Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

In re: Loco Parents

I am a baby-boom parent with children in college. We baby-boomers, now in our pre-dotage, have become infamous on college campuses — again — this time for noisily hovering over our children as they try to make their ways in the world (see Wikpedia on “helicopter parents”). From my own bleak experience — both professional and personal — I can say with confidence that our children become adults not because of our involvement in their lives, but in spite of it.

Related stories

Penny Rue, the University of Virginia’s dean of students, calls us “benign dictators.” We, who reacted against the enforced age hierarchy of our own dictatorial parents, have become instead oppressors whose rule is based on the illusion that we and our children are peers, Rue says. And the illusion is so strong, that our children are fooled into not claiming the birthright that we claimed at their age: personal autonomy.

This embrace of dependence is not surprising given the attitudes of contemporary college students toward their parents. At the University of Maryland at College Park, James M. Osteen, the assistant vice president for student affairs, writes, “I find that students and their parents generally have a much closer relationship in recent years as compared to earlier decades. Students are very likely to list their parents as significant role models; whereas in the past students might name people like Gandhi, Martin Luther King or Mother Theresa.”

It is sweet and fine for your 5 year old to think of you as sainted and heroic, but for your 20 year old to have the same attitude should be worrying. Why don’t we hear self-help sages speaking of the problem of arrested development any more? Where are the Erik Eriksons of yesteryear?

Rue and Osteen see the positive side of parental involvement. Both judge today’s parental role as student advocates to be an invitation to college-parent partnerships that can benefit students. But they also recognize the dangers: Both Osteen and Rue note that with parents handling everything from roommate problems to purchasing airplane tickets, students cannot develop a sense of mastery and the confidence necessary to live on one’s own. Erikson might observe that such parental behavior deprives young people of their identities as autonomous and competent adults.

I learned my own necessary lesson about meddling in my children’s education probably too late, after the critical period of Eriksonian development — when the second of my three children was in sixth grade. Before that, I would regularly become concerned and then incensed about some way or other schools were failing my children. So caught up in tilting at windmills, I did not devote a moment’s attention to the big picture — to problems of other students, teachers, schools, or to my children’s educational needs beyond small and preoccupying slights.

This is how I learned my lesson: My child, a superior sort of girl, of course, seemed not to be doing any work, while at the same time was receiving good grades. At a teacher conference I complained/boasted that my daughter was not doing any work and getting good grades. I suppose I imagined that with the complaint, her brilliance would be more appreciated, and she would get the special attention that as an exceptional person she deserved. Sure enough, it got her more attention immediately. Her grades plummeted. She became discouraged. And until she enrolled in college and had only herself to please, she never again studied for a test or did a lick of homework. To this day, this is the story my children tell their friends to describe the sort of person their mother is. There is no living it down.

As a parent of two in college and one in graduate school, I get involved only in questions of spelling. They may beg me to advise about conditional clauses, but I stand firm. I do listen to complaints about roommates, but have learned that in this area as in most issues of personal relationships it is best to listen only.

If other parents would fail earlier in their micro-management careers, college educators would not have to grin and bear helpful advice from over-bearing parents who threaten to bury student affairs offices under ship-loads of constructive criticism. Student affairs professional regularly remark to novices, “You see all those students walking around with cell phones? They are not talking to friends. They are talking to their mothers.”

And what are these students telling their parents? What they want to hear: that the people who run colleges don’t know half as much as their parents do and that life on campus is hell. And then their parents get on their mobile phones and call administrators who, if they weren’t chained to their desks would run screaming from their shabby little offices each time a call from a parent were announced.

I’ve looked at life from both sides now — as a parent and as a college administrator. These calls can generate a lot of negative emotion — raising blood pressure of both parents and college administrators. The number of these calls increase exponentially every year. The U.S. Census Bureau reports that in 2003, 16.6 million students were enrolled in college. I imagine that 16.6 million cell phones transmitting the troubled chatter of parents and children about what is going wrong in college must surely be capable of unbalancing the music of the spheres.

When I worked in a college president’s office, I often took calls from irate parents. I sometimes thought I felt the universe skipping a beat as they described the woes of their children in college: not being able to get into a popular (gut) class; wet, slippery floors in the bathroom; having to go to class in the snow/wind/rain; having an electrical box mounted outside their dorm room (which was sending out dangerous electrical waves); poor grades on tests studied for; having to study for tests over Thanksgiving break; having too short a Thanksgiving/Christmas/Summer break; administrators not doing something about hurt feelings caused by not being offered a place in a fraternity; not doing something about roommates having sex; not being allowed to cheat on exams; the president getting too tough on those who assault others, etc., etc.
Some parents would call already angry. Some would become angry when they realized that no matter how much they wanted it, changing the university was going to take longer than 24 hours. They became angrier and angrier as they were transferred from one office to another. The political science department would get calls from parents complaining about fully enrolled courses out of which their children were closed out. The department would pass the calls on to the provost’s office, which would pass it along to the president’s office. What did I do? I told these parents to write to their legislators about getting more funding for public universities. I pitied the next person they would talk to after getting off the phone with me.

Sometimes I think that my generation doesn’t much care about what we are trying to control. It is the existential act of exerting control that is important to us. Not going gently into that good night makes us forget ultimate truths. We may have short memories, but those we plague with our demands do not. Student affairs officers shake their heads and remember that baby boomers in their own youths had demonstrated for increased personal freedom, and had gotten rid of the college practice of in loco parentis. Now for their children, irony of ironies, they are demanding that it be put back.

In our 45-60 years we have been promiscuous and irrational in many of the issues we have raised our voices about. We got the U.S. out of Vietnam and, 30 years later, into Iraq. We started the sexual revolution, and now we vote for anti-birth control and anti-abortion politicians. We rejected our elders’ assertion of control over our lives and we put chokeholds on the lives of our children.

The time has come to think about the consequences of indiscriminately throwing our considerable middle-aged weight around. It seems to me we have to face some facts. First of all, we need to let our children grow up. Second, we need to realize that we can’t stop the world from turning, that the generation we bred will replace us, and that they need to be prepared to do so. Most of all, we need to grow up, grow old, shut up, and step aside.

Margaret Gutman Klosko is a writer based in Virginia.

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

Quite frankly, after reading this article I found it more of an indictment of the author’s own failings of a parent, rather than a treatise on the evils of the nefarious “helicopter parent” syndrome (discovered by that Nobel Laureate, post Freudian psychologist Ned Zehman…oh wait! No, he’s just a magazine editor). Don’t get me wrong, I hold the venerable art of psychobabble and those skilled in the art of psychobabble in the highest regard.

As other reviewers have noted, there are certainly a wide variety of parents, ranging from those who can’t let go (like Howard Sprague’s mother), to others who let go early (say for example, those who give up in the 6th grade (once your 6th grader gives up on their homework and tests, you should respect their decision…after all, you wouldn’t want to stunt their growth into independence would you?)

Furthermore, I wouldn’t let it worry you too much that some 20 year olds might look to their parents as role models and heroes…I suspect there are those who would consider your angst wrong-headed. Not all children have irresponsible, self-centered parents. (Oh, and in case you missed it, Erik Erikson’s is out of vogue, just like his friend Sigmund…didn’t you hear?) But I do appreciate your honesty in describing the values and ideals of some of your generation: one afflicted with the cognitive dissonance to be at once anti-war, anti-life, anti-authority, and pro-war, pro-life, and pro-leadership…well, that takes some doing! (you should run for office). Please excuse me though, if seek advice from those with fewer “issues”. Finally, I too am a “baby boomer”, raised by WWII era parents. My parents both worked from the age of 14 to help with the family expenses (yep, you guessed it – they weren’t wealthy…had to grow up quickly if you know what I mean). And guess what – my dad still sought advice and counsel from my grandparents until the day they died. I worked my way through school (the first in the family to go to college), while holding full-time jobs. Nevertheless, even while in graduate school, I considered my parents heroes, and regularly sought, and took their advice. As a result, I may not be so “well centered” as you (I hope not), but I do my best.

Jeffrey Wright, at 2:25 pm EDT on September 18, 2008

Thanks for including this side of the issue. As a faculty member turned administrator, I learned recently that I’m dealing with “lawn mower” parents — those who mow over the administrators when they can’t get the faculty to fix things for their beloved children!! Heaven help us — when will today’s college students get some space to figure things out on their own and join the real world? And why are parents so worried that their children will fail without their help?

ssk, at 9:15 am EDT on April 18, 2006

Well., Well.., Well..., Well!

Is there hope for this net generation appearing at last? Are we beginning to see the deterioration of the harvest that we have been reaping that was sown in the 60’s? I certainly hope so!Congratulations to this author for recognizing that personal reaponsibility for one’s own decision-making and the consequences thereof cannot be forever controlled by Mommy and Daddy...! This net generation has seen through that and is seeking the structure and value systems that were blithly tossed away. They, as each generation must, need to find them on their own. In that 15 or so years we can exercise leadership to influence them, we have given them a basis of decision-making, good or bad, and since we cannot continue lead them, we must get out of the way and follow, like it or not!

Edward Winslow, a tired “retired” Business Professor, at 9:30 am EDT on April 18, 2006

‘Loco parents’ or “The No Parent Left Behind Act’

Am writing to thank you for your interesting and timely article. As a psychotherapist who works with parents of kids all along the age, developmental and educational spectrum, I wish to echo the reality of your concerns and experiences. I believe that parental willingess to tinker with the school experience has grown to truly pathological proportions and shows no signs of abating. I regularly see kids, who from a very young age, feel crushed by the need to redeem parental regrets and ambitions, until they balk by refusing to attend at school. If the kids manage to sidestep this pitfall, they simply don’t know what they think about anything.

Time and again, I see little evidence of conflict in around the possibility that we are sabotaging our children with overwrought notions of parental advocacy.

I wish to add to your commentary the notion that this process begins much earlier in the life at school;from k-12 teachers and schools interact with parents in a manner reminsicent of spouses of alcoholics willing to keep the frig stocked with beer.

The concept of ‘early intervention’ has morphed into a rationale for both schools and parents to abandon their respective responsibilities for nurturing individuation, autonomy and mastery. A paradigm shift has taken place, demanding that teachers share the responsibility for teaching while moving parents from a role of establishing the perameters for a child’s success, to being the primary shareholders and beneficiaries of that potential.

The result is that kids lose what has been historically the most enriching aspects of their relationships to adults and mentors outside of the home. Intellectual curiosity, mastery of self, the development of critical thinking skills are subordinated ultimately to a collaboration that turns education into finishing programs for pre-selected universities and careers. It is no wonder then, that the college psych clinics overflow with kids who feel lost, depressed, overwhelmed and angry.

The overall graduation rate from four year colleges still hovers at under 55%. The research has much yet to illustrate about why this is; one factor must surely be that our eighteen year olds are not prepared to stay the course in the university milieu.

I’d like to be hopeful. Since the university is also the place where education policy and teachers are nurtured, perhaps greater emphasis can be placed on re-examining the concepts and pardigms which frame what schools and parents must do to support the strength in our kids.

Sincerely,

Elaine Zaks, MSWRoyal Oak, MI

elaine zaks, clinical social work psychotherapist at private practice/previously Univ Mich clinical faculty, at 10:55 am EDT on April 18, 2006

Parental Profs

I’ve noticed a similar pattern in regard to students’ relationships with their professors: the need for a protective and sympathetic parental figure, rather than a teacher, an evaluator, a critic. Many of my students approach me with the age-old excuses for classes skipped, assignments missed, grades below-par—but unlike the stereotypical “grade-grubbers” or “brown-nosers,” these students often go the sympathy route, asking for “understanding” or “forgiveness.” As a former student myself and a reasonably experienced teacher, I do, of course, offer sympathy and understanding whenever I can. But what’s strange is that these students often take that sympathy to mean that “everything’s okay” and express shock when their grades don’t reflect the new understanding that we’ve apparently arrived at. They assume that, like a parent, I can simply overlook or forget their mistakes, their lack of effort or enthusiasm, or, most importantly, their performance, because we have “a good relationship.”

I can’t help but feel that some of this derives from the permissive, if well-intentioned, attitudes of many of their parents and/or their high school teachers who see their primary job as being to encourage, promote, and support, rather than to judge, discipline, or evaluate. I often spend a good part of the first semester trying to convince students that they are, in fact, adults—entitled to adult opinions, choices, and knowledge, but also required to take on adult responsibilities and accountability for their actions. I’m sympathetic to the experiences of stress, loneliness, depression, and exhaustion—but that doesn’t excuse you from doing the work, or making a good-faith effort in the course! I UNDERSTAND if you choose to skip class because your parents are in town and you want to spend quality time with them (that’s your prerogative as a voluntary student), but it’s not a free-pass or an excused absence. I tell my students that family and personal life or health always come first (as it did with me when I was in school), but that doesn’t mean that one’s obligation to other things simply goes away with every crisis! Asking for help or extra time is one thing—asking to be excused or forgiven is something else altogether. A parent can do that, I can’t.

Now I’m seeing that this is a more widespread cultural pattern, and not just a an idiosyncrasy of my students.

Earl Grey, at 11:35 am EDT on April 18, 2006

I’m tired of hearing of the “net generation” and its supposed prolonged adolescence. This is a quinessentially middle class problem. Working class parents don’t have time to micromanage their children’s lives. Working class college students gain independence fast because they know if they fall on their face, there won’t be a safety net.

grad, at 5:10 pm EDT on April 18, 2006

This is the typical baloney that parents hear from teachers, administrators, coaches etc from the time their kids are little until after college. Many parents have learned the hard way that they have to be involved to make sure that their kids are being well treated and that learning is actually taking place. At the college level, parents are shelling out 20 or 30 or 40 grand a year — of course theyre going to be involved. It’s time for administrators to get real and treat parents with the respect they deserve, that’s who’s paying their fat salaries. Let’s knock off the parent bashing!

owen, at 10:20 pm EDT on April 18, 2006

response to Owen

Owen,

No one’s arguing against parental involvement. It’s the nature of that involvement that either encourages or discourages independent problem solving in a college kid. Best wishes

elaine

elaine zaks, at 5:45 am EDT on April 20, 2006

Well. That was quite a blanket indictment of parents being involved in their children’s lives. Overwrought, to say the least. Something like those poppsych magazine covers HOW YOU ARE RUINING YOUR CHILD’S LIFE WITH TOO MUCH LOVE. STORY INSIDE. Sure, there are overinvolved parents, there are children who have trouble adapting to their new independence in college, and there are also healthy, effective parent-child relationships that extend to the college years (and beyond). The article is basically “Hey boomer parents, lighten up!” OK, we get the message. My message: “Hey boomers, stop whining about everything, including yourselves.”

On the one hand, there are overinvolved, pushy parents. On the other, there are college administrators who would much rather deal with inexperienced and subordinate students than with parents. It makes for a tension that is sometimes productive (called accountability) and sometimes not so productive. What we can do without, however, is patronizing administrators telling parents how misguided they are and how the administrator experts know so much more about what’s best for their children.

Bob at State U., at 11:45 am EDT on April 20, 2006

loco parents and loco colleges

comments on both sides of the issue are valid. parents shouldn’t do work that students should be doing for themselves, but many colleges do the bait and switch and abandon their responsibilities to the student. Programs, facilities, and professors change all the time. things that are listed in the catalog may be unavailable when the student actually enrolls. Resources are scarce. After getting accepted, that is where the real fun begins. some students don’t have the stomach to fight city hall on their own. i can’t blame parents for wanting their children to get what has been promoted and promised. college attendance has become a “transaction” of commercial nature. The importance of the credential and the funds we are forking over make us very wary consumers.

Adjunct mom, at 12:00 pm EDT on April 25, 2006

In re: Loco Parents

I only now read the subject article along with comments. I’m a bit taken back by some of the comments that are contrary to the writer’s position. As a university educator and trainer who works hands-on with cadets every day of the work week, I can tell you that “helicopter parents” are one of our biggest, if not our biggest challenge. I regularly conduct investigations of student indiscipline, and I also regularly face parents who think that their little Johnny and little Suzie can do no wrong. Little Johhn and little Suzie have learned that when things get tough, all they have to do is tell their parents whatever they want them to believe and, voila, they believe it. We are automatically the villains. Regarding the one comment about us and our “fat cat salaries,” I don’t know where this person is coming from. I know of few “fat cat” educators who deal with students in a direct mode. It is my assessment that the writer knows from whence she came. I, too, am a Baby Boomer about to turn 60. I came through a very tough Corps of Cadets experience. There was ONE telephone in my dormitory. I would have never thought of calling my parents and lying to them about my tough experience. Sure, I cried on their shoulders for support, but I never expected them to get in the face of my upperclassmen and my administrators. Today, they do both. Oh, and they have attorneys on retainer. Wanna talk “fat cats?” They “ain’t” the educators.

Mike Caudle, Instructor at Texas A&M University, at 2:50 pm EDT on August 23, 2006

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to In re: Loco Parents

or search for jobs directly.

Electrical Assistant Instructor
South Texas College

South Texas College Job Announcement # 2010 – 3025 Position pending Board approval of FY10 Budget Please note that only ... see job

Dean, Visual, Performing & Communication Arts
Chaffey Community College District

CHAFFEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Invites applications for: DEAN, VISUAL, PERFORMING & COMMUNICATION ARTS Application ... see job

Model for Drawing/Painting Classes
Princeton University

Position Summary: Unclothed Models needed for Drawing and Painting courses at the Lewis Center for the Arts. ... see job

Professor in Educational Foundations and Inquiry (NCE1509)
National-Louis University

NLU is comprised of the College of Education, the College of Arts and Sciences and the College of Management and Business. As ... see job

Assistant Professor Smiley’s Residency Program
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Adjunct Faculty — Astronomy, Geology, Meterology, Physical Science, Physics
Harrisburg Area Community College

HACC, a leader in education in Central PA, is a comprehensive, multi-campus community college, providing quality instruction ... see job

Department of Management, Assistant/Associate Professor
Bridgewater State College, MA

BSC is one of the largest and most exciting centers for higher education in the commonwealth. Here in our idyllic setting, ... see job

Communication Studies (Debate)/Tenure-Track
Augustana College, IL

Augustana College is a private, selective liberal arts college located on a 150-acre campus near the Mississippi River in ... see job

Assistant or Associate Professor
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Tenure-Track Assistant Professor of Chinese
University of Rochester

The Department of Modern Languages and Cultures at the University of Rochester invites applications for a tenure-track ... see job