Search News


Browse Archives

News

Liberal Arts in Jeopardy?

November 13, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

BALTIMORE — As colleges across the country continue to cinch their belts, both administrators and students have been forced to decide which sorts of programs are good investments and which are now unaffordable luxuries. And with students sweating a cutthroat job market that favors specific skills, many in higher education have been left wonder how the recession stands to affect the liberal arts.

That was much on the minds of liberal arts leaders gathered here at the annual meeting of the Council of Colleges of Arts and Sciences. How to maintain the appeal of “an education for wisdom and virtue” as families and institutions fixate anxiously on their bottom lines was the question of the day.

“We need to think about how it is that we preserve the things that are important,” Dan Wakelee, associate dean of the faculty at California State University at Channel Islands, “so that when things stabilize, we’re in a position to accommodate students and continue to offer liberal arts programs that have made us distinctive in the past.”

Liberal arts institutions must take an active role in convincing students and parents that pursuing a liberal education will enrich them as people without compromising them as job-seekers, said Kristin Fossum, an associate dean at Pomona College.

“We need to make the case that a liberal arts education is not less but more valuable in a faltering economy,” she said, “especially in an economy that is likely to falter and change several times during a student’s lifetime. We need to make clear to others … that such an education is the best preparation for knowledge, critical thinking, communication skills, adaptability — not specific technical skills, but habits of mind.”

Matthew C. Moen, dean of the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of South Dakota, said that as college becomes more expensive, students and parents have increasingly come to expect that it pay immediate, measurable returns. “[Higher] tuition means students emerge laden with debt,” Moen said. “And so I think part of what we see is that they act in a more calculated, careerist fashion, choosing majors with the promise of jobs — and who could blame them?”

Moen, who served as president of the council last year, suggested that institutions need to help students recognize what the broad curriculum of a liberal arts education can prepare them to accomplish in the long term — to focus not on the jobs they hope to land in immediately upon graduating, but the jobs they aspire to hold when they are 30, 40, 50 years old.

Several attendees offered examples of how they are assuring students of the relevance of the liberal arts on their campuses. The University of Alaska at Anchorage has started a lecture series where professors from different liberal arts disciplines give talks aimed at attracting a popular audience. Utah State University has invited successful alumni back to talk about how their liberal education shaped their careers.

But it’s not just students who need to be recruited into the liberal arts ethos, said Jeffrey Lynch, a dean at Eastern Illinois University. It’s the policymakers who control the money, and the public they answer to. “We do a terrible job of that,” Lynch said. “We talk to one another very meaningfully about this stuff because we’re all initiated, but talking to your taxpayer — I mean, who goes out to the Rotary Club and talks about the liberal arts? It’s just not done, and I think we’ve got to do that.”

And then there is the issue of backing up all that talk with high-quality liberal arts programs while budgets everywhere are being slashed. The College of Arts and Sciences at the California State University at Stanislaus, for example, has lost 16 percent of its full-time faculty since last November and has struggled with a $13.5 million budget cut, said dean of humanities and social sciences Carolyn J. Stefanco. The college has instituted furloughs, reduced enrollment (the college loses money on each student), increased fees, eliminated its winter term, and is planning to create for-profit programs to help shore up its budget.

Even still, Stefanco said she anticipates more cuts in the near future, in which case some programs in the college might have to absorb others. “If anyone knows the roadmap to follow,” she said, “please let me know."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Liberal Arts in Jeopardy?

  • too bad
  • Posted by Theron on November 13, 2009 at 9:00am EST
  • I find it sad that we must "make a case" for liberally educated people, educated to participate in the goings on of their world. I find it sad, too, that there is this sense of either-or. The act of trying to make the case assumes that liberal arts must be shown to have "value." Value becomes, therefore, whatever contributes to the current socially acceptable view...in this case wealth. By so arguing, we face the paradox having to turn liberal education into a commodity, the very problem leading us to have to make the argument. In 1978, I heard a job candidate for a rhetoric position state that the biggest challenge to that profession was that "being Literate is no longer a self-evident value." We face this same challenge with liberal education. This challenge shows in a variety of areas: budget debates on the local, State and Federal levels, college/university restructuring, books to storage and sales of art collections. No wonder liberal arts seems under seige.

  • the value of liberal education
  • Posted by Debra Humphreys , VP for Communications and Public Affairs at AAC&U on November 13, 2009 at 9:15am EST
  • Those quoted in this story from CCAS are absolutely right that a liberal education provides exactly the set of skills and abilities that will enable students to succeed over the long term. That is precisely what research AAC&U has been sponsoring has been showing. Employers are seeking graduates both with specific skills and the broad capacities--especially communication skills, global knowledge, and teamwork skills--that a good liberal education can provide. AAC&U is also fielding a new survey of employers right now--new data will be released in January. This research is being sponsored by AAC&U's LEAP initiative which is also sponsoring a series of public forums around the country doing precisely what is called for in this article--bringing the community into the conversation about the improtance of higher education for both work and citizenship, and helping them see the value of liberal education, regardless of a student's specific major. See www.aacu.org/leap for more information about the project and findings from national employer surveys. The new survey findings will be released at AAC&U's upcoming annual meeting, January 20-23, 2009 in Washington, DC. See www.aacu.org to register.

  • Expanding to global
  • Posted by Naomi F. Collins, Ph.D. , Independent consultant on November 13, 2009 at 9:45am EST
  • Without turning the liberal arts into another commercial product to be sold to a public for career value (as valuable as they may be in second or third careers), one can also help students realize that nothing will prepare them better for their new global context (in any field) than the liberal arts. Without understanding cultures other than their own, they won't be able (for example) to be an accountant in Qatar, an attorney in Moscow, or an engineer learning how the Germans address a particular feat; nor how the Dutch deliver health care, the Chinese attempt to clean their air.

    In sum: we don't have the luxury of isolationism (if we ever did); and nothing will prepare students better for living in the worldwide context than will the liberal arts. The students (studies show) know that they seek an international education -- so it's time for universities and colleges to show them what that means by broadening the bandwidth of their teaching in all disciplines. (Naomi F. Collins, Ph.D.)

  • The Narrowness of the Stated Liberal Arts Argument
  • Posted by Karen R. Schnakenberg, Ph.D. , Teaching Professor at Carnegie Mellon University on November 13, 2009 at 11:15am EST
  • Kristin Fossum's argument that a liberal arts education

    "is the best preparation for knowledge, critical thinking, communication skills, adaptability — not specific technical skills, but habits of mind”

    provides a good summary of set of skills we want and need in all graduates and all majors. Where it misses the mark -- and makes an error inconsistent with the very skills it praises -- is in arguing that the liberal arts alone can teach these skills and that professional education by definition does not include critical thinking, communication skills, adaptability and related habits of mind. It is indeed a problem when professioonal education is overly technical and narrow, but it is equally a problem when liberal arts perspectives exclude the expertise and intellectual value of other disciplines. This need not and should not be a defensive "either/or" argument.

  • False Argument
  • Posted by Ron Bramhall , Director - Business Honors Program at University of Oregon on November 13, 2009 at 11:15am EST
  • Others have already said this but I will affirm that the article presents a false choice and a false argument. The premise, "a cutthroat job market that favors specific skills" just isn't true. Look at any study on what employers value and they will tell you, without using the term "liberally educated", that they want students who are liberally educated. So the set up is wrong but the solutions make sense. We all have to make the case better and to do that we have to look inward. On my campus, there is resistance to discussing the Liberal Arts in instrumental terms - the liberal arts must be viewed as valuable not for the ends they produce but because they are valuable in and of themselves. I agree with this perspective, but it's a hard sell to make externally.

  • Liberal Arts
  • Posted by Ned Broadwater , Managing Director-Higher Ed Practice at Gallagher Benefit Services on November 13, 2009 at 12:15pm EST
  • As a graduate of a liberal arts college, in 1982, (one of the toughest years to graduate and find employment on record) I was often asked, "What can you do with a liberal arts degree?" My response was always, "I can do anything." What happened to diversity of education? Does everyone have to learn a trade?
    My college also happened to be all-male, which also raises eyebrows among some. But during the week, we weren't concerned about the gender competition and were able to work more collaboratively and allow ourselves to open our minds to things we might not normally want to discuss in a mixed setting. We stood by the ideal that we must: Think Critically, Act Responsibily, Lead Effectively and Live Humanely.
    Liberal arts and education diversity is critical to the success of students and our society.

  • Connecting liberal arts grads to the real world
  • Posted by Sheila Curran , Career Strategy Consultant at Curran Career Consulting on November 13, 2009 at 12:30pm EST
  • As Debra Humphreys indicates, AAC&U is doing great work through their LEAP initiative on identifying the key skill sets and values of a liberal arts education. There is a compelling argument to be made that there is an employment advantage to a liberal arts degree. Unfortunately for most graduates, that advantage only kicks in when they are in the middle of their careers. In tough economic times, employers who recruit for entry-level post-baccalaureate positions are looking for employees who can hit the ground running and don't need training. To compete effectively for entry-level positions, liberal arts students need to round out their liberal education with additional experiences and knowledge of the industry/organization in which they wish to work. Liberal arts departments don't need to change what they are doing as long as they recognize and embrace the fact that their students need opportunities to explore options and learn outside the classroom as well. Internships/co-ops are increasingly important for liberal arts students, as is the opportunity to learn from alumni about different career fields. A critical collaborator in helping students translate their knowledge, skills and experiences into qualities that resonate with employers is the career services office, yet in 50% of all colleges and universities, funding for this already under-funded office has decreased in the past year. If liberal arts departments want to survive and thrive in difficult economic times, they must recognize that prospective students and their parents don't care about what will happen 20 years from now. They want to know that their selected college also prepares students for their immediate future after graduation.

    I hope to continue this conversation with participants at the AAC&U conference in January.

  • Posted by Lisa on November 13, 2009 at 1:30pm EST
  • While liberal arts colleges are indeed important, the institutional devaluing of liberal arts in institutions like Stanislaus seems like a highly pressing issue for the majority of students today. As a first generation college student who graduated from CSUS with a philosophy degree and went on to earn a PhD, I benefited immensely from the 'habits of mind' cultivated there. My college experience introduced me to the life of the mind, and I'm grateful for it. It's disheartening to see that current and future students' opportunities to learn, grow, and engage similarly are so diminished.

  • Posted by James Buckley, Ph.D. , Dean, Loyola College of Arts and Sciences at Loyola University Maryland on November 13, 2009 at 3:45pm EST
  • It's gratifying to see the comments above continuing to validate the importance of the liberal arts in preparing students not only for specific careers--but for all careers, and even more importantly, for a life of learning. Our alumni tell us all the time just how critical our liberal arts core was in readying them for their professional lives: in banking, in medicine, in software development, and so forth. As a Jesuit university, Loyola University Maryland sees the value of the liberal arts on an even more profound level. Our students’ exposure to literature, philosophy, theology, history, languages, and the arts certainly prepares them for professional success in a limitless range of fields, but more importantly, it helps them develop as people. They become men and women who understand how our society has developed, recognize the origins of the opportunities and challenges we face today, who ask themselves critical questions of ethics and morality, religion and spirituality, and God. These are the men and women we want leading our corporations, schools, and hospitals. These are the men and women we want holding elected offices—individuals with unparalleled intellectual curiosity and practical skills who see how those qualities can be applied to effect positive change in the world. If we’re looking at academic programs as “investments,” what could possibly be a greater investment than that?

  • Posted by GTKarnezis on November 13, 2009 at 7:15pm EST
  • So, students are being asked "to focus not on the jobs they hope to land in immediately upon graduating, but the jobs they aspire to hold when they are 30, 40, 50 years old."

    That's an interesting suggestion,and it raises the deeper question of the immediate versus the eventual and one's ability to specify and predict such matters. And let's see, what about the concept of vocation, and the idea that there's some continuity between the job one aspires to and the job one imagines decades later?

    I lament the built-in sense of discontinuity at play here, the steady clamor for adaptability and change, the utter hubris and insistence upon being able to authoritatively project decades into the future. Lots of computer geeks are walking the streets as their jobs, like so many others, fled abroad to the lower bidders.

    Those of us who've been around long enough will find all these defensive postures with regard to the "liberal arts" oh so familiar. Of course, no one ever, ever discusses how those holders of oh so relevant and "practical" high degrees in business or finance did ever so much to infect the economy and often run away unpenalized. No, they were fashioned so "job-ready" and career perfect. They never had to defend their majors or apologize for their degrees.

    And a final note: once you turn colleges and universities exclusively into pre-employment training, you'd better prepare their legal staffs for law suits when parents and/or graduates come trotting back angry because Mary or Joseph are un or underemployed despite att the "investment" they put into education. Perhaps the best thing to do is follow the UPhoenix example: forget the liberal arts, privatize, and guarantee suitable employability as product of their education.

  • Some underlying factors
  • Posted by Hannah , Ex-Adjunked on November 13, 2009 at 10:30pm EST
  • When the NYTimes debated the value of "the humanities" in universities and in society about a year ago, over one thousand posters wrote long, involved, thoughtful responses, packed with critical thinking and philosophy--about how the humanities may not be all that valuable after all. Sort of like the student of mine who wrote three pages in the collective class journal all about how writing in the journal was a "busywork" assignment, totally a waste of student time. Bottom line, humans like to attach meaning to things and explore various connections. The value of liberal arts and the humanities to society becomes warped and artificial when solely linked to skills, taxpyer investment, and getting a job. The human need to attach meaning to things is, anthropologically, psychologically, and spritually, or whatever, will always make debate about the "value" of liberal arts and the humanities silly; as the notion of debating this topic is something only humans (well, as far as we know) would care about doing.

    Culturally, Americans separate out art and philosophy and "letters" from the "hard" and "real" skills one gets from higher education. In most of the rest of the world, all kinds of art and philosphy are much more integrated into the materials and pace of daily living; even the most common, practical objects have "art" in them. I received my degree in Composition and Critical Thnking 15 years ago, went broke as an adjunct instructor (because teaching is the most common end point of a liberal arts degree), and got some "hard" skills that would get me a paying job. But I've found that even the most "hard" skilled job never suffers from chances to engage others in critical thinking and faceted discussion. It's not something monetary values attached to higher education can obliterate even if it wanted to.

    It seems that a fundamental thing that needs to change is the false but deep cultural perception that liberal arts and money-making skills are oil and water. Many accounting, medical, and science employers really do prize the candidate's minor in philosophy or creative writing, to demonstrate flexibility of thinking in problem-solving. We might require more such integration in higher education curriculum (beyond the "general studies" coursework) so that the graduate really will be prepared for the job world.

  • Who has the broader skill set?
  • Posted by Susan W , Laboratory technician at University of Rochester on November 16, 2009 at 7:45am EST
  • I have a son who is an A- student majoring in Math and Physics and minoring in Economics at a well-known technical university. Besides having a fair knowledge of Latin, Mandarin Chinese, and world history, he reads extensively enough to be able to carry on an intelligent conversation in western literature or religion, and taught himself to translate Egyptian hieroglyphs. He is also a fair musician and president of a performing arts club on his campus. How many students at liberal arts colleges read math texts for recreation, run a model rocketry club, or do genetic engineering experiments in their dorm rooms?

  • Posted by Marie on December 8, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • As one who majored in a scientific, career oriented area, I can testify to the importance of a liberal arts education as the basic requirement for living a full, rich,engaged life . Without the formal exposure to literature and the arts in my curriculum, I found it necessary to play "catch-up" in order to develop a world vierw, an appreciation of literature and the arts, and the mindset and skills to analyze the culture I live in. In retirement, I call upon what I have taught myself (and what I might have learned in college) to keep me fully participitory in my community, my interests, my enjoyment of life. Given my experience, I would like to see every discipline include a core of liberal arts courses. Habits of thinking and being need to be established. Skills can be learned on sight.

  • Reaching for the soma
  • Posted by Jordan Seidel , Instructor - Philosophy on December 16, 2009 at 9:30am EST
  • Oh Brave New World!