Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

Students and Campus Leadership - I

August 2, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

I walked eagerly last year into the picturesque and historic building that housed the Finance and Administration Office. As I sat down in the plush lair of one of the senior finance vice presidents, I was immediately hit with a nine-page, single spaced memo outlining new and innovative committees by which certain university services could be financially stabilized and told that I needed to sign on. After all, “You’re here to make the university a better place right?” asked my new administrator chum. I began to think to myself, “What have I gotten into?”

I had been elected only two weeks earlier as the student body president of my rather large research SEC, sports-loving university. The basic idea behind the job, as it is widely known, is to be the students’ voice to the administration, a man of the people! Well, at least I thought that was what I was supposed to be, that is, until I met my newly found and oh so eager group of new best friends: administrators.

Sure, every new head of student government gets the usual treatment: a round of university visits, regular access to the president, and even a free meal every once in awhile, but I had a lot more coming to me. Soon I was getting jetted off to big fund raisers in New York City, brought up to the suites at football games, and being placed on more podiums and platforms than I care to remember. Accompanying all of these outings, I was being brought into closed-door meetings where I was presented with business plans, budget sheets, and financial projections. Evidently, mostly through no fault of their own, administrators had allowed certain units on campus to go too long without a fee increase while cost of operations went up and now these units were about to, if not already, run into the red. “No need to worry” my vice chancellor blood brothers told me, they had a plan to getting these “much needed and long overdue” fee increases through: me. I was supposed to endorse the plans.

These strategies were soon followed by a new plan to have all freshmen live on campus their first year. I of course knew the students would not want this but, when I attempted to raise concerns, I was placed on a university task force to create the proposal for submission to our governing board. Before long I found myself, rather than voicing students' opposition to being forced to buy meal plans and move into rather run down dormitories, helping formulate new ways to craft the proposal so that it would be most politically palatable to the members of the board and external groups. This was shortly followed by the need for more fees for new construction projects and renovations, all of which were coupled with angry student opposition and protestations from the campus media. One late night I sat in my office in the Student Union, looked out the window and came to the realization as I shouted out, “Oh my God, they’ve turned me into one of them! I’m an administrator!”

Lo and behold it had become my reality: I was no longer an independent, elected representative of the students; I had become a Blackberry-wielding student rubber stamp to the administration. Although I understood the upper administration’s reasoning and the need for certain controversial decisions to be made, the truth of the matter was it just wasn’t my job. I was merely being used -- harsh a phrase as it may be -- to provide for the much sought after administrative Holy Grail: student input.

I brought this up with other student body presidents across the state and sure enough they too, albeit to a lesser degree because of the size and scope of resources on their campuses, had been slowly morphed from their once righteous place amongst the student constituents to a budget analyzing, policy crafting administrator-groupie. We had becomeless a part of a student democracy and more a part of a university oligarchy.

As my year in office ended I walked slowly away from the new student body president and the crowd of hopeful students surrounding him at inauguration. He stood eager-eyed and bushy-tailed, shaking hands with the university president, provost and vice presidents. I placed my hope in the fact that perhaps the next generation of up-and-coming student politicians would remember to keep a clear focus on the job description of being “SG Pres” and not be pulled into administrative orbit without a fight. I’m sure that he too thought, “I will be a man of the people, always speaking up as the voice of the students: no more fees, no more pushing students around.” Little did he know that the all too powerful lure of “doing what it takes to make the university a better place” and all the perks that come along with it would turn this student leader into a mini-administrator before you could say, “Vote for me!”

Chris Odinet graduated from Louisiana State University at Baton Rouge in May, and begins law school there this fall.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Students and Campus Leadership - I

  • Posted by Josh M. , Administrator on August 2, 2007 at 8:35am EDT
  • A nice article that articulates the conundrum pretty well. It's hard to keep your stripes when you're being "wined and dined" with the big-wigs, those who you admire.

    I have felt for several years (since I was an undergrad) that student government and particularly those in leadership roles were simply there to put a nice face on whatever the upper administration wanted to do anyway. Simply put, student leaders are used to push through already-laid plans. Such is the state of higher education leadership in the US.

  • Posted by Ray , Student Body President on August 2, 2007 at 10:25am EDT
  • I'm sorry to hear that your experience was as such. I'm President at a smaller, medium sized institution with a fairly unengaged student population. One thing I've noted over my years in student government is that I keep getting surprised at how often everyone asks, "is this good for students?" I count myself lucky for having an administration that I can tell truly cares about the students and isn't willing to put unnecessary and unwelcome policies on the backs of students. After my few years working with these people, I'm constantly getting excited for the next steps because I know that they have the best interests of students in mind. I've only been President for 4 months, but I know I'm right. I'm sorry your experience was so disappointing and I wish everyone could be blessed with administrators that truly care for students.

  • Rubber Stamp?
  • Posted by College Professor on August 2, 2007 at 1:25pm EDT
  • Before you can become a rubber stamp, you must already be made of rubber. I can think of many ways to hold your ground and voice the opinions you were elected to represent, and I used several of them when serving as a student member of a college-wide governance system.

    Options range from simply speaking up at a meeting, placing it on the agenda of your next student government meeting to get a vote behind your position, resigning from the committee in very public protest, writing an opinion piece in the local paper, or that tried-and-true standby of passive agressives: leaking it to the press.

  • Posted by Michael on August 2, 2007 at 2:30pm EDT
  • Reality is a downer, isn't it? Student government leaders are not so much co-opted as they are immersed in the reality of what it takes to run a multi-million dollar educational institution. As one who has served as an elected student representative, a student government president, later in life as a university adminsitrator, and now a faculty member it is amazing to me how little most of us really know about what it takes to make such complex institutions function, let alone succeed.

  • There are others
  • Posted by Ken , Professor at HSU on August 2, 2007 at 3:05pm EDT
  • What about the Academic Senate Chair? What about the University Curriculum Committee Chair? What about so many others that let themselves be duped by whomever is in charge? If you have no principles on which to stand, then you can be duped.

  • Posted by Patrick on August 3, 2007 at 3:20am EDT
  • I experienced the same institutional 'pull' that you did, Chris, when I was head of student government. It's plain as day that many student governments (including, sadly, mine) play a very important role in the process of pacifying students.

    The politically ambitious students get to play politics and create tempests in their little institutional teacup and compete with each other for the best resume notches, while the Administration gets about actually deciding things of import. In the end I realized that student governments are designed for fights between students, not fights on behalf of students. To be successful at the latter, you'd need to, at the very least, restructure SG, probably along the lines of a student union.

    Student unions all over the world fight on behalf of students -- and often win. The organized resistance to Israel's Shochat Reform Committee and Greece's militant student opposition to University privatization show that such models should be looked at closely. Even our neighbors Canada and Mexico have vibrant student union movements.

    Student unionism is a central plank of Students for a Democratic Society -- and for that (among other reasons) I'm glad to see its re-emergence. Keep your fingers crossed, and keep telling your cautionary tale, Chris. :)

  • BEING CO-OPTED... YOU CAN RESIST!!
  • Posted by Lev D. Zilbermints , University College SGA Senator at Rutgers-Newark, New Jersey on August 3, 2007 at 3:20am EDT
  • Well, it all depends which school you are at and how involved students are in school politics. I used to be an SGA Senator at Essex County College, back in 1991-92 and 1992-93. Our 1992-93 SGA President, Mustapha Sandi, he was always kowtowing to the administration. I was one of the few Senators, if not the only one, who fought the administration tooth and nail. Dig? Sandi got the Student Leader of the Year Award in '93 ahead of more deserving candidates.

    Skip ahead to Spring 1996. I was the President of the Day Student Government at Bloomfield College. The administration there was very respectful of students, and I really did not have any problems with the administration. But then the administration decided to take away housing from fraternities and sororities, and turn them into Theme Housing. That was when I went against the administration, because it was not right.

    I stood up for the students there, and fought for their rights. I managed to get the Greeks (frats/sororities) the largest house, while the admin. took away the other 4 Greek houses. Despite all this, I still received Bloomfield College's equivalent of Student Leader of the Year Award from the faculty.

    The point? When you are SGA President, you better have principles which you are not going to compromise or give up. No matter what perks the administration gives you as president, you should put the students first and foremost. Sure, the administration is not going to like it.
    They want to wine and dine you, turn you to their side.

    But you know what? As long as you stick by your principles, keep the interests of the students first and foremost, the administration cannot buy you. Man, will they get pissed when they find that you are not for sale!

    The students, not the administration, come first and foremost. Keep that in mind.

  • Student government
  • Posted by Marvin McConoughey on August 3, 2007 at 2:40pm EDT
  • My view as a student was that student government did harm to the affordability of higher education by promoting costly student fees. Subsequent information supports my earlier observation. Student leaders typically are activists who want to make things happen. Unfortunately "making things happen" happens to often cost money.

    At OSU, the athletic department wanted more money from students. Sure enough, all students--not just those going to games--must now pay higher student fees to subsidize a program that is only peripherally connected to academic learning. The negative impact on affordability received little attention and OSU is now less affordable. It is a continuing story in higher education where affordability gets lip service and higher costs become real.

  • And the other side...?
  • Posted by Jason on August 4, 2007 at 5:25pm EDT
  • This is a useful cautionary tale, and one which I'd certainly encourage any would-be (or current) student representatives to consider, but what irks me about it is the tone of justification. As in, "It wasn't really me! The administration made me do it!" And it clearly wraps up with the implication that next year's representative won't do any better, and no one else is doing any better, so after all, your failure isn't really your own.

    If you got sucked in, and turned against your principles, it's good for you to own up and admit that. Maybe someone will learn from your story. Maybe you'll learn, and be better in the future. But as it reads, the moral of your story seems to be that student empowerment is impossible, that all elected representatives are self-serving or soon to be so, and that students would be better off without any representation at all.

    I cry bunk. Quit justifying, own up like a man, and admit that not only did you fail in your role, but perhaps it's even possible that someone else might succeed where you failed. Either students are adults or they aren't. Either they have the capacity to represent their shared concerns as adults or they don't. And in my experience it's very possible. Not for everyone, perhaps, and obviously not for you (at that time) but still very possible.

    Gratz for the well-intentioned effort and story. But a little less with the "not my fault" would contribute to a useful moral, rather than one which only legitimizes the position that a student voice isn't needed at all. You may not realize it, but many administrators would dance for joy if they had a firm excuse to dispense with even the form of student consultation. So here you are, still telling students exactly what the administration wants you to say. Good job.

  • Posted by Patrick McCune , JD-MBA Joint Degree Candidate at LSU on August 9, 2007 at 6:00pm EDT
  • The main reason I'm commenting is because some people have called me to credit me for the response posted under the name of "Patrick".

    I did not write that comment and do not wish to receive credit for the author’s well penned words.

    As to this topic generally, I would say that while there is nothing to stop an administrator from shoving a 10 page memo at a student leader and asking the student to sign it, there is also nothing to stop the student leader from shoving the memo back and saying -- respectfully, no.

    Student Government leaders should not forget that they are in one of the most influential positions on campus. Their titles place them on the most powerful committees and in front of the campus’ top administrators. Yet unlike other people with similar access, the student leaders are not employees of the university, and the retribution that might be legally and practically be suffered upon them for respectfully taking an unpopular position is usually very minute. This combination of access and independence is truly an amazing thing. A student sitting at the Chancellor's staff meeting is likely the one who should feel the most free to engage in unpopular advocacy, respectfully of course.

    Just like in any arena, a student leader will win some arguments and lose some – but a student leader who recognizes their unique position will usually always be able to shape the debate.

    For those student leaders who feel that they are pressured to be a rubber stamp, I would encourage you to take a step back and realize the true independence and influence you wield, and then use that power to change some aspect of campus life for the better. While an administrator may hope for a rubber stamp, the student leader should take the initiative to melt that stamp down with fiery analysis – and reform it, so that when the stamp does finally meet the paper, some of the less desirable parts of the plan are inked out of the final implementation.

    You may not make friends with the administrators, but, if done respectfully, you will likely gain their respect.

    This is not simply inspirational thinking, I’ve seen it put into action with good result.

    Sincerely,

    Patrick McCune