Search News


Browse Archives

News

Wanted: Obama's Help

November 17, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

WASHINGTON – The leader of a major public university system called on President Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan to do more to accomplish the White House’s goal of seeing the United States lead the world in postsecondary educational attainment by 2020.

William E. Kirwan, chancellor of the University System of Maryland, said that colleges and universities need help in expanding the populations they serve and improving their graduation rates, and that the help must come from the highest levels of power. “I’m very pleased that the president announced this goal because I do think it provides sort of a galvanizing force for us to do this.” But, he urged, “the president and the secretary have got to use their bully pulpits and their purse strings.”

Kirwan's remarks came in a panel discussion,“Expanding Higher Education -- Public Universities and the President’s Goal,” held on the final afternoon of the annual conference of the Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities, ahead of Duncan's Tuesday morning closing speech to the group, in which he's expected to touch on graduation rates, expanding accountability and financial aid reforms.

Obama first announced his vision of a college attainment rate of about 60 percent during his address to a joint session of Congress in late February, and while the administration’s 2010 draft budget ups funding for community colleges and boosts Pell Grants, it has yet to launch an initiative targeted at reaching the president’s goal.

Four-year institutions, community colleges, K-12 schools, private donors, state governments and the federal government must all come together to effectively expand and improve higher education, said Peter McPherson, the association’s president. “There’s only one party in this country that has the capacity to … mobilize the whole, and that’s the president.”

Colleges and universities and the associations that represent them, he said, must work together to formulate intermediate steps toward reaching the 2020 goal. “We need to, as a community, go to the administration and say something like this needs to be done,” he said, adding that he and fellow panelist Muriel A. Howard, president of the American Association of State Colleges and Universities (AASCU), have been working with the leaders of the other four presidential associations to develop a plan.

Obama’s push is not without its critics -- those who think too much federal money is pouring into higher education and too many students going to college. But, understandably, no one voicing those opinions -- contrary to the APLU’s official stance -- was on the panel.

Dewayne Matthews, vice president of policy and strategy at the Lumina Foundation, said his group believes “there is very clear evidence that the proportion of the population that completes postsecondary education is in fact itself an important measure of the economic vitality of the nation.”

The American work force, Matthews said, is divided into jobs that lead to the middle class and jobs that situate workers squarely in the working class. Decades ago, it was relatively easy for a high school graduate to get into the first group in, perhaps, a manufacturing job, but those opportunities have largely disappeared. Now, he said, “the dividing line between those two categories of jobs has become postsecondary education … and the current recession has simply greatly accelerated that whole process.”

Matthews hopes to see more Americans go to high quality programs and graduate from them, in line with Lumina’s “Big Goal,” to push the country to 60 percent degree or credential attainment by 2025 (five years later than President Obama’s goal date). To reach that goal, colleges and universities would need to award 23 million more degrees annually than they did in 2009. Each year for the next 16 years, national graduation totals would have to be 150,000 students larger than they were the previous year.

One key part of reaching Obama's goal, of course, is community colleges. Their missions are directly aimed at reaching out to students who would otherwise not pursue higher education, Kirwan acknowledged. "States have to invest less money there, students pay less there," allowing them to complete two years of postsecondary education at a far lower cost than they would face at four-year institutions. But, he said, public universities must play a key role too, Kirwan said, pointing to the need for clear articulation agreements that can help students who earn associate degrees transfer seamlessly into public universities in order to earn bachelor's degrees.

Higher education has become more essential to Americans’ economic well-being and, relatedly, national security, said Howard, of AASCU. College enrollments grew by 82 percent in the 15 years following the end of World War II and 174 percent in the next 15 years, between 1962 and 1977, as the federal government launched programs aimed at staying ahead of the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Since then, though, capacity has grown at a much slower rate, even as the U.S. population has grown and other industrialized nations have stepped up their efforts to expand college enrollments.

“I think higher education right now is probably at the next big stage … since Sputnik in the sense that we have this major goal and need in front of us,” she said. “We need to be competitive economically but I also think we’re moving closer to an issue of national security.”

McPherson added that the goal is “not just about where the country’s going, it’s about individual opportunity.”

Kirwan, too, voiced hope for the American dream. “For me -- and, I suspect, for many of you -- this isn’t about any particular president’s goal. This is about what kind of country we want our children and grandchildren to live in.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Wanted: Obama's Help

  • Chains you can believe in
  • Posted by Steve Foerster on November 17, 2009 at 1:30pm EST
  • For goodness sake, this is the second call for a federal bailout in two days! Does higher education in American have total amnesia? In the previous administration many vocally opposed the centralization that was called for by the Spelling Commission, and rightly so. Now, just a few years later, rulership by the Obama administration is somehow a great idea?

    When you look to Washington for cash, don't be so naive as to think that it won't come with serious strings attached. And even if you like the guy in charge now, that power will still already have been lost to Uncle Sam once he's gone. What happens in a few years when someone else is president? Would you want, for example, to see Sarah Palin in charge of American higher education?

  • If We Build It, Will They Come?
  • Posted by Cristy Passman , Doctoral Student in Higher Education at CSUF on November 17, 2009 at 2:00pm EST
  • Reaching these lofty goals involves more than changes to institutions of higher education, it involves changes in the attitudes of potential applicants to expand the applicant pool. As the US population has grown, its demographics have changed dramatically, but the demographics of college populations have not changed as significantly. The populations which went to college post World War II and in response to Sputnik learned the value of a college education and are sending their children and grandchildren to college. Other populations need to be reached. The President's use of his bully bulpit is a beginning, but the message also needs to come from church and temple pulpits across America and from middle school and high school faculty and guidance counselors. This message needs to reach a new population and reach them before their actual college years, catching them when students and their parents are planning and thinking about what members of the younger generation will do with their lives. Constructing buildings and opening new classes will only expand the population of college graduates when we expand the pool of applicants.

  • Mixed Awareness
  • Posted by Robert W Tucker , President at InterEd, INc. on November 17, 2009 at 5:30pm EST
  • We are fortunate to have an administration that understands the contribution of higher education to the economy. President Obama's intentions seem to be nothing but the best.

    We are less fortunate in the following ways:

    1. The administration's notion of higher education derives from an elite perspective. It shows little understanding of recent changes in the two-thirds of the market that serves less lofty but equally or more important aims.

    2. The administration does not understand that federal financial incentives to get more students in the classroom will be quickly sopped up through greedy tuition hikes.

    3 The administration does not understand that 40% of the higher education market consists of working adults for whom the time to economic contribution will be years shorter than will that of 17 year old freshman. If the administration wants near-term economic boost, we should be providing incentives for the working underclass and lower middle-class to complete college or to augment existing degrees.

    4. The administration does appear to understand that higher education is not unlike the insurance, health care, and pharmaceutical industries insofar as they all turn in annual price increases that run 2-3 times that of CPI of GDP changes. Higher education is perhaps less ethical than the in-your-face increases of the other industries in that it invented the HEPI as an uninspiring way to obscure their inefficiency and greed.

    Before we ask for help from the administration, I suggest that we ask the administration to allocate a little time to getting up to speed on the issues.