Appeals court backs U. of Texas at Austin's consideration of race in admissions, but appeal is likely headed back to Supreme Court.
Scholar goes behind scenes to observe professors decide whom to admit to top Ph.D. programs. She finds that GRE and grades dominate first winnowing, while diversity comes into play later.
In new book and discussion, researchers and advocates envision strategies for fostering campus diversity in a world in which race-conscious remedies are prohibited.
A professor's e-mail to students he thought were minority raises the question of whether help should ever be offered only to that subset of a course's students.
Supreme Court orders new appeals court consideration of the right of U. of Texas to consider race in admissions. Ruling requires "strict scrutiny" for such policies, but doesn't offer the sort of definitive guidance on affirmative action that many expected.
New research says that by examining both socioeconomic status and "overachievement," colleges could increase racial diversity without considering race.
With only 9 women among 44 editors, the Harvard Law Review expands its affirmative action policy to include gender.
Appeals court rules that Michigan's voter-approved ban is unconstitutional because it limits equal access to the political process.
Report charging that UCLA considers race in admissions infuriates minority student groups, and illustrates how affirmative action debates can divide a campus, even one required to be race-neutral.
Richard D. Kahlenberg questions the rationale for the University of Texas defense of affirmative action.