Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

It's More Than the Photos

May 22, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

There's been a fair amount of attention over the last week to the issue of hazing and women's college sports teams. The Web site badjocks.com published a number of photos depicting the Northwestern University women's soccer team conducting an initiation for new players. The women are shown being forced to chug beer, give lap dances to members of the men's soccer team, all while various words and pictures are drawn on their bodies.  Then the same site followed up with pictures from a dozen other colleges and universities, almost all of which focus on hazing/initiation rituals involving various women's sports teams. All of the colleges involved have anti-hazing policies, and all (naturally) prohibit underage drinking.

In the national media, the faces of the women involved are obscured, but on badjocks.com, they are in full view. Though it was obviously foolish for the teams involved to photograph their hazing rituals and post the pics on the Internet, I grieve for the embarrassment the young women involved must now be feeling, and I have no interest in staring pruriently at the various details of their humiliations. We must remember the intent of those who uploaded the photos to sites like webshots.com; these pictures (often showing students in their underwear) were for the enjoyment of a select few, not a huge national audience. Foolishness on the part of those who don’t know better doesn’t excuse leering on the part of those who do.

What I've seen tells me what I already knew: the kind of hazing that takes place on contemporary college campuses is more or less identical to what happened when I was an undergrad 20 years ago. The essentials, then and now, are these: forcing the pledges/initiates/rookies/frosh to undress (at least to their underwear); forcing them to consume large amounts of alcohol; asking them to "perform" sexualized dances in front of members of the opposite sex. The Northwestern women were required to give lap dances in their underwear in front of members of the men's soccer team -- while the Quinnipiac College men's baseball team is shown on the site stripping and dancing for a group of unidentified women.

As an adult who struggled with problem drinking for years, I am of course greatly concerned by any ritual that requires that folks consume large amounts of booze in a short period of time. I have no sympathy for those who see binge drinking as an essential rite of passage; I've seen the damage it can do to lives and bodies.

As a feminist, I'm grieved to see that ritualized sexual humiliation is still such a vital mainstay of initiation practices. It's not new, of course. When I was a freshman at Cal, I flirted with the idea of joining a fraternity (one to which my grandfather, a great-grandfather, and numerous uncles and cousins had belonged). In the end, I decided not to, both for reasons of principle and because I worried that I wouldn't fit in with the fraternity culture. I had lots of friends in the Greek system, however, and I heard their initiation stories. One of my former wives was a Pi Phi in the late 1980s; she told me that she had never gotten over her hazing. She recalled being stripped to her underwear, at which point all the "actives" (members) of her sorority took magic markers and wrote on her body -- circling areas that they thought "needed work" and writing commentary about her attributes. She said she laughed at the time -- but years later, she would still sometimes gaze at those parts and think about the criticisms and obscenities she had seen written there.

I'm a fierce fan of intercollegiate sports.  With the possible exception of golf, I love to watch men and women play any NCAA sport. I know the good that sport has brought to my life, and I've seen it bring discipline, health, camaraderie, and character to a great many young people. I'm not one of those professors who "goes easy" on the jocks, but I'm not someone who wishes that intercollegiate athletics would disappear, either. And as a fan of sports -- and former athletic department tutor at UCLA --  I've got at least a passing understanding of how vital it is to build close community on a team.

I think initiation rituals can be very valuable. Requiring frosh or rookies to go through a series of steps before they are accepted as full-fledged members of the team is healthy. It is axiomatic that to suffer together is one way to build community. But not all suffering is the same. Forcing the frosh to run extra laps or do extra push-ups or go through a weekend of brutal fitness camp can build community and fellowship just fine -- all without a drop of alcohol and without a single lap dance. Requiring frosh to put on silly skits that don't involve vulgar humor, nudity, or intoxication (or asking them to memorize all the verses of an ancient school fight song) can have a similar bonding effect. The problem is not with the nature of sports teams/fraternities/sororities, or with initiation rituals -- the problem is with a culture that connects that valuable process of initiation to ritualized sexual degradation and binge drinking.

Too many university policies (such as Northwestern’s) confuse the positive effects of team-building exercises with destructive and humiliating hazing. As quoted on the badjocks Web site, the NU policy reads in part:

The university defines hazing as any action taken or situation created intentionally, whether on or off university premises, to produce mental or physical discomfort, embarrassment, harassment, or ridicule. Such activities and situations may include but are not limited to paddling in any form; creation of excessive fatigue; physical and psychological shocks; quests, treasure hunts, scavenger hunts, road trips, or any other such activities carried on outside the confines of the university; wearing apparel that is conspicuous and not normally in good taste; engaging in stunts and buffoonery; requiring sleepovers or morally degrading or humiliating games and activities.

Banning all treasure hunts, quests, and road trips along with underage drinking and strip shows demonstrates a complete disregard for the potentially positive aspects of initiation rituals. There are countless physical challenges that can be offered to frosh that allow them to retain their clothes, their dignity, and their sobriety -- all while pushing them beyond their limits. Hazing can degrade, but healthy and constructive games and rituals go a long way to building that precious sense of camaraderie which is such a vital part of the college experience.

But a call to recognize the positive aspects of some traditional initiation rituals is not a defense of what we apparently see in the pictures from Northwestern. This sort of hazing troubles me so much is because it is so fundamentally antithetical to what sports can be in women's lives. The beauty of sports for women, at the high school or college level, is that it teaches women that their bodies are not merely decorative objects to be gazed at. It teaches women that their sexuality and their potential reproductivity are not their greatest assets.  Sport -- at its best -- teaches girls that their bodies are strong, and powerful; it teaches the athlete that she can transform and control her flesh for her own delight as well as for the good of the team. It turns objects into subjects, turns the passive active. I've seen sports from softball to track to soccer to basketball do that for countless women and girls in my life, and I rejoice in it. And thus I grieve when I see young female athletes forced to use their bodies so differently -- as objects of public, sexualized ridicule -- all for the sake of creating community that could so easily be created in a different way.

Hugo B. Schwyzer teaches history and gender studies at Pasadena City College. He teaches and blogs about such issues as the interplay of faith and sexuality, American history, and masculinity.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on It's More Than the Photos

  • Posted by Sherman Dorn , Associate Professor at University of South Florida on May 22, 2006 at 5:55am EDT
  • I'd wait to see what the rationale is before ridiculing language that bans road trips as hazing; while it seems an overly-broad definition, my guess is that some hazing rituals involve a so-called quest that ends up with the initiates abandoned on the side of the road for hours at a time.

    Hugo, do you know of any college team "initiation rites" that haven't involved humiliation?

  • Save your grief
  • Posted by Larry on May 22, 2006 at 7:30am EDT
  • I wish I could understand why people grieve for these girls. They are the kind of people that would undress to their underwear and give lap dances. They enjoyed it. None of them seem to have refused or quit the team.

    Future employers and graduate schools can now decide for themselves whether they want the kind of student that would do this working with them. Some will. Some won't.

    Safe your grief for families of poor kids killed in the war. Not for the many drunk girls at Catholic University that could have backed out of it at any moment.

  • Posted by LK on May 22, 2006 at 9:30am EDT
  • these pictures (often showing students in their underwear) were for the enjoyment of a select few, not a huge national audience...” Webshots allows users to mark a photopage “private” and “by invitation only”. The photo pages were marked for public viewing. The students WANTED the entire world to see them.

  • Hazing is a slippery slope
  • Posted by Astrid on May 22, 2006 at 10:00am EDT
  • How naive to imagine that 20-year-olds are mature enough to see and keep the line between "positive" and "negative" hazing! There is a reason _all_ of it is prohibited. Once a group crosses that line, it rarely goes back. Hazing tends to get worse over time, not better.

    Not to mention that practically, hazing doesn't work. It builds a strong bond within the hazed group, but does not strengthen the bond between the newcomers and the older members.

  • privacy
  • Posted by Hugo Schwyzer on May 22, 2006 at 11:00am EDT
  • The fact that the photos weren't marked private means that the person who TOOK the pictures wanted them displayed -- it says nothing about those whose photos were taken.

    I have seen college initiation rituals that weren't degrading -- particularly in Christian fraternities and sororities (with which I have some familiarity). Lots of emphasis on team-building exercises on weekend retreats; no alcohol, stripping, dangerous stunts.

  • how can these activities be private?
  • Posted by Larry on May 22, 2006 at 11:55am EDT
  • Mr. Schwyzer, I really wish you would address the argument that goes like this: these girls knew what they were getting into. Every day women strip and perform lapdances on people of the opposite sex. They do not insist on privacy.

    They only insist on tips. While many girls are CUA do work at adult entertainment venues, I don’t see why these girls, who perform lapdances on members of the opposite sex and cavort in their underwear are any different.

    Perhaps if these girls had filed a police report regrading their bondage and various forms of assault it would be different, but they didn’t seem too concerned with their privacy. Instead, they seem to like doing what they are doing, because it makes them feel like the belong to something greater than themselves and a part of the Catholic University experience.

  • Hazing and choice
  • Posted by Rebecca on May 22, 2006 at 12:35pm EDT
  • Larry seems to believe that women enjoy being hazed, and that it was their choice to participate.

    Let's look at it this way, Larry. Imagine you're a talented high school soccer player. You win a soccer scholarship to a prestigious DI program. You get there, and find out that as a member of the team, you have to submit to the various traditional hazing rituals. If you don't, your position on the team will be precarious, you will be marginalized, and perhaps your position on the team will be in jeopardy (and hence, your scholarship).

    Yep, Larry, a whole lot of choice and enjoyment there.

  • Posted by Larry on May 22, 2006 at 1:30pm EDT
  • Rebecca, I tried your mental experiment and it didn’t do any good. I am still stuck in my mindset where: 1) athletics are an adjunct to the academic curriculum; and 2) assault is a crime. (But, showing one’s underwear is not a crime in DC, and none of those pictures is likely obscene.) I mean, I played collegiate sports (nothing as glamorous as girl’s soccer), and I never had to give anyone a lapdance.

    These girls could have gone to a school with a stronger academic program which didn’t substitute hazing and sports for actual study. But they did not. Under your counterfactual situation, these girls only went to school to do everything but be an academic. Therefore, once they abandon their scholarship, there is nothing out of place about giving lapdances.

    Finally, Rebecca, since nobody has asserted that they were kicked off the team for refusing to participate in these rituals, I think that your argument is, well, problematic. Perhaps you could show me that coaches were declaring students that wouldn’t give lap-dances to not welcome. If you can’t, then I think that these girls really did like it.

    Since we all know that some people like cavorting in their underwear, I think that it possible that these girls enjoyed it.

    Now, if you are one of those folks that says that adult entertainers are “forced” to do what they do, then, perhaps that is a different conversation.

  • Personal Experience
  • Posted by Laura on May 22, 2006 at 4:00pm EDT
  • I wanted to comment on several statements that have been submitted. My comments are based on my experiences.
    I attended college based on a full scholarship to play basketball at a Tier 1 school. I was excited because the only way I could attend that school was on scholarship, being that there aren't full scholarships for B+ students. To my dismay, there was a hazing ritual which required drinking, of which I had to physical fight them to not participate. In any event my short time on the team was a terrible, horrible experience. I quit because they made my life miserable, pranks, stealing my stuff, injuring me during practice, etc. My performance as a player became so awful that I was benched. I went from averaging 14 pts a game to nothing. I didn't want to tell anyone because I didn't want to publicize it and have to be "punished" more than I already was. So when I quit i lost my scholarship and had to transfer because I couldn't afford to pay for school.
    I never played again, but eventually decided to join a sorority in my last year at the new school. It took me that long to search for a good one. It ended up being a great experience. We participated in "hazing" according to the law, but nothing that I would be ashamed of and totally within my morals. I had fun and learned about myself and my sisters and future sisters. I learned practical things that I can use in the business world, as a professional and as a mother.
    This brings me to the hazing laws being broad. What is so different from doing a scavenger hunt with a third grade class to find butterflies for a science lesson, than pledges participating in a scavenger hunt in looking for meaningful objects regarding sorority history. Granted, some spoil it for the bunch and therefore there are laws but maybe they should be more specific. Such as, if drinking, physical battery in any form, singularly or during scavenger hunts, road trips etc. are punishable by law. Get the idea?

  • Posted by Paris on May 22, 2006 at 7:20pm EDT
  • Larry, your inability to distinguish between professional lap dancers and college girls being hazed by their sports team may not be counter-factual, but it is certainly disingenuous.

    While Schwyzer does imply that excess drinking or deshabillé are categorically problematic, I believe his main point is that they are problematic in a particular context. That meaning is generated by context isn't so difficult now, is it?

  • Hazing
  • Posted by Kevin , Undergraduate on May 23, 2006 at 12:50pm EDT
  • Seeing as this is consentual behavior, the university could better spend its resources elsewhere.

  • Posted by anon on May 23, 2006 at 2:05pm EDT
  • Um.....it's not consensual Kevin. In order to be on the team and avoid taunts, pranks, social isolation and other "punishments. Did you not read Laura's post? It amazes me how people casually accept hazing as acceptable. Hazing is clearly a form of ritualized abuse. How can you argue that it's consensual if there is retribution if you don't participate.

    These 2 links just scratch the surface of the problems related to hazing:
    http://www.mgh.harvard.edu/news/releases/052402hazing.htm

    http://www.washtimes.com/upi/20060517-071517-7790r.htm

  • address Kevin's point, please
  • Posted by Larry on May 23, 2006 at 5:45pm EDT
  • Anon, You need to address Kevin’s point. They don’t need to be on the team. They could have just gone to the library and studied. They don’t need to go to college, either. The adverse behaviors you describe are mostly criminal in nature, and there is no evidence that the police would not respond to a call for help.

    To say that hazing is non-consensual, and thereby place it in the same vein as, say, rape or murder, pretty extraordinary, if you ask me. Also, I still don’t get the distinction between voluntarily giving someone a lap dance at an bar, and voluntarily giving someone a lap dance at a college. Is there some social convention here I am unaware of?

  • Posted by Mel on May 24, 2006 at 4:40am EDT
  • Larry,
    "They don't need to go to college, either" ? That sounds an awful lot like "that bank teller is an accessory to robbery because instead of handing over other people's money, he could have just let himself be shot." That is to say, technically true but not very helpful. There does exist such a thing as coercion.

  • is this your analogy
  • Posted by Larry on May 24, 2006 at 8:15am EDT
  • Mel, Are you saying that these girls with the threat of going to a school where they can’t play soccer are analogous to a bank teller that has a gun thrust in her face, and is threatened with death?

    These girls knew what they were getting into. They seem to enjoy the idea of lapdancing on men as a means to bond with their teammates. Let’s try and keep our streets safe for women who actually might be the target of attackers. These girls, with their bizarre rituals are not worth our attention.

  • Posted by LK on May 24, 2006 at 8:45am EDT
  • If every girl that truly objected did what Laura did, would there still be photos of the event? Yes. Because the ones that don't like it and truly object to it, don't do it. College athletics does not attract weak-minded individuals. It attracts egos.

  • Anon
  • Posted by Kevin , Undergraduate on May 25, 2006 at 6:10pm EDT
  • Anon, the people who decided to partake in the hazing chose to be there. If they were physically forced to be there, it would be another matter. If they were held there at gunpoint or knifepoint or at the credible threat of being beaten with a baseball bat it would be another matter. Those matters, in point of fact, would be called false arrest and kidnapping and dealt with by the police.

  • Posted by Mel on May 29, 2006 at 7:30am EDT
  • Except that there are people for whom it's not an issue of "going to a college where they can't play soccer" it's an issue of keeping their scholarship and going to college at all. And maybe a junior college would be just as good for them, maybe they don't need to be going to a state school - but people certainly *feel* as if what school they attend makes a difference to their futures. Noone's threatening their lives directly, but that doesn't mean there's no coercion present.

  • Grandfather's View
  • Posted by Glen on July 7, 2006 at 9:35pm EDT
  • Kids these days lack both self-respect and respect for others. There is appeal in decency and modesty that these kids need to be aware of. Maybe I should consider dancing around in my knickers and a bottle of whiskey to obtain my tenure. I vouch for my mean Presley hip swinging any day.