases in American students, but others are seeing decreases. For the 166 reporting increases, the average was 11 percent. For the 79 reporting decreases, the average decline was 7 percent. Generally, doctoral institutions reported larger increases than master's-oriented institutions.

The council's survey -- although it includes some questions about domestic students -- focuses primarily on international students. While there are figures for total enrollments as well as first-time enrollments, the latter are particularly important in projecting future trends. Because doctoral programs take many years to complete, first-year figures are a better indicator than total enrollments of how the market for international students is changing. And this year, the first-year numbers are changing all over the place.

As has been the case in recent years, the enrollments of graduate students from China continued to surge. But gains from the Middle East and Turkey were much larger than they have been in recent years, while figures from India and South Korea -- major provider nations of graduate students -- were down.

One-Year Changes in First-Time International Graduate Enrollments

Country of Origin 2006 2007 2008 2009
China +20% +19% +14% +16%
India +32% +8% -2% -16%
South Korea +5% +3% -4% -13%
Middle East and Turkey -1% +12% +8% +22%
All countries +12% +4% +3% +0%

In some sense the data are not surprising in that they largely mirror what the council found in an earlier survey on graduate admissions offers. But the question remains: Why are some countries sending far fewer graduate students to the United States?

Last month, The Economic Times of India reported on a 25 percent drop in the number of U.S. visas being awarded in India. The experts in the article said that the problem was not the difficulty of obtaining visas (a complaint in the past) but reductions in the financial aid packages being offered by American universities to Indian students, decreasing the desire of many of them to apply for visas.

Nathan Bell, director of research and policy analysis at the Council of Graduate Schools, said that the rationale identified in that article "rings true," although the council's survey did not ask for information about why various programs were seeing gains and dips. Some graduate school officials, however, have told him that there is some hesitancy among foreign students about borrowing to pay for graduate education at a time when job prospects are uncertain.

Bell stressed that "it's no one thing in any country, but a combination of factors." For instance, he said that Chinese students may be as reluctant to borrow as are Indian students, but he noted that the increase in undergraduate enrollments in China has been so dramatic that demand for graduate education continues to surge, leading many to come to the United States.

Another key issue is competition. Bell noted that countries like India and China have seen an expansion in graduate education offerings, and that other Western nations -- such as Canada and Britain -- are wooing foreign students. "I think there is some cause for concern," he said. "Twenty years ago, the United States was your destination of choice. Now there are other countries to consider and the option of staying at home," he said.

The data also show some notable changes -- although less dramatic than those for country of origin -- in field of study. Physical and earth sciences, one of the areas showing a decline, is historically one of the dominant subject areas for international students. And science and technology fields are generally flat, following years in which many showed significant increases.

One-Year Changes in First-Time International Graduate Enrollments

Field of Study 2006 2007 2008 2009
Arts and humanities -6% +4% -1% -3%
Business +10% +12% +4% +0%
Education +8% -6% -2% +5%
Engineering +22% +8% +1% +0%
Life sciences +2% +6% +1% +0%
Physical and life sciences +5% +2% +5% -4%
Social sciences and psychology +3% -1% -1% +1%
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Shifts in Grad Enrollments

  • A message for the next generation of college leadership
  • Posted by Master of None on November 10, 2009 at 1:15pm EST
  • These numbers bear watching over the long-term--10 to 15 years and beyond. As the US continues to provide fiscal, physical and human capital for higher education overseas--particularly in developing nations and/or democracies, one cannot overlook the possibility that those institutions will themselves become highly successful 'local' options for students to pursue undergraduate and graduate degrees alike at which point the value and cost of a US degree will become questionable.

    The college presidents, regents/trustees, and admissions officers of tomorrow should be watching these data today and for years to come.

  • Why I didn't come...
  • Posted by Penguin on November 10, 2009 at 6:30pm EST
  • Well, I'm just one prospective student and not from one of the famed cash cow countries listed, but I seriously considered graduate study in the US and decided against it for a number of reasons.

    Firstly, I already have an MA from my home institution (a well-ranking one). Most PhD programmes were not very interested in crediting this. That puts me on the back foot straight off.

    Secondly, I was put off by the cost of the graduate entrance exams and their irrelevance to my field. I don't have to sit weird exams to do a PhD elsewhere, why would I do this for the US?

    Thirdly, I was put off by the inability of graduate advisers in quite a few institutions I contacted to discuss my study options to bother to even acknowledge my query. I can be happily fobbed off to a secretary or sent information through the post, but you need to actually read my nice polite email to do this! I've read your website and I'm asking a genuine question - not giving me an answer is a sure-fire way to make sure I don't apply to your institution.

    Fourthly, I was put off by the low likelihood that my partner would be able to enter the US with me. I don't need to dismantle my family to study elsewhere, and the US is not enough of a draw to make me do this.

    Finally, I was put off by what I see of the US in the media. A country that actually has to argue about whether people deserve healthcare isn't actually an attractive destination for me.

  • Sixthly,
  • Posted by DFS on November 10, 2009 at 7:30pm EST
  • An American-provided education just ain't what it used to be.

  • One more reason
  • Posted by MK on November 11, 2009 at 2:45pm EST
  • With no data from a nationally recongnized accrediting agency, it is very difficult to assess the comparative quality of any particular US institution.

  • MK
  • Posted by DFS on November 12, 2009 at 11:15pm EST
  • You may be right about 'assessment.'

    But, in the real world of experiential insight, one can still make a judgment that American higher education has steadily declined.