Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

Longing for the Chili Pepper

December 16, 2005

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

When does one really enter the community of scholars and become a "real" professor? When you finish your Ph.D.? Perhaps -- but having a degree is very different from being a professor. What about teaching for the first time? But many people do that before they complete their Ph.D. Getting hired a professor? Getting a tenure track position? Getting tenure? As a new Ph.D. I thought these questions would end with a successful dissertation defense. And yet now as a young professor I find that the goal posts of disciplinary self-confidence seem to shift ever backwards over the horizon. Or at least they did. Today, however, my doubts have been erased with a single stroke. I now know, with a certainty and firmness beyond doubt, that I am a real professor: I have just found out I have been rated at ratemyprofessors.com.

Most obviously, I'm happy with "my reviews" because they've  good (all three of them): I get a 4.8 out of 5 for overall quality.I am a "good professor," a "very great instructor," and I teach "a very interesting class." Although I was surprised to hear that in my classes there is, apparently, "no right answer." Some comments are even more enigmatic, like the one noting that "one of the books he has chosen for the class is very different from other books." But make no mistake about it, I’m gratified that someone cared enough about my course to register an opinion one way or the other, and delighted that the opinion was a good one.

In fact, comparatively my reviews are quite good -- of the four other rated profs in my department, I tie for second in terms of overall quality, although I am second to last for overall easiness (i.e. most professors are easier than I am). There is one thing that I am missing though: the coveted chili pepper icon, which indicates that at least one of my students thinks that I am "hot". This lack of hotness is something I share with only one other professor in my department. Transference: it's complicated. When I told my chili-peppered department chair that I lacked this most desired icon, he just put his hand on my shoulder and said "don't worry, Alex, it'll come. Just give it time."

What does the existence of sites like ratemyprofessors.com have to teach us? Quite a lot, actually. We professors worry constantly about how our corporeal classrooms spill out onto the Internet. Was Dan Drezner denied tenure because of blogging? Is Ivan Tribble right that blogging hurts your chance of being hired? Is it ethical for profs to blog anonymously? Ratemyprofessors.com raises a related problem: what happens when students, rather than professors, virtualize the classroom dynamic?

The first response of many professors to their virtual rating is, of course, the same one they bring to bear on their real-world evaluation: angst and denial. Frankly, I understand the usual end-of-term outpouring of complaints that professors release into the blogosphere about how unfair and unrepresentative student evaluations are. I am sympathetic to much of this, and I can understand why ratemyprofessors.com would be even more galling. Completely anecdotal, unregulated, random -- despite pretensions to quantitative rigor -- and biased, as a diagnostic of actual teacher performance it probably stinks. As someone with good ratings on the site, I can shrug off the weight of these problems. But as someone lacking the chili pepper, I know all to well how these sorts of sites can sting.

How to respond to our students' virtual evaluations? Is it wrong, in other words, to go in to my class and thank them for the rating and tell them I'd really appreciate a chili pepper? Intuitions vary wildly here, but I bet some of you reading this think that mentioning virtual discussion of a professor’s performance in class somehow violates our students’ privacy, or at least the in-class/out-of-class divide that structures so much of our relationships with our students. Here we see the strange dual nature of the Internet at work again -- writing on the Internet is both public and private, and the mediated nature of interaction on the Internet makes every blog post and Amazon review written both a personal confession made in the solitude of a glowing screen and a world-readable, deeply public statement.

There is an even more interesting question here: what about my world-readable confession? Which bounds of propriety am I crossing if I discuss my ratemyprofessors.com entry not in class but on screen? If we started with a recognition that not only professors talk out of class, then we can now ask: What happens when professors blog back?

I imagine the situation could ultimately come to resemble that in Alfred Hitchcock's Notorious, where Ingrid Bergman goes undercover and weds the Nazi Claude Rains in order to track down a post-war cabal hoping to revive the Reich. He discovers her secret, and begins poisoning her food. She knows what is happening, he knows that she knows, and she knows that he knows that she knows, but they go about as if nothing has happened in an eerie, very Hitchcock set piece in which no one is willing to admit that the game is up. It could be that my students and I could each end up blogging behind our backs, unwilling to admit in class what we have both been saying behind each other's backs.

So in some sense ratemyprofessors.com has the potential to provide me both existential solace and to affect my in-class dynamic in a way which, if not as poisonous as Claude Rains's meals, at least has the possibility of being unhealthy. Ultimately, however, I think that the way to navigate this dilemma is simply to accept it. Increasingly today young Ph.D.’s (or at least young Ph.D.’s like me) recognize that the question is not whether you will leave a data trail on the Internet, but simply what sort of trail it will be. Reconciling with the fact that information about you is going to circulate willy-nilly, means accepting that part of being a professor these days means actively construing yourself online -- shaping your data trail to make it behave the way you want it to. The solution, as I see it, is not to futilely rail against sites like ratemyprofessors.com, but to learn to live them. Which is just to say that for a professor like me, the surest sign that we have well and truly arrived is not an august sheepskin with my name on it, but a small smiley face icon next to my name at ratemyprofessors.com. Preferably with a chili pepper underneath it.

Alex Golub finished his dissertation in anthropology at the University of Chicago in 2005 and is now an adjunct professor at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. He blogs at Savage Minds, a group blog about cultural anthropology.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Longing for the Chili Pepper

  • Hot Today, Not Tomorrow
  • Posted by Yavo on December 16, 2005 at 12:17pm EST
  • The website ratemyprofessors.com is much more valuable than some of us recognize. This is because it consists of insider information that proves my smug attitude about the guy who works in the office next door to mine is justified: "I know what your students really think about you..." That's what I'm thinking as I read through the rankings of other people at my university. I'm happy to report that my own overall quality ranking is 4.5, and happy to report also that many, many senior faculty members score considerably lower than I, a non tenure-track faculty member, do. Moreover, I think there is some limited validity to the scores--just as there is some limited validity to the grades we give to the papers we read. The grade I'm about to give the paper on my desk is different from what many of you would give it, for scholarly as well as personal reasons. That's what students are reporting on in their rankings: scholarliness and personality. Sure, I try to keep what's "personal" out of my grading, but I will never achieve that objective fully, as I'm sure those among us who are honest would agree.

    On the "hotness" factor: For a long time I was looking for the chili pepper, too, which throws many new considerations into the mix. And then one day I found one attached to my name. I was buoyed by it for several weeks. Then, just as mysteriously as it arrived, it disappeared. I hadn't even changed my hairstyle. What happened?

  • Posted by Dustin on December 16, 2005 at 12:25pm EST
  • I spend quite some time discussing ratemyprofessor.com with my students -- especially a) when the online student evaluation system becomes available (around mid-semester -- apparently my school believes students should have a fully formed opinion on the class by midterms) and b) on the last day of class. It's a very important tool in a community college setting because there do not tend to be opportunities for student-to-student bonding and the accompanying exchange of gossip about professors that students at more campus-oriented schools use to decide what classes and professors to take or to avoid. Since the formal student evaluations are not made available to students, many have no way to know whether they are likely to "click" with a particular professor or not.

    So I show students how to use it, and how to evaluate the comments they see. I put my ratings on the board, to show how much particular students' evaluations can differ from their own experience -- they are usually quite shocked to find that one student said I was "biased and unhelpful". So they learn that ratemyprosessor.com is a guide, not an objective description. Ratings tend to the extremely negative and the extremely positive -- I'm both the best and worst prof some students have ever had. Moderate opinions don't tend to get posted -- why bother?

    Interestingly, on Canada's ratemyprofessors.ca you get a "smiley-with-glasses" for being "cool" instead of a chili professor for being "hot". Rather telling, I think....

  • Posted by DK on December 16, 2005 at 12:25pm EST
  • I'm in the same salsa dish - how does one lose a chili pepper?

  • Posted by Dustin on December 16, 2005 at 2:37pm EST
  • As it happens, I have a pepper (suck on that, Alex!). How it works is, when a student gives you a "hot" rating, you get a +1; when a student gives you a "not hot" rating, you get a -1. Add it all together: a positive score gets a pepper; a 0 or negative, no pepper. My pepper is only one point away from disappearing, so all it takes is one student who doesn't care for my personal brand of bearded geekyness to make that pepper history.

  • Small sample sizes?
  • Posted by Bart J. on December 16, 2005 at 3:03pm EST
  • n = 3 -- kind of a small sample size, isn't it? I've never tutored a study group that small.

  • Posted by FHN on December 16, 2005 at 3:04pm EST
  • Regarding the comment: "Moreover, I think there is some limited validity to the scores—just as there is some limited validity to the grades we give to the papers we read. The grade I’m about to give the paper on my desk is different from what many of you would give it, for scholarly as well as personal reasons. That’s what students are reporting on in their rankings: scholarliness and personality."

    This understates the major problem with a site like ratemyprofessor, which is that anyone, anywhere, can rate any professor. There is absolutely no way to know if a given rating actually comes from a student in the class or even in the school or the country, for that matter. For the site's ratings to be taken at all seriously, there would need to be a test for whether the author of a comment, at the least, is a student at the school.

  • Do students blog?
  • Posted by Jonathan Dresner at University of Hawai'i at Hilo on December 16, 2005 at 5:03pm EST
  • I've often wondered, reading the blogs and op-eds, etc., by faculty like myself, that there ought to be more students out there blogging, as well. But very, very few of my students have admitted to it, and of those fewer actually blog about their own academic issues.

    It seems to me that there's a rich vein of research for someone willing to delve into LiveJournal, etc....

  • Posted by Ms. random entry on December 17, 2005 at 9:18am EST
  • I'm certain that you can clear your comments. I've had colleagues who have gotten rid of all the student comments good and/or bad. I suppose you just have to contact their administrators. While I appreciate any and all opportunities for students to speak their minds about courses, it does not make sense for the comments sections to be open to just anyone. I guess I'll go in and give the author a pepper. I hope that makes him feel good, but it shows the emptyness of this on-line ratings business: it does not mean anything.

    On the other hand I know administrators at my college look at them "for fun". Now THAT is frightening and all the more reason to monitor the situation.

  • Posted by M on December 19, 2005 at 4:48am EST
  • A faculty member in my department with very low student evaluations and who is known to have been quite rude to students has a very high rating on this site. I wonder if he filled them out himself!

  • Response to Jonathan Dresner's question about student blogging
  • Posted by Dennis G. Jerz , Associate Professor of English -- New Media Journalism at Seton Hill University on December 19, 2005 at 6:37pm EST
  • This is the third year that I've had my students blogging at blogs.setonhill.edu, and I recently compiled a short list of scholarship that mentions our blogging activity.

    http://blogs.setonhill.edu/nmj/012592.html

  • ratings
  • Posted by Rick P , Lecturer at CCNY on April 14, 2006 at 11:40am EDT
  • It would seem to me that someone rating a 5 is as much concern as someone rating a one. A good teacher with high standards is going to get some low scores just out of spite. I find the ratings questionable unless you read the accompanying comments which can provide some insight.