Search News


Browse Archives

News

Stopping Short of No More Fries

December 1, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Lincoln University’s requirement that all obese undergraduates lose weight or take a one-semester fitness and nutrition course to graduate has angered students, drawn questions from faculty and roiled many observers -- to the point that the institution may back down from the plan following a faculty forum later this week.

While Lincoln’s policy is extreme in mandating a class for students with a body mass index of 30 or greater, many other colleges and universities have developed less controversial programs aimed at fighting obesity among an ever-growing proportion of significantly overweight students. A 2007 analysis of data collected for the Harvard School of Public Health’s College Alcohol Study found the proportion of obese college students increasing -- from 5 percent in 1993 to 8.4 percent by 1999. The spring and fall 2008 National College Health Assessment surveys found 10 percent of college students to be obese.

Though other institutions aren't following Lincoln's lead in mandating a certain course, meal plan or exercise schedule just for obese or overweight students, they are offering coordinated weight loss programs, sessions with nutritionists, cooking classes, healthier dining options and more, all with the implicit goal of whittling down students’ waistlines.

“Obesity is absolutely a big problem in this country,” says Kathleen Malara, director of student health services at Fordham University. “Every college should have some way to promote healthy eating and exercise to students.”

Jennifer Haubenreiser, director of student health promotion at Montana State University and vice president of the American College Health Association, says that “college students, overall, tend to be a healthy population” less affected by obesity than is the general public. The National College Health Assessment data collected by the association suggest that one in 10 college students is obese, while a third of Americans over age 20 were classified as obese in the Centers for Disease Control’s 2006-07 survey.

Colleges, though, should still promote diet and exercise initiatives aimed at helping students develop healthy routines, adds Haubenreiser. “Obesity may not be an acute health concern on campus, but preventing this can certainly provide lifelong benefits for the individual as well as the national health care system.”

Striking a Chord

Lincoln University's aggressive approach has garnered an enormous amount of attention in recent days, and faculty leaders there are said to be reconsidering it. But the underlying issue that prompted the Pennsylvania historically black institution to act is generating significant concern on other campuses, too.

Colleges are seeing growing numbers of “students coming to campus, already with high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes,” says Cynthia Burwell, a professor of health, physical education and exercise science at Norfolk State University. “They’re struggling with these issues and we need to help our students make better choices so they can be healthier.”

Her campus’s food court and student center include several fast food vendors which, she says, are students’ favorite places to eat. “Chick-fil-A and Pizza Hut are the most popular. Students love to go to those places and we do have a hard time trying to get students to break out of those habits since we’re offering the food right here on campus.”

There’s no effort to get rid of unhealthy options, she says, because “it’s clear they’re what students want, and we have to go with that.”

Karen Cutler, communications director for food services provider Aramark, says foods like french fries and pizza “are clearly the most popular” offerings and would never be eliminated from the company’s menus. “Like a lot of things in life, it’s about how to, in moderation, still enjoy the foods that you want to have as part of your social campus experience but knowing how to balance it out.”

At the University of South Carolina's main campus in Columbia, a string of efforts aimed at “making healthy choices simple” have been brought under the umbrella of the Healthy Carolina initiative. Michelle Burcin, director of the program, points to a four-season farmers' market that averages about $7,000 a week in sales, eight walking and running paths around campus, and Fitness Buddies, an anonymous online networking tool to match students, faculty and staff who share the same exercise interests.

The right sides of all campus vending machines are stocked with healthier snacks like high-fiber granola bars, baked chips and pretzels. “We’re not saying the only options are fruit or typical potato chips,” she says. “We’re showing them there’s something in between.”

The introductory University 101 class for freshmen includes talks on nutrition and health. The university’s Campus Wellness unit offers free nutrition consultations to all students, as well as Choose to Lose, an eight-week weight management program that includes exercise sessions, nutrition instruction and food logs.

Stacey Zawacki, director of Boston University’s Nutrition and Fitness Center, has in last few years developed the Sargent Choice program, which has worked to introduce “healthy food choices all across the campus environment,” she says. “If you’re in the mood for pizza, you should he able to have a healthy option on whole wheat dough. The same should go for any other kind of food. Healthy is sometimes perceived as not as satisfying or as appetizing but it can be just as good.”

Though some colleges – like Babson College, where 10 ounce ice cream servings have been cut in half -- are turning to “the stealth approach, changing ingredients, making plates smaller,” Zawacki says this isn’t how she intends to get students to eat healthier. “We’re at a university and it’s our mission to educate people. We want people to understand and have full knowledge about what their choices are and then to make whatever choices they want based on that information.”

Gustavus Adolphus College, in St. Peter, Minn., has eliminated all-you-can-eat meal plans and instead requires students to pay for each item they take, à la carte. Food waste has been cut by 80 percent. Campuses that have made their dining halls trayless also report dramatic reductions in food waste.

While it’s unclear whether these changes are actually leading students to consume fewer calories, Aramark’s Cutler says they “have certainly helped students think twice about what they’re choosing and maybe taking less -- and eating less -- than they would have before.”

The Challenges

Eating less, of course, has its dangers.

As colleges develop programs for overweight and obese students, it’s this challenge that comes up again and again: making sure the programs help those who need help, while not encouraging anorexia, bulimia and other forms of unhealthy weight loss.

“Colleges walk a fine line because of the prevalence of eating disorders,” says Fordham’s Malara. “Help obese students lose weight but don’t do anything that promotes eating disorders.”

Haubenreiser, the ACHA's vice president, warns that because "college students are ... at higher risk of body image issues and eating disorders... interventions and programming need to take" into account the unintended consequences of any offerings.

Deborah Zippel, South Carolina’s campus dietician, says the university tries to ensure that it’s not stoking the flames of eating disorders while trying to help the obese and overweight get healthier. “If a student’s not considered overweight, then they can’t be in the group,” she says, referring to the university’s Choose to Lose program. “We pay close attention to whether it seems like anyone in the class -- or really in any of our dealings having to do with nutrition -- needs additional counseling.”

Boston University’s Zawacki says efforts toward healthy eating and exercise are “very careful not to say ‘never have this, don’t do that.’ ” Instead, she tries to “help people feel confident about what they’re doing and what they’re eating.”

Another challenge colleges face in fighting obesity is a cultural and racial one.

Like Lincoln, Norfolk State is a historically black university. The 2007 study of Harvard’s data found that 19.2 percent of African American college students were obese in 1999, compared with 10.5 percent of Hispanic students, 7.9 percent of whites and 2.9 percent of Asians.

“Because we’re an HBCU, obesity is an issue we just can’t avoid,” Burwell says. “It affects African Americans disproportionately and we need to give students knowledge to prepare them for the real world, the working world.”

The Healthy Spartan Fitness Initiative aims to “change the culture on campus with regards to fast food, exercise and other issues related to obesity,” Burwell says. Campus dining halls are offering more salad options and more low-fat items and labeling them. A Facebook page encourages students to share strategies for healthy living. One recent discussion topic is "Pretty Hair and Working Out," directed at the large number of African American women who get hair weaves or braids that can't be washed.

Though an effort like Lincoln’s is not in the offing, Norfolk State does require freshmen to take a physical education course and a health education course. But the focus, Burwell says, is “not only about obesity and nutrition but other health information as well,” and enrollment is required of all students, not just those who fit a certain health profile.

“We acknowledge that before students get out in the real world, we can impact them by giving them factual information on the health problems -- like obesity -- that plague our community,” she adds. “We just know that every single one of our students needs this information.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Stopping Short of No More Fries

  • Posted by Lauren , Academic Advisor on December 1, 2009 at 12:45pm EST
  • These less invasive strategies are what really have an impact on college campuses. There's a fine line between promoting healthy eating and exercise habits and mandating students to take a course that teaches these issues. If an institution doesn't have a physical education or health and wellness requirement for all students, it will be hard to put a program in place that specifically targets obese students. It seems that Lincoln may have jumped the gun in administering this required course. Obesity isn't the only nutritional deficiency on campus. Like many have already mentioned, anorexia and bulimia are threats as well. South Carolina and the other schools mentioned seem to have the right formula: providing voluntary and anonymous programs to students, faculty, and staff that are based on positive communication and collaboration with nutritionists and fitness consultants. This blip in strategic planning and communication seems like it will cause much backlash for Lincoln administrators in the coming weeks. And by the time it's over, it's unlikely that they will accomplish setting up any sort of health-based initiatives for their students.

  • The Larger Picture
  • Posted by Hannah , Ex-Adjunked on December 1, 2009 at 1:15pm EST
  • OK, so Lincoln's menthods are arguably illegal, discriminatory, superifcial, expensive (requiring an extra course), not fully thought out, and promotional of a socially "acceptable" prejudice. On the other hand, much of what we blindly defend as personal "freedom" impacts others. My "freedom" to not wear a seatbelt, smoke, wear a helmet while cycling, be a drug addict, to drive just under the legal limit, or not eat nutritionally and exercise all drive up the soaring national health bill; we all pay. Other nations with lower overall health premiums value "personal freedom" less than we do and mandate that all schools serve healthy foods and that everyone exercises. At the K-12 level in the US, many schools are banning cupcakes and other sugary treats in class to celebrate birthdays, and parents, especially the rich ones, are decrying the lack of "freedom" and the "instrusiveness" of "dictator" school administrations. Now--as opposed to yesteryear--junk food is instantly available feverywhere; we thus have an expensive national health problem (spiraling, diabetes rates have been attributed to obesity) that is subsequently make affordable healthcare impossible for too many. So, while Lincoln's (perhaps) attempt at addressing obesity (a policy which should cover ALL eating disorders) will proabably get shot down by scores of lawyers real soon, let's not forget that something needs to be done by some institution(s) to re-interpret "limits on individual freedom" as actions that could benefit many individuals.

  • If you're not perfect, don't apply.
  • Posted by DFS on December 1, 2009 at 4:45pm EST
  • Then, you won't infringe on anyone else's rights.
    Oops, maybe you will, since you've just infringed on someone else's right to improve themselves.
    Let's just extend this insanity on all other public organizations. Churches must deny them, because charitable contributions may be more predictably directed towards those they're in more contact with. That's not fair.
    Airlines should only deal with a maximum weight of anyone within one standard deviation from the mean. Therefore, exclude all of those above that measure. (After all, they must have "deviated" from some "standard.")
    And, it would be "greener" to force fat people to walk instead of taking the bus. Then, the bus companies would spend less on gasoline, and oil, and therefore benefit our "green" environs. (I know -- a lot of huffing and puffing would introduce more carbon dioxide, but we have to draw that line somewhere.)
    So, let's just outlaw fat. Outlaw PowerChair (so I don't have to listen to that annoying announcer's voice anymore, as well), or any other such enterprise.
    In fact, outlaw all exercise equipment, since that would increase the output of carbon dioxide.
    Everyone -- stop exercising!
    Peace.

  • The Smaller Picture
  • Posted by DFS on December 1, 2009 at 4:45pm EST
  • Picture this: no one need apply unless you are already svelt.
    That means that you should stop exhaling carbon dioxide right now, though. Well, that's ridiculous -- of course one should be allowed to exhale!
    Rather, just stop working out!
    And, all of you fat people, be forewarned: you are no longer able to fly, to ride a bus, or even to be a passenger or drive in a vehicle.
    After all, your weight is the obvious factor.
    You, instead, should just get out and walk. That way, you will lose weight. Or die.
    But, don't forget, don't exhale! That would be bad.
    We'll move on to something else to bitch about, after we're all a bunch of sticks.
    (Are we sticks too sharp? Have we hurt someone's feelings? Does our sveltness undermine Gaia's intention in our existence? Oh, my! I just don't know what to think, now!)

  • Framing obesity as a danger to self and others
  • Posted by Gus03PhD on December 1, 2009 at 4:45pm EST
  • If a student walked around campus displaying a holstered gun, others would (on most campuses, anyway) perceive that student to be a threat. Granted, an obese student probably isn't going to explode in a particular direction at any moment, but he or she is a walking piece of trouble, and probably for a lot longer time. And not only to himself or herself. The costs to the health care system alone are way more than they would be than if the person were physically fit (your obesity makes my fitness more expensive, so what incentive is there for me to help pay for you?) Another imperfect, but workable, analogy: The rule demanding that all people drive on the right can be violated at anytime, but I don't hear anyone going around crying "discrimination" against left-side-of-the-road drivers. The dangers of obesity are real (even if its ugliness is, admittedly, socially constructed) and they should not be downplayed simply because their costs to self and society are less immediately apparent than a room full of trigger-fingered gun-toters. I welcome Lincoln's willingness to frame obesity (like loaded guns, like promiscuous unsafe sex practitioners, like Talibanist women-controllers) as a societal hazard, not just a personal matter of taste.

  • Have everybody pay individually
  • Posted by ACF on December 1, 2009 at 6:00pm EST
  • The easy way to handle all these problems is to let everybody pay for their health care themselves out of pocket. If they choose to practice unhealthy behaviors and end up needing care, then they pay for it. This way, costs flow back to their sources. Econ 101. (By the way, if you feel sorry for someone who cannot pay for all the care that they want, then you can send your salary to that person).

  • Adults?
  • Posted by HSCWU , Director/ Student Affairs at Art Institute of CA - Hollywood on December 1, 2009 at 9:45pm EST
  • One more expample where students are not treated like adults. Part of the learning and developmental process is choice and outcome of choice. These students have lost their ability to make good or bad choices about their life. No one sending the booze hounds to AA, no one is sending the bulimic/anorexics for help, don't even get me started about the smokers! SO why is being overweight the biggest crime against health? There are those whose personaly habits are way worse than the extra pounds someone might be carrying. Matter of fact, there are some perfectly healthy heavy people, who exercise, do not drink, smoke or carry on other behaviors deemed as poor health choices. There are those who will always be large in stature, despite weight loss. Genetically they are just big people. This is one of the last stigmas that the public thinks is ok to be insensitive about. People of size, have lives! They do more than eat, they are smart, they are clean, they are intelligent, they go on dates and even yikes! HAVE SEX! Get over it already...these are people with real feelings and real lives. Quit playing God already and dictating how they should live. Going to college is hard enough, students don't need to be stigmatized by the institution that is supposed to serve and develop them.

  • Behavior vs. Outcome
  • Posted by Jeffrey J. Milroy , Doctoral Candidate in Public Health on December 2, 2009 at 12:00pm EST
  • While reading through all of these thoughtful comments my mind is going haywire (in a good way). Many relevant issues have been raised and I must say I have gone through this same debate in my head several times (and continue to do so).

    I will refrain from sharing my own opinion on the Lincoln U situation, but what I will do is offer something to contemplate. Many of the comments shared indirectly speak about "obesity" as a something other than an outcome. We need to understand that obesity is an outcome; a result of other contributors. If this is done, we can then focus our attention on those specific contributors and possibly the whole notion of discrimination would be eliminated. Let us not focus on only those who are obese, because frankly there are a lot of healthy "obese people" out there. We should focus on those who make unhealthy eating choices; we should focus on those who do not follow the American College of Sport Medicine's recommendations for weekly physical activity. Then I can assure you the only people we would be discriminating against would be those who eat healthy all the time and those who meet the ACSM's guidelines every week (I hope those reading this have a sense of humor).

    It seems to me that Lincoln had their minds in the right place, they just focused their attention in the wrong area. Regardless of BMI (which has it's own set of limitations), everyone can benefit from being more physically active and everyone can benefit from making healthier eating choices. College is the time and place to help students make better choices in these area, so why not do so? I commend Lincoln for taking a step in the right direction, I only wish it had been better thought out.

  • Why Not Apply the Rules to Everyone
  • Posted by carolinem on December 3, 2009 at 1:30pm EST
  • The obsession by the Left to control people's lives is completely out of control.  Administrators have no business dictating eating habits of students, who as a whole are far healthier than the administrators.  If this kind of micromanaging were applied equally to administrators, faculty and staff, the rules would go away in a hurry.  Have you seen the girth of professors and campus bureaucrats, lately?  Yecch.