News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
July 20, 2006 The Strategist
This column will provide Inside Higher Ed readers with advice on a range of strategy and financial issues facing colleges. Eduventures, a leading consulting services firm, has agreed to answer questions from readers. Questions for future columns may be submitted via e-mail. We hope this column provides an opening for all to seek consulting advice and to understand the way consultants approach issues.
Question: How can colleges best mix on-campus and online delivery of instruction?
Answer:
Too many college and university leaders think, “We have an online program and we have a campus program, so we can probably just combine the two to create a hybrid program.” This usually doesn’t work well because online and on-campus programs often appeal to different people for different reasons, and the delivery challenges for each are also quite different.
We’ve seen some great successes, and a few spectacular failures, in the hybrid market model (in which 20-80 percent of content is delivered online). From these examples, we’ve learned that planning up front and being clear about objectives are preconditions for success. Institutions considering hybrid models for a program, or even several courses, must first create a “business plan” and clearly state what they want to achieve, which students they plan to serve, and how they plan to compete. When building this plan for your institution, you should keep the following in mind:
The Goal. Why are you considering a hybrid model? What is the business rationale? Are you trying to reach different, or more, students, or trying to solve space constraints? Are you doing it because you see an unmet need in your marketplace or because your competitors are going hybrid and you feel the need to keep up? Are you looking for a local, regional, or national audience? The national market is becoming quite competitive, and programs in this space are becoming more commodity like, so a program focusing on the regional or local market may position your program for success.
Philosophy. A program with 20 percent of delivery online and 80 percent on-campus is quite different from a program with 80 percent online and 20 percent on-campus, yet they both qualify as hybrid. Will you use the online component only for communication purposes or for content delivery as well? How will you use adjunct faculty members — to create the content, deliver it, or both? The philosophy you choose should provide a blueprint or roadmap for how you will achieve your goals. Too often in our work, we have seen institutions miss this step — they did not identify their philosophy before jumping into the hybrid model, and later found that it significantly impeded success. Without a philosophy, it is difficult to communicate the value proposition internally or externally, and it becomes challenging to make some of the difficult trade-offs inherent in any new venture.
Target Consumer. What type of consumer is your hybrid offering designed to attract? Adult learners tend to be more open to an online experience because it allows them to balance their professional and personal lives with their educational pursuits. Traditional students — those aged 18 to 24 – tend to want face-to-face, classroom-based learning. Corporations may prefer a little of both, to allow employees to work and study at the same time. Segmenting the market by consumer types and needs — adult, traditional, current, new, credit, non-credit — and designing programs that fit these segments and needs are important early steps.
Integration. Integrating between bricks and clicks is probably the single biggest point of failure for institutions pursuing a hybrid model. Where does campus-based learning begin and end relative to the online component? How do student services coordinate with these components? What do you need to change about your student information system? The challenges range from technology and training, to content design and delivery, to student services. Be sure to prepare by thinking through the entire system and how it will affect the students, the faculty, and the staff.
Programs. Some courses and programs have done very well online and would be logical candidates for a hybrid model (e.g., business, IT, education), but not every course or program is well-suited to a hybrid approach. It’s best to begin with an audit of existing programs, dissecting the curriculum to determine how a hybrid model might be applied. At the same time, you should do an external evaluation of market demand and supply to determine where the best opportunities are for introducing new programs. Again, if you consider local versus national distribution, you may find that, on a local level, a particular hybrid program may provide a competitive advantage in attracting students.
Core Competencies. What is your institution known for? What do you do better than most of your peer schools? Focus your efforts on maximizing the benefit of these core competencies and consider outsourcing those areas that are not strengths, such as marketing, lead management, student services, or technology.
Faculty Buy-In. Faculty members have a large stake in content delivery because most of the time they supply the curriculum. Whether you plan to offer incentives for faculty to adapt content to a hybrid model or to outsource this function, faculty should be involved in the discussions.
Hybrid courses and programs represent more of an evolution than a revolution in educational content delivery. Hybrid delivery represents a natural progression for many campus-based institutions to investigate and perhaps pursue, and often can serve as a competitive advantage in reaching a wider student population. Rigorously thinking through process design and delivery components and planning carefully for implementation will make the difference between those programs that succeed in the hybrid arena and those that invest a lot of resources with little to show for it.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
“Some courses and programs have done very well online and would be logical candidates for a hybrid model”
I have seen colleges offer “Speech” online. I can understand that from an angle where you are studying different types of speeches, etc. But for the actual speaking part, the student would record themselves in front of a video camera and send it in. I encountered some traditional students required to take speech, that would opt for the online program so they wouldn’t have to speak in front of others. That defeats the purpose, doesn’t it?
In terms of addressing who the market is that online programs attract, these students are typically working adults, military, or others with schedules that do not allow for traditional classroom hours. Other components of the college would need to address these students needs as well, such as financial aid and admissions. Financial aid applications and counseling would need to be available to these students at non-traditional hours in order to fully service their needs.
Sandra, Global Financial Aid Services, at 11:00 am EDT on July 20, 2006
This sort of canned advice is hardly helpful. After all, the advice simply to “plan ahead” can be applied to virtually any activity. Meanwhile the writer hasn’t given a thought to the key question: how could online and classroom instruction best supplement each other in a powerful curriculum?
Charles Muscatine, Professor emeritus, at 5:00 pm EDT on July 20, 2006
In reference to the corporate desire to have learners work and study at the same time, a large evaluation was left out of the research. The corporate world with high turnover, such as retail, desires the learning to be rapid in order to get the employee to a desired level regardless of the retention rates. Although the e-learning “looks” like a great concept for retail, it is usually administered without the consideration of adult learning principles. Knowledge is served with a mass dose in a short time. Learning is assumed.
Richard DeBlasio, Instructional Designer at ITT Technical Institute, at 8:25 am EDT on August 15, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Drake University is a diverse learning community of more than 5,600 students, distinguished by collaborative learning among ... see job
Founded in 1898, and affiliated with what is now New York-Presbyterian Hospital since 1927, Weill Cornell Medical College ... see job
The Department of Sociology at the University of California, Irvine invites applications for possible visiting lecturer ... see job
Exciting Attorney Job Opportunity at The George Washington University. see job
Job Summary Roosevelt University’s Chicago College of Performing Arts seeks an Assistant Professor of ... see job
Join one of the finest regional universities in the nation. James Madison University, home to 18,000 + students, welcomes you ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
This is a tenure-track position, at the Assistant Professor level, in the Department of Anthropology, jointly with the new ... see job
Posting Description: The position will primarily center upon our ongoing Investigation of brain ... see job
The College of Business and Economics at Towson University invites applications for the position of Chair of the Department ... see job
A natural progression
Kristin has crystallized the approach that many staid and self-satisfied higher education administrations must reocognize in the long term. Strategic Planners like Kristin recognize that in order for the US to grow as a participant in the world economy, these administrators need to consider the changing and adapting the way they do business.
Yes, I said “the way they do business"! It is a business. Getting rid of severe limiting and restraining factors like tenure, bought-and-paid-for-positions on Boards of Directors, prevalent nepotism and other similar factors and making the necessary changes to move through the information and knowledge revolution that is going on. Having experienced this first hand, it is not hard to see that change that should happen within an organization will come from the outside at a much higher price.
Did computers start and grow within the higher education community? No. Did the empahasis on current knowledge and learning expansion start within the higher education community? No. Did changes in modes of educational delivery start within the higher education community? No. To compete and lead in the World economy, this community needs to take a world view and grow up.
Edward Winslow, A “tired” retired Business Professor, at 9:20 am EDT on July 20, 2006