Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

Nomad Scholar

The Isolated Academic

March 24, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

At 15, I was captivated by Stephen King. I read all of his works. When I finished, I stumbled on to Tolkein’s Lord of the Rings trilogy. That lasted me another few weeks. While my teenage friends smoked pot out by the bleachers, I hunkered down in my mother’s living room with a library book in front of me and Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers’ Hard Promises blasting.

I realize I am not normal.

In college, I tried film as a major. After I got tired of the work involved in editing, I fell into business classes. I kept telling myself it was "reasonable." That I’d get a good job. When I found I had to take a general education course in the liberal arts, I cursed the university system.

The idea of a broad-based education frustrated me. Why learn something that I wasn’t even going to use in real life? I finally signed up for a course that seemed less painful -- something that didn’t involve 18th century writers. And I found James Joyce. My world unfolded like a tulip in mid-morning sun. I had found my love. Words. Literature. Ideas in books. I had come home. Years later I wrote prose to send to literary magazines and taught composition. Something inside of me had settled in, finally content.

But the loneliness. Ah, the loneliness. I realize I have set myself up. Like many colleagues, my world has gradually formed boundaries that often leave me without companionship. But I don’t believe it is just the industry that ropes us in; it’s often what we bring to the lifestyle that limits our ability to cultivate a community for support.

Yes, the job is a world apart from others. Unlike my electrician friend, I don’t work from nine to five. Not even close. While he is wiring a storefront in a strip mall, I may be taking a nap. When he finishes and is ready to shower and go to dinner, I may be grading English composition papers on my coffee table. And when my girlfriend in architecture calls me at my office, I may be teaching a class. When I call a few hours later, she is at lunch. Friends and family have never been able to remember my odd schedule -- which changes every three months without fail. It’s exhausting.

And it’s not just the hours. My discipline creates a division, too. Yes, I feel at home in my department meeting. I even feel at home in the liberal arts building. When I traverse the campus to the health professions building to teach my afternoon class, I feel a bit like an interloper.

Passing a man with an attaché in the hall, I nod a teacher’s hello and walk confidently to my classroom. As I write on the board the day’s lesson, I wonder if he teaches something in the medical field since we have pre-med classes here. Or maybe something scientific. I realize that unless I throw myself in his path with an awkward introduction, I will never find out what this man is doing on campus. At the big meetings, faculty members are very friendly. Disciplines seem more permeable; small talk abounds. We feel as if we are meeting extended family for the first time. Deans move about making introductions. Yet the next week, there is no contact.

Yes, our choice of career makes us special. While talking to a science instructor at my university cafeteria, I realize that students at adjoining tables must think we are crazy. "Pegagogy" and "curriculum" may mean something to education majors; but to most, it’s a secret teacher language. I realize that I subscribe to the adult/child split when on campus -- that staff, administrators and faculty are of one kind; students are another.

I’m sure it seems unfair to some. And it also lends to a feeling of separateness that engulfs some instructors. A professor friend who teaches upper-level literature claims it's not that bad. He then admits that his students are older and more accomplished; at times they seem more like colleagues than students. But over the course of years, I've noticed that those who teach must keep some distance from those we teach. Faculty handbooks caution against close friendships or love relationships between students and instructors. Many professors find it
better to cultivate peers or those outside of academia for friendships.

And those who relocate for a position have another hurdle to overcome. Here in the Midwest, many of my colleagues are married. Others are more established. We who relocate for positions often find ourselves trying
to horn our way into circles of friends who have lasted for 10, 20 or 30 years. An ex-colleague of mine in Northern California confessed that she is going to approach an office mate and his wife and ask point blank if they’d be interested in cultivating something more than an acquaintanceship.

Another friend of mine who relocated from California to the Mid-Atlantic for a position said that she and her husband have never been more lonely. This is their third semester -- and she is already talking about the possibility of going "back home" -- if only to reestablish old friendships that feel as if they are fading over the
phone. It's heartbreaking to think of the effort that they've put into this move. Her new tenure-track position is the envy of all of our friends; he finally found a good corporate job. Their children are in good schools. And he was contemplating bringing out his father from a neighboring state. I’m hoping that in time their mid-sized city will
open up to this valuable couple. Yet I know from experience that smaller towns are tough. Even here in the Midwest, friendliness only goes so far. And then we outsiders sometimes feel locked out as locals discuss long bloodlines and who went to high school with whom.

And what about what we bring to our situation? Is it possible that we lonely academics have a hand in our own fate? How many of us have secretly felt superior to those around us simply because of our specialized knowledge? Is it easy to cultivate friendships when we have high expectations that simply cannot be met? And when we do start to form acquaintanceships, how many of us realize we are too afraid to take the next step? When I think about it from an objective point of view, I have to admit that like many academics, I’m socially awkward.

After decades with my head in books, I sometimes trip over my tongue and stand around looking foolish when more socially accomplished adults make contact. A girlfriend of mine on the East coast confessed that she
and her husband often find themselves talking to each other at faculty gatherings. He is painfully shy; she is in a specialty field that makes her feel cast out. Making friends -- especially in smaller towns -- can be difficult at best and painful at worst for the most accomplished academic.

The solution? I’ve found that I have to be willing to let my guard down and squelch "better than" thinking. Reaching out in more than one area has helped. Other professors who have relocated seem more approachable -- if only because they are suffering from loneliness, too. Staff are a possibility -- which has the added advantage of diminishing the “us vs. them” gap. Social service organizations and volunteer work can provide contacts outside of academia.

After eight months in an isolated middle-sized town in the Midwest, I finally have a few friends. Two women whom I met through a local nonprofit organization are now my closest friends. Not only do we volunteer together -- but we also meet for dinner every week and find time to sit in a coffee house until closing time. A fellow patient at my chiropractor’s clinic has invited me to church with her family. I often chat with an electrician who did some work for a colleague. I’ve been asked to an ice cream social with another instructor who relocated here for a position, too. And I keep in touch with a systems gal who moved into the private sector after working for my department.

Believe me -- it’s not easy for this academic. I’ve wanted to wait for others to approach me. I have sometimes retreated, afraid that I’ve been talking about things that bore people. I check that feeling of "different than" and focus on the similarities. And I do what I can not to expect too much too soon. I know that friendships often take time -- especially in communities where others are already established. Keeping in touch with several ex-colleagues across the nation helps me to feel connected, too. The good news is that the loneliness has abated. Ultimately I’ve had to work on my own skills and self-esteem in this venture to reach out. It’s paying off. Slowly.

Shari Wilson, who writes Nomad Scholar under a pseudonym, explores life off the tenure track.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Isolated Academic

  • The Pitfalls of a Privileged Life
  • Posted by Mark Grimsley , Professor at The Ohio State University on March 24, 2006 at 6:55am EST
  • I think Shari Wilson has hit upon something that some institutions--mine, for instance--have begun to recognize as a serious, albeit elusive problem in academic life. Too many faculty are, not to put to fine a point on it, miserable. They may like their colleagues, they may respect their departmental and college leadership, yet these things do little to disippate a cloud of joylessness that often hangs over our whole enterprise.

    While I would not presume to offer a blanket explanation, at my institution, I would say that the university's efforts to support research--not in a "publish or perish" way, but in a spirit of helping their faculty capitalize upon their intrinsic interest in writing articles, books, etc.--have inadvertently constricted the spaces within the university where colleagues can simply meet and talk as human beings.

    When I encounter most of my own colleagues, it's generally in the line of duty: faculty and committee meetings, etc. We may exchange pleasantries when we pass each other in the halls or run into one another in the department mailroom, but it isn't the same thing as casual, friendly, open-ended conversation. Nor are coffee and lunch dates when there's an academic agenda attached, which is often the case. Ditto for the otherwise laudable seminars that a number of fields maintain as a way to exchange ideas and work in progress.

    The other day I encountered a fellow research associate at a "think tank" we have here at Ohio State. I saw her tapping away at her word processor and just poked in my head to introduce myself, since we'd never met. I'm a military historian. She's a folklorist. We wound up having a most pleasant two-hour conversation in which we discussed, very broadly, what we did, since each of us knew little of the others' field. As a result, it was very like a "normal" conversation. I can't speak for her, but it was the most energizing experience I'd had on campus in many months. And it was the authenticity of the exchange, its lack of pretense and jargon, etc., that made it so refreshing.

    Yet as we wound down this wonderful exchange--which down the line may well produce the very interdisciplinary exchange our university so vigorously seeks to promote--we both felt a bit as if we'd been playing hooky.

  • Faculty Isolation
  • Posted by Linda Kvamme , Director, Learning Communities and Faculty Development at Lehigh Carbon Community College on March 24, 2006 at 9:30am EST
  • As a faculty developer, I often hear that faculty are so busy that there is not enough time in the day, or night, to get together with colleagues. One way to overcome this isolation is to teach in a learning community with a faculty member from a different discipline. Very often, faculty report that they have learned a great deal about another discipline and have made a new friend. Another option is to offer Faculty Learning Communities, where faculty plan times in advance tomeet and discuss their instructional strategies, challenges, etc. and as the conversation gets more personalized, friendships start to bloom.

  • Re: Isolated academics
  • Posted by Janice Tehie on March 24, 2006 at 12:15pm EST
  • I would agree that faculty, especially in small colleges, do become isolated, and some faculty members are miserable, though they may not want to admit it! Smaller towns, such as Bradford PA, where I taught for four years, don't have people who really like education, and the town-gown relationship was quite bad, with a lot of friction between local residents, faculty, staff and students. Faculty worked hard but did not feel like they were appreciated for what they did, and morale was low. This was ultimately one of the factors that led me to transition my teaching experience into the parallel field of instructional design.

  • Posted by k on March 24, 2006 at 12:35pm EST
  • What a wonderfully honest assessment.

  • Posted by dorothy on March 24, 2006 at 12:50pm EST
  • It has been my experience that fifteen or twenty years of interaction with good literature makes one a much better judge of character than the same amount of time spent having the same conversations and experiences with one narrow group of people. I would encourage readers, writers and literature teachers to learn to trust the human insights that come with their immersion in well-crafted fiction. Your shyness may really be your ability to listen well.
    Anyway, those of us who started adultlife as bookworms and nerds probably have an advantage. After all, when your best friend gets reposted to Texas, Ohio or Darmstadt, it's nice to have companions waiting on the bookshelf in the hallway.

  • Making Connections
  • Posted by Jonathan Dresner , Assistant Prof. East Asian History at University of Hawai'i at Hilo on March 24, 2006 at 3:05pm EST
  • I do think it takes longer, on average, to create real friendships in academia because of the relatively isolated nature of our work: we don't work together except in very small doses, so there is less of a shared time/space to feel a strong affinity.

    However, perhaps because I'm not a natural schmoozer, it's not been a big issue for me. I have found, however, that there are easy ways to create connections within and without academia.

    First is blogging. I probably have more academic friends in the blogosphere than I do on campus, and I learn more from them (on the other hand, my blogospheric friends can't help me get my course proposals passed or my books ordered). It's been a fantastic way of reopening the grad-school discussions about theory and method, swapping tales of work, etc.

    Second is family. My wife and son have their own circles of friends, and I get included in those circles quite frequently. That's fun.

    Third is religion. Synagogues have always been a friendly place for me: it takes some time because I'm socially slow, but a good congregation is a wonderfully grounding and diverse experience. There is a "life of the mind" in study sessions, weekly lessons, etc. (I am a bit disconnected from this at the moment, lacking a synagogue within a two hour drive, but I've filled in some of the gaps with online classes courtesy of Torah.org.)

    Conferences are a great way of making connections as well, particularly if you find a relatively small one to which you can go back repeatedly. There you are SUPPOSED to talk about your research, etc., which can be hard to do at faculty meetings or play groups....

  • Escaping isolation
  • Posted by RC , Asst. Prof at Flagship U on March 24, 2006 at 3:55pm EST
  • Since we moved 250 miles from our old home for my first tenure track job at Flagship U, we're done as much as we can (with toddlers at home and a limited income) to build a support network, and fast. I'm an extrovert which helps, but also for me increases the urgency. We've invited people over for dinner, mostly. Tried to set up a play date here and there. We've had scores of visitors in from out of town (we're lucky to be within reasonable driving distance of our old support network).

    But truth is, it's still quite lonely. Social contacts don't immediately equal friends, and because most here are in the habit of being isolated, we've gotten return invitations from only a few.

    As a new faculty member and a young scholar, I had hoped for more of the "welcome to the fold" sort of thing, but as the first commenter above mentioned, so many faculty are already miserable, or something like it, that they don't seem to feel like the addition of a new colleague is cause for celebration. For me, and for the hundreds who land and move far awar for new jobs every year, that kind of susutained social support from a community can be crucial, but is sadly often lacking.

    Honestly, this is the same reason why I found the comments on the collegiality articles here recently so disheartening.

  • Team Teaching
  • Posted by Mark Grimsley , Professor at Ohio State University on March 25, 2006 at 5:30am EST
  • Team teaching, which was suggested above, is an excellent potential way to break down the isolation.

    Unfortunately, impediments often stand in the way. For instance, at my institution you receive only 50 percent credit for a team-taught course, and yet such courses are at least as demanding as their traditional variants.

    Exceptions are made in the case of faculty from different departments who collaborate, but I'd like to see this expanded to include certain types of team taught classes within my own department (history). The types I have in mind are those that cross-pollinate, for lack of a better word, traditional and non-traditional fields: e.g., military history (my own field) and women's history to produce a course on war and gender.

    Such a course would focus on males as well as females, of course, but would treat men as *men*--carriers of masculine values that change over time--rather than men as, for all practical purposes, normative human beings with women the "aberration" that requires special study.

    I like this idea particularly because it woud tend to help us better reap the fruits of a department that in many ways is already diverse, but where much of the diversity is de facto compartmentalized into rather self-contained fields. And it would certainly broaden "traditional fields" in healthy, intellectually stimulating ways. But currently this proposal runs up against the 50 percent credit rule.

  • Posted by cd on March 25, 2006 at 5:50pm EST
  • An interesting essay and clearly written from the heart. I wonder how loneliness varies among academic fields? Ms. Wilson’s laments seem to be somewhat humanities-specific—you know, the classic picture of the Lit/Phil/History scholar reading and thinking—although I could also imagine a lab scientist who is doing something self-contained and non-collaborative having the same issues. I am an archaeologist, and my field is drunken, dirty, social fun. Of course I do a lot of solitary reading as well, but the real core of my work—the stuff that the solitary reading helps frame and direct—gets done outside with other people. Nearly everything I do is collaborative in some way. I have observed similar academic cultures among ethnographers, field geologists, field biologists, etc. I think the overall feel this lends to my field helps us socialize more easily, and not just with research collaborators but also with new people.

  • Isolated Academic - maybe yes ... maybe no...
  • Posted by DBerkowitz on March 26, 2006 at 6:20pm EST
  • Flying home to Boston from LA after attending a west coast conference I was reminded of not only how isolating academic can be but also how much like a social fraternity we are. The first leg from LA to Chicago was filled with midwest and southern families and college kids returning from Disney vacations and Spring Break. Business men with loosened ties and grandparents off to visit the grandkids all heading through the Grand Central Station of air travel - O'Hare.

    Switching to a flight for Logan I found myself sitting next to a Professor laptopping a syllabus, across the aisle from another grading papers. The guy in the seat ahead of me was an athletic coach on a recruiting mission and a fellow student affairs type was sitting next to him. Diagonal to my seat was another professor traveling with their TA who was sitting close by as well. All of us got to chatting and discovered mutual acquaintances and that our institutions were practically spitting distance from each other.

    For a couple of hours we chatted about the state of local politics (both on and off campus), the upcoming commencement season, various high profile moves, student issues du jour, and - for some odd reason - the state of Linux distribution and its impact on our IT systems. I have never had a flight zip past as fast as this one. It was one of those rare moments to realize and relish the social fabric that we in academia enjoy.

  • Posted by John , I agree and disagree on March 27, 2006 at 11:10am EST
  • The isolation addressed here is a real problem, and it does come from the “I’m OK; you’re not OK” and “I’m not OK; you’re OK” attitudes insecurity encourages. However. I am an ABD at Midwestern university, and the department is miserable. It is exceptional when a faculty member acknowledges one of us on the street. The faculty are glum, and whine about their jobs, the town, the weather, the department, etc. I can think of two of them in this quite large department that teach with any joy or smile on any sort of regular basis.

    So I agree; there is a problem. But I have been so alienated, and I’m so annoyed that these people dismiss opportunities I am struggling to have the merest chance at, that I do not think the answer is reform. Rather, I prefer such faculty members to continuing languishing. Hopefully a few of them in my field will choose self-annihiliation and open up a job in which I suspect I’d be quite happy, as I generally deal quite well with most of the problems they complain about.

    So please stop encouraging improvement among faculty. I need a job, and I would be grateful for it.

  • Appreciate the Comments!
  • Posted by Shari Wilson , Nomad Scholar on March 27, 2006 at 11:45am EST
  • I have to admit it... when I first wrote this column, I felt very vulnerable with the words on paper (or screen, really). I almost considered NOT sending it to my editor here--not only because it was a topic close to my heart, but because I was admitting my own shortcomings in social skills. I was gently surprised to see comments that echoed some of my sentiments from online colleagues. I can only say, "Thank you" to those who made the choice to approach this difficult and personal topic. For those who feel isolated in their academic situation, I might advise them to 1) do some research; 2) take some risks; 3) reassess and reapply yourself; 4) know that you are not alone; and finally 5) enjoy the sense that you are building a community around you. It's worth the effort--or should I say you're worth the effort!

  • Time passes...
  • Posted by CombatPhilosopher on April 2, 2006 at 8:15pm EDT
  • I think that the lonely feelings described in the article and echoed in some of the comments are fairly common. When I arrived at my new tenure-track job, I too was lonely. Most of my collegues were at least a decade older than me and our institution was mired in politics. To make matters worse, I was thousands of miles from my family and friends in a totally new part of the world. However, this was not the first time this had happened to me. Something similar happened in grad school. That experience made me realise that ultimately, the isolation would end, so it was just a matter of getting through it. I found that good strategies were (1) work, (2) getting involved with community projects, (3) e-mail and telephone contacts with the outside world, and (4) taking trips whenever possible. As time has passed, the loneliness disappears. Older professors are replaced by new hires. Whilst they may not all be too interesting, at least someproved to be. Also, if one gets involved in the kind of local project that involves hard physical labour and collaboration, differences in education mean very little. The bond of a common goal and a job well done is a great reward. Finally, after a few years, former undergraduates can even become friends. After they have graduated, perhaps gone to grad school and found their place in the world, it is quite possible to spend time with them, exploring areas of common interest, that never came up in class. Over time, life has become very full. For those stuck in the lonely phase, I suggest you tough it out. It is just a phase. You cannot expect to suddenly have an instant circle of friends, as friendships take time. However, take the steps to get to know people and get involved and the lonely phase should not last too long.