Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

Bring Back the Handshake

January 9, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Comrade of all who shake hands and welcome to drink and meat,
A learner with the simplest, a teacher of the thougtfullest....                                                                                               --Walt Whitman

Academia is my hometown. I was raised to believe in its fundamental fairness. And since I am lucky enough to have landed a good, tenure-track, first job, and young enough that earlier generations of women fought the real battles for me, I had never really questioned that faith. The academic men I have known from childhood through my Ph.D., as family friends and as teachers, have with only one exception taken me seriously. I never had a male teacher tell me, as one friend was told, that women should make babies instead of going to graduate school. Since I am in the humanities, I was never openly mocked in class, as a woman engineering student I taught a few years ago was. No female professor told me, as one told a colleague, that women had to choose between family and an academic career. The only male teacher who ever kissed me also encouraged my scholarship. So I have never felt that I was discriminated against on the basis of my gender.

But at my new job I have just completed two hours of required online training about how to prevent harassment on the basis of race, gender, religion,  sexual orientation, etc., and as a result have been thinking over my experiences. Despite the draconian strictures imposed by the training course, I have colleagues of both sexes who have become good friends, and whom in social settings I am happy to put my arms around. But to the chair or dean who is serious about gender equality in the workplace, I commend  the handshake. I realize this sounds crotchety and old-fashioned -- and it is true that I also resent strangers using my first name -- but I object to the prevailing culture of the hug. The handshake is, in my view, the best way to communicate greeting, congratulation, and good will among colleagues.

Consider this: when I had passed the arduous third-year review process at a small university with a nationally-recruited faculty better than most of its students deserve, my female colleagues came to my office one by one and shook my hand. Some then asked, "May I hug you?" By contrast, my senior male colleagues ignored the right hand I stuck out in front of me, and enfolded me in the embrace known as a hug. They were  people of good will, whose feelings I did not wish to hurt, and so I said nothing.

It is not so long ago that job candidates at this institution were routinely taken to the Playboy club, but that does not happen nowadays, and my first hint that my gender might matter to someone had come only halfway through my first term. A student having made unspecified complaints about my class, the chair, a self-proclaimed "recovering sexist" asked the senior woman in the department to talk to me, declaring, "This is one for the knitting circle." One day when four department women were heading out together, we twice encountered male colleagues who blanched and turned tail. The new chair saw two of us discussing grading practices and asked jovially, "What are you girls chatting about?"

What does this all add up to? Maybe nothing. My colleagues and the new chair supported my work and were kind to my family. My constant feelings of insecurity as the tenure decision approached were shared by a male colleague on the same timetable in another department. How much should I read into the fact that a window office went to a man junior to me, supposedly because I was out of town for the summer when it opened up? I don't know -- but I do know that I carefully considered what I might lose by insisting on my precedence.

And I know I never had the courage to say anything about the hugs. The gender problems in the department came to the fore when a senior colleague's wife suspected him of having an affair with a graduate student, and demanded that he no longer work with her. Despite the fact that her thesis could not be properly supervised without him, the department -- I heard indirectly, since everything took place behind closed doors -- acquiesced in the demand, and worked out a deal that gave the student an additional year of funding and arranged for her to work long-distance with a comparable scholar at another institution. The department further agreed -- hearsay again -- that the man in question would never again work with female graduate students.

Naturally, the graduate bulletin was not revised, but this would mean that only men could be admitted to focus on a certain period in history, and that women who came to the department hoping to have this eminent scholar on their committee would be disappointed. I was outraged, but my senior female colleague advised me to keep quiet, since I did not yet have tenure, and the matter was never discussed in a full department meeting. Furthermore, the student herself, although an experienced lawyer, told me that she did not want to hurt her former advisor by making a fuss: the same mentality that kept me from objecting to those awkward, unnecessary hugs.

Chairs and deans who are serious about gender equality: I commend to you the handshake. From brief and frosty to warm and two-handed, the handshake is capable of expressing any feeling that should be expressed between colleagues.

Coral Hughes, who is writing under a pseudonym, teaches history at a research university.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Bring Back the Handshake

  • Just say no
  • Posted by Sim Etrias on January 9, 2006 at 8:01am EST
  • When I see the unwelcome hug coming on quickly, I extend my hand and say, "I don't do hugs." Sometimes I add "no offense." My first impulse, which often works, is to get that hand out front for the shake early and often.

    When will people (men in power, especially!) learn that the hug, the arm around shoulders, and other "friendly" gestures take a choice away from a person (usually a woman)? And that friendly can feel invasive?

    It's hard to say "I don't do hugs" when you are vulnerable. Every time I say it, I see the "taken aback" look. But I've decided that my discomfort at an unwelcome hug needs to be traded for his discomfort at having presumed the hug was welcome.

    Leaves you shaking, huh!

  • Handshakes
  • Posted by Les on January 9, 2006 at 9:45am EST
  • Lots of good points in this article, but I couldn't help but be struck by the author's description of her institution, "a small university with a nationally-recruited faculty better than most of its students deserve." What arrogance! I'll gladly not give the author a hug--or a handshake--for that statement. Maybe the top prospective students sense the disdain and go elsewhere.

  • Hugs
  • Posted by LogicGuru , Professor on January 9, 2006 at 11:31am EST
  • I think 6'3'' 220 is missing the point. The issue isn't that hugs are sexually threatening but that they're woman stuff (at least in Anglo-Saxon cultures)--it's just as bad when women hug. When you get the hug you're being classified as Woman, not fully professional. Hugging isn't the stuff of business conferences, department meetings, the public world where power is weilded--it's the stuff of ladies get togethers and church services. It's for girly women.

  • No Hug Zone
  • Posted by WCS , Professor at Saint Vincent College on January 9, 2006 at 11:55am EST
  • I could agree wholeheartedly with Hughes' piece if it did not imply that men are hug-sharks ever-cruising for the next wraparound. I am a male teacher (with 33 years at college level) and have never offered to hug a female colleague or student. Even at that hug-fest called graduation, I wait for the first offer, and get away ASAP.

    The author's opinion would hold a lot more weight if no women in academic hallways ever decided to come a huggin'. I am not comfortable, I don't like it, and I wish they would just do the handshake, if anything. I have been called "stiff" "aloof" and "tight" by female colleagues, and that's fine with me. I just consider it being professional.

    On this issue, the point is that more than one gender is culpable.

  • Posted by Sam , Space Invaders at Temple University on January 9, 2006 at 2:24pm EST
  • She has a point! I notice, however, the language that she uses when referring to her interactions with male colleagues. It seems as if her gripe isn't just about hugs, but also about gender discrimination or bias. The excuse provided for her not getting the window office is a good cover, but she should have had top choice. The fact that they denied her the option does ring of bias, but unless they outrightly say so, there's no ground for argument.

    Now, the tenure trepidation is another matter entirely. Of course, it goes without saying to be amicable until you're granted tenure, but it's hard when folks take advantage of that fact. It's no secret that, like hazing, many senior colleagues abuse their position knowing full-well that the junior members won't risk their tenure chances by complaining. I'm familiar with incidences in which those who are single were overwhelmed with service responsibilities because those with families had other obligations & couldn't make the meeting, conference, stay late, etc.

    I also notice that the space invasion doesn't ring true for those who are openly "otherized." Have you noticed that? My Iranian female colleague who loyally dons her veil does NOT have problems with people trying to make any physical contact with her - not even a handshake by the opposite sex. This is also the case of a Conservative Jewish female colleague of mine. One of my Filipino female colleagues read this article & commented that the stereotype of the docile Asian female automatically places her in an awkward position; men feel their advances are warranted & welcome.

    Hugging isn't "girly" by any means; Roman warriors often did so whilst standing among carcasses. What makes it girl-like is the assumption that women welcome the physical contact. It is always safer for the hugger to ask, but that would be providing the huggee an oportunity to express her voice & reject it.

    Truth is, female faculty are never taken as seriously as their male counterparts - except in women's studies, but the term is "studies" so go figure - & so these biases remain tried & true.

  • Still Missing The Point!
  • Posted by RWH on January 10, 2006 at 8:49am EST
  • Apparently I’m not only “missing the point,” as the LogicGuru claimed, but I’m still completely out to lunch.

    What did I say? ... I’m a 6’3” 220 pound male, and I also hate those greetings by hugging (and kissing). The Guru said “When you get the hug you’re being classified as Woman, not fully professional.”

    Frankly, I have gotten that hug thousands of times (hated them all) and have never felt “classified as Woman, not fully professional.”

    Hmmm, let’s see ... got hug ----> didn’t feel classified as Woman ----> didn’t feel classified as a woman ----> still feel fully professional. Eureka, now I get it! LogicGuru is telling me this is a gender issue, men don’t experience the same sensation women do when they’re hugged or kissed, and since no man can experience what a woman experiences under those circumstances, men shouldn’t weigh in on this issue.

    All I can say is I have more than sixty years of experience greeting others and being greeted by them ... and 100% of those “casual acquaintances” who have greeted me by hugging or kissing have done so by pushing past my outstretched, semi-arthritic hand to get the job done. Yeeech!

  • hugs or not?
  • Posted by ruviana on January 11, 2006 at 1:18pm EST
  • I don't completely agree with some of the author's points, but I'm down with the hugging stuff. In general I'm not a hugger. I'm not a "toucher". Handshakes are fine, but no more except under specific circumstances with those close to me. I had a colleague in grad school, female (as am I), who felt compelled to greet EVERYONE with a kiss. It was *her*! She was being *real* and *herself*! But for me to be real and myself I kept not wanting to be kissed. We've long since gone our own ways, but when I see her at conferences--from a distance--I run the other way so as to avoid the kissing problem! Gah!

  • Politeness
  • Posted by Ro on January 16, 2006 at 6:13pm EST
  • Mindful of collegiality, it is polite to greet others with the offer of a handshake in the USA. It is also respectful to allow the other person to decline the handshake due to a physical or emotional issue concerning touch. There should be no hard feelings in this polite exchange or decline to exchange a physical greeting.

    Refusing to greet others, no matter what their gender, in a professional way within in the academy might relate a disrespect for collegiality, irreverance for others, or disregard for social customs in the USA(specifically, a handshake upon greeting) and does not contribute to a functional learning environment.