News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Nov. 20, 2006
The passage of the anti-affirmative action ballot Proposition 2 hit hard in Michigan for those who care about access to college or campus diversity. A Detroit teacher related to me what an African-American high school student told him about the results of the ballot measure’s passage. The academically talented student picked up a basketball and said that he had better start to practice, as sports were the only opportunity left for kids like him. The student was making a joke, but the point of the story remains – for the next generation of students, Proposition 2 will shape their hopes about college, their sense of who they can be. Though the measure may not keep students like the one above from being admitted to a top school, it could well keep him from applying, or even aspiring to attend a top school.
In the wake of attacks on affirmative action, students may believe that they cannot attend college, when most colleges and universities offer tremendous access to a wide range of students. Colleges and universities will need to make sure that students have the correct information about college standards and admission requirements. Students need to understand that standardized tests are only part of the system, and that students with a wide range of test scores can be successful in postsecondary education.
Colleges and universities need to reach out to students to bring a message of hope — a college education is not out of reach, and that our colleges and universities remain committed to educating a diverse student population. Colleges and universities, if they work together, could use the assault on affirmative action as an opportunity to work together to better engage with the K-12 community. This work is difficult, long-term, labor intensive, frustrating and counter-cultural. Universities have traditionally had a “build it and they will come philosophy,” in which they build buildings, print application forms and expect a class of students to show up.
Higher education’s focus must change from admissions policies to outreach, with greater attention to college preparation. Programs such as Upward Bound and Gear Up (Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs) provide models for what can be done, but these need to be strengthened, energized, and made central to the mission of colleges and universities. Nothing in Proposition 2 prevents universities from targeting schools districts across the state that are not now sending their students to college, and working with those schools to improve their curriculums and their college-going rates. The schools that need this help range from urban districts like Detroit, Flint and Lansing, to many small struggling rural districts, to districts with large populations of Native Americans, Arab-Americans or Latinos, groups of students who have been ignored in the debate over Proposition 2.
In California, Proposition 209 led to a drastic decline in minority enrollments in the flagship University of California institutions, but it has energized the California State University System, which has become the leader in school outreach, in college preparation and awareness, and in minority student enrollments. The passage of Proposition 209 has made both the University of California and Cal State system far more interested and involved in high school curriculum, and both systems have become far more explicit with students and high schools about the knowledge and skills that are prerequisites to college success.
Regional universities, long the second tier of the hierarchy, may now become the most important part of the system for diversity. The reality is that affirmative action in admissions is a far less important issue once you leave state flagships like the University of Michigan. Minority students who do not get in there because of this change would be welcomed, admitted, and successful at institutions all over the state. This shift would bring these regional universities the “critical mass” of diversity that the University of Michigan argued was so important for campus climate, and revitalize regional universities’ mission of providing access to underrepresented students.
If universities want a more diverse student body, business as usual will not work anymore. Universities and colleges need to take a role in building, encouraging, locating and recruiting their future students, starting now. The passage of Proposition 2 presents a moral challenge to colleges and universities to leave the ivory tower and to work for a better future for the students that need it most.
If colleges and universities are going to do this kind of work, engagement with the K-12 system needs to go to the top of the university’s agenda. Most of the programs at colleges and universities that work with schools and schoolchildren can be found in some of the most marginal spaces imaginable, including leaky basements, off-campus sites, and in other cities entirely. They are found in virtually every unit except Academic Affairs, and are rarely run by faculty members. These valuable programs, long neglected by their institutions, need recognition, energy, clout and involvement from the top.
For faculty, substantial involvement in elementary and high schools has never had the rewards of research, even for faculty in education schools. If universities and colleges were to revitalize this role, it would take a cultural shift, in which faculty would be expected to engage with their colleagues in the K-12 system, as well as students on a regular basis.
The passage of Proposition 2 in Michigan provided higher education across the nation with a very bad night. It showed that no matter what level of corporate and higher education support exists for affirmative action programs, voters can overwhelmingly reject this based on a few attack ads.
It is now the morning after that bad night. Time to get to work.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
If the black high school student in the anecdote is academically talented, why would his solution to the abolition of racial quotas in college admission be to pick up a basketball instead of a book? Why would the teacher who related the anecdote neglect to advise him to prepare himself to compete for admission on his academic talent, since he can no longer do so on the color of his skin?
I suppose it’s because they understand, as most people do, that the reason the lack of racial quotas means a disproportionately white college student body is that teachers like this one fail, through inability or unwillingness, to prepare racial minority students adequately for college. The colleges won’t hold the high schools accountable for that, they just complain that the voters won’t let the colleges lower academic standards for black students the way the colleges allow the high schools to.
Isn’t it ironic that when the student in the anecdote picked up a basketball as a humorous way to suggest how he could get into college, he chose an activity where the standards—the height of the goal, the length of the game, the length of the free throw line—are exactly the same for white contestants as for black ones? Denied the chance to compete where his race confers a special advantage, he self-confidently suggested a competition where he is to be judged wholly on his ability.
Jack Olson, at 10:10 am EST on November 20, 2006
Many academically qualified Black students aren’t going to public universities because they can’t afford the cost of attending college. Most financial aid is tied to loans and if low income parents have bad credit or low credit scores, they don’t qualify for loans. Private universities have realized this and are offering free tuition for low income students. Many states that have banned affirmative action have also been forced to shut down scholarship programs set up by Black professional organizations specifically targeted to encourage Black students to attend a particular university. The young man makes an interesting point about honing his sports skills if he wants to stay in Michigan, where Black athletes are agressively recruited and given full scholarships. In California after Prop 209 passed, private universities like USC, Stanford, USF, Pepperdine, Claremont and even Cal Tech stepped up Black and Latin recruitment of both faculty, staff and students and created financial aid packages and scholarships specifically targeted to Black and Latin students. This recruitment effort resulted in an overall increase in Black and Latin enrollment at California private schools to a point where even Cal Tech, which historically has had one of the lowest percentage of Black students of any major university, this year had a higher percentage of Black freshman than UCLA. Michigan has few private universities, and if Michigan, Michigan State and Wayne State can’t recruit Black student in state with nothing more than sports scholarship, they’ll lose them to nearby Notre Dame, University of Chicago, Northwestern, schools that recruit Black scholars with the same deals Michigan and UCLA use to recruit Black football and basketball players.
Harryo, at 11:20 am EST on November 20, 2006
“After the Vote, Moving On” is correct about outreach. The other side of the equation has to do with improving the resources that K-12 students have in their respective school districts. As a graduate of a suburban school system, I can attest that the resources I enjoyed as a matter of course are almost unthinkable at my son’s rural, underprivileged, Appalachian school. Let’s get serious about diversity by improving the conditions under which the poorest segments of our population must learn.
Larry Shillock, Asst. Dean at Wilson College, at 12:15 pm EST on November 20, 2006
My son asked me after the passage of Proposal 2 if that meant he couldn’t now get into college. My son has been enrolled in a rigorous college prep curriculum and will likely do well on the ACT and/or SAT. I told him, I think correctly, that this would not impact him personally.
But his response begged the question: what is the perception we have about minorities and college admittance. Is it assumed, by blacks and whites, that but for Affirmative Action, minorities could not be admitted to college? This seems to be the overwhelming response by folks on both sides of the issue and this is truly disheartening.
If it is the case that Affirmative Action is the primary reason minorities were being admitted to college, then we (blacks and whites) should have been examining why that is all along. Maybe now we’ll examine it AND take steps to correct the problems with K-12 education in urban and rural districts.
Julie, at 1:25 pm EST on November 20, 2006
So now that discriminating on the basis of race is made illegal, NOW it’s important to fix minority schools? Are we really going to suggest that the terrible states these schools are in was somehow ok before, or more to the point, that the success of the students in these schools is just a means to the glorious end of keeping up the number of brown skinned people at UMich? Does Russell believe that the better solution is Affirmative Action, but since that’s not possible, the second best solution is fixing the school system?
The reactions to this vote have been very revealing.
Sam, at 2:55 pm EST on November 20, 2006
” .. voters can overwhelmingly reject this based on a few attack ads ..”
Yes .. 58% of Michigan voters, despite defeating a billionaire’s son and thus retaining a Harvard Law graduate as governor, are so stupid, they were easily duped by Rove-ian tactics. Despite every major business, labor, and media endorsement.
Yes, despite what Juan Williams writes in his current book, it is really our fault that the anti-family culture of some groups leads poverty, dislike for education, and other bad life-choices.
Shame on us hard-working, tax-paying Rove-ian dupes. We should pay more in taxes and apologize more to those who basically spit on our good intentions.
It is our fault, and we need to take responsiblity for unwillingness to pay more taxes and take more blame for matters outside of our control.
We are sorry. It won’t happen again.
B.D., at 9:10 am EST on November 21, 2006
This sentence proves that notwhtstanding the title of the article the author is not ready to “move on":
“It showed that no matter what level of corporate and higher education support exists for affirmative action programs, voters can overwhelmingly reject this based on a few attack ads.”
At what point do progressives — actually, they now need to be called “traditional progressives” or even “reactionary progressives” — accept the fact that while the elites love AA, the non-elites of good will find it increasingly abhorent?
Elitist, traditional progessives can fight a rear guard action or can join the people on this one. Only be adopting the latter attitude can they build a fairer society.
Bernardo O’Boyle, at 12:50 pm EST on November 21, 2006
I would like to see all preferential admissions eliminated. Someone mentioned equity in athletic admissions. Yes, but often athletes do not meet the academic standards. If there should be no consideration of race, then there also should be no consideration of athleticism or any other talent for acceptance. Especially must legacy admissions go. If all the above are done away with it would truly make the process fair. Of course, this will never happen because it would result in eliminating affirmative action for white students and the millions of dollars prized Black athletes are bring to schools like the University of Michigan. You see, every year some white students are accepted over qualified Asians who have better grades and scores than they do. In addition, most legacy students are white who get accepted because of money given by relatives—not due to academic excellence. Every poster cheering the passage of the anti-affirmative action initiative, are you going to push for the elimination of those other unfair programs too?
james allen, at 7:30 am EST on November 24, 2006
James Allen:
We have a constitutional amendment that bars discrimination based on race.
We don’t have one for athletic skill, or for intellectual skill for that matter. I’m curious whether you were joking when you wrote “any other talent", since this would include the talent of test-taking. Should we bar discrimination based on good grades?
I am getting fairly tired of hearing about what is “never going to happen", ie legacy preferences are never going to be eliminated, etc. It seems to me that the whole legacy idea springs from exactly the same thinking as affirmative action. Both betray a kind of arrogant meddling in the outcome of the admissions process. Both are abhorent to the ideals of classical American Liberty. Its interesting to me how frequently and reliably affirmative action supporters move from defending their beleaguered position to impugning their opponents’ true motivations and hypocricies.
Samwise, at 4:00 pm EST on November 27, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Posting Description: University of Colorado, Boulder Leeds School of Business Accounting Division Tisone ... see job
Walden University is focused exclusively on providing a superior university experience for adult professionals through the ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Everest College, a respected member of the Corinthian Colleges’ network of schools, is dedicated to helping students ... see job
Founded in 1898, and affiliated with what is now New York-Presbyterian Hospital since 1927, Weill Cornell Medical College ... see job
The School of Technology at Michigan Technological University invites applications for a tenure-track Assistant Professor ... see job
Northern Kentucky University’s College of Arts and Sciences invites applications from dynamic and distinguished ... see job
American University is an independent liberal-arts university located in Washington, DC with 12,000 students. The faculty are ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The Department of Comparative Literature and Languages at Hofstra University invites applications for an anticipated ... see job
“The passage of Proposition 2 in Michigan provided higher education across the nation with a very bad night. It showed that no matter what level of corporate and higher education support exists for affirmative action programs, voters can overwhelmingly reject this based on a few attack ads."Way to dismiss your opponents as the easily duped. Perhaps we had a principled opposition to affirmative action? Perhaps we felt that scholars such as yourself begged the question as to whether diversity, defined on race as you do, is so important for education. Perhaps even if we bought that begged question we felt it was still wrong to sacrifice an individuals chances on that altar, perhaps we worried over the division and the resentment racial preferences cause, or a stigmatizing effect on the supposed beneficiaries of the program...No, it must have been us folks easily duped by those darned clever attack ads...
Ken, at 8:46 am EST on November 20, 2006