Search News


Browse Archives

News

Smart Homes

November 20, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Three out of five are on food stamps. Four out of five newborns are on Medicaid. Obesity is rampant, as is diabetes. Crime rates are high, and graduation rates are low.

A cynic might say life would be better in the Cleveland communities neighboring Case Western Reserve University if the people there acted smarter. Researchers at the Case Western think life would be better if the people there had smarter homes.

The university is preparing to embark on an 18-month research project, beginning in early 2010, in which it plans to transform 104 homes in the impoverished neighborhoods near its campus into "smart homes," powered by a super-high-speed network that is approximately one thousand times faster than a normal high-speed Internet connection. Up to 72 percent of those homes are not currently connected to the Web at all.

The idea, says Lev Gonick, Case Western’s CIO, is to study whether hyper-speed networks -- and the suite of services they can support -- can help fix the health and education problems in those communities. “We hypothesize that creating interactive, home-based extensions of health, learning and safety, along with energy management, will lead to positive outcomes,” Gonick said in an interview.

What exactly is a “home-based extension,” anyway? While Gonick, who announced the project on his blog this week, said that the university and its 18 commercial partners are playing the details close to the chest at the moment, he did offer some examples.

The high bandwidth and reliability of the one-gigabit connection -- which would connect the smart homes not only to the university but also to various hospitals, museums, libraries, and public buildings that Case Western already serves with its “backbone” network -- would allow residents to video conference with their health care providers, for instance, Gonick said. Wireless networks inside each home could take readings from pedometers, blood pressure monitors, and other health-monitoring tools and send them instantly to the residents’ doctors through the backbone network.

Neighborhood video surveillance, broadcast to every home as well as the six public safety organizations in the community, would be another application. Same with utility meter monitors, which would calculate each home’s energy consumption, compare it with other homes in the neighborhood, and provide information on how to use water, gas and energy more efficiently to minimize utility bills.

“Each one of these examples has got the use of very high-end connectivity,” Gonick said. “And there is no consumer service today that you could buy, even if you had the money and you were inclined, to equal a gigabit for residential use. It simply doesn’t exist.”

Nor does any similar program -- at least not in this hemisphere, he said. “There’s no other city in the country that’s doing this even for commercial purposes, never mind research purposes,” Gonick said.

But Gonick is hardly winging it: He has a history of democratizing Web access, most notably through his work with OneCommunity, a non-profit that built an enormous fiber optic network for public institutions throughout Northern Ohio. "This piece," he said of the new project, called the University Circle Innovation Zone, "is spreading that connectivity to the neighbors of the university."

He emphasized that project is not meant as a charity. Although Gonick and his colleagues are hypothesizing positive outcomes, he said it is first and foremost a research program.

“What difference would it make if we were actually providing real-time, interactive wellness education and chronic-disease care from the home rather than the clinical setting? That’s a research question,” he said. “So there’s nothing altruistic about the technology endeavor -- it’s actually trying to change models for health care, models for public safety, models for energy consumption and energy management.”

Gonick added that the project would also include features designed to improve access to certain educational resources for children in the homes, with the intention of boosting graduation rates in STEM courses.

The equipment has been ordered, he said, and research is set to begin shortly after New Year's.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Smart Homes

  • How smart are they?
  • Posted by S Jones , academic development specialist at Parkland College on November 20, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • It's a tad unclear just what the folks are getting besides a fast connection. Makes my imagination run rampant along the 1984 directions...

  • that won't solve the problem!
  • Posted by mh at uga on November 23, 2009 at 10:45am EST
  • Really? High speed internet will stop crime and health problems in this community????? What should be considered and questioned is the dyfunction behind the problems. You have people all across this country suffering from diabetes and depression, they have education, and information (via the internet), and still suffer from these maladies.Children from more affluent communities commit crimes too but their families have the money to hire attorneys to keep them out of jail and white wash their records keeping them out of a very public system. Some of these same people may not committ crimes but treat themselves and others horribly. Is anyone questioning HOW people in the neighboring communities are COPING with dysfunctional families, lack of money etc..? Humans cope in many ways that are devastating and do not lead to stable social, mental, fiscal or physical health. To say the only thing that would resolve it would be to offer them a means to access information does little to resolve the underlying issues. . Families in these areas are in crisis as many need mental health services, life coaching, money in their pockets to help pay bills. And above all, help to undo years of family/community neglect and abuse. I feel this program should be much more complex than just offering internet access as smart homes do not make smart people. What it takes to access information and what it takes to USE that information are two different things entirely. If all poor communities needed to make "smart decisions" was information then those that are middle classe and upper middle class wouldn't suffer from the same issues.

    A better research project: Let's investigate why diabetes, crime and mental health issues abound in middle class america? They have internet services, decent healthcare, access to all kinds of information so why are they not making "smart decisions."

  • 1000 Times Faster
  • Posted by William Wolff , Former Engineering Student and Current Law Student at Case Western Reserve University on November 23, 2009 at 9:00pm EST
  • I wish to address a matter of English language communication. In the higher education environment, I suppose that people are reasonably educated. And I would like to think that reasonably educated people can communicate better than reasonably uneducated people. Knowing as I do that many reasonably educated people nevertheless have difficulty with math, I ask that you bear with me just a moment and that you please not panic at the sight of numbers. Now please consider the following. And, if you will please read past the next sentence through to the end, I sincerely believe you will understand what I am saying.

    Suppose we're standing next to the autobahn where we see two cars, one blue car and one red car. If the blue car is going at 100 mph and someone says that the red car is going 5 times FASTER THAN the blue car, is the red car going 500 mph or 600 mph? (This is not a math question. Don't think about the math. Just keep reading. Thank you.) I suspect the speaker means that the red car is going 500 mph and thus that 500 mph is 5 times FASTER THAN 100 mph. Granted that 5 times 80 mph is 400 mph and 500 mph is 400 mph FASTER THAN 100 mph. I don't understand why someone would choose 80 mph as the increment. An increment of 100 mph makes more sense to me. But 5 times 100 mph is 500 mph. Surely one doesn't think that 500 mph is 500 mph FASTER THAN 100 mph. (600 mph is 500 mph FASTER THAN 100 mph. So now you know the answer to the question I posed a few sentences back.) 500 IS 5 times AS FAST AS 100 mph. And everyone knows that "as fast as" isn't the same as "faster than."

    I can think of places where I would not be surprised to find someone using "faster than" to mean "as fast as." But the higher education environment isn't one of those places. If you're thinking that no one cares what words you say and that everyone knows what you mean, then, really, you have no reason to say anything. QED.

  • Connectivity doesn't solve the problems; software does
  • Posted by Marc Canter , Visiting Lecturer - EECS, TIME at CWRU on December 1, 2009 at 5:30am EST
  • Tee Hee Hee

    Give Lev a break. He's light on details until all his ducks are lined up.

    I have a saying "put up or shut up" - and indeed this project is gonna put up - in spades.

    Stay tuned.