Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

Nomad Scholar

Indestructible Student Relationships


par-a-site n. 1. An often harmful organism that lives on or in a different organism. 2. A person who habitually takes advantage of the generosity of others without making any useful return. — Webster’s Dictionary.

It is the first day of class. A student in his early 20s strides into the classroom. A beautiful young woman walks quickly to keep up with him; she is so close to him that she bumps into his side. They sit in adjoining seats in the next-to-back row. I smile and look down at my census sheet. I call roll. He is Alex, with a last name I’ve never had the chance to pronounce before. She is Traci. “Ah, true love,” I think. Smiling, I ponder young love as the students settle in to the assignment.

Three weeks into the fall semester, I realize the inequity. She is an A student — bright, intelligent, motivated. He? A C student, haggling with instructors, looking for extra credit, borrowing her notes and time. The problem? He is bringing her down. Her grade slips because she turns her paper in late — along with his. I know that she has done hers on time, but she holds on to it until he is ready, too.

In another world, I might think it is a beautiful sympathetic gesture; here I think it is a mismatched sign of her devotion. He does poorly on quizzes; she misses a few. I wonder if she does it to bridge the gap between them. In group work, he sits like a stone; she mimics his silence. Together they sit, mute, refusing to participate. They stride into class together every day — late — 5, 8, 12 minutes. Her attendance grade lowers, as does his. I can’t help but want to take her into my office and tell her what I think. “Traci,” I imagine myself saying, “He’s bringing you down. He’s a loser — an underachiever. Think of what he’ll be like later in the job force.” With a wan smile,
I might add, “Yes, I know you love him, but consider your future.”

But I do not intervene. Why? Because I do not think that she will listen. She will act just as I did when I “fell in love” with a 21-year-old underachiever while in high school. My parents tried to warn me. My grandparents lectured me. My sisters smirked; but I held on to that man, desperate to make my own choices — to someday show them all.

The result? I dropped out of high school, worked as a waitress and tried to impress him, me and the world. Finally he found another young woman to admire him and I was lucky enough to bury my sorrows at a local junior college. I hope that Traci, too, will find her way, with or without the underachiever who tucks her hand into his coat pocket as he stands in the hallway, his textbook clean, untouched.

It’s an odd partnership, I think. But is it? On every campus I have worked, I have seen it over and over. The academically weaker ones attaching themselves to the stronger; hoping for a lift, a chance, a ride on someone else’s success. Blatantly exchanging sex (or sex appeal), bravado, status, money or simply a ride to campus for
another’s brain-on-loan. Sometimes it develops into a romance — but more often than not a partnership develops that seems mismatched. I want to be shocked; but I have seen so many things. Students buying term papers from one another. Students lying about work not produced. Excuses, excuses, excuses.

In my office, deluged with yet another onslaught of excuses, the phone rang. After four minutes of all the sympathy I could offer, along with the assertion that I would tape an assignment to my door, I turned to my colleague. “Guess she can only use that excuse one more time,” I said to him. “Dead grandmother,” I answered him before he could even ask. “Oh, yeah,” he replies, his voice tired, “I’ve already had two and it’s only four weeks into the semester.”

Yes, we’re cynical. But we buck up, lace our shoes tighter and get ready for another class. And we are prepared to see them arriving two by two, like a twisted version of Noah’s ark. The all-too-attractive girl who can’t spell with the engineering major who has already received four scholarship offers. The funny returning front-row student who is attached to the young man who can’t seem to make it to class one out of every three sessions. Even the pal-teams are suspect.

In class today I noticed a young man who has missed two deadlines for papers. He sits and chats with a another young man on international status who has trouble with English. I can’t imagine what that exchange
will provide. I can only hope the international student will receive some pronunciation tips while the local student will hustle through his work and turn it in on time.

In my night class at another campus, two women friends straggle in 15 minutes late. Both are in their early 20s, with the usual giggling and guffawing as they sit. Yet when it comes to class work, one is head and shoulders above the other. That night I notice that the overachiever has started to use the same make-up techniques as her friend. I wonder if poor study habits will follow now, too.

What is the drive to couple up in college? Why the buddy system in the face of education? I think that fear plays a big part. At one large institution where I’ve taught, there are more than 100,000 students registered. Even faculty can be intimidated by the numbers.

Fighting for spaces to park, seats in classes, books at the campus bookstore — even for the limited financial aid available can turn the most motivated student mad. And they do not bring their complaints to staff or faculty; they share them with each other. Many of the students will not take the college catalog or schedule at its word. They talk to peers and press for the underground news on campus. Who is the easiest grader? Will this transfer to a
state university? If they take this course, how much will the instructor expect?

Can I get into this class — or should I try at night? And by the time they get into the class, partnerships are forged. With the constant barrage of information, they steel themselves for another assignment. And who can understand their pain and confusion most? Their colleague in class. That sympathetic gal or guy sitting to their right who will not only lend them a #2 pencil, but will walk with them to their next class. An alliance is born — and having been forged under the pressure of academia, it may be tempered so strongly that it will not easily
break.

In some cases, these teams are really good for both students. One student’s talents can help the other; they work to model positive behavior for one another. As a college student, I floundered. Wandering on a campus in Austin, Tex., I felt as though I would go mad if I saw yet one more big, shiny belt buckle. To my surprise, another West Coast student motioned me to sit next to him in accounting. Later he said that it was easy to see I was not a local — my hairstyle and clothes branded me as “a little too liberal” for the crowd there.

Chuck helped drag me, complaining and wheedling, through bookkeeping practices. In return, I unofficially tutored him in English. At the end of two semesters, we had forged a partnership that made us each better
students. I was able to get the right side of my brain to function with numbers, and Chuck became a fair writer, turning out business letters and proposals in his class for a solid A. Teachers who saw us shook their heads. “Those two,” I heard an instructor mutter. Yes, we clowned around; yes, we laughed at the cafeteria food, but our transcripts took a tremendous leap.

Here is the value in student partnerships. Not the kind that are set up by well-meaning clubs or administrators, but born completely out of need. And the result? In this case — fabulous.

But not all partnerships can claim success. I watch as a sympathetic working student hands his textbook to a newbie just out of high-school. She smiles at him, a Revlon red meant to attract. He looks dazed and his shiny eyes return to his handwritten notes. I know he means well, but I wonder if he will get his book back in time to study for the next quiz.

In another class, I watch as an experienced international student sweetly bullies another student into leading the group assignment. The newer student immigrant fights her natural shyness to rise to her new friend’s challenge; I wonder if she will also help her more experienced friend write a thesis statement after class.
Realizing that there is not much I can do, I look at my syllabus and write down “in-class writing” for the next Monday. I hope to try and identify the students who are not really producing their own work. Even as I circle the note in medium-blue, I know that many of my students will connect, sit with another on a Tuesday night and struggle through the Wednesday homework together. I can only hope that both students lend a hand and walk away better for the experience.

My curiosity wins out and I consider these teams. At times I sense that the academically superior student receives a sense of belonging or being adored that is hard to match with simple numeric grading systems. But I admit that as we make our way into the semester, I look over my attendance sheet at night and close my eyes. I pray for the success of both students — and hope that they both find what they need without wasted semesters. I ask for guidance and hope that none of my students will ever have to know the shame that follows when your transcripts can never be sent on to another campus.

Just as instructors find mentors useful, so do students. And like their less educated counterparts, academics find friendships more natural than forced mentorships through administration. Many of my friends at universities discuss freshman interest groups. The good news is that many students new to the campus will find support by those they trust most — their peers. Yet even this caring environment may breed a parasitic relationship where one student takes advantage of another. Here too, weaker scholars may find a less sophisticated counterpart to shore up their skills. The real solution is the confidence that comes with years of learning. When a student begins to sense the value of their knowledge, the cycle is less apt to continue.

On a day when I feel connected to the sky, to the grass around the campus buildings, to the instructor passing me in the hallway, and the flood of students from the parking lot, I hope that I am wrong. That I have misjudged. I hope that the partnerships will strengthen their experience here rather than weaken it; that they will move into
universities or the working world with all that they need. That is my hope.

Shari Wilson, who writes Nomad Scholar under a pseudonym, explores life off the tenure track. Her last column was about the problems with once-a-week courses.

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

so these are the acceptable stereotypes

Thank you for that beautiful trip down stereotype lane. I like the fact that in your relationships, nobody was the parasite, but you assume that in your students’ relationships 1) students are somehow unable to avoid being seduced by someone that rubs against them and therefor are not making conscience choices; and 2) the dumb-looking guy is the one dragging the girl down.

Larry, at 9:10 am EDT on August 22, 2005

Leeching gets a bad rap

I think Larry only read half the article, since 1) she offers examples of both positive and negative relationships in her own life, and 2) offers examples of women leeching off of men as well as vice versa. Her point is pretty clear that college, in particular, produces intellectual leeches of all shapes and sizes. What I think she overlooks, though, is that these kinds of parasitic/imbalanced relationships exist throughout our society—people thrive on and take advantage of their partner’s popularity, their looks, their money, their status, their caretaking abilities, etc. In fact, don’t all relationships do a little of that? Who’s to say that the smart one isn’t leeching a little of whatever the “dumb” one has to offer (maybe he’s a great cook!) Would a professor even see that in a classroom? Of course not—we only see one aspect of the relationship, the one we measure and evaluate. But certainly that’s not the most important element of everyone’s life... Honestly, it’s a little refreshing to a once and future “nerd” to see that at some point “intelligence” actually buys you something in the sexual economy. It almost certainly wasn’t buying these kids much in high school when many students’ priorities were very different! Let ‘em leech each other dry...they’ll decide for themselves if it’s worth it. And they’ll only be “dragged down” as far as they let themselves be...

huntly, at 10:06 am EDT on August 22, 2005

Markets are efficient (theoretically)

As someone who partied his brains out in college — worked hard, chased more often than was chased — I often gave as much as I got. Unfortunately, some have less-equitable experiences. Well, life has to go on.

Now, much wiser, I tell my beloved 18-year-old niece — “is this guy you’re dating, going to help you become, the person you reasonably think you can be? Or is he going to be a drag?

“If it is the latter — you have some hard questions to consider, dear. Time-outs aren’t only for small children — they are for relationships, too.”

Bart S. (not L), at 10:37 am EDT on August 22, 2005

Creating Academic Partnerships

Just a thought as I read this article: why does the instructor not intervene and set groups in the class? In this way, if the professor warns the students that they will be regrouped, perhaps more than once, during the term, the rotation may break up some of the parasitic dependencies, at least for one class. Yes, the weaker student may wander over after class to the group containing the more skilled friend, but at least they are separated, with new colleagues, for part of the time.

I have done this with good results: students have to learn to be flexible and work with each other and on their own.

Elza C. Tiner, Professor of English at Lynchburg College, at 10:41 am EDT on August 22, 2005

Evaluating individuals & groups

As to Prof. Tiner’s comment — I may get some criticism on this — I have students evaluate each of their group peers, as well as themselves.

Many times, you get group-think (e.g., “everyone was swell!"). But other times, you get some frank commentary (e.g., “she/he never helped, was always late, was very negative").

Bart S. (still not L), at 11:35 am EDT on August 22, 2005

Huntly, In looking at my comments, I can say that I understated how balanced the article was. Moreover, your point about personal relationships being “give and take” is a good one. Indeed, it may very well be that helping with “objective performance” in one class is traded for “subjective performance” in another class where the teacher grades based on ambiguous criteria that really come down to how well you can socialize with the teacher. So, your points are well taken.

Larry, at 12:43 pm EDT on August 22, 2005

Together Wherever We Go …

I appreciate this topic. I’m bewildered by the choices some students make in terms of associations – a smart, academically-ambitous guy joining a particularly slovenly frat comes to mind. But the process of association isn’t surprising, especially on bigger campuses.

I went to undergrad @ UT-Austin, arriving at a campus w/ 40k strangers, it seemed. My 1st semester I remember as one of the loneliest periods of my life. I desperately needed some “group” connection, & some identity. I used my dorm and intramurals to find a group. I was incredibly lucky, as 4 of the sophs I got friendly with ended up in med schools. I’ve seen the other side plenty of times – the drag-down relationships, both dyads & groups. But the memory of that utter loneliness, confusion & fear is explanation enough.

My undergrad major has cohorts of 30 that go thru 2 yrs. of ed school together. For the most part, smart & involved students affiliate w/ each other (something I experienced as a law student – after 1st yr. grades ranked you, your friendship groups formed around shared futures, more or less). And slugs find fellow travelers. There are exceptions – eg, sorority sisters cleaving together despite markedly different goals, but I think smart often follows smart in upper division & grad classes. Romantic relationships can skew that, but there are so few men in my world, the women set their own levels and have identities w/out couple issues (thou their private lives are sometime schzoid — smart @ school & self-destructive or dependent socially/privately).

As for intervening, well, unless I have a relationship w/ a student that carries influence & trust – vs. 15 weeks of ships passing @ sea, why would she follow my advice vs. her own sense of self-interest? Risk isolation or loss among peers on MY say-so? In truth, I’ve tried “interventions” before, but the salience is pretty much dependent on what the student & I have invested with/in each other. For most, I’m not that important, especially in matters beyond the classroom and touching life as a whole. If I peel her away from a powerful, yet negative (in my mind) influence, what duty have I then? To replace the relationship? To nurture & support, as a bridge? Maybe nothing so dramatic – I’m merely advising, after all. But a kid in a lousy, exploitative relationship may end up being really needy, yes?

Teaching has such interesting boundary issues, particularly in a smaller institution where “mentoring” relationships and such are more common. Once we come out from behind the podium & establish a “relationship,” the issues of distance & duty are quite subtle & complex. Hence, my number 1 rule for teaching other than at arm’s distance = We can’t do this alone. We need dialog and mentoring ourselves.

Mike Sacken, prof of educ at tcu, at 3:17 pm EDT on August 22, 2005

Is college for learning, or for socializing?

After 25 years of teaching at several colleges and universities, it’s become clear to me that for the vast majority of students, “learning” is the farthest thing from most students’ minds.

It’s not desirable to be reproducing a nation of unenlightened individuals, but students’ “lax” behavior is understandable (I’m not condoning it) when you look at the social factors that have shaped their choices.

See it from their perspective: The lateness, cheating, lack of participation, not reading the assignments, and plagiarism are all strategies students have developed for coping with the rules of club membership. They have to go to college in order to finally have a childhood they were cheated of, and a chance to develop some real autonomy.

For years, these students endured controlling parents who watched them like hawks, treating them like incompetents, horning in on their “play dates” and calling the shots at their ball games, pressuring them, stressing them, and hothousing them. Responsibility isn’t cultivated in most youths, because parents want to keep them co-dependent as long as possible. Parents are afraid to “let go” at an early age, and let their kids realize they are free agents, accountable for their actions.

Arriving at campus, they have finally escaped parental scrutiny and have a chance to spend four years living it up before they have to spend the rest of their lives trapped again, this time in six-by-eight cubicles staring at computer screens.

I don’t blame students for their lack of desire to be chastized, molded and coerced by professors into being “good little students.” Young people get four years to feel like a human; after that, it’s the daily grind.

I can tolerate a certain amount of lateness and absenteeism. I am clear about what constitutes plagiarism and cheating, and I rarely have problems with it. Students who want to “negotiate grades,” I just don’t go there. Students with “excuses” — I’ve gotten good at looking at eye work and body language to intuit if they’re telling the truth. Often, they are. Grandmothers do die occasionally.

WitchyProf, at 9:10 am EDT on August 23, 2005

I understand the womans frustration. In any situation it is difficult to witness two people, with two very different ideas of how things should be haning out. In most cases one of the parties has to sacrifice their way in order to maintain the relationship with the other person. That is sad, people need to stay true to themselves. This problem is not only prevelant in the eduction system, but also when it comes to partying and drinking. I also understand why she does not step in. Once people have established a relationship with someone, it is often hard to enlighten them on the fact that the person is bringing them down or changing them.On the other hand, matches, even diverse can be beneficial to both parties. One party may be advancing their study habbits while the other is learning to be social, both of which are necessary.

E, at 1:14 pm EDT on August 26, 2005

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to Indestructible Student Relationships

or search for jobs directly.

HVAC Station Operator
Hillsborough Community College

Hillsborough Community College is a public, comprehensive multi-campus, state-supported community college located in the ... see job

Lead Teacher
Johnson County Community College

A career at Johnson County Community College is more than a job. We believe it’s important to invest in our employees and ... see job

Research Technician II
Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Founded in 1898, and affiliated with what is now New York-Presbyterian Hospital since 1927, Weill Cornell Medical College ... see job

Research Associate in Weed Science/Agronomy
Montana State University

The position will be located at the Northwestern Agricultural Research Center (NWARC) near Kalispell, Montana. NWARC is a ... see job

Dental Assisting Instructor (FT & PT)
Corinthian Colleges

Everest College, a respected member of the Corinthian Colleges’ network of schools, is dedicated to helping students ... see job

Medical Assisting Instructor
Corinthian Colleges

Everest College, a respected member of the Corinthian Colleges’ network of schools, is dedicated to helping students ... see job

Supervisor I
Columbus State Community College

Columbus State Community College invests in employee development by providing numerous resources, partnerships, training and ... see job

Lecturer
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Assistant Professor of Psychology — Multicultural Psychology
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Clinical Professor, Health Sciences
University of California, Irvine

School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care Pain Management Position: Health Sciences Clinical ... see job