Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

Standardize Financial Aid Award Letters

June 22, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The letters that colleges send students to notify them about their financial aid awards are cryptic and confusing. Families often find them to be difficult to understand and interpret. Key problems include the use of obscure terminology, incomplete cost information and limited disclosure of important loan terms. An award letter might highlight the total amount of aid while providing insufficient information to allow the family to figure out the bottom line cost. A lack of universal standards for financial aid award letters also prevents families from comparing aid offers from different schools on an apples to apples basis.

Currently, there is no standard format for financial aid award letters, nor requirements for the content of award letters. Colleges are not required under federal laws or rules to send an award letter. There is, however, a haphazard set of regulatory and statutory notice requirements that colleges fulfill with the award letter, such as the notice of the amounts and types of Title IV aid, availability of financial aid and certain institutional information.

Every family wants to know how much their college education will cost and how they can pay for it. This means the letter should include the full actual cost of attendance, the total aid (broken down by type and timing), and the remaining cost. Unfortunately, many award letters seem to omit one or more of these elements, as has been demonstrated by Kim Clark of U.S. News & World Report at FinancialAidLetter.com.

Some of the more common problems with financial aid award letters include:

  • Inconsistent reporting of cost figures. Some letters don't mention costs at all and some include only selected costs. For example, some letters mention just tuition and fees instead of the full cost of attendance as defined in section 472 of the Higher Education Act of 1965. Even when an award letter includes the full cost of attendance, it may not break down the costs into the major components -- tuition & fees, room & board, books & supplies, transportation and personal expenses -- making it difficult to determine whether one or more cost components has been omitted. Some cost components, such as textbook prices and living expense budgets, may be underestimated or be based on old estimates. This makes the financial aid offer appear more generous.
  • Masking the identity of award components. Sometimes award letters use cryptic acronyms, abbreviations and names for components of the financial aid package, making it difficult for families to determine what's a grant, what's a loan and what's work-study.
  • Incomplete disclosure of loan terms. Award letters rarely disclose the key terms of the loans, such as interest rates, fees and loan length, or even whether it is a student or parent obligation and whether the interest is subsidized or unsubsidized by the federal government. Financial aid award letters also sometimes fail to distinguish between need-based loans and non-need-based loans. There are good public policy reasons for including non-need-based loans and tuition payment plans on the award letter, such as raising awareness of often-overlooked options for financing college (e.g., the PLUS loan and the unsubsidized Stafford loan). But incorporating these loans into the financial aid package without clearly distinguishing them can mask gapping, where the college fails to meet the student’s full demonstrated financial need, and be misleading. For example, when a private student loan is branded as a college loan, a practice that has been criticized by Congress, it suggests that it is a low-cost loan, when in reality it is one of the more expensive forms of education financing.
  • Masking the real price of college. Financial aid award letters often emphasize the net cost, which is defined as the difference between the cost of attendance and the need-based components of the award letter. The net cost roughly approximates the expected family contribution (EFC). In some cases award letters include non-need-based loans when calculating the net cost, making the college seem less expensive than it really is. A key problem with net cost is it treats loans like gift aid, as though they don't need to be repaid. While low-cost loans provide cash flow assistance, and so are a form of aid, subtracting them from the cost of attendance hides how little support some students get. A better approach is to highlight the out-of-pocket cost, which is the difference between the cost of attendance and just gift aid. This more closely reflects the true cost of college.

Colleges need to take the lead in standardizing a set of disclosures for financial aid award letters in order to improve transparency and accountability. This will make it easier for prospective students to compare awards from different colleges and for current students to understand just what help they are receiving.

A standard could include the following requirements:

Cost of Attendance

  • Use standard definitions of college cost components.
  • Require all award letters to include total college costs, not just a subset of the costs.
  • Require all award letters to include a breakdown of each major component of the cost of attendance, such as tuition & fees, room & board, books & supplies, transportation and personal expenses.
  • Use realistic cost of attendance figures, based on actual costs, to prevent underestimates that provide a misleading picture of college costs.

Financial Aid

  • Segregate need-based aid from non-need-based aid.
  • Aggregate and label awards according to award types, such as grant, need-based loan, non-need-based loan, and work-study.
  • Disclose the key terms of each loan, including the interest rate, fees, loan term in years, whether it is a student or parent obligation, and whether the interest is subsidized or unsubsidized. For example, a subsidized Stafford loan could be listed as "Subsidized Stafford (6.8% interest, 2.5% fees, 10 year term)".

Standardized Format

  • Establish a standard reporting format for this information, akin to the Schumer box required on all credit card solicitations. Using a standard format would make it easier to compare award letters from different schools.
  • The award letter could include additional information, but this disclosure box would establish minimum standards for the information to be included on the award letter.
  • Summarize the family cost as the out-of-pocket cost in addition to the net cost.

The following design illustrates one possible approach to a standardized disclosure box. It presents just the summary information in a standardized format, establishing a minimal standard for the information that should be included in every financial aid award letter. It highlights the information that is most important to families and uses a standard format to make the award letter easier to interpret. Detailed listings of individual award letter components, such as Pell Grant and subsidized Stafford loan, would appear elsewhere in the letter, along with detailed disclosures of the interest rates and fees and other conditions of the award.

Cost of Attendance  
Tuition and fees $10,000
Room and board $8,456
Books and supplies $1,000
Transportation $1,500
Health insurance/fees $1,000
Miscellaneous/personal $1,500
Total Cost $23,456
   
Gift Aid  
Grants $15,000
Resources (outside scholarships) $500
Resources (veterans' education benefits) $1,000
Total Gift Aid $16,500
OUT OF POCKET COST $6,956
   
Self Help Aid  
Need-based loans $2,500
Employment (work study) $1,000
Total Self Help Aid $3,500
NET COST $3,456
   
Non-Need-Based Loans  
Federal student loans $1,000
Federal parent loans $2,456
Private student loans 0
Total Non-Need-Based Loans $3,456

Such a standardized disclosure box is clear and easy to understand. It provides families with a realistic summary of the real cost of college. Colleges must adopt a nationwide standard for financial aid award letters to enhance the accountability and transparency of the information they provide to students and parents.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Standardize Financial Aid Award Letters

  • award letters
  • Posted by Ruby Robinson , Director, Financial Aid at Saint Mary of the Woods College on February 13, 2008 at 10:15pm EST
  • I agree with Mark in that we do need some type of standardized award letter, but I also would like it to be easily understood by the masses. I would hate to see Congress mandate this, but I am afraid that they will unless we as Financia Aid Administrators get together and create our own mandates. I do not know about the rest of you, but I think we can do a much better job of this than Congress. So I encourage everyone to discuss this and do what is best for our students and parents and get a standard letter with standard components and let Congress do more important things.

  • Award letter disclosure
  • Posted by Reecy Aresty , College admissions/financial aid expert & author at Payless For College, Inc. on June 22, 2007 at 8:00am EDT
  • While I'm a big fan of disclosure, federally mandating it going way too far. That's like asking the car salesman how much commission he makes on various add-ons, or an insurance man's commission on comparable products. It's none of the buyer's business.

    Being in a service business, It's like having to make a cafeteria plan and estimate the cost for each component of my services, which would be an impossibility. Should I charge more if the client calls twice or three times in a day? What if I have to write four appeal letters instead of three?
    Should a store owner be required to disclose the pure cost of every item in inventory? I could go on and on to the point of absurdity.

    Disclosure - yes, but absolutely, positively keep the gov't, federal, state or otherwise, the hell out of it!

  • Federal Mandates
  • Posted by Bob Foultz , Assistant Director of FA at West Chester University of PA on June 22, 2007 at 8:31am EDT
  • While I agree that a standardization of format and full disclosure are desirable, mandating might not be the panacea that some people think. Schools should have the flexibility to do what seems right for their students.

    Further, no format will be the magic pill that makes the "light go on" for students and parents. We disclose full COA to students and we constantly get asked why we are charging students for transportation when they will be living on campus. Asking is ok, even encouraged.

    Further, what about enrollment? Should we do an award letter as 3/4 time for fall and 1/2 time for spring? Or should we just do all students as full time and include a disclaimer that says aid (and COA) will be reduced for enrollment status. We have just moved into the realm of what is the schools mission and philosophy and what seems to work best for their students.

    While I agree that more disclosure is better than less we will have to be concerned with sending each student the equivalent of the NASFAA encyclopedia through the mail (or email). There is such a thing as too much info.

    Ultimately, if a student or parent does not understand they will need to call the office and speak to someone about it.

  • Posted by Bridget Herrera on June 22, 2007 at 9:05am EDT
  • This is a good start but when looking at the bottom line, I think parents need to understand what they will be billed for and other costs that may vary and where they might be able to cut corners such as transportation and personal expenses. I think schools are using a very modest estimate for book allowances these days--last semester my daughter's books cost slightly over $900--that was definitely not in the budget!

  • What's wrong with full disclosure?
  • Posted by Jack Girvan , Founder at Educational Funding Consultants on June 22, 2007 at 9:35am EDT
  • Considering that the cost of a four year education at an average private college is over $100K it doesn't seem inapropriate to question the lack of clear and accurate disclosure. While buying a new car one at least sees a sticker on the window even though everone knows that it is not the real price. Families receive an award letter and have no idea what they are required to pay. Or worse they think that they know and then receive the "invoice" from the Bursor's office for thousands of dollars more because various costs were not disclosed.

    Transportation is not a billable item only an allowance granted by the DOE which allows families to borrow more for college costs. If families question a transportation fiqure they should as well as everthing else that they don't understand. Making award letters clearer will reduce the questions. Having worked with hundreds of families through the years it is clear to me that families just don't understand award letters. One of the most common requests that we receive at Educational Funding Consultants is...Can you help me to understand what this letter (award) means? Even with a standardized format our workload will not go down. Families will continue to be asking us... How are we supposed to pay this bill?

    If there was full disclosure regarding private loans and the relationship between lenders perhaps the current loan brouhaha wouldn't have occurred.

  • Posted by Thomas Babel , VP at DeVry University on June 22, 2007 at 10:40am EDT
  • I appreciate Mark's attempt to address what is a true issue for parents and students. However, after extensive research over the last several years at DeVry, we have found that there is no single solution to this issue. Whether the reader is a traditional-aged student, first-generation college-attendee, parent or commuting adult, the need for information and the ability to understand what is in the award letter differs significantly. The one solution that we have found that works optimally, is to keep it simple, keep it focused on the awards (I think it is a fallacy to assume that most students are using award letters to compare offers from multiple schools) and support it with in-person advising (preferably prior to issuing an award letter). The single biggest issue we have found is printing of the full cost of attendance...it overwhelms many more than it helps.

  • Full Disclosure versus "TMI"
  • Posted by Robert Bode , Director of Student Financial Aid at Metropolitan State U. on June 22, 2007 at 10:45am EDT
  • As someone who annually writes these letters, I constantly have to balance the needs of full disclosure versus the "too much information" syndrome. An effective award letter can only be at most 2 pages long. Therefore, it's not only the award letter, but also the supplemental inserts that go with the award offer which families must review carefully if they are to understand their out of pocket costs.

    The award offer inserts my school provides to new financial aid applicants this year runs 20 pages. In order to make it more family friendly, I used a question and answer format wherever I could. But we also provide addtional information, such as our "suggested" lender list (yes, I still have a lender list) on our web site, and expect students and parents to read their promissory notes and loan disclosures. So a family that really wants to fully understand could end up reviewing 40 or 50 pages of materials, depending on they aid being offered.

    If our award offers only needed to show families how to calculate their out-of-pocket expenses, the offers could be fairly simple. However, I have found that much of the information we provide is necessary disclosure information in order to protect ourselves against charges that "we never told" the student we would adjust their aid in a given set of circumstances. Just the "Terms and Conditions" of our award offer inserts runs 4 pages.

    Perhaps what is needed is a standard format "Offer Summary" showing the bottom line costs and financing options, which we can supplement with our own version of the award offer and other supplemental information.

  • Posted by James Smith on June 22, 2007 at 11:40am EDT
  • Mark,

    You stated:

    Incomplete disclosure of loan terms. Award letters rarely disclose the key terms of the loans, such as interest rates, fees and loan length, or even whether it is a student or parent obligation and whether the interest is subsidized or unsubsidized by the federal government. Financial aid award letters also sometimes fail to distinguish between need-based loans and non-need-based loans. There are good public policy reasons for including non-need-based loans and tuition payment plans on the award letter, such as raising awareness of often-overlooked options for financing college (e.g., the PLUS loan and the unsubsidized Stafford loan). But incorporating these loans into the financial aid package without clearly distinguishing them can mask gapping, where the college fails to meet the student’s full demonstrated financial need, and be misleading. For example, when a private student loan is branded as a college loan, a practice that has been criticized by Congress, it suggests that it is a low-cost loan, when in reality it is one of the more expensive forms of education financing.

    The problem with this is the student has the choice of lender if a school is not part of the Direct Loans program. How am I able to disclose the exacts of a student loan that I am not sure of who the lender is until the student applies? We all know each lender offers different interest rate reductions and to assume which lender students will choose is going a little too far as well...plus to just put that the loan is 6.8%, 2% loan fees, and 10 years...that would be false information....what if the lender has lets say 1% intrest rate reduction upon repayment....so the loan is actually 5.8%, and what if they pay the fees...so there are $0 fees, and what if the student chooses to consolidate or chooses an extended repayment option...the terms wouldn't be 10 years....there is no easy answer to solving this problem other than educating students and parents as much as they are willing to learn. I go to 40-50 High Schools each year teaching financial aid literacy to parents, students, and High School counselors. I hope it helps, but giving them the information does not mean that they will retain it. I've worked for state schools and now a private law school and the funding is different at every level. To assume that the government has the know how to inform us of how to do things properly is far fetched....They don't even know which students really need money for school...or how to create the proper policies to allow Higher Education to function properly. The whole "student loan scandal" is a prime example....men and women in Washington, DC who are taken to lunch and dinner and many other functions to sway their votes on a daily basis....telling a person making $30,000 a year that it is wrong for a lender to take them to dinner and discuss business....hmmm...I think I just saw a pot....I think Financial Aid professionals could meet at the National level at NASFAA and determine a much more sound solution than Congress...after all how many of them have worked in Financial Aid? 2 maybe 3?

  • There is a way...
  • Posted by Brian , Higher Ed Researcher on June 22, 2007 at 1:05pm EDT
  • While I agree that there shouldn't be a federal mandate, the federal government could provide a technical "reader" for these award letters. The federal government (FSA) could come up with a tool for students to 1) Electronically submit their letter and 2) get a detailed explanation of what the terms mean (perhaps even giving a printout like the one proposed in the article). Additionally, pulling in cost of attendance provided to IPEDS, average graduate debt levels, and information on the student’s chosen career salary, the government could prepare a transparent snapshot of the student’s future – including debt levels and other obligations.

    That is transparency…

  • Legal? Larry -- where are you?
  • Posted by Unapologetically Tired of Tedium , Ol' Lar's BFF at Mediocre State on June 22, 2007 at 2:25pm EDT
  • " .. Perhaps what is needed is a standard format “Offer Summary” showing the bottom line costs and financing options, which we can supplement with our own version of the award offer .."

    Might want to check Legal on this (Lar?)

    For example: consider the "telephone books" of disclosures that TIAA/CREF sends out. Of course, it is probably CYA -- what else is new?

    And, of course, there are those who actually read every single word. We're talking about house-size amounts of money here, after all.

    Heck, what about the DL exit meetings? Why not "entry" FinAid meetings? Or did Marketing nix those?

  • Confusion reigns
  • Posted by Les on June 22, 2007 at 2:50pm EDT
  • When I worked in financial aid at the college level, I thought we did a pretty good job of providing useful, accurate information to families in the award letter and otherplaces. I may have even been a touch self-satisfied about it. But when my kids were in college, not a semester went by without the need for me to call their universitites' bursars or financial aid office to straighten out some mess--often the same one that requred fixing the previous semester. And they had only some modest scholarships! Without my professional aid background, my kids would have lost money and gained headaches. This whole process cries out for fixing--and the award letter is just a small piece of it. That the process works at all is a testament to the many hard working and well meaning school folks and the persistance and efforts of goal directed students and parents.

  • Award letters
  • Posted by Ann Doherty on June 24, 2007 at 8:50am EDT
  • Sad but true, most of my kids call it a REWARD letter in the beginning. I agree with the "keep it simple" comment but would further add "keep in simpler, still." It took me years to become an "expert" in all of this so to expect a kid or their parents to figure it out from a letter is not happening no matter how clear it seems to us.
    As much as I applaud Mark for trying to standardize this all, I don't think it is as simple as having a standard award letter-- you could mail 20 of the same thing and there would still be confusion and worry. I also concur with another poster the state of lending the way it is now, disclosure is impossible unless we just go DL. With all the "shiney pennies" FFEL is coming up with to entice borrowers in order to maintain their livelihood (and the other feeder enterprises), it's impossible to do what Mark is suggesting: disclose.
    Perhaps instead of leading the charge to rewrite and standardize a letter Mark could lead the charge to simplify the education funding in this country once and for all. Now there's a cuase I fully support.