News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Oct. 23, 2006
Dear Dr. X:
Please find enclosed my article “Time, Inscrutability, and the Attempt to Measure Frustration in the Work of Heidegger.” In it I try to reconceptualize some of the more accepted approaches to the topic and connect them to more theoretical arguments coming out of work like Dr Y’s recent article “Turning ‘Turn Around’ Upside Down: Bakhtin, Nietzsche, and Enigma of Time” and Dr. Z’s landmark argument, “Sign, Signifier, Skulk: Saussure’s Empty Mailbox.” Given your journal’s long-standing interest in this issue, I believe that it is the best venue for my argument and I hope your readers agree.
Yours,
Graduate Student A
Dear Graduate Student A:
This is to confirm
receipt of your manuscript.
We will evaluate
your work and inform
you of our decision as
soon as possible.
Thank you for thinking
of our journal for your work.
Blossoms fall like snow.
Sincerely,
Dr. X
Editor
Dear Dr. X:
Thank you for your earlier reply. I’m still a little unclear on your process and was hoping you wouldn’t mind if I asked another question.
I recently accepted a job that required me to move to another state. Since the forward order I left at my old address expired after a year I was concerned that your response to my essay, “Time, Inscrutability, and the Attempt to Measure Frustration in the Work of Heidegger” might have gotten lost in the mail. I’ve listed my new postal address and e-mail address below.
Yours,
Assistant Professor A
Dear Assistant Professor A:
Thank you for your note.
Our readers are reviewing
your essay right now.
I’ll check its status
when I return to campus
sunset in August.
Sincerely,
Dr. X
Dear Dr. X:
I’m sure it’s just me, but I’m confused by the August timeline you mentioned in you last email. Can I ask for further clarification on when to expect a response from you readers?
Recent changes in the tenure review process at my institution require that an article actually be in print before it can count toward tenure. As my third year review is coming up at the end of this semester, I was hoping to check on the status of my submission, “Time, Inscrutability, and the Attempt to Measure Frustration in the Work of Heidegger.” As you can imagine, it would be quite a boost to my file if I were able to list an article as “forthcoming” in your journal.
Yours,
Assistant Professor A
Dear Assistant Professor A:
Spring beats a loud drum
As you might know, our student
office manager
he graduated
and as a result we have
quite a large backlog.
We are committed
to catching up by the end
of the semester
and I am quite sure
we will have a clear answer
for you by next month.
Sincerely,
Dr. X
Dear Dr. X:
In the course of some research on the work of Professor Emeritus A I came across some correspondence that made me think your journal might know of an unpublished article of his entitled, “Time, Inscrutability, and the Attempt to Measure Frustration in the Work of Heidegger.” As you probably know, Professor A’s health will probably keep him from publishing in the future, something which makes this missing article even more important. I am collecting his papers in the hopes of publishing an edition of his essays and would be thrilled to include this one. I would appreciate any information regarding this essay you might be able to provide. I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours,
Graduate Student C
Dear Graduate Student C:
As you know, May is,
of course, a very busy month
Call back on Monday.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Some years ago, I had a similar experience to the one satirized above. I packed off an article to a Canadian journal in my field, and then promptly forgot about it, as I had just accepted a position, was working on my first book, had other articles to write, etc. etc. etc. About two years later, I was cleaning out my desk when I came across some of the original correspondence. I then wrote to the editors (this is pre-e-mail), assuming of course that their response had somehow gotten lost in the mail, asking about the upshot. To my astonishment, they responded that while they had one positive reading, they were still waiting on the second reader’s report! Eventually, the article came out, but I never contributed to that journal ever again.
Peter C. Herman, Professor at San Diego State University, at 12:16 pm EDT on October 23, 2006
This, of course, militates in favor of law-review-type reviews. All these articles would have been published, cited, and obsolete by now.
Larry, at 3:45 pm EDT on October 24, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Join the Pack! A community with nearly 8,000 faculty and staff, and 30,000 students. NC State is one of the largest employers ... see job
A top research university, USF is located on Florida’s west coast in the metropolitan Tampa Bay area, a highly desirable ... see job
University of Pennsylvania School of Design Department of Landscape Architecture Standing Faculty Position in the History and ... see job
Cornell University, located in Ithaca, New York, is an inclusive, dynamic, and innovative Ivy League university and New ... see job
Postdoctoral Scholar Training Position The University of California, Irvine’s Institute for Brain Aging and Dementia has an ... see job
The nation’s first university, Penn is a world-renowned leader in education, research, and innovation. Situated on a ... see job
This posting is an ongoing pool for those interested in teaching Composition courses offered at HCC. The department will ... see job
This posting is on ongoing pool for Nutrition. The department is currently seeking to fill vacancies for the Spring 2008 ... see job
Founded in 1898, and affiliated with what is now New York-Presbyterian Hospital since 1927, Weill Cornell Medical College ... see job
Columbus State Community College invests in employee development by providing numerous resources, partnerships, training and ... see job
A Source is a Source of Course, of Course.
Reminds me a little of the correspondence I had with a now defunct History Journal put together by some graduate students in the Midwest over a decade ago. I sent in a meticulously researched manuscript (after passing my doctoral comps) of an article detailing the long interaction of the Romans, Hellenistic Kingdoms and Egypt with one stubbornly independent nomadic neighbor. I pulled together every primary source relating to this issue (many of which were only available in German translations) went back from there to the sources in their original languages and did my own translations (from Coptic and Greek) and then assembled a well documented paper that many advised I get published.The rejection letter I saved for years and I attach it to this paper when I use it in my classes today. After my students find it at the end, I always get a shocked, “What?” The main point: the editors enjoyed reading my paper, but said the only publish work based upon primary sources! To this day I wonder if they knew what a primary source was!
John F. DeFelice, Associate Professor of History at University of Maine at Presque Isle, at 8:00 am EDT on October 23, 2006