Search News


Browse Archives

News

Northeastern Ends Football

November 23, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

In an unusual move for a Division I institution, Northeastern University is today announcing that it is eliminating its football program, which will have played for 74 seasons.

The economic downturn has led many colleges to cut some of their teams, although football has rarely been among them. Northeastern officials stressed that the decision was not simply about saving money, but about where the university should spend money. A review determined that sustained multi-million investments would be required to build up the program -- and the university decided that wasn't appropriate.

"A broad consensus developed behind discontinuing football and focusing future resources on programs — both academic and non-academic — where the university can achieve and sustain leadership," said a statement released by the university this morning. Team members were informed Sunday and have been told that athletic scholarships will be honored as long as they remain enrolled at the university. But the statement acknowledged that they will need "flexibility" as some may transfer to play elsewhere.

Joseph Aoun, president of the university, said in his statement that the decision involved setting priorities. “Northeastern has always been guided by the principle that we should focus on our opportunities for leadership,” he said. “This approach ultimately leads to difficult choices, but leadership requires that we make these choices. This decision allows us to focus on our existing athletic programs. At a time when higher education is critically important to rebuilding our knowledge-based economy, universities have an obligation to invest resources in areas of strength — whether they are competitive athletic programs or cutting-edge academics.”

The Boston Globe noted in an article that the football program has for years operated in outdated facilities, which didn't help the team, which hasn't had a winning season since 2004 and this year averaged fewer than 1,600 fans at home games.

Two years ago, The Huntington News, the student newspaper at Northeastern, quoted the athletic director as saying that there was a "possibility" that the team could be eliminated, and the paper quoted the then-president of the student government vowing to fight any such move.

The university statement noted that Northeastern will continue to have 18 different intercollegiate sports, more than 40 club sports, and hundreds of intramural teams. The university recently renovated its arena for basketball and hockey teams, which have had more athletic success and fan backing than has football. Northeastern is a member of the Colonial Athletic Association.

The athletics director, Peter Roby, issued an open letter explaining the university's rationale. "The decision was a difficult one, made all the more difficult because of the respect and admiration I have for our coaches and players. Despite my personal feelings toward them, I am convinced that this decision is in the best interest of the university," he wrote.

On the discussion board of the Diehard Dogs Web site (a Northeastern fan site for which registration is required), considerable criticism has been posted this morning already. Those posting comments speculate on where the money will go, and suggest that the football program could have been improved. "This is a horrible decision. I will now cease any donation to the school forever until a football team is reinstated," said one comment.

But comments coming in to the student newspaper's site are more mixed. When one comment suggested that those happy to see football go were those "who got cut from JV football in 10th grade," several responded in praise of the university's decision.

One response: "wow, this is clearly a comment from a football player who's too stupid to succeed in anything else. why is it so difficult for you guys to realize that lots of people don't care about football or sports AT ALL? and it's not like playing for nu is a stepping stone for pro football careers. that has always confused me - do nu's football players actually think their nu football careers will lead to any level of success in football beyond college? if so, that's delusional at a whole new level. if not, what are they wasting their time and OUR money for? school spirit? great job there fellas! 70+ full scholarships for these clowns? good riddance. don't let the door hit you on your way out."

Another said: "We had a football team? Assuming the money doesn't go towards another 25% raise for Aoun, step in the right direction!"

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Northeastern Ends Football

  • Congratulations
  • Posted by Hoosier Prof on November 23, 2009 at 8:30am EST
  • A brave decision. And when Northeastern survives just fine w/o football, more schools will follow.

  • Posted by Amazed in NY on November 23, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • Smart move by NU, and I hope HoosierProf is right that others will follow. I love college athletics, but I've seen too many D-I schools pour money into football with nothing to show for it. Football is a sport that should pay for itself, and if it doesn't, it should go.

  • GOOD NEWS
  • Posted by K SCHUG , Professor of Chemistry at Illinois Iinstitute of Technology on November 23, 2009 at 11:15am EST
  • It's nice to see that the recession is not all bad for higher education

  • Posted by pragmatist on November 23, 2009 at 11:15am EST
  • A few schools have done this and I wonder why more don't follow. I get the whole homecoming rah-rah pressure that schools get from alumni, but when no one shows up to games and those alumni actually don't contribute money to the school, what are we dumping cash into an expensive sport like football for? At enrollment-driven schools I suppose we need the students...I hope we're breaking even if that's the case. There's a lot of other ways to spend that money in an educationally relevant way.

  • Posted by jim on November 23, 2009 at 11:30am EST
  • Any business that has a failing division (one that sucks up more money than it generates and doesn't succeed in spite of the money) cuts the division. This results in lost jobs, an economic downturn for local businesses that depend on the paychecks of the laid-off employees and lots of hard feelings all around. I see a university football team as a division of the total university business.
    That said I have a problem with schools that spend millions, succeed as a football team (game wins, tournament wins, players going to the NFL etc.) and still measure the benefit to the school in "good will" because the dollar outlay is many times the dollars generated.
    I see the primary mission of a university as "preserving and extending knowledge" with teaching and publishing being the preservation and research being the extending. If schools are sliding into economic "black holes", it is time to look at all divisions of the "business" and decide whether it helps to fulfill the main mission or is just a feel-good distraction.
    I love sports but I study first!

  • My Kingdom for a football team!
  • Posted by Bob on November 23, 2009 at 11:30am EST
  • My respect for a college community in general, and and the NU president in particular has increased. Rarely, will anyone touch the "sacred cow" of football, but why should they be excluded from the discussion of the colleges priorities and limited resources. So often we hear that "everything is on the table" for consideration in hard fiscal times, but you would never be able to tell by most colleges football programs.

    To the alum who swears no more donations to your alma mater until they get a football team...get some perspective!

  • Slippery Slope
  • Posted by JC , Assistant Dir. - Admissions at in the Mid-West on November 23, 2009 at 12:00pm EST
  • "Football is a sport that should pay for itself, and if it doesn't, it should go." - Amazed in NY

    Careful with that idea there sparky.

    While I am in support of athletics at the collegiate level as a way to provide another avenue for a student to access higher education, I am also a realist that schools should not mortgage the ability to provide academics to improve/build a single purpose facility.

    That being said, those on the academic side should not be jumping for joy because the critical eye may be put on your department should further cuts be required.

    To follow the thoughts of Amazed, why would a college/university support and/or fund an academic department that does not have an adequate number of students to financially support the faculty and support staff? Yes, I know the age old arguments. However, I am following the thought of our learned poster, Amazed, to a logical way station.

    The college/university that I currently work with, has multiple departments that receive funding in excess of that which it takes in from students in the major and/or minor. The majors are taught at every other college/university in the state, so students could pursue the majors/minors at another institution if it was not offered here. What would be the harm in doing away with a department that cannot financially support the costs of the department?

    Again, be careful when you point the finger because there may come a time where it is pointed at you.

    "Avoid doing what you would blame others for doing." - Thales of Miletus

  • NU Football
  • Posted by Huskie Dawg , Athletics at NU on November 23, 2009 at 12:15pm EST
  • The NU program has produced a few outstanding players but little in terms of team success. Yes, there are going to be a number of disappointed men and families but the football team should have followed Boston University a dozen years ago. When a football program has little success on the field or in the financial office for decades on end, it is time to move beyond considering the redirection of resources. In this case, NU finally found the cajones to pull the plug.

    Now, if only the uber-conservative wing of the Republican Party would do the same with that train wreck known as Sarah Palin.

  • Posted by Andy on November 23, 2009 at 12:15pm EST
  • I'm sure the Northeastern rugby men and women would be thrilled to inherit any outdated facilities...

  • Follow the Leader?
  • Posted by Harley on November 23, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • When Chicago, then a collegiate football power and a highly regraded academic institution, dropped its football team, almost all other institutions simply yawned. It is likely that the main reaction to Northeastern's decision will be similar, but we should expect that the number of institutions that bother so much as a yawn will be far smaller than was the case with Chicago's decision.

  • JC!
  • Posted by Comm Prof on November 23, 2009 at 1:45pm EST
  • You are comparing apples and oranges. Academics are a core activity; athletics are an ancillary activity. In fact, the money saved by plugging a cash drain yielding few benefits could be diverted to support those low-enrollment programs you disdain, but nonetheless provide an education.

    Athletics as "another avenue for a student to access" higher education? They are generally such low-quality individuals that they don't belong in college at all and my university, at least, would be far better without them.

  • Comm Prof!!
  • Posted by JC , Asst. Dir. Admissions at in the Mid-West on November 23, 2009 at 4:45pm EST
  • I don't know what you were reading, but I was not comparing I was pointing out the realistic idea that eventually the finger of the bureaucracy will find a way to finger other areas of an institution when times become tough.

    I apologize if you believe I hold any academic department in disdain. That was not, and is not, my intention. For a person who is a Comm (communication?) Prof I am surprised that you do not realize emails/posts such as these are not the best forum for communication and leaves much to the reader and their innate bias. Which, if I understand your post, you have toward those individuals whom may access higher education through their athletic ability. From your post you also demonstrate the attitude that students should arrive at college as 'ready made' students who will listen raptly to your lectures that will prepare them for a life after college. Because, as you must know, students can only learn when in class and the remainder of their college experience is of little use (yes, sarcasm).

    Alas, I chose higher education as a career to try to give back to my community and society. In that effort, my intentions are to always assist those individuals who desire the opportunity to access higher education. If that means a student is also an athlete, then I will do what I can to assist that student in pursuing their individual goal. I am only disappointed when those charged with the education of students views them as nothing more than gum to be scraped off the bottom of their loafers - "They are generally such low-quality individuals that they don't belong in college at all and my university, at least, would be far better without them." - quote attributed to Comm Prof

  • You can do Homecoming WITHOUT Football
  • Posted by Tim on November 23, 2009 at 5:15pm EST
  • Combine it with a Fall or Winter Carnival and have more of the teams play Homecoming games .Its more work to schedule the first couple years but when the new tradition takes hold, nobody will miss Football. If the Alum NEED to freeze their backsides, have the Soccer team play.

  • Semi Tough
  • Posted by DFS on November 24, 2009 at 8:30pm EST
  • It's about time for a well-defined semi-pro league. But, good luck convincing the boosters and alumni everywhere.

  • Posted by marie on November 25, 2009 at 5:00am EST
  • Finally, a school with some guts! I've always argued that football should pay for itself if it wants to be on a college campus! If it cannot, it should not be there... and btw that should be the rule for every sport!