Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

Bitches, Good Soldiers and Golden Boys

September 19, 2005

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

I'm a bitch. I realized this about six months after I started on the tenure-track at my small Midwestern liberal arts college. It took me a bit longer to figure out what the others in my cohort were. But gradually we all took our turns under the sorting hat. By the time I earned tenure last year, I had figured it out. There are three ranks of junior faculty: bitches, good soldiers and golden boys.

Despite our sexually progressive campus, bitches must be women, and golden boys will be boys. Good soldiers alone promise equal access to all.

Bitches and golden boys needn't work very hard to earn their titles. Often, the die is cast before heels or oxfords touch down on sod. A woman, rumor has it, might have asked for too much start-up money upon receiving her offer. Golden boy status is often earned far, far earlier -- frequently, birth, does the trick. While many bitches belie the canine etymology of their label -- many of  our local brood are quite stunning -- for men, being golden often means, well, being golden. And tall.

After a few faculty and departmental meetings and the scuttlebutt from students circles up to faculty, cementing your title in the gendered categories requires only a few token gestures. A suspected bitch might express strong opinions about curriculum, hold only four office hours a week or grade tough. You can practically hear the sizzle upon flesh.

Golden boys will shine bright if they have some innovative ideas  about revising the curricula, travel to conferences frequently and ask for lots of start-up money upon receiving an offer.

There's nothing much surprising about the above -- these are just gender stereotypes, after all. What's surprising is that they're really true. This, despite the fact that we're not stuck in the past here: scholarship by women is assigned in class without having  to make a point of it, many departmental chairs, administrators --  well-nigh the highest administrators -- are women. We hire as many women as we do men and, overall, do well at helping with the work/family balance. On paper we've left those stereotypes behind.

But this is a place where buying a house before tenure can still raise eyebrows and where most junior faculty are to be seen but not  heard. When it comes to that all important tenure criterion --  being a good colleague -- gender still gets in the way.

You might think, resentfully or aspriationally, that the best thing to be is a golden boy. Not so. Sure, when they're assistants,  golden boys are the top of the class. But remember, we're a liberal  arts college in the Midwest, so golden boys are both flattering and threatening. They smell too Research I. It's like when someone more good-looking than you asks you out -- you can't shake the suspicion that you're being played. And while golden boys make the senior  faculty look good (we hire the most promising graduate students) and never have any problem getting tenure, once they become senior, the gilt falls off quick. Suddenly they become washed-up middle-aged guys who never fulfilled their promise.

If you're in this for the long haul, then, it's a good soldier you really want to be, and what I now advise recruits become. Good soldiers are the meat on our bones, the soul of our institution, our bread and butter, what makes the place tick. They're married to the institution; they're, well, they're us.

Unfortunately, unlike becoming a bitch or a golden boy, becoming a  good soldier requires work. Grunt work. Serving on committees.  Going to student plays. Taking on new course preparations. Asking good questions at departmental meetings. It means raising your hand when the question is "who can help?" not "what should we do?" Good soldiers are in town when you are hosting a dinner for a speaker, and they keep their office doors open, should anyone want to chat.

When the tenure enclave commences, golden boys, of course, sail through. No rules are broken, but mediocre teaching and a few less articles than promised are overlooked. It's the period after tenure golden boys need to worry about. Rumor has it, the therapists in town see them a lot. Good soldiers, though, are rarely done deals come tenure review time. Service is no problem, of course; they've already entered the ranks, have perhaps already served a tour of duty as temporary chair or on a major committee. Superior teaching evaluations are required. Research is usually fine but not great (guess why?).  However, having earned the love of students and lessened the senior faculty's workload for seven years, good soldiers will, usually,  sweatily, receive their medals.

Bitches? We're tricky. We tend not to even make it to tenure. Some of us get better jobs -- we may not smell Research 1 on this  campus, but we do on those. A surprising number leave academia  altogether. A good number read the writing on the wall early --  unlike golden boys, bitches can't sail through, and the senior faculty let us know that in yearly reviews. So those who aren't producing quite enough, or never could find a comfortable seat in departmental meetings, make lateral moves before tenure. You might say that bitches are smart.

As for me, I spent a few years holding my tongue, raising my  students' self-esteem and volunteering for thankless tasks. I was being good, if not exactly a soldier. Some of this, I freely admit, was salutary: I stopped fighting losing battles, learned the value of the phrase "buy in," and relaxed during debate-filled faculty meetings. knowing I wouldn't be contributing.

I made it through, and to those who sorted me upon arrival, earning tenure meant that I had, at long last, arrived. In the photocopying room one summer afternoon shortly after the results had been posted, a  career soldier congratulated me, shook my hand and welcomed me aboard. "It's nice to have you with us," he said, seven long years  after my arrival on campus.

Still, it's lonely. I miss my bitches. However, I'm also, suddenly, thrilled. I'm not washed-up, I'm not stuck in the mire of the foxhole, and I can finally say, without impunity, what I think this institution should do to improve, hold my students to high standards and pursue an independent research agenda. And isn't that, after all, what being a professor at a liberal arts institution is all about? Maybe being a bitch isn't all that bad after all.

Ruth Haberle is the pseudonym of an associate professor of English at a liberal arts college in the Midwest.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Bitches, Good Soldiers and Golden Boys

  • Posted by CS 1.6 on July 14, 2007 at 9:25am EDT
  • Hey
    That very nice blog
    there are very mcuh intresting and helpful
    stuff :)
    THX and greetings!

  • Posted by anon 2007 on October 17, 2007 at 3:20am EDT
  • I've encountered [and befriended] quite a few Golden Girls in my time. They may be rare, but have no doubt they exist. [I use the gender-neutral "Golden Child" often].

    And I must wonder...I'm a gay man and I think I fit as a "Bitch." Several students recently called me "rude," "mean," "cruel," and remarked they originally thought I was cool until I graded them "unfairly."

    I *do* think it's a gendered idea...a hard man is just seen as competent...a hard woman is a bitch. Queer people get lumped into the feminine [especially by homophobes...and boy did I have a bunch of them!].

  • No bastards?
  • Posted by B.J.S. , Good Soldier at Middling State U on September 19, 2005 at 5:43am EDT
  • Overall concept: above-average. Not especially original, but nice spin, with near-whiny feminist overtones, viz. the book "Bitch."

    But all b's must be female and gb's male? Puh-leeze. Must be no ex-husbands at your little college, madam. As in, no bastards?

    As for the alleged lack of "golden girls" -- the potential answers are so multi-dimensional (gender, political, socio-cultural, economic, geographic, to name a few) as to defy simplistic answers.

    For instance, as a starting point, perhaps the college in question lacks sufficient size to compete effectively against the MegaState universities. That is, all the golden girls are at MegaState, or Public Ivy Torture U.

    Further, given the large and various number of factions on a campus (gender, racial, sexual identity, class, to name a few) -- one wonders what would be an ideal mix for the b's of the world. (What about the gay Ethnic-American male groups?)

    A final note: recently, NYTimes had story about high school students using English professors in India as tutors, via the Internet.

    With the wonderful attitudes displayed in this essay, is it any wonder why? As in, lower costs and less attitude?

    IMHO, students today don't need any more educating in critical thinking -- television has already accomplished that goal.

    Rather, they need education in the basics (e.g., grammer, spelling, proper usage) -- thus, the journey to India.

  • B.J.S. at Middling State U
  • Posted by M. P. on September 19, 2005 at 7:30am EDT
  • Before criticizing students who use tutors from India, and who purportedly need basic skills rather than critical thinking skills, you had best learn to spell words such as "grammar" yourself!

  • Whither "bitch"?
  • Posted by Prof. Bitchin' Golden Soldier at True North U. on September 19, 2005 at 10:53am EDT
  • A few minutes after reading this piece it occurred to me that I don't think I've heard anyone use the term "bitch" with reference to a woman in probably 20 years, except women who think they are one. It's not even a term that occurs to me and then has to be quickly suppressed and replaced with something else. Perhaps it is used only in private conversations between one man and one woman to which I am not party. The impression I often get is that some women (viz., the ones who think they are "bitches") believe that men do something like slink off to the pub after hours and draw up lists of which women are "bitches" and which ones aren't. I guess I don't get invited to those sessions. That isn't to say that there aren't self-invovled, complaining people who don't think they get enough credit for the work they do (but which many others question the value of). There are lots of those, and aeveryone knows who they are, but I'd say that they come about equally in both sexes. The people I hang out with, anyway, don't even refer to the females of this group as "bitches."

  • Equal numbers of men and women? Where?
  • Posted by Newbie Prof , Assistant Professor at University of British Columbia on September 19, 2005 at 1:06pm EDT
  • Perhaps the statement "We hire as many women as we do men and, overall, do well at helping with the work/family balance" is true for this author's institution, but few other places in North America. At most places, the women/men new hire ratio still favors men, so how does this play into the three categories of bitches, good soliders, and golden boys? More importantly, who is on the search committees and the tenure review panels? If these are golden boys with axes to grind, look out!

  • The Spineless, Feckless Profette
  • Posted by Chuck on September 19, 2005 at 2:27pm EDT
  • I got a big laugh outta the pretentious, overblown, and pompous sneering from Prof. Ruth [not her real name].

    Despite her blowhard huffing and puffing, Prof. Ruth is just another poseur, a fakir so timid and spineless that she resorts to using a pseudonym.

    With folks like her increasingly infesting our college and university faculties, it's no wonder that undergraduate are becoming increasingly conservative and impatient in the face of such bloated egos and irrelevant scribblings.

  • Classification of faculty
  • Posted by Gene Scaramella on October 4, 2005 at 1:04pm EDT
  • Dr. Ruth,

    Well done! Your categorization of faculty is consistent with my experiences, both at state and private universities.

    Golden boys are a dime a dozen and normally possess not one bit of substance. Good showmen...nothing more, nothing less.

    The good soldiers are the bread and butter of any academic institution. As for your references to "bitches," sadly that rings a familiar tone as well. Female assistants who appear to be bright, enthusiastic and offer their opinions are often characterized in that fashion. I believe the gatekeepers, a.k.a. "golden boys," feel a bit uneasy around co-workers who happen to be competent and female.

    Good job!

    Gene S.

  • Bitch?
  • Posted by Joe on November 20, 2005 at 12:41am EST
  • The piece and the posted comments render ample justification for the
    " Dynamic Incompetent" model as a sustainable method for career survival.