Quick Takes

November 20, 2009

Hundreds of Thousands Claimed $532M in Excess College Tax Credits

The Hope tax credit is designed to help middle class families pay for college -- but not this much. A Treasury Department audit released Thursday found that several hundred thousand taxpayers sought credit in 2006 and 2007 for more than half a billion dollars more than they were supposed to by claiming the tax credit for a third or even a fourth year; it is limited by statute to two years. The agency's inspector general for tax administration found that the IRS system is not set up to flag taxpayers who seek the credit for more than two years, and that agency officials lack the ability to disallow claims for Hope credits because of "math errors." The audit recommends that the IRS be given that authority. The Hope credit was significantly expanded for 2009 and 2010 as part of the federal economic stimulus package.

U. of Nebraska Regents Weigh Stem Cell Restrictions

The University of Nebraska's Board of Regents is scheduled to vote today on whether to limit embryonic stem cell research at university facilities to studies that would have been permitted under the Bush administration's more restrictive policy. The resolution (see Page 4 at this link), which is backed by several regents supported by Nebraska Right to Life, would put the university out of the mainstream and at odds with policy changes made by the Obama administration, which has cleared the way for far more use of stem cells than was allowed in federally backed studies during the previous eight years.

U. of California Backs 32% Increase for Students

As students protested outside, the University of California's Board of Regents on Thursday reluctantly approved a 32 percent increase in "fees" (what the rest of higher education calls tuition) for 2010-11. "We're being forced to impose a user tax on our students and their families," Mark Yudof, the UC system's president, said during a committee hearing Wednesday. "This is a tax necessary because our political leaders have failed to adequately fund public higher education." Under the budget, which also seeks a $913 million increase in state support for the 2010-11 academic year, undergraduates and graduate professional school students will see an increase of 15 percent, or $585, in the forthcoming winter and spring terms, and an additional 15 percent increase, or $1,334, beginning in summer 2010.

Faculty Unionize at UConn Health Center

Medical faculty members at the University of Connecticut Health Center have voted to unionize and to be represented by the American Association of University Professors. According to the AAUP, this is the first time that the faculty at a free-standing medical school will have collective bargaining.

Independence Urged for Community College in DC

The new community college at the University of the District of Columbia needs independence from the university to be "credible and legitimate," according to a report being released today, The Washington Post reported. The study praises the establishment of the community college in a city that had lacked one, but says that UDC has lost the confidence of the business community, a situation that would hurt the development of the community college. Officials of the college said that their institution would be judged by the quality of graduates, not the link to UDC.

Klan Enters Debate Over Song at Ole Miss

The Ku Klux Klan is planning a rally at the University of Mississippi Saturday to protest the university's ban on shouting the final line of a fight song: "The South shall rise again," The Memphis Commercial Appeal reported. The university has been discouraging the last line -- going so far as to change a song commonly performed at football games -- because the line is offensive to many who see it as a link to the university's racist past. The Klan sees the issue in a different way. "This is not a white or black issue at all. It's freedom of speech. They've got a right to say what they want at the game," said Shane Tate, a Klan leader in the state.

Affair Expenses Aren't Reimbursable

Jeff Schemmel resigned Thursday as athletics director at San Diego State University after the university determined that he had sought reimbursements for expenses from a cross-country trip related to a tryst he had with an Alabama woman, not university work, The San Diego Union Tribune reported. Both Schemmel and the woman are married to other people and the situation became public in part because of the woman's divorce proceedings.

University Settles Lawsuit by Witch for $40,000

Without admitting wrongdoing, the University of Nebraska at Lincoln has agreed to pay $40,000 to a former employee who says she was fired after the university learned that she is a witch, The Lincoln Journal Star reported. The woman formerly directed a youth program at the university.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Around the Web

How to teach writing to non-humanities majors, in Acephalous.... The adjunct career, in Literature Should Mean Something in Your Life....

FREE Daily News Alerts

Comments on Quick Takes

  • Credit Where Credit Is Due
  • Posted by Juan De CA on November 20, 2009 at 6:30am EST
  • I think Mark Udof has one thing right, we need to hold our politicians accountable for this mess. Governor Grey Davis was recalled for having a $9 billion budget shortfall. Governor Schwartzenegger is getting a pass twice, once for a $42 billion budget shortfall, which led to this 32% fee increase, and now for a projected $21 billion shortfall. I wonder where will that leave students?

  • KKK
  • Posted by Diogenes on November 20, 2009 at 8:30am EST
  • When the KKK takes up your cause, you're generally screwed.

  • NOT a Klan Fan
  • Posted by ex-prof on November 20, 2009 at 8:30am EST
  • OK. Can we now all finally agree that singing songs that bemoan the demise of the confederacy or flying the confederate flag and all its imitations (like Mississippi's state flag) is racist? For God's sake, if the Klan is for such things, regardless of how they veil their reasons, is there any question as to the basic meaning and significance of these acts? What else is the purpose of the Klan folks? Having lived only 30 miles from Noblesville, IN, the birthplace of the modern clan, I can assure you that their raison d'etre is NOT the same as the ACLU's. They couldn't care less about freedom of speech, except to the extent that it protects their ability to obnoxiously picket at or near events that they want to disrupt. They want racism to be a fundamental feature of all social life. Period. Duh.

  • First Speech, Not Free Censorship
  • Posted by G. Tod Slone on November 20, 2009 at 10:00am EST
  • Professors seem to be sadly and notoriously ignorant of, or at best apathetic to, the First Amendment. Speech codes enacted on campuses across the country bear witness to that assertion. The comment posted by "ex-prof" proves the point. Like it or not, the Klan has a point. To dismiss all ideas and all speech that one disapproves of as hate speech or divisive speech does not by any means whatsoever eliminate such ideas and speech from First Amendment protection. Vigorous debate, democracy's cornerstone, demands a vigorous clash of different ideas and speech. Sadly, that has not been the case in far too many institutions of higher education, where the party-line tends to be enforced. The ideas you hate might be the ideas I espouse, and vice versa. That is, like it or not, a self-evident truth, or to cite ex-prof: "duh."
    G. Tod Slone, PhD and Founding Editor (since 1998)
    The American Dissident, a Journal of Literature, Democracy & Dissidence
    A 501 c3 Nonprofit Providing a Forum for Vigorous Debate, Cornerstone of Democracy
    todslone@yahoo.com
    www.theamericandissident.org
    1837 Main St.

  • MO tuition
  • Posted by MO reader , Professor/Art on November 20, 2009 at 11:15am EST
  • MO 4-year schools have agreed not to raise tuition and fees (they couldn't very much anyway as they are limited by law to the rate of inflation) as long as the legislature only cuts support by 5%. I can see this in this year, but next year and the year after. We are still going to be limited by the rate of inflation, but the legislature will never put back that 5%, and will probably take more. And even the students are starting to notice this is a problem, as their profs are laid off and the on-campus opportunities for enrichment get fewer and fewer.

  • KKK and my pocket protector
  • Posted by George Gollin , Professor of Physics at University of Illinois on November 20, 2009 at 11:15am EST
  • G. Tod Slone said "Professors seem to be sadly and notoriously ignorant of, or at best apathetic to, the First Amendment."

    Oh come on, now.

    Do you mean "All professors," or "The majority of professors," or something milder: "More than one professor?"

    In the film "Annie Hall," Alvy Singer's wife said "I love being reduced to a cultural stereotype." Dang, where's my pocket protector?

    On the matter of the KKK, it is amusing to see them on the same side of an important issue as those who defend the Bill of Rights.

  • Posted on November 20, 2009 at 1:30pm EST
  • Isn't there a difference between limiting an individual's free speech and changing a school sanctioned song?

    I mean, what are they going to do if you sing the last line at a prep rally? Individual rights are not at risk. What will happen is the band will stop playing the last verse... the cheerleaders will stop leading the final cheer... and eventually it will become normal.

    It seems to me that the KKK is upset that they are loosing ground in preserving traditions that help to cultivate positive attitudes towards their cause.

  • Free Speech and Literacy...
  • Posted by John on November 20, 2009 at 2:15pm EST
  • I missed where ex-prof called for restricting free speech. Ex-prof's argument seemed to be that KKK support of the song proves that the song is racist. It always troubles me when people who claim to be supporting free speech confuse censorship and criticism of speech. Criticism of speech seems to be fundamental to the notions such as the marketplace of ideas.

  • Free Speech doesn't imply social acceptance
  • Posted by John , Assistant Professor on November 20, 2009 at 7:30pm EST
  • The First Amendment only provides for freedom of expression for the individual, not for social acceptance or institutional advancement of those ideas. No government, business, or community is obliged to provide outlets or forums for speech that violates basic civility, decorum, or social values. Racist speech, hate speech, violent or obscene speech, or speech that creates a hostile environment doesn't have to be "tolerated" simply because those individuals who use it are "free" and can't be arrested or penalized by law. They can still be fired, removed from private property, ostracized, or criticized for their words and actions. And they should be--that's the cost of abusing a "right" in order to promote the violation of other people's rights, dignity, or pursuit of happiness. Fly the Confederate flag in your own home and sing all the racist songs you like--just don't do it at my school or workplace.

  • Freedom of Speech
  • Posted by Dr. Anonymous on November 21, 2009 at 4:45am EST
  • Dear John,
    That freedom of speech at University of Mississippi football games is supported by the KKK is embarrassing and unfortunate. Howver, we are not guilty by association; we will not accept to be so.
    I find your comment particularly dangerous. It is part of the political correctness industry to state that certain interest groups have a right not to be offended, and that their right trumps our right to freedom of speech. Such may well be true at private colleges. However, at state universities we are protected by the Constitution. We will not be impeded and our rights will not be limited to the home. We have our right to the public sphere. Campus speech codes have been declared unconstitutional every time that a misguided administration tries to impose them. We cannot be fired. We will not lose our homes. You are offended by our speech? Too bad. We don't care. On the contrary, it will do some good to militant students to see their ideas challenged. That will get them used to life in the real world.

  • Constitutionally Protected Speech
  • Posted by G. Tod Slone on November 21, 2009 at 11:45am EST
  • If I had wished to stipulate ALL professors, I would have written ALL professors. You might wish to choose to quote a more respected First Amendment authority, as opposed to Annie Hall! This statement is perhaps made out of ignorance: “On the matter of the KKK, it is amusing to see them on the same side of an important issue as those who defend the Bill of Rights.” “Those” is such a vague, general category. Couldn’t we say the same regarding PC leftists, whom some consider having fascist tendencies (check out FIRE). Allow me to (sort of) paraphrase Heinrich Heine’s famous statement on burning people: When orthodox minds advocate freedom of expression, they will also, in the end, advocate castration and incarceration.
    Good point, John, regarding censorship and criticism. I certainly agree with it. However, one man’s dismissal of another’s arguments as “racist” is akin to vacuous ad hominem rhetoric. Criticize Affirmative Action and be immediately labeled racist. Yet, AA is in itself clearly a racist policy. Name calling gets us no where. Instead, why not find the flaws in the arguments, if in fact there are any.
    “Fly the Confederate flag in your own home and sing all the racist songs you like--just don't do it at my school or workplace,” states John. If flying that flag is unconstitutional, then I agree. But the same must be said about all the liberal propanda flooding the nation’s campuses, much of it unconstitutional! Again, educate yourself. FIRE is the best place for that!
    Yes, Dr. Anonymous has a point. If speech is constitutionally protected, it BELONGS on public college campuses! Now, why are you so afraid of using your real name? That in itself says so much about the horrendous academic culture of fear firmly in place. How to change it… radically change it?

    G. Tod Slone, PhD and Founding Editor (since 1998)
    The American Dissident, a Journal of Literature, Democracy & Dissidence
    A 501 c3 Nonprofit Providing a Forum for Vigorous Debate, Cornerstone of Democracy
    todslone@yahoo.com
    www.theamericandissident.org