Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

People Get Ready

July 23, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

"As far as the university is concerned, the core of the human being, his or her emotional and spiritual life, is dealt with as a necessary evil, on the sidelines, and the less heard about it the better."
--Jane Tompkins, in A Life in School: What the Teacher Learned

Like many faculty members, I'm starting to get ready for the fall semester. I'm preparing syllabi, and I'm sending my textbook orders to the campus bookstore. I'm putting some resources on Blackboard, I'm waiting to hear where my classes will be located, and I've incorporated my school's academic calendar into my own-general faculty meetings, Labor Day, Thanksgiving break, finals week, and so forth.

This summer, getting ready also means preparing to move my office here on the fourth floor to a new office on the second floor of our building. Because I'll be starting this fall as the director of our general education program, I'll have new digs. Lots of out-of-date files and old student papers will hit the recycle bin.

Also, I'm getting myself ready for the emotional demands of teaching. In the past, I never made my students' emotional needs a priority. When they came to my office with this or that teary-eyed story about why the paper would be late, I just waved them off. I'd say, "No reason to explain. Just get it to me as soon as you can." No tissue box in my office. No time for tears. See you later, alligator.

I also told my writing students to change all instances of "I feel" to "I think" in their papers. They were there to learn how to be critical thinkers, not to share feelings. After all, how were they going to provide clear and verifiable evidence for those kinds of claims? Focus on what's up there in your head, not ... uh, you know, wherever your feelings happen to come from.

Sad to say, that's been my story. Not that I'm a cold fish. I've learned over time that my feelings about my family, children, students, and colleagues are pretty much an open book; in other words. I'd never make it to the final table at the World Series of Poker. My wife can easily tell the crabby Laurence from the sad Laurence from the confused Laurence. Marcel Marceau I ain't; still, my face is a pretty accurate map of my emotional life. And it's a life I've tried to ignore or bury, especially on the job.

Why? Well, I think I'm beginning to arrive at some answers. Earlier this summer, I was attending a conference at the YMCA of the Rockies in Estes Park, Colorado sponsored by the Assembly for Expanded Perspectives on Learning, an affiliate of the National Council of Teachers of English. The organizers of this conference selected the topic "The Emotional Life of Teachers," and they invited Peter Elbow, author of Writing Without Teachers, to be one of the featured speakers.

During a morning plenary session, he asked us to reflect upon the emotional logic of our teaching, to play "the believing game" when it came to the feelings we have about our students and our work. According to Elbow, the believing game is refraining from doubt, and, in this case, purposefully accepting the truth of those feelings to better understand them. In other words, he asked us to commit to the idea that our feelings made sense, and to identify why the emotions we have are the emotions we have.

As you can imagine -- that is, if you know anything about Elbow's work -- we also engaged in quite a bit of freewriting about this topic. And as I was writing along, opening myself to whatever came my way, two very simple things struck me. First, emotions take time. Second, we probably need reminding which emotions got us into teaching in the first place.

Emotions demand a different kind of schedule. They put the brakes on the frantic rush of our daily lives. Thus, feelings get swept aside because they slow us down, they make us late for class, they spill out in a mess, and they produce unnecessary conflicts. They simply interfere with the clockwork of teaching and learning. They have no place in the faculty meeting because they aren't on the agenda. They have no place in the classroom because they can't be tested or multiple-choiced. And in this age of setting and measuring outcomes, what can't be assessed certainly shouldn't be included.

Emotions also reveal how unprepared we are for them. Sure, some of us stand more at the ready than others, but emotional readiness as a topic of study in educational scholarship focuses almost exclusively on the emotions of pre-school and elementary students, not college teachers. In addition, the emotions we generally think of or encounter are negative or hurtful, like fear, anger, and sadness. When we characterize colleagues or students as emotional, they are overly dramatic, out of control, or just can't be reasoned with. We say, "Why can't they get a grip? Can't they see how much time they're wasting?"

In an effort to do a better job of accepting the emotional reality of my profession, I made an important decision this summer. In the past, when a student or colleague came into my office with a look of concern, I always asked, "What's on your mind?" I now realize this question is sorely insufficient. If I really want to get to "the heart of the matter," I have to take the extra time to ask questions that explore the emotional dimensions of that concern. I also have to take the extra time to explore and express my own, to dignify the full humanity of that concern and that person.

Finally, and especially as we approach the new school year, I feel we need to recall the emotional logic of choosing our careers in the first place.

Wasn't it the joy of learning? And wasn't it the joy of teaching? Wasn't it the passion-filled hallelujah of the miracle of our students' lives? The celebration and laughter, the crazy enthusiasm and embrace of the privilege to teach and to meet semester after semester new souls, minds, bodies, hearts, passions, and pains?

Who else gets to do what we do? Who else gets the glorious privilege to teach what we teach? Who else gets to read what we read? Who else gets to live in the continually increasing variety and wealth of ideas? Who else gets to see and recognize and argue for the gifts our students don't even see in themselves? Who else recognized the joy we felt at the joy our teachers felt in seeing our futures for us? Who else heard the honest soul-piercing yes that affirmed us? Who else gets to join this choir?

And for heaven's sake, where is this joy now? What are our responsibilities to remembering and nurturing and practicing this joy? To standing, to raising our arms and hands and voices in praise of the thrilling, smiling, embracing gospel of learning?

Where is our thanksgiving? Who gave us our jobs? Who gave us this privilege to teach and to swim in these libraries of glory? To hold the hands of our students as they trace the lines of their lives, the tears they let fall, the visions they desire, the worlds they discover, the learning they love?

Who sings this? I mean, who lifts their voices in song about this miracle? Who bows before it? Who recognizes the undeserved grace of this joy? Which of us thanks our students for coming into our lives? Who says "Amen" to the love we receive from this joy? In all creation, sky to earth, ocean to ocean, man, woman, parent, child, teacher, student, animal, plant, rock, and soul, in all creation: Why us? Why this joy?

I say, people get ready, there's a train a-coming.

Laurence Musgrove is an associate professor of English at Saint Xavier University, in Chicago where he also directs the general education program.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on People Get Ready

  • Posted by Cacambo on July 23, 2007 at 9:10am EDT
  • Beautifully said. And true. Joy and pleasure are two pedagogical principles that often get lost in the shuffle. I know for myself that all my best teachers were full of both.

  • Unexpectedly rousing!
  • Posted by JS Clark on July 23, 2007 at 10:00am EDT
  • Infectious essay, Laurence--know that you've probably improved the Fall semesters of a great many teachers and learners with this enthusiastic reminder. Thank you!

  • Posted by lindsay waters , exec ed for the humanities at harvard univ press on July 23, 2007 at 10:00am EDT
  • Concepts without emotions are blind. We orient ourselves in our worlds by grasping them emotionally. I welcome this essay. What I have called in the pages of THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION "slow reading" is an activity we can do only by opening ourselves up to feel the feelings the work of art triggers in us. So, bravo.

  • Curtis Mayfield, R.I.P.
  • Posted by Buzz , Fact-checker at Public Ivy on July 23, 2007 at 10:30am EDT
  • " .. I say, people get ready, there’s a train a-coming."

    ------------

    To the originating driving force behind that statement --

    http://www.npr.org/news/specials/march40th/people.html

    http://www.lyricsfreak.com/r/rod+stewart/people+get+ready_20117591.html

  • Posted by Peggy Oliver on July 23, 2007 at 10:30am EDT
  • Laurence, you have certainly renewed me for the fall term--just as I'm dragging students and myself through the last weeks of the summer session. College-wide tensions about funding and re-organizations and our governor's veto of health care benefits for community college employees have overshadowed my colleagues and myself, definitely weakening our teaching. Your article re-awakened the old me that was over-joyed to be doing what I love most: teaching and caring about my students. Focusing on that again trivializes all the other matters that the admin people can worry about!
    Peggy J

  • Posted by jon plaisted , lecturer at stony brook on July 23, 2007 at 12:10pm EDT
  • I ask my writing students to dispense with the "I think(s)" as well as the "I feel(s)" as both are assumed. It is like prefacing each spoken commment with "personally speaking....". Of course a person is speaking. ha!

    If a teacher needs a pep talk before the semester begins, the poor students best prepared for another snorefest.

  • Synthesis of emotion and rational thought
  • Posted by Blind Man on July 23, 2007 at 3:40pm EDT
  • a timely reminder for us all. It is so unfortunate that we live in a bi-polar society that seeks to artificially create a two party, black vs. white dichotomy in all things and manifests it prurient juvenile behavior with jerry springer and sur-reality TV. I had a great professor (who actually professed) as an undergrad who was not afraid to show or deal with emotions, and yet he would have our minds working the entire time. He taught that duologies were the minimum model in our multiverse (NOT Universe). College educators are models for the alternative to the Springer "milieu".

  • Posted by Bill on July 23, 2007 at 5:00pm EDT
  • What a muddle of claptrap. Sure, teaching is great. But we are training minds and intellects, not emotions. That's for therapists. This sort of silly muddle is exactly why grad school classes are increasingly like group therapy, why we are vexed with "mesearch" masquerading as research, and why we hop up and down and shreik at the prospect that anyone might ever be offended by anything. Yes, find joy in your teaching, but describe it, don't act it out like an adolescent with ants in his pants.

  • Posted by Perry on July 23, 2007 at 7:15pm EDT
  • There are actual researchers who study emotion and their understanding is very different than the ideas expressed in this essay (cf Ekman's The Nature of Emotion). First, emotion and cognition are not opposite, nor separate and distinct but inseparable, interrelated, with a bidirectional effect on each other. What you think affects how you feel and vice versa. Second, emotion is faster than cognition, which is part of its value in decision making or rapid response. Third, there is a difference between being unaware of one's feelings and having no feelings, even when teaching. I've never taught a class without emotion, nor has this author, nor has anyone else, barring some sort of neurological deficit.

    It makes more sense to talk about the kinds of emotional experiences we want to create for our students and experience ourselves in our work. Fear used to be the prime motivator. How does it relate to learning? Our students still feel it. Is boredom an emotion? Is it a cognitive emotion? What about curiosity? What about emotional contagion? Can students catch our boredom? Can you really hide how you feel about your course or your students? I wish the author had spent some time on this stuff instead of telling us all to go forth and feel, a la Oprah.

  • Posted by LaNedra Randolph on July 30, 2007 at 10:25am EDT
  • Bravo!! very well stated. It is inspiring to hear this prospective applied to the higher education arena.