Search News


Browse Archives

News

Students, Faith, Catholic Colleges

February 1, 2010

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

WASHINGTON -- What accusation about Roman Catholic colleges is most likely to worry parents and bishops alike?

How about the charge that they make their Catholic students less Catholic? That's the assertion regularly made by the Cardinal Newman Society, based in part on a 2003 analysis called: "Are Catholic Colleges Leading Students Astray?" The society -- a self-appointed watchdog group on Catholic colleges' fealty to church teachings -- reported findings that generated nationwide news coverage: "[G]raduating seniors are predominantly pro-abortion, approve of homosexual 'marriage,' and only occasionally pray or attend religious services. Nine percent of Catholic students abandon their faith before graduation."

On Sunday, new research was released here at the annual meeting of the Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities that challenges many of the assumptions of the 2003 report. The new study doesn't dispute that many Catholic students at Catholic colleges disagree with some church teachings, especially those on abortion and gay marriage. But by asking a different question -- did Catholic students move closer to or further away from church teachings during their time at college? -- the new analysis suggests that Catholic colleges are not the heresy-producers they are accused of being.

The research finds that Catholic students at Catholic colleges are less likely than Catholic students at other colleges to move away from the church and more likely to turn toward it. Further, the study finds that the Catholic students at Catholic colleges -- while moving away from the church on some issues -- more toward the church on others, including both political and philosophical views and specific actions, such as the reading of sacred texts.

Over all, the study finds that Catholic students "remain profoundly connected to their faith" as they progress in college.

Given that the charges raised by critics of the colleges regularly create controversies at Catholic colleges, the data could be significant. Richard A. Yanikoski, president of the Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities, said that the comparisons to non-Catholic institutions are important because this is an era in which college-age students are willing to question faith regardless of their faith and where they go to college. The new research shows, he said, that "a typical Catholic undergraduate student attending a Catholic college or university emerges more spiritually intact than if she or he had attended a public or secular private institution, but not nearly as spiritually active as would have been the case a few decades ago."

The new study was conducted by the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate, at Georgetown University. Like the Cardinal Newman research, the new study relied on national surveys of student attitudes -- as they enter college and a few years later -- conducted by the Higher Education Research Institute, at the University of California at Los Angeles.

Attitudes of Catholic Students, by Type of College

Issue/Institution Type Away From Church Unchanged Toward Church Net Change (in % Points)
Abortion        
--Catholic college 31% 53% 16% -15
--Public college 36% 47% 17% -19
--Private religious (non-Catholic) 33% 53% 14% -19
--Private non-sectarian 35% 47% 18% -17
Commitment to reducing pain and suffering in world        
--Catholic college 15% 47% 38% +23
--Public college 18% 42% 40% +22
--Private religious (non-Catholic) 18% 48% 35% +17
--Private non-sectarian 21% 38% 41% +20
Cutting military spending        
--Catholic college 17% 46% 37% +20
--Public college 23% 45% 32% +9
--Private religious (non-Catholic) 18% 45% 37% +19
--Private non-sectarian 12% 45% 43% +31
Attitudes on same-sex marriage        
--Catholic college 39% 45% 16% -23
--Public college 42% 43% 15% -27
--Private religious (non-Catholic) 36% 50% 14% -22
--Private non-sectarian 42% 44% 14% -28

The research also examined data on specific religious behaviors. Here, the study finds that Catholic students at Catholic colleges do move away from some (but not all) practices, but that the movement is greater at other types of institutions.

Religious Behavior of Catholic Students, by Type of College

Behavior Less Active Unchanged More Active Net Change (in % Points)
Mass attendance        
--Catholic college 32% 61% 7% -25
--Public college 42% 50% 8% -34
--Private religious (non-Catholic) 51% 44% 4% -47
--Private non-sectarian 49% 45% 7% -41
Prayer        
--Catholic college 29% 45% 26% -3
--Public college 34% 42% 23% -11
--Private religious (non-Catholic) 31% 45% 23% -8
--Private non-sectarian 40% 38% 21% -19
Reading sacred texts        
--Catholic college 28% 42% 30% +2
--Public college 33% 49% 18% -15
--Private religious (non-Catholic) 32% 39% 29% -3
--Private non-sectarian 32% 44% 24% -8

Yanikoski acknowledged that the data don't suggest some kind of "magical" transformation at Catholic colleges that would run counter to all other societal trends. Catholic students at Catholic colleges are more likely to decrease mass attendance than increase it, and so forth. But he said that the figures show that this movement away from religion is less likely at a Catholic than a non-Catholic college. And he added that one has to factor in what goes on to all people in their late teens and early 20s.

"The trajectory of faith, relative to when they were younger, is downward," he said, and that's true of all students (and Catholics who don't attend college). That being the case, he said that the smaller drops in adherence to religious practice or beliefs at Catholic colleges (and gains in some cases) reflect the positive work taking place at the colleges to connect students to their faith.

That's not to say, he added, that leaders of Catholic colleges don't want to see more from students, but in "young adulthood, what parent is happy with everything in the state of the minds of their kids? This is when young adults are pushing back against authority."

Generally, he said that the "more nuanced" analysis prepared by the Georgetown researchers should be helpful to member institutions.

While the report notes that there may be issues of "self-selection" in that Catholic students who care about their faith may be more likely to attend Catholic colleges, Yanikowski said that this wasn't a serious limitation of the study. Most Catholic students who select Catholic colleges do so for reasons other than the religious nature of the institution, he said, which also explains the high non-Catholic enrollments at the colleges. In this context, he said that he believes the self-selection factor is minimal.

Patrick J. Reilly, president of the Cardinal Newman Society, said that he had not seen the new study, but that he was not impressed with the ideas in it that were described to him. "If the ACCU thinks it appropriate to celebrate the fact that Catholics lose their faith somewhat slower at Catholic colleges than elsewhere then they can hardly represent the concerns of faithful Catholic families."

He said that he has wanted ACCU and other groups to do more research to build on the Cardinal Newman Society's work, so he was pleased to see the association's interest. But he said the association seemed to want to "ignore" the "serious problems" the society has publicized. Reily said it wasn't good enough for Catholic colleges to say that they have success with Catholic students on some issues but not others. At Catholic colleges, he said, "students should be inspired to embrace and deepen their Catholic faith, not negotiate around Catholic moral teaching."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Students, Faith, Catholic Colleges

  • Orthodoxy versus exploration
  • Posted by catholic school alum , Professor at Private U on February 1, 2010 at 10:00am EST
  • What the Newman society is advocating is unquestioned belief in authority not embracing faith. My own catholic education (K-16) taught me to think more deeply and critically, explore my beliefs, understand and heed "the cry of the poor". Currently, I am a member of my Catholic Church's religious education board. We're finding that the drop off in attendance at Mass, participation in CCD, and youth engagement in faith-based activities starts as soon as post first communion not in College. Doesn't this say something about the direction and role of the Church in modern life more than "gee, catholic colleges are actually teaching them to think" and that's dangerous.

    As long as groups like the Newman Society refuse to explore deeper, the downward trend in orthodoxy will continue as will world conflicts in the name of religion.

  • Gay Saint
  • Posted by Diogenes on February 1, 2010 at 11:30am EST
  • I always find it ironic that the anti-gay, radically right, walk-in-lockstep Newman society takes their name from a profoundly spiritual ,gay, convert to the faith. They are an antithesis to the life of this kind and gentle man who went a profound spiritual quest and like many British gay men in the 19th century found peace in the Catholic Church. He and Ambose St. John shared a house and now share a grave. Maybe some day they'll learn about Christian love and allow the truth of this pioneer to exist separate from their right wing radicalism and intolerance. Yes they deny Newman was gay. That part of his long life does not fit with their radical ideology. Two bad. He was a bigger man than they will ever be.

  • Cardinal Newman Society
  • Posted by Catholic Professor , Professor at Le Moyne College on February 1, 2010 at 11:45am EST
  • The major theme I have always heard about the Cardinal Newman Society (CNS) is that, despite its august title and an affiliated board (which includes some of the more conservative clerics in the American Catholic community), the CNS consists primarily of Mr. Reilly and a fax machine. He has served an important gadfly role for years, but hardly represents a significant constituency. His prominence in the press is equivalent to that shown for "Catholics for Free Choice," yet another radical liberal group which should receive a lot less attention than it gets.

  • big picture take-away
  • Posted by Monica on February 1, 2010 at 12:15pm EST
  • Interesting piece. What I take away from this is that a significant number of Catholic students will move away from the Church's position on abortion and gay marriage regardless of what college they attend. And a similarly significant number will increase their commitment to reducing suffering in the world and military spending. The question for the Church then is, Which of these social positions are more important? If it's the former, the conclusion would be to DIScourage students from attending college at all.

  • Orthodoxy vs exploration -- nuanced
  • Posted by Thomas A. Szyszkiewicz on February 1, 2010 at 1:00pm EST
  • As a graduate of one of the few Catholic colleges which the Cardinal Newman Society likes (Franciscan University of Steubenville), I can attest to the fact that I received a first-rate liberal arts education and was formed in an orthodox understanding of the Faith. I was taught to explore that Faith, but not by saying things like, "Women should be ordained," knowing that there are parameters outside of which I cannot go without then rescinding the title "Catholic" to which I can lay claim by virtue of Baptism. Is this "unquestioned belief in authority, not embracing faith"? On the contrary. It is embracing faith and understanding that the faith has authority to which I submit myself by that embrace, something which it seems certain people have a hard time understanding.

    What's interesting to note is that CatholicCulture.org has a series of reports that it's been running for a few weeks now about the relationships between schools in the Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities and Planned Parenthood (see this, for instance: http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=5310). Every day, they're finding another "Catholic" college that somehow or other has ties to the world's largest provider of abortions. Is this "exploration" of the faith? I'm sure this is how it will be marketed, but to ally oneself, however remotely, to an agency which teaches and acts in the very antithesis of what the Church teaches and acts is to, at the very least, call into question one's Catholic identity.

  • Diogenes, I expected more...
  • Posted by PiledHigher&Deeper , PhD at European on February 1, 2010 at 4:15pm EST
  • Are all same-sex relationships "gay"? (You don't even give the option of "homosexual"; you've immediately reduced it all to "gay." Come on! How about a little sophistication!) Is sexual identity real, or--borrowing from Foucault--is it our own day's convention, capable of being displaced by something else? Aren't the terms homosexual and heterosexual better as adjectives rather than substantives--less restricting, confining, labeling?

    If you're right, Diogenes, then we must pity poor, frustrated Newman, for he was forced by his Catholic faith (but wait a minute...he chose that faith) to curb his desires, which evidently he did. Oh, goodness! Now I've really confused myself. If that is the case, then we don't have a problem with Catholicism here but, rather, an argument against restraint of all kinds. Hmmmm... I'm not sure that we want to make that argument, Diogenes. A little restraint would help in almost every ill facing humanity that I can imagine: the environment, war, crime, greed, exploitation, etc., etc. Now if we only had an institution--better yet, a person--who would speak out with authority about these terrible matters, telling people to care more about others than themselves, we would finally be on the right track...

  • Hear, Hear!
  • Posted by Cicero on February 1, 2010 at 5:15pm EST
  • Dear "Piledhigheranddeeper":

    That might just be the absolute smartest comment I have ever read on this site. Good on you.

  • Your weak response...
  • Posted by Diogenes on February 1, 2010 at 6:30pm EST
  • Actually piled higher, your response is the usual piled higher comment I expect from the anti-gay crowd. It was hardly brilliant and rather self serving. Just because a man or women is gay does not mean they are promiscuous. One can be gay and celebate just like one can be straight and celebate. Being gay is a not a choice. Being sexually active is. One can be a gay man in love and never have sex. Unlike you piled higher, we all don't think with our gonads or assume that others do. The same goes for your little clack! Now I hear the Pope has order Newman's body dug up and separated form his life partner's in preparation of sainthood. That is a tragedy. Obey the man's last wished and leave him with the man he loved. It seems churches exploit nearly everything.

  • What, Diogenes?
  • Posted by Scooter on February 2, 2010 at 9:30am EST
  • You seem to be putting words into the mouth of Piledhigher that are not there. I don't see where he speaks about promiscuity at all. In fact, I think he is claiming that Newman did in fact choose to be celibate and applauding him for that. I also don't think that the CNS is condoning intolerance. If I am understanding you correctly (and I am struggling to do so), you seem to be defining intolerance differently than they do. Catholics who truly understand their faith can acknowledge and reconcile their dislike of sin (their own and others') with their love of each individual human being. I am great friends with my sister-in-law, who is gay. We have had wonderful, open conversations about our differences of opinion and share a mutual respect for one another. We consider each other great friends, in spite of the fact that we do not share the same views. Based on my interpretation of your writing, it seems as though you would call me intolerant. On the contrary, I think the intolerant person is someone who refuses to engage in honest and respectful dialogue. Such a person either removes themselves completely from any discussion of (or exposure to) the topic or makes loud and accusatory statements based purely on emotion and refuses to listen to other perspectives (although they may claim to listen, they don't truly). Pot, have you met kettle?

  • Horrific
  • Posted by Judy on February 3, 2010 at 9:15am EST
  • What a horrid defense by any Catholic institution! It's "ok" because they are steering away from the faith a smaller percentage of students than other colleges and universities!? Why is this not shameful, embarassing and shocking to the Catholic universities in this country? I work for a major one, and I'm sorry to say that many faculty would be proud to see these stats because it furthers the cause of academic freedom on our campus--as if freedom denotes that we can teach anything we want whether it aligns itself with any sort of truth or not.

    Any person, regardless of whether he holds religious beliefs or not, should accept that an institution of higher education that utilizes the words Roman Catholic in describing itself, owes it to the Church and, more particularly, to its students, to adhere to those beliefs in its instruction. And students who attend would and should expect as much. Otherwise, just call yourself a college or university and dispense with any connection to the Church.

  • Is this study supposed to be a parody?
  • Posted by Edward Grant on February 3, 2010 at 10:00am EST
  • When a study is advertised as "more nuanced," it's usually time to run for the hills -- and this one proves the rule. Let's start with some Statistics 101. Is this a controlled study? Of course not. Conversely, is there a selection bias resulting from the choice made by parents and students to attend a Catholic college, as opposed to a public or non-Catholic private college? Of course there is. That is, the kids who enter a Catholic college have already indicated a preference (either based on their own or parental inclinations) to further their education in a Catholic environment. (And they have backed up that preference by genuine financial commitment and sacrifice, at least when compared to the costs of a public college.) That alone would account for much of the difference between Catholic and non-Catholic collegians on an issue such as Mass attendance.

    My own sense, as a parent of one former student at a Catholic university, and an adjunct faculty member at the same institution, is that at their best, Catholic colleges adopt a curious "yin and yang" stance, accommodating the secular and hedonist popular culture on the one hand (e.g., mixed-sex floors in dormitories), while at the same time offering (at least to those so motivated) outstanding professors (and programs) who stand athwart that culture and offer the best of what Catholic education should be in the 21st century. Like most schools, they ask too little of their students in terms of genuine intellectual (and, in their case, spiritual) formation, and thus graduate too many students who are as spoiled as they are educated.

    The Catholic schools which at least pay lip service to the idea of "formation" would do well to consider how mixed a message they are sending. What is the point of encouraging a life emboldened by notions of sacrifice and service to others if you actively encourage a dorm (and party) life geared to the pursuit of personal pleasure? Sure, some students will take a pass if they learn that your dorm floors (and perhaps even some entire dorms!) are sex-segregated -- but perhaps these are the types of students who would be better off at another college. To take another example, directly from the study, support for reduced military spending is "cheap grace" (what exactly does it cost to state that opinion) compared to the personal commitment to attend Mass at least once a week.

    Perhaps things are not as bad as the Cardinal Newman Society paints them. But this study, an exercise in cheap grace if I ever saw one, does nothing to refute the charges.

     

  • Catholic Colleges
  • Posted by Jim , Humanities at SJU on February 3, 2010 at 10:45am EST
  • The findings of the study don't surprise me. It attests to the great job many Catholic colleges are doing as they promote and present the faith, while encouraging analysis, ciritcal reflection, and questioning. The history of Catholic higher education testifies to its openness to debate and discussion. One only has to look to the Univerisity of Paris or Oxford during the Middle Ages to affirm its openness to debate and search for truth.

    What the study did not cover, nor did it intend to, was the influence Catholic Colleges have on non-Catholic students. It has been my experience that many non-Catholics at Catholic colleges are given a new respect and understanding of Catholicism, an appreciation of their own religious traditions, and a solid background in moral decision making grounded in the Catholic tradition. This, not taking into account the numbers of converts to Catholicism at these campuses, should be commended by all interested in the Catholic Faith. As for the issues, these are not the foundations of Catholicism, despite what we have heard lately. Abortion and same sex marriage do not hold the same weight as the beliefs in the scriptures or the creed. The current positions on these topics have been nuanced through the ages and may change in time. The debate goes on. If one does not approve of it, read the debates between the Franciscans and Dominicans over the Immaculate Conception in the Middle Ages. They debated and argued; they did not just defer to authority and not question. The Catholic positions (as stated by the pope and bishops) on all issues are presented clearly at Catholic Colleges. But being true to the tradition, these positions are also questioned and critiqued in light of new insights and knowledge.

  • Nunsense
  • Posted by Bob on February 3, 2010 at 1:30pm EST
  • Gee, a study which confirms that students who self select a religious school feel closer to their faith in certain ways upon graduation...and that students who self select a nonreligious school find themselves moving away from their faith in certain ways...tells us what exactly?

    I guess you all missed the comment by the poster that said that it is already happening at communion/confirmation age.

    Society is (hopefully) moving away from mindlessly following the religion of their parents just because...

    The Newmanites should remember Soren Kierkegaard...you know the unexamined life and all that...