Submitted by Doug Lederman on November 2, 2007 - 4:00am
Smart Title:
Hearing on rising tuitions, normally a scary topic for higher ed officials, treads gently and focuses on proposal to ensure better state funding of public colleges.
Submitted by Doug Lederman on November 12, 2007 - 4:00am
Smart Title:
House Democrats introduce Higher Education Act bill that would shame institutions that raise prices sharply; 747-page measure would increase federal role in other ways, too.
Submitted by Scott Jaschik on November 15, 2007 - 4:00am
Smart Title:
Congress is jazzed about plan to embarrass colleges with above-average tuition increases. But will the "watch list" identify profligate spenders -- or discriminate against colleges with working class students?
Submitted by Doug Lederman on November 15, 2007 - 4:00am
Smart Title:
As House panel debates Higher Ed Act bill, lawmakers hammer home risk that rising prices could lead to further federal action. Plus a last-minute gambit on accreditation.
Submitted by Doug Lederman on November 16, 2007 - 4:00am
Smart Title:
Colleges have mixed views on bipartisan legislation that wins unanimous approval; full House fails to override Bush veto of education/health spending bill.
Regional agencies and college groups spar over Higher Education Act provision on learning outcomes. Does the rift open the door to increased federal role?
Submitted by Doug Lederman on February 4, 2008 - 4:00am
Smart Title:
Reworked Higher Ed Act legislation would limit scrutiny to 5 percent of colleges that raise tuition price the most, but ramp up other reporting requirements.
Submitted by Doug Lederman on February 6, 2008 - 4:00am
Smart Title:
With House poised to take up bill, one lawmaker offers plan to require 5 percent payout by endowments, and leaders back default-rate change pushed by for-profit colleges.