Search News


Browse Archives

News

Teaching for Free

November 10, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Employees at the University of California at Davis have been hit hard by the economy. They’ve been forced to take unpaid furloughs, give up research funding and watch as a much-envied state system is de-funded and deteriorates.

Faced with a 20 percent budget cut for the division she oversees, Patricia Turner, vice provost for undergraduate studies, is calling on them to sacrifice yet again, writing to dozens of faculty and lecturers late last month and asking them to forgo part or all of the research stipends they earn for teaching freshman seminars.

In previous years, some seminar instructors had voluntarily given up the stipends and asked that they be reinvested in the program. Turner and Winder McConnell, director of the Teaching Resources Center, which oversees the seminar program, hoped others would do the same if given the chance. “We’re looking under every rock for resources,” Turner said in an interview. “Given these times, I needed to at least ask the question.”

The answers, though, have ranged from begrudging to angry, as Davis faculty and observers consider the possibility of giving up $1,500 to $2,000 designated to be used for research or travel, expenses already cut to oblivion in most academic departments.

Amy Clarke, a writing lecturer with a forthcoming book about the Twilight fantasy series, is teaching a seminar on the books this fall. She is not giving back the $1,500 stipend to which she is entitled. “This was an agreed upon amount,” she said, “and I have already earmarked the money for research.”

By teaching seminars without a stipend and as overload, she added, instructors “are most definitely doing this for free.… It is an add-on to their workload.” Some bloggers and commenters seem to agree.

Cristina Gonzalez, a Spanish professor, has volunteered to give up the stipend for the next seminar she teaches, conceding that she’s “volunteered to teach for free.” Seminars generally meet for 10 to 20 hours over the course of a 10-week quarter and, she said, the stipend “does not begin to compensate for the time and effort that it takes to teach these freshman seminars, so I think that most of us teach them out of a spirit of service.”

Even so, she added, “for some faculty members, these are the only research funds available.” Giving them up would leave them without the bit of cash they have to pay to attend conferences or subscribe to professional publications that are no longer funded by the university library.

Davis offers about 200 freshman seminars each year and could save at least $300,000 over the course of the next year, should all instructors decide to decline their stipends. Though the stipends are “relatively small expenditures” in the scheme of the Davis budget, Turner said she sought them out in her pursuit to “find any source of revenue that can be useful to me in meeting the budget targets.”

More than two dozen instructors have responded to her with e-mail messages committing to give up all, some or none of their stipends. “Nobody’s happy about it,” she said, “but they still say they want to help. The basic tenor is, ‘It’s lousy that it’s come to this, I can’t do it this quarter but I can next quarter’ or ‘I wish I could participate but I really need this money for my work.’ ”

Jon Rossini, an associate professor of theater and dance, falls into the latter category. Though he’s not teaching a seminar this semester, he often teaches a course on the cultural politics of the cartoon series “South Park” in part for the chance to interact with students in a field outside his own, but also “for the research support.” Without some sort of stipend, he said, he would be “unlikely” to teach another seminar. The money covers his travel expenses for a few conferences each year.

One faculty member who's agreed to give up his stipend this fall is Subhash Risbud, a professor of chemical engineering and materials science, who said he won't do so again when he teaches a seminar next spring. He sees the giveback as “a short-term, Band-Aid solution” he’s willing to be a part of, but won’t allow to become the norm.

“By giving up my stipend now, I hope I’ll be part of making it possible for more students to take these seminars in the longer term,” he said. “But this is not something that should be continuously done on a constant basis.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Teaching for Free

  • You have to be kidding!
  • Posted by Susan , Academic Counselor at CVCC on November 10, 2009 at 8:30am EST
  • I've been teaching Freshman Orientation for almost 20 and never got paid for it. It was part of my job. Never mind the extra hours that I put in getting it organized, pulling the material together, creating the activities all the while enrolling students for fall.

    I work at a community college, so faculty whining about not being paid for orientation is kind of insulting to me.

  • Two Things
  • Posted by Steve on November 10, 2009 at 9:00am EST
  • 1) Susan - You are not faculty. Part of your job as a counselor is teaching freshman seminar. Your payment is built into your salary. As a result, you are not doing this for free.

    2) I cannot understand why colleges, especially my own, continue to try and save money with a dollar here and a dollar there instead of looking at the administrative bloat that has accrued over the last 10 years or so. At my college, administrative positions are up close to 40% over that time and I have read similar statistics for other schools around the country (UNC - http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/unc_administration_bloated). The easiest way to save money is to get rid of one or two highly paid administrators. Every college has one or two that could be let go without the college suffering any adverse effects. This will never happen, of course, because it's the administration that decides how to save money. No one in their right mind is going to lop off their own head.

  • Posted by cece , Assistant professor on November 10, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • Unfortunately these decisions, if understandable, can be used to take advantage of those of us who feel deeply committed to teaching such courses.

  • More Information?
  • Posted by cts on November 10, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • It would be helpful to know if these seminars are overload or in-load teaching. If the latter, then faculty are paid for teaching them; they have been receiving a bonus to encourage their participation.

    Of course, being nickled and dimed to death while money is spent on athletics and administrative positions will cause resentment.

  • Posted by Ronert on November 10, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • Orientation and Freshman Seminar are often quite different things.

  • information
  • Posted by Dorsal at UC DAVIS on November 10, 2009 at 12:00pm EST
  • Freshman seminars are overload courses. Travel money has already been cut as have small grants for research assistance in the humanities, so the only way to generate a trivial amount of support is through this overload mechanism. I agree with others here. The Administration is entirely bloated, one position would account for more than all the continuing funds sought for this entire program. Our travel to conferences and invited presentations to professional groups has been cut but not the more expensive travel of a 3rd rate football team. Perhaps universities could put on conferences as half-time shows?

  • Welcome to our world
  • Posted by Piss Poor Prof at www.burntoutadjunct.wordpress.com on November 10, 2009 at 1:15pm EST
  • I have great sympathy for the tenured faculty of UC-Davis...I really do. It is insulting to be asked to perform professional services for sub-standard or non-existent wages. In addition, how is a professional supposed to advance in her field if the institution doesn't help offset the costs of attending professional events? To pay out of pocket, all the while teaching for low wages, living a "so called" life and .... It is just to much.

    I agree. I really, really do.

  • Twilight? South Park?
  • Posted by Administrator from Another State on November 10, 2009 at 1:15pm EST
  • These courses are in "deteriorating" system? Hell, the rot has already set in. Clearly the faculty in question are completely clueless about public perception in offering quotes for this article.

  • Posted by UCD student , Student at UC Davis on November 10, 2009 at 2:45pm EST
  • I couldn't agree more with Steve's comment #2! How about looking at the new chancellors $500K/year salary, the job built in for her husband, the new house and new cars they were given... funny how she's busily asking others to give up money and yet she's not even close to doing the same thing... hypocrisy at is finest!

  • Posted by WTF on November 10, 2009 at 4:15pm EST
  • Why is is that every time some class featuring content related to popular culture some anti-intellectual wonk like Administrator from Another State snarks on it?

    Sweetie, the kids aren't sitting around watching videos all day. I suspect these one-credit courses are designed to take interesting content (like perennial undergrad faves like South Park and Twilight) and use them to introduce skills necessary for the rest of college, like observation, criticism, oral participation, etc.

    It's all about that this-class-is-relevant-to-my-life crap everyone is supposed to be promoting in colleges now. What's more relevant than using one of the most popular TV shows (and therefore watched by millions) and book series (and therefore read by millions...in fact, quite possibly the only books the little cherubs have read in recent years)?

    Or is college all about churning out more business majors who work as corporate drones all day then sate themselves through uncritical imbibing of brainless pop culture all night? Oh, it's so much better to deride any potential inculcation of critical thinking about the ubiquitous media texts flowing hither and yon, ain't it! I mean, Good Heavens! We might actually not be able to say they're all brainless then!

    Considering some colleges are ditching their museums and arts programs, even high art isn't safe from the anti-intellectuals.

    Job training!

    ROI!

    Retention and graduation!

    Ignore the functional illiterate in the back row...ignore him...pass him through...

    If you don't, then we'll make sure you don't get tenure and re-assign your class to an adjunct desperate enough to work for nearly free!

  • Yes, Twilight...
  • Posted by Amy Clarke on November 10, 2009 at 4:15pm EST
  • This is an overload, I did offer in future to take a reduced stipend, and yes I do indeed teach a course on the Twilight Series. Freshmen Seminars are a unique way to bring new undergraduates in on our research topics, making them part of the academic conversation very early on in their college careers. In this case, I take something they are avidly aware of and teach them how to ask critical, analytical questions about it and the cultural phenomenon it represents. To the tactless "administrator from another state," the reporter did not inquire about which classes I taught, but she did choose to focus on this one probably because she knew it would get your attention.

  • A small suggestion to save money.
  • Posted by DFS on November 10, 2009 at 6:30pm EST
  • Ask faculty who have become administrators to waive their salary differential from their previous pay.

    That ought to fund a few things around here.

  • Posted by jim on November 10, 2009 at 8:00pm EST
  • To DFS:
    If the faculty-who-have-become-administrators forfeit the salary differential the university will find out how to proceed with no administrators. The salary differential may be the only reason to become an administrator.

  • Oh my, I struck a nerve...
  • Posted by Administrator from Another State on November 10, 2009 at 8:30pm EST
  • One of the subjects of the article and others are upset about earlier comments. I'm so hurt by being called tactless. The fact is that when I have to explain such courses to state legislators, the explanations don't go very far. They want the histories and writings of dead white guys. They want some sense that the curricula have value.

    They, and I, are also fed up with legions of faculty telling them how impossible it is to assess student learning. Uh yeah, right, California also has an "Incomplete" in student learning according to Measuring Up.

    Yes, I bow to your dedication. I just wish there was evidence of its value.

  • You're right, Jim.
  • Posted by DFS on November 10, 2009 at 8:30pm EST
  • (Shhhh!) They may get wise.

    Or, would that be a bad thing? I'd rather the faculty be in charge.

    Perhaps we should just consider adjunct administrations, with a faculty as penultimate president.

    Just wondering . . .

  • Seminars, not courses
  • Posted by Faculty from another state on November 10, 2009 at 9:15pm EST
  • Administrator from another state - you have nerve, it's not that you struck one. These aren't courses, they're seminars, i.e., sessions to generate interest in a subject as a mini-advertisement for the institution. You see, the faculty get a little stipend because the seminars are over and above their usual workload, beyond their contract responsibilities. (I'm trying to explain it slowly and carefully so that you and other administrators can understand.) The gist of most of the comments is, the institution would save a lot more money if they relieved some of their overpaid administrators.
    Oh wait, now I get whose nerve has been struck...

  • Untenured
  • Posted by BCT on November 11, 2009 at 5:15am EST
  • Do untenured but tenure-track faculty really have an option to refuse this? It seems to me that untenured faculty should not be asked to forgo their stipend.

  • There's a sucker born every minute...
  • Posted by Jack on November 11, 2009 at 5:15am EST
  • In what other field would professionals give up pay for doing extra work?

  • By all means, reduce the administrators
  • Posted by Administrator from another stat on November 11, 2009 at 5:15am EST
  • There are lots of administrative costs that be reduced and saved.

    Administrative salaries, especially presidential salaries are out of control. Slash them. Fire them.

    Doesn't hurt my feelings at all. There are a lot of things we can do to cut costs and make a college education affordable for more students.

    And you have my support...even if that means giving up my job.

  • Faculty get a clue
  • Posted by Another Administrator on November 11, 2009 at 9:30am EST
  • I need to weigh in on this. As a front line administrator I take offense to faculty assuming all administrators are under worked and overpaid. Granted the upper administration is certainly over paid, there is no reason for some of these presidential salaries. But please do not lump all administrators into the same category.

    I have always been a strong supporter of faculty, especially adjucts. However, I am tired of feeling undervalued by faculty. I challenge all faculty to come out of your ivory tower and in to the realm of student affairs. Please work a week in my life. I'd like to see how you deal with the suicidal student at 3am, the roommates who can't get along, the homesick student over the weekend or the student who was sexually assaulted.

    These are cases that dedicated student affairs professionals deal with and we are the underpaid and over worked. I'd like to see you work 50 hours a week for $27,000 and try to support a family.

  • Administration, get the obvious clue.
  • Posted by DFS on November 11, 2009 at 2:00pm EST
  • As front-line faculty, I take offense to administration assuming all faculty are underworked, overpaid, and under-appreciated. Especially with regards to those suicidal students, the students who cannot or will not get along, the student who was sexually assaulted at 7:30 AM before my first class, and all of the homesick students who have taken heart by virtue, for example, of the fact that I'm a veteran who has seen much of the world and so impart to them the excitement of doing so for themselves.

    I'd also like to see you administration types realize that we faculty who give a damn are the underpaid and overworked people who answer our telephones at 3:30 AM, or who help the strapped by doling out money for their meals, or even for those who just need an ear at 6:00PM on a Friday, when we're exhausted, past our posted office hours, and not obligated to be there for them.

    You have chosen to be an administrator. You have chosen to be on-call for your job. You may earn some more money for doing that, but you probably have taken a teaching cut, and therefore can afford the energy. Just do it, then.

    I don't know if I could be a good administrator. Probably, I would get fired for telling the president or a VP that their ideas are shit. But, what I want to do is teach, and I know from my life experience that every entity needs a good person at the top. Although I would like to aspire to be one of those, I would rather just do what I do.

    Further, give me a break! I put in about 90 hours a week doing this thing called a job!