Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

The Professor's Ten Commandments, Thanks to Notorious B.I.G.

August 28, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

We're staring down the barrel of another academic year. Time for a refresher course in professional deportment -- by which I mean "The Ten Crack Commandments," by The Notorious B.I.G. All you professors starting out at new institutions (like me) will be getting orientation sessions to show you the academic ropes -- procedures on academic misconduct, FERPA guidelines, sexual harassment policies, etc., but you can save some time and just listen to hiphop. "The Ten Crack Commandments" only looks like it's about drug dealing. All hustles obey the same logic, so heed Biggie's words.

Rule nombre uno: Never let no one know how much dough you hold/Cause you know the cheddar breed jealousy. Especially worth remembering at academic meetings. People want to know what you've been up to, but not if you're doing better than they are. If you're a hotshot junior professor with one monograph coming out from Harvard and another under contract at Cambridge, along with 9 major articles and 14 essay-reviews and a teacher-of-the-year award, be cool about it. And don't go around bragging about how you've got the 10 best people locked down for your edited anthology of new scholarship on Aquitanian verse, because the 11th guy, the guy you didn't ask, will be waiting out by the dumpsters with a chair leg. Don't let it get drastic.

Number two: Never let 'em know your next move/Don't you know bad boys move in silence or violence. Or, as MF Doom says, never let your so-called mans know your plans. This applies especially to bloggers. Seriously, bloggers, always assume that everyone you know, and everyone you might want to know, will read your blog. It's easy to get suckered into the illusion that you're confiding your innermost thoughts with an anonymous Them you'll never actually meet. Nope, and when you confide stuff about yourself that you wouldn't announce from the lectern of a plenary session of the American Musicological Society, you could end up like Youngblood Priest from Superfly, who accidentally kills his best friend when he drops the name of his connection in a nightclub.

As Curtis Mayfield comments in the title song: "But a weakness was shown, 'cause his hustle was wrong/His mind was his own, but the man lived alone."

Or, to put it in less poetically, if you want your mind to be you own, or if you want to be master of your own destiny, you need to live alone, metaphorically speaking; don't confide, or a weakness will be shown, and your hustle will be wrong. A hard school, I know, but then....

Number three: Never trust nobody/Your Moms'll set that ass up, properly gassed up/Hoodie to mask up, shit, for that fast buck/she be layin' in the bushes to light that ass up. Well, not your Mom, necessarily -- Actually, I would amend this one to Black Thought's line, trust your fam, or trust nobody at all. But then, you never know, do you? You never see it coming. Those of you who have been working in academe for a while, you know what I'm talking about. Those of you who are freshly minted Ph.D.’s polishing the nameplate on your new office door (you took a picture of it with your cell phone, didn't you? admit it) are going to find out.

Number four: Know you heard this before, never get high on your own supply. Admittedly, a harder one to square with academic life. But think of it this way: when you are up in front of your students, you are not necessarily "being yourself." You have a persona, or several personae, that you adopt as a way to frame the meaning of the material you're teaching, and to impart a sense of your own relationship to that material. And this is also true of the larger academic community: Chant scholars don't come across like hip-hop scholars. But don't believe your own bullshit. Keep clear, if only in your own head, the distinction between who you are for professional purposes and who you are at home. Don't let academic faction get in the way of friendship, fun, or human values generally. Be a hustler, but don't hustle yourself. William S. Burroughs puts it another way. "Hustlers of the world, there is one mark you cannot beat: the mark inside."

For me, Biggie's commandments five and seven are really two sides of the same coin: Never sell no crack where you rest at and keep your family and business completely separated. I like to keep professional and personal stuff separate. Sure, we all work at home sometimes, but when you're off the clock, you're off the clock. Don't go ruining your daughter's fourth birthday party by sneaking out to answer department e-mails. Don't screw up a good dinner party by getting in a shouting match with the orthodox Schenkerian over the ontology of background structure. And you can be friendly with your students, sure, but don't forget the sexual harassment lecture they gave you on orientation day.

Number six: That goddamn credit, dead it/You think a crackhead payin' you back, shit, forget it. For "crackhead," think "student with a late paper." For "credit," think "extension."

Number eight: Never keep no weight on you/Them cats that squeeze your guns can hold jobs too. Let your TA do the grading. Actually, no, I kind of disagree. Don't turn your TA’s into a firewall between the students and yourself. When something goes wrong in a class, it is always your problem. If you're a leader, everything is your fault. You have to be cool with that. Still, when things get heavy -- like, when you have a serious case of plagiarism -- know when to call in the specialists. Don't try to fix everything in-house. The Office of the Dean of Students carries more weight than you do, and they know how to use it.

Number nine shoulda been number one to me: If you ain't gettin' bags stay the fuck from police. Don't snitch. Academic bloggers especially, don't talk about the inner workings of your department, and don't talk shit about your colleagues. This is why a lot of academic bloggers are anonymous, of course, but sooner or later you'll make a mistake and drop an incriminating detail, and your cover will be blown. See number 2, above.

Number ten: A strong word called consignment/Strictly for live men, not for freshmen/If you ain't got the clientele say hell no/Cause they gon' want they money rain sleet hail snow. Protect your time; don't bite off more than you can chew; learn to say No. The academic equivalent of the guys who want their money rain sleet hail snow is your tenure committee, and what they'll demand, with the same inflexible rigor as a Columbian drug cartel, is a good publication record.

There's probably a few other commandments that could profitably be drawn from hiphop lyrics. I invite you to suggest them.

Phil Ford is starting a new job as assistant professor of musicology at Indiana University at Bloomington. This essay is adapted from one of his postings at the blog Dial “M” for Musicology.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Professor's Ten Commandments, Thanks to Notorious B.I.G.

  • And Tupac?
  • Posted by Buzz on August 28, 2007 at 7:35am EDT
  • This was different, this was "diverse," this was "academic freedom" in real-world action.

    Personally, I don't use the F-bomb in public -- save it for M/C gang field studies, Navy/Marine bars, and faculty union water-cooler discussions about the administration's competence.

    But I don't want to wind up like Larry Summers (R.I.P.). And who knows, maybe there's a would-be Mike Nifong to j'accuse. Oh, my ..

  • No time for profanity
  • Posted by allweather , Outrageous on August 28, 2007 at 8:20am EDT
  • I can't believe Inside Higher Ed would subject the unsuspecting public to this outrageous profane diatribe with no warning or disclaimer! Disgusting! The decent thing to do would have been to put a disclaimer so that the reader could be warned that what follows is "profane and has absolutely no educational value.

    Shameful!

  • Rules from the completely inexperienced
  • Posted by Prof. Moriarty on August 28, 2007 at 8:50am EDT
  • Wow--so, before you've begun your first job, you've managed to tell the rest of us what we should and should not do as professors. Gee, thanks! Lucky for you the comments, beneath the cryptographic lyrics, are really quite platitudinous.

    Must have been a slow submissions day at Inside Higher Ed.

  • Posted by slim on August 28, 2007 at 8:50am EDT
  • It's a shame that someone would discount B.I.G's words as having no educational value just because of the use of a few profanities. Or I should say that it's a shame when personal views get in the way of education.

  • Excellent
  • Posted by Master MC on August 28, 2007 at 8:50am EDT
  • Very well done! Not only is this sound advice, but the format is interesting. Thank you for a great read!

  • Posted by OWM on August 28, 2007 at 9:00am EDT
  • I really find this posting troubling! What is the point! At a time when "racial profiling" is at an all-time-high, this kind of sharing simply reinforces stereotypes.

    Might I suggest sharing the comments of several successful, African American academics from both private and public higher education institutions who have navigated the tenure and promotion process.

    This posting is neither helpful nor tasteful.

  • Posted by Oh No, Somebody used dirty words on August 28, 2007 at 9:00am EDT
  • How could it be that somebody used bad words and didn't get their mouth washed out with soap? I'm betting that readers offended by the language didn't immediately stop reading but continued through the end of the piece. Had they not been so busy being mortally wounded by goofy combinations of letters into off-color language, they would have seen a more literate appraisal of what the words really meant. Try readinig the stuff not in bold print next time.

  • Playa Hater
  • Posted by biggiesmalls on August 28, 2007 at 9:00am EDT
  • RE: previous post, I'll grant it may have been wise for IHE to post a "content" warning for language that may have offended some people.

    However, a generational gap is clearly at work here. I loved this piece, knew exactly what the 'Ten Commandments' the author was referring to, and find much creativity in this piece. Congrats to the author for giving new meaning to the lyrics of music many young Ph.D's grew up with.

  • Best. Thing. Ever.
  • Posted by Allison , PR Staff at Big State University on August 28, 2007 at 9:10am EDT
  • I love it. Love, love. As a certified PR flack, I'd like to say THAT is good communication.

  • Where's your sense of humor!
  • Posted by Staffer/adjunct on August 28, 2007 at 9:25am EDT
  • I thought this article was hilarious, and I'm surprised that some of you found it offensive. The "F-bomb" shocks you? NOW? Did you cover your ears when you watched The Sopranos?

    Is there free expression or not?

  • Give da prof a more prominent headline!
  • Posted by Wordly Wise on August 28, 2007 at 9:25am EDT
  • This essay was alive, captivating, compelling, creative, witty, and freakin' hilarious!

    A shame that some were offended by Phil's very real use of language (which I would hardly deem as gratuitous profanity)--but, that's how it be.

    Those of us with teenage children, and even those without teenage children but who teach in just about any urban classroom on just about any level, know that our students come with these stark realities which, through the arts and sciences, we help them to accept, process, transform, recreate. Take heed, all, lest your brilliant lectures and profound philosophies fall on deaf ears.

    IHE: More like this, please.

  • True Dat
  • Posted by SB on August 28, 2007 at 9:25am EDT
  • Anyone above the age of 50 (heck, I'll even venture anyone above 35) should have probably known from the headline what kind of article they were about to read.

  • Posted by Max Grinnell on August 28, 2007 at 9:25am EDT
  • Word is bond, Professor Ford. Insightful and funny...thanks!

  • Word!
  • Posted by Mediaprof , Over 50 Faculty on August 28, 2007 at 9:40am EDT
  • The advice is not only valid, but the form resonates with this over 50 faculty.

    "I'm only givin you
    things you joke about with your friends inside your living room
    The only difference is I got the balls to say it
    in front of y'all and I don't gotta be false or sugarcoated at all"

  • Posted by lk on August 28, 2007 at 10:05am EDT
  • It would have been better without the vulgarity. "Fuck" and "Shit" were not necessary to get the point across, but try telling that to your students. And I don't believe the use of vulgarity is a generational divide, it is an educational/professional divide.

  • Posted by Chuck on August 28, 2007 at 10:20am EDT
  • What's the point of legitimizing gansta culture by pretending it has "wisdom" for academics? I think people make themselves ridiculous when they listen to this stuff, much less pretend it has anything of value to say to anyone.

    Is the author seriously advising new professors to trust no one, hide their lights under a bushel, and never believe that students will make good on their assignments when given an extension or other flexibility? That isn't good advice.

    I didn't take a cell phone picture of my nameplate, but I see no harm in taking pleasure from an accomplishment. "Wisdom" like this sounds superficially good, but lacks substance when you think about it -- like most platitudes.

    Can't we have some serious articles about academic life? The dispute in the comments about the use of profanity is more interesting than anything in the article itself. Personally, I think avoiding profanity is a way of showing respect to the students and I would never use it as a way to wake up or shake up students -- shouldn't there be better ways of doing that involving the content of the course more directly? For that matter, why does the younger generation believe it invented profanity and that those older will be terminally shocked by hearing it?

  • Oh Noes! Not PROFANITY!
  • Posted by Colleen on August 28, 2007 at 10:30am EDT
  • Ack! How dare you engage us in new and interesting ways, utilizing pop culture and the familiar to make your points! You must be an excellent teacher - how'd you make it into academia?

    *end snark*

    Congrats. Very nice piece.

  • 10 Commandos
  • Posted by Big Stick on August 28, 2007 at 10:50am EDT
  • Why y'all git down on a brutha who keepin it real? I think my man Phil prolly be tokin the pipe and havin good vizuns. You shud be listnin to what he say, stead of caterwaulin bout he bad languish.

  • Wisdom is everywhere... how hard are you looking?
  • Posted by Professor G on August 28, 2007 at 11:00am EDT
  • Great piece -- refreshing and funny, not to mention smart. I don't use profanity in class (my choice) but I realize that there's a massive cultural & generational gap between many of my students & me. When I was in college "Yo, MTV Raps!" was cutting-edge, but rap & hip-hop cultures are pervasive now and the youth that my students are experiencing bears little resemblance to mine. Like it or not, Biggie and Kanye shape our cultural rhetoric in powerful ways -- ignoring or diminishing their voices due to grammar or profanity or subject matter doesn't change that. (And btw, I don't mean to suggest that said cultures are the only ones to glorify profanity. Please.)

    Surely there's room in IHE for a range of voices & subjects, including the irreverent and impolite. As for a content warning, I say no way -- you either believe in academic freedom & freedom of expression or you don't. Holla.

  • Well Done
  • Posted by Big Poppa , Ass't Prof on August 28, 2007 at 11:30am EDT
  • Stellar. There's probably a generation gap in the responses--I'm guessing the 35-and-unders loved it; those who grew up thumpin' the Kingston Trio, not so much--but it's worth remembering that wisdom takes many forms. Perhaps it makes us a little uncomfortable that the narratives of capital-through-rapping, capital-through-drug dealing, and capital-through-intellectual production dovetail so nicely. Academia, like gangsta rap and crack, makes for a beautiful, glorious racket.
    Main difference is, I wear a tie and don't get to use the f-word quite so often. Also, less bullets.

    As a brand-new assistant professor, this made my week. Kudos.

  • Posted by Yvette on August 28, 2007 at 11:30am EDT
  • BRAVO!!! You can grab the mic here at IHE anytime!

  • Posted by SLPgirl on August 28, 2007 at 11:45am EDT
  • I thought this was insightful and fun and take issue with the comment that it reflects "stereotyping". It assumes that rap or gansta rap is associated with ONLY one group. As far as the profanity, it is what it is.

    Kudos to the author.

  • Props and all
  • Posted by cryptogrrl on August 28, 2007 at 12:15pm EDT
  • You freakin' RULE! Let language live ...
    This absolutely made my day.

    Thank YOU!

  • Posted by Academic Librarian on August 28, 2007 at 12:15pm EDT
  • This essay rocked! I absolutely loved it, and so did the rest of my Gen X colleagues.

  • Posted by Lee J Rickard on August 28, 2007 at 12:35pm EDT
  • Profanity? Well, yes, but the priority goes to accurate quotation of the source.

  • Generational Divide?
  • Posted by Matthew , Assistant Professor on August 28, 2007 at 12:55pm EDT
  • "Aquintanian Verse"?! "...orthodox Schenkerian over ontology of backgound structure"?! What the h*ll does all of
    that mean? And who is Curtis Mayfield and Williams S. Burroughs? As someone just turning 35 these references are irrelevant and misplaced. I would never mention these old people or abstract things in the courses I teach...I am offended!

    This guy sounds well read, witty, and intelligent--absolutely, no place for him or any of his ilk in academia.

  • Posted by Alex Golub , Assistant Professor at University of Hawai'i Manoa on August 28, 2007 at 1:10pm EDT
  • "Upgrade your grey matter/because some day it may matter" --Deltron 3030
    Teaching requires wider knowledge of your field than the focused dissertation research you've been doing. Feel free to spread out an make yourself at home intellectually.

  • Yo - Suge Knight say
  • Posted by Buzz on August 28, 2007 at 1:50pm EDT
  • To paraphrase Suge:

    An "authentic narrative" -- where would academia be without obtuse buzz-words and trendy "fads of the month?

    If Prof. "Ice" Ford wanna go' 2 Death Row Records n' West Coast -- fo'shizzle, ma'nizzle, my brother. East Coast, it B' toast.

  • Haters-
  • Posted by MC Full P on August 28, 2007 at 1:55pm EDT
  • Don't let the haters get you down, G. Sometimes those OG don't have enuf respekt for the shorties.

  • Has this become an epidemic?
  • Posted by Buzz , Member ("Super Fly, Fly & Trey") at Curtis Mayfield Fan Club on August 28, 2007 at 2:15pm EDT
  • " .. who is Curtis Mayfield .."

    Well .. after reading this ..

    http://insidehighered.com/views/2007/07/23/musgrove

    One would know a little more. Also:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Mayfield

    On the next exam:

    Seal, Snoop, Akon, Ludacris, Kanye, Wyclef, Ice-T, Ice Cube, NWA, Eazy E, 'Dre, EWF, W. Houston, J. Brown, A. Franklin, D. Ross, G. Clinton, Prince, J. Hendrix, D. Ruffin, R. James, 'Trane ..

    Ah, fughgetaboutit -- faculty jest' 2 cold, up'stairs.

  • Speechless
  • Posted by Helen on August 28, 2007 at 3:40pm EDT
  • I'm not sure how to feel about this piece. I must be priggish because this struck me as too off-color to be taken seriously enough to be read all the way through.

  • Posted by Robin on August 28, 2007 at 3:40pm EDT
  • Too bad it is not written in English. I understand a word of it!

  • Re: Prof Moriarty's Comment
  • Posted by Rocco DiStreitlmahn on August 28, 2007 at 3:45pm EDT
  • Contrary to your assertion, a simple Google search would have revealed that Professor Ford's new job at Indiana University is not, in fact, his first:

    http://www.music.utexas.edu/directory/details.aspx?id=224

  • Well written and great use of American culture
  • Posted by Andre Brock , Assistant Professor at University of Iowa on August 28, 2007 at 4:10pm EDT
  • The problem for several of the above commenters, as i see it, is that they cleave to an ideology that connects "low culture", "Blackness", and "hip hop".

    As a minority professor who grew up on hip hop, i was surprised that the lyrics were quoted verbatim, but was completely in agreement with the signifying practices embedded in the lyrics of Christopher Wallace and pleased with the connections that Professor Ford made to academic culture and its adherents.

    For those pretending that spurious constructions of Ebonics are relevant or funny - get out. for those protesting the inappropriateness of using rap to teach life lessons - get a clue. and for those with no sense of humor? lighten up, people...

  • Classic!
  • Posted by Amy , Student/Working Professional on August 28, 2007 at 5:00pm EDT
  • I suspect that Phil's classes are as interesting as this piece, which might make learning *gasp* fun! Who ever heard of such a thing after kindergarten, right? As for a "disclaimer" because one might read a curse word: A.)if you did not think that you might stumble on a curse word or two after reading the title of the piece, you need to clue in to the 21st century and, B.)I have yet to come across "disclaimers" in any of the texts that I read for my graduate courses, a few of which contain the dreaded F-bomb.

  • "Racial profiling"?!!
  • Posted by MC Nerdlinger on August 28, 2007 at 5:15pm EDT
  • OWM complains: "At a time when “racial profiling” is at an all-time-high, this kind of sharing simply reinforces stereotypes."

    Did the article say one word about race? I think it is OWM who is racial profiling here.

  • The -ISMS
  • Posted by ADP on August 28, 2007 at 8:25pm EDT
  • Ageism, Racism, Inappropriate-ism...
    Clearly not what the topic was about, but people are always willing to show their "-isms" with comment sections these days.

    Just take the article for what it was...a lesson that I feel is applicable in EVERYBODY'S situation whether you are new faculty, a single mother, a business owner, and etc.. This article should be generously shared because it definitely rings a helluva lotta truth.

  • Posted by Biggie Fan on August 28, 2007 at 10:20pm EDT
  • Being a Biggie fan, I subsribe to googlenews which highlights artices containing "Notorious BIG" in it. To my surprise this was sent to my inbox and I absolutely love it. I'm 28 and finished University 4 years back but would have loved to have a professor in tune with today's youth and our music. Furthermore, seeing as the author is an assistant professor of musicology this article makes sense on so many levels. Profanity? Who cares, this is 21st Century, get over it.

  • Posted by Chuck on August 29, 2007 at 10:20am EDT
  • What's fun about this piece? It strikes me as ugly and negative, and much of the advice is just plain wrong.

    My students are diverse (mostly Hispanic and Asian) and do not follow hip hop. They wouldn't respond to this stuff.

    There is a larger question about whether you need to pander to youth culture in order to present a fun class. I think you don't and that you can make yourself look ridiculous by doing so.

    I realize this is parody (of what I'm not really sure), but hip hop itself glorifies violence, misogyny, perpetuates negative stereotypes and is profoundly anti-intellectual. Why would anyone think it would enhance the classroom? The age issue is a red herring.

    My students come to class in order to learn, often at considerable personal sacrifice. It insults their aspirations to present them with this crap.

  • Posted by David H on August 29, 2007 at 10:50am EDT
  • Much of the discussion thus far seems to miss the point. I'm not offended by the author's profanity, though I am bemused (as an earlier poster noted) that someone just beginning a tenure-track position presumes to tell the rest of us how it's done. I'm surprised no one has responded to the central assumption of the piece--that being an academic is somehow equivalent to dealing crack, and that the rather anarchic, violent, and extremely selfish and defensive ethos that the late Notorious BIG presented is somehow applicable to a faculty career. Leaving aside the fundamental distinction between purveyors of a harmful, addictive product, and those of us who, with varying success, attempt to create and spread knowledge, what are we to make of a piece that essentially advocates disdain for students, colleagues, administration, in the name of a looking out for number one, f*** everyone else sensibility. We have more than enough of that in the academy already, thank you very much!

  • Don't forget Dirty
  • Posted by ODB on August 29, 2007 at 1:05pm EDT
  • "I don't have no trouble with you fuckin' me / But I have a little problem with you *not* fuckin' me."

    Dirty here leads by example: The message is that you have to ask for something -- and to be persistent -- if you want to get it.

    Too often, timidity prevents academics from getting salaries, committee assignments, jobs for spouses, and other perks of life inside higher ed.

  • Yes
  • Posted by Buzz on August 29, 2007 at 2:20pm EDT
  • "What’s fun about this piece? It strikes me as ugly and negative, and much of the advice is just plain wrong .."

    Agreed. That's why I don't use the F-bomb in class.

    But since many of those on this site are -- in the words of Garrison Keillor -- "above-average," we work with the world as it is and we perceive it.

    That is, sort of like the "Star Trek" episode, when Starfleet Capt. James T. Kirk, et al., trade places with their counter-parts in a parallel universe who are KGB-like.

    "It was easy for us to imitate them, but they could not imitate us," Kirk said.

    No F-bombs in class. Only on IHE.

  • ethnocentrism
  • Posted by Student , anti-intellectual? on August 29, 2007 at 4:00pm EDT
  • I am stupefied, nigh aghast, at several of the dubiously contempt faculty that believe hip-hop somehow precludes education. If anything, I would imagine any culturally versed faculty member might appreciate the musical metaphor. As scholars, should you not broaden your horizons and conceptualize ideas in new, abstract, and creative ways?

    As far as the belief that hip-hop "glorifies violence", it is offensive and simply grounded in provincialism and parochialism. The world is constantly evolving, and with it, the social-cultural context within which we live. If you persist in an obstinate ethnocentrism, then you are only resiting an increasingly diverse and "flat" world. If you actually cared to learn more about the music which you are minimizing and alienating, then you may gain some valuable insight. For example, at local levels there are youth initiatives that synthesize beats, rhymes, and slang to create positive inspirational messages about college. There is also a hip-hop group called "flocabulary" which utilizes hip-hop as an effective strategy for increasing basic vocabulary. At a more popular level, Kanye West integrates messages about assisting refugees and helping sierra leone.

    As far as the reference to Notorious B.I.G. is concerned, Metaphor: "figure of speech in which a term or phrase is applied to something to which it is not literally applicable in order to suggest a resemblance" I highly doubt Professor Ford is making a literal connection to the violent and delinquent life of a crack dealer, but is making a figurative connection to someone who is poised to enter a profession with the "credentials", but still lacks the "respect". Metaphors stress higher order thinking skills and require conscious examination of deeper meanings, not just surface values. Ebonics ,through psycholinguistic studies, has been found to contain it's own unique language structure(see Jean Wofford or Robert Williams). Therefore, the "vulgar" lyrics of Notorious B.I.G. move beyond simple colloquialisms to a more formalized vernacular expression and may be interpreted as so.

    I applaud Professor Ford, especially as a professor of musicology. May his students minds be set free to interpret our complex world from a variety of creative angles. Students do not need grandiloquent professors who stand by their pedagogical regime. We also do not need professors who, because of research or a prodigious vocabulary, believe their "cause" is the only "cause". We need professors who are urbane yet humble, challenging yet supportive, and impassioned yet filled with openness. I would like to end with a quote on creativity from Joseph Addison: "Everything that is new or uncommon raises a pleasure in the imagination, because it fills the soul with an agreeable surprise, gratifies its curiosity, and gives it an idea of which it was not before possessed."

  • Hip hop violent?
  • Posted by Prof , optional on August 30, 2007 at 2:35am EDT
  • Here a violent song for ya':

    Saturday Night's Alright (For Fighting)
    http://www.eltonography.com/songs/saturday_nights_alright_for_fighting.html

    Well they're packed pretty tight in here tonight
    I'm looking for a dolly who'll see me right
    I may use a little muscle to get what I need
    I may sink a little drink and shout out "She's with me!"

    A couple of the sound that I really like
    Are the sounds of a switchblade and a motorbike
    I'm a juvenile product of the working class
    Whose best friend floats in the bottom of a glass

    ---

    And let's not forget Max the Knife!

    ---

    But here is my favorite pre-rap song:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTCQSk2l8bc

  • Let's not forget
  • Posted by tree on August 30, 2007 at 9:20pm EDT
  • May Irwin's "Bully Song"

    http://ucblibraries.colorado.edu/cgi-bin/sheetmusic.pl?RagBully_2&Rag&main

  • Posted by Chuck on August 31, 2007 at 10:15am EDT
  • When you analyze the content of a genre, you don't select one or two examples to make your point, you sample systematically or randomly to see what is representative. I'm sure you can find a few non-violent or pro-social songs, but are they typical of the genre?

    When you adapt a song for the purpose of giving advice, you implicitly endorse that medium. Students will consider anything you do using hip hop songs in this manner to be promoting or supporting them, not criticizing them.

    If you think it is OK to support violence, drug culture, misogyny, disdain for education, in the classroom, I don't think much of your values. The point of classroom education is also to expose students to things they don't already know about. Everyone calls out at concerts to hear the familiar oldies of an artist, because it feels good to hear them. That doesn't make it educational.

  • get the lyrics right, fam
  • Posted by Game Over on August 31, 2007 at 11:00am EDT
  • it's 'if you ain't getting BAGGED (arrested), don't talk to police'

  • The reaction has me thunderstruck...
  • Posted by Jesse Thorn on August 31, 2007 at 11:40am EDT
  • I almost can't believe that some of the reactions to this piece are real. I can understand objecting to the author's advice. I think the advice is intended to be read with a bit of levity... but still, I can see that.

    But the reaction to the profanity? Totally bizarre.

    The author is quoting and analyzing a text that contains profanity. Should we not read or consider any profane text? That seems like a pretty problematic proposition to me. Maybe we also shouldn't consider texts that are seditionist or anti-government? Or ones in which crimes are described or depicted?

    People seem to see quoting a text with "f bombs" and casualy using profane language in a lecture as equally horrible. I have to say that this kind of reaction is reflective of the power hip-hop still has in our culture, and is exactly the reason we *should* pay it scholarly attention.

    Even if you don't believe that hip-hop is worth of consideration on aesthetic grounds (and I'd disagree vehemently), you have to admit that it's... you know... important in the culture.

  • Posted by Dast on August 31, 2007 at 12:40pm EDT
  • David H said "Leaving aside the fundamental distinction between purveyors of a harmful, addictive product"

    Are you talking about crack or knowledge? It sounds like it could go either way.

    A couple of my favorite drug/violence/women abuse "advocates" just so happend to drop these gems on the youth of America

    "Prepare for your future to the best of your abilities / Prosper, otherwise you've been conquered" - Cormega "The Saga"

    "It's a thin line between love & hate
    In due time, a stable mind separates what's fake" AZ - "Royal Salute"

    "I'm livin' now, fuck back in the day / does freedom have a meaning if your trapped in your ways?" - Cormega "Ain't Gon' Change"

    "You know the wisdom is reflected in knowledge when its manifested / If not fed in due time the mind is anorexic" - Cormega "American Beauty"

    You could go cherry pick all the bad examples you want, real hiphop heads know the deal and can one-up you with the positives all day long.

  • Well done
  • Posted by onewordphotography.com on August 31, 2007 at 6:10pm EDT
  • The title caught my attention and I read the complete piece (which I suspect those critical did as well). I find the comments about this being stereotypical of one group to be off base though. This particular culture hasn't been exclusive to one group now for more than 10 years so, perhaps it's time to brush up on current culture.

    An entertaining read that delivers the intended message. What more can you ask for?

  • Posted by giles on August 31, 2007 at 6:50pm EDT
  • Shocking - but sadly not that shocking - that educated people involved with higher education would leave such racist comments in response to a fun and insightful article.

    Taking offense over the use of dirty words - in my opinion a bit silly - is at least understandable. But blatantly mocking hip hop culture, modern-day slang, and African American communities while hiding behind Internet anonymity is despicable.

  • dumb & dumber
  • Posted by live man , philosophy student, hip-hop student on August 31, 2007 at 10:10pm EDT
  • I thought the article was kind of dumb, but still a nice try. The responses were much worse, but exactly what I would expect from academia.
    Some rappers have a lot to say. Others don't. You should take the time to figure it out. If you don't, then you shouldn't generalize (and you probably shouldn't talk about rap as though you have, despite that being the way of academia).
    And lots of poetry is lewd. (See Romeo & Juliet, I.i.1-31.)
    And let me be the first to commend this man on his use of an MF DOOM lyric. (Hint: He's a rapper with something to say.)

    Now bounce.

  • Umm
  • Posted by Lefty Banks on September 1, 2007 at 5:20am EDT
  • "My students are diverse (mostly Hispanic and Asian) and do not follow hip hop."

    I can't imagine where in America one could teach Latino and Asian students (presuming they grew up in the States) who do not follow hip-hop, at least not the majority of them.

    I teach Latino, White, Asian and Black students and I can guarantee you, many of them follow hip-hop (even if some of them probably think Biggie is "old school").

  • Posted by jadedscholar on September 1, 2007 at 5:20am EDT
  • Wow. I'm stunned at how few people seem to even get the main point of Phil's piece: "All hustles obey the same logic."

    But that's not surprising, I guess. It's easier to spew platitudes about profanity, hip-hop, and stereotypes, than to take on the real issue: the advice is frighteningly *sound*. Making it in academia requires dealing with--and even perpetuating--its forms of violence, disgusting competition, and ugliness.

    How about getting up in arms about that, for a change?!

    Good luck on your new job, Phil. Please keep on keepin' it real.

  • institution
  • Posted by Zelda , teacher and student on September 1, 2007 at 2:10pm EDT
  • As a someone who is in academia as a teacher and most recently as a student again I love this piece. Inside academia is more than one perspective to be sure and generalizing about students, teachers, can be limiting. But what I found was that the comments echo the atmosphere of confusion I felt when I finally got to teach: taking in a lot of information from anywhere and everywhere, processing it and figuring out how to perceive it and utilize it in your world and the world - I thought that's why they called it school? Because we are supposed to learn, make judgments, sure, but learn to think for ourselves and listen to others. It's the atmosphere of hierarchy that hurts all of us, though. Most of the folks I meet teaching in academia seem to be threatened by learning and knowledge and information and ideas that make them uncomfortable and shake their comfort level in the academic world. It's why they call it an institution, too.
    I think this professor is onto something - he's excited about learning and connecting with his students. We need more of that kind of attitude. Don't give up Prof Ford.

  • More hip-hop wisdom
  • Posted by Daniel Maté , M.F.A., Musical Theatre Writing at NYU on September 1, 2007 at 2:15pm EDT
  • The author asked for more instances of cautionary career wisdom in hip-hop. Here's my vote:

    "Industry rule number four-thousand and eighty:
    Record-company people are shadeeee -
    So kids, watch your back,
    'Cause I think they smoke crack,
    I don't doubt it: look at how they act."
    -Q-Tip (A Tribe Called Quest), "Check The Rhime" (1991)

    Of course, why should all wisdom be cautionary? What about uplifting, possibility-filled wisdom, about following your purpose and being true to yourself? KRS-One and other rappers have plenty of that to share.

  • Only in Academia...
  • Posted by John on September 1, 2007 at 2:15pm EDT
  • Chuck, come on. Be at least a bit honest.

    "When you adapt a song for the purpose of giving advice, you implicitly endorse that medium."

    That is unbelievably absurd. You mean to say that analysis of one text, implicitly endorses all other texts of that medium? So studying Dylan's "Desolation Row", endorses Andrew WK's "Party Till You Puke"? Analysis of "The Bicycle Thief", endorses "Girls Gone Wild VI"? Breaking down "The Autobiography of Frederick Douglass", endorses "Mein Kampf"?

    That's a pretty broad standard.

    It is an article about a text. The author discusses the text and places its meanings in an unfamiliar context: academia. It has nothing to do with whether you hate Hip Hop or the people associated with Hip Hop culture. Its about a text. Respond to the text.

    If you're unfamiliar with the text (let alone the entire genre), maybe its time to move on to the next article on Globalized Economies, Medieval Poetry, or whatever your speciality may be...

  • hmmm
  • Posted by John on September 1, 2007 at 2:15pm EDT
  • "My students are diverse (mostly Hispanic and Asian) and do not follow hip hop."

    While it's definitely a peripheral issue, also kind of wondering what kind of information exactly this curious statement was based on...

    Informal show of hands in class?
    Simple Random Sample by phone?
    Gut feeling?

  • Max the knife?
  • Posted by David McGregor on September 1, 2007 at 2:15pm EDT
  • My colleague above would have made a much more convincing impression if s/he has managed correctly to refer to Weil's "Mack the Knife".

  • piece
  • Posted by Truesoul1 on September 1, 2007 at 4:55pm EDT
  • I actually found the piece very entertaining. Being a fan of Biggie and being over 35 I only had one problem with it" them cats that that squeeze your guns can hold jobs too" It's actually jumbs as in crack or jumbos. Other than that I found it insightful and funny.

  • Violence, Misogyny and Anti-intellectualism?
  • Posted by Kimberly on September 1, 2007 at 6:20pm EDT
  • "hip hop itself glorifies violence, misogyny, perpetuates negative stereotypes and is profoundly anti-intellectual."

    I'm almost embarrased to respond - because surely this can't be real.

    Certainy *some* hip hop glorifies violence, mysogyny, perpetuates negative stereotypes and is profoundly anti-intellectual. But so does some pop, rock, blues, jazz ... -- not to mention fiction, poetry, film, television, fashion magazines...

    Let's be real. What's problematic is that we live in a culture that so profoundly glorifies violence, mysogyny, and anti intellecualism - particularly of black and brown women and men - that the only thing most people know of hip hop is the stuff that conforms to these American values.

    When I was listening to Biggie, I was also listening to Queen Latifah, Salt 'n Pepa, and MeShell NdegeOcello (not rap - but most definitely hip hop). Even now, for those who care to look beyond what gets promoted by record companies, there's Common, The Roots, Mos Def, Talib Kweli, Floetry...

    And btw, nobody warned me of offensive language before reading Mark Twain and finding 'nigger' peppered throughout. Oops - probably should have warned you about that one.

  • Posted by Tom on September 1, 2007 at 8:10pm EDT
  • Interesting. But since I left academia I found that Cypress Hill's classic "How I Could Just Kill A Man" to be a much more useful guide to the workings of the private sector.

  • Posted by tom on September 1, 2007 at 8:10pm EDT
  • Wow Chuck - so Asians and Hispanics don't follow hip-hop? I hope somebody remembered to tell Jeff Chang and Big Pun.

  • Posted by Chuck on September 1, 2007 at 8:10pm EDT
  • Source of my comment about student tastes: (1) what I hear played in the halls; (2) what students respond when I routinely ask them to name their favorite artist; (3) the concerts students say they attend; (4) the artists invited to perform at campus concerts; (5) stickers on student cars and on their notebooks and backpacks; (6) music overhead from earphone leakage.

    I suspect this may be an East Coast/West Coast thing, since I did hear different music in NY and Boston than in California. My carpool associates play more hip hop than the students, leading me to regard this as a futile faculty attempt to stay hip and gain acceptance by students, who in turn smirk at them and patronize those who attempt to bond that way. By the time current student tastes appear on faculty radar, they've moved on to something else.

    This discussion is as foolish as the mom who tries to wear her teenage daughter's clothes. Maybe this is about the grad school lesson -- you don't get to be a student anymore once you become their teacher. Perhaps it is about age after all -- people who feel that by staying in school and absorbing or mimicking youth fads one can stay young forever.

    When I need advice, I won't take it from someone who thinks hip hop and rap are funny (much worse, eloquent) instead of tragic. I can't believe a person who thinks that is really listening to it.

  • Posted by DLM on September 1, 2007 at 8:30pm EDT
  • As a younger faculty member who grew up with this type of music, I am no less offended by the language and (I would argue) inaccurate cliches than my more senior colleagues. I don't find it problematic to articulate my thoughts in writing or orally without using profanities or derogatory comments, so I fail to see the necessity in anyone else using them.

    Inside Higher Ed., if this article is evidence of what we will see in the future, kindly terminate my subscription now. I don't allow my students (outside of Creative Writing classes) to utilize profanities and offensive derogatory terms in their writing to encourage them to demonstrate respect to other people (their audience, opponents, future supervisors, and me) and to show them that they can make their points without being offensive.

    Evidently this "professor" never learned those lessons. It's sad. I hope that none of my children are misfortunate enough to take to a class with him or someone of his ilk.

    I also hope that this publication does a much better job determining what is appropriate vs. offensive in the future. I don’t mind stating clearly, “I am offended by this article.”

  • lol
  • Posted by something , guy on September 2, 2007 at 5:35am EDT
  • you spelled "Colombian" wrong.

    dont get high on your own supply, eh ;-D

  • wow
  • Posted by chris on September 2, 2007 at 5:35am EDT
  • come on, chuck, really? you hang out in the residence halls listening to music with the kids?

  • So, let me get this straight
  • Posted by AD on September 2, 2007 at 5:35am EDT
  • Several responders have a problem with the use of profanity, even if used in a quotation, and have the tendency to assert a "higher-than-thou" attitude towards those who may willingly and perhaps even usefully slip in the occasional "cuss word." It's difficult to believe that such comments are the product of an enlightened mind.

    As I consider these responses, an important distinction comes to the fore. There is a difference -- always has been, always will be -- between language that is used for negative purpose and that which is dialectically apropos for effective rhetoric, and "cuss words" can be used in either category. Or, to put it simply, there's a difference between cursing at someone and just using the language for emphasis or humor. If you can't tell the difference, I suggest a semiotics lesson or three. Perhaps a refresher in speech acts and basic rhetoric? Even Aristotle understood (and wrote extensively) on the elementary dictum of presentation: Know your audience.

    Prof. Ford's audience is the new professor: under 35, probably nervous about the first serious job, familiar with pop-culture, and can still relate (mostly) with the incoming class. There are times when the use or exposition of curse words are wholly appropriate. Prof. Ford's article is an excellent example. His reading is amusing and insightful, and you'll note (as others have), if you read it carefully, he doesn't actually curse: it's in the quote.

    While I do not condone the use of "offensive language" in the classroom, one must intend an offense for most terms (excepting explicitly racist or sexist terms) to be offensive. It is as much the context of a word that bears its meaning as the vocabulary itself. As an avid scholar of Shakespeare, I can provide dozens of examples of insulting language without ever uttering a contemporary "curse word." I even have a lovely coffee mug with several choice quotes. Some of the invective found in Renaissance literature should make your eyes peel, and yet we teach that with impunity because Will never said, "F*ck." But, "I'd die in your lap" is just fine as the punctuation to an exchange about genitalia and coitus. And let's take a good, long look at what Petruchio says to Cate in the basement, shall we? Would you let one student say that -- no, QUOTE that -- to another student? But it isn't cursing, so it must be acceptable.

    The focus of our classrooms should be engaging our students in order that they learn the material we propose to teach them. If that takes an off-color word or two, then let fly if that effectively connects them to the presentation. If I can get 22 of my 25 students to really engage the material with a casual use of the "F-bomb," then by all means, bombs away. It's better than being "proper" and having 22 students typing away on their cell phones and remaining three still ignoring the material.

    Would I insult a student? Never. Would I let one student insult another? Absolutely not. On the other hand, if you're preoccupied about profanity instead of effective content, you give yourself away to the anti-intellectual, non-progressive, conservative 19th Century religious and patriarchal "propriety" you profess to overcome with your Ph.D. and left-leaning politics. The word "profanity," whose root is "profane" and is binary to "sacred," is of a religious origin with orthodox and hierarchical signification rather than reasoned value. Don't forget that. By regaling "profanity," you are enforcing the dogmatic conservation of a Victorian aesthetic and the closed-mindedness that follows closely at its heels.

    Or, you can loosen up and enjoy the lyrics.

  • "Sometimes your words just hypnotize me!"
  • Posted by Machiavelli , Ph.D. Candidate at UMass on September 2, 2007 at 1:00pm EDT
  • I found this piece to be witty, brilliant, and insightful. That some older (and/or uptight) scholars find hip-hop music and culture to be devoid of value is just plain sad. As a young academic, I've been using the philosophy, words, and music of artists such as 2pac, Biggie, Clipse, etc. for years as a way of enabling my students to better engage with and learn from the material I teach. Mad props, yo!

  • Posted by Abe on September 2, 2007 at 1:00pm EDT
  • Pepedī provectus non carborundum.

  • There's got to be a joke here...
  • Posted by Dhunter on September 2, 2007 at 4:35pm EDT
  • I have a mere 2 years of community college, yet I understood the context of the article and appreciated the deeper metaphor. People with PhDs never got beneath the surface. That's hysterical. I thought critical thinking skills were an important part of a university education. Apparently, I was wrong.

    I've learned a valuable lesson: should I ever need to flummox an academic in order to make a rapid exit, all I need to do is drop a few naughty words in his or her path. In the immortal words of T.H. Huxley, "How extremely stupid not to have thought of that!"

    Or is this all an extended academic in-joke I'm missing?

    Prof. Ford, thank you for stirring things up. Keep 'em stirred. You remind me very much of those professors of mine who made learning and thinking live, breathe and soar. Fossilization is great for paleobiologists, anathema to education. Never let your students forget that.

  • Comment on the Comments
  • Posted by Jessica Evans , Title? Uh? I have to title this? at Mental on September 2, 2007 at 7:55pm EDT
  • Free speech is free speech, not by aesthetic.

    Competition and betrayal are human qualities, and just those of academe.

  • To Heck-alogue wit yo Decalogue
  • Posted by Albert , Ex-academic on September 3, 2007 at 6:50pm EDT
  • Wow. Never have I seen so much written by so many who knew so little about the topic at hand.

    Except for when I was in the academic game, of course.

    At least Biggie knew a lil' sumthin-sumthin 'bout what he was slingin' in his rhymes, yo? Have some respect for the dead.

    Some observations:

    1) Biggie's ghetto analogue to the Decalogue tragically highlights how traditional religious codes often fail to address the ethical concerns of communities ravaged by crack cocaine. Like any good Church Father (or Church Poppa), he provides text and commentary for the edification of the masses. His message? If you're gonna sling, this is how to stay alive. "How to stay alive" sounds like pretty good basis for ethics to me.

    2) Most of us "above-average" types don't need to worry constantly about such a minor detail as staying alive . . . unless one subscribes to the "publish or perish" idea, that is. Mad props to P. Ford for making this connection in his article.

    3) Compare "Ten Crack Commandments" to Master P's "Ghetto D," where he gives his listeners explicit instructions on how to make crack before launching into a similar list of do's and dont's. Makes Biggie look like a saint in comparison.

    4) When confronted by something horrific, profane, or otherwise utterly incongrous to one's own beliefs, should one simply run away? Or should one make a good faith effort to understand that something on its own terms, however repugnant those terms may be? Swift's "A Modest Proposal," which gets taught in high schools, is far more gruesome than the majority of hip-hop songs.

    5) Playing the race card: I'm an Asian male who learned everything he knows about hip-hop from "a white girl." Word.

    Okay, I'm done reliving my past. I'll be getting on with my non-academic life, right about . . . now.

  • Posted by Taikun on September 3, 2007 at 8:40pm EDT
  • I am very well impressed with the author of this article.

    I too have used "biggie" concepts in real life.

  • Sad
  • Posted by Ray Jahollic , WTF at Roc Solid Entertainment on September 3, 2007 at 8:40pm EDT
  • It's not so much that the responses to this article were stupid sounding but it's even worse how insensitive and ignorant they are. It strikes me that more of you should be listening to Biggie if not so that you can downgrade your corny factor in the face of the young people you teach but so that you can gain a little sensitivity. I don't know if you're all professors or not but the aping, condescending comments typed in some graying fogie's version of hip hop dialect is so racist and disgusting it's a wonder how most of you won't end up in someone's office this year due to your complete lack of couth, not to mention epithets that you didn't know had moved into the realm of don't-go-there.

    Open your minds people. If in fact you're considered to be today's intelligencia then rants about profanity, disagreeing that Biggie's had any impact on today's culture and relenquishing oneself to the generation gap surely have no place in this forum, if anywhere. Not to mention the word urban should have been buried alongside the n-word, it's just as offensive when used by people like this.

  • Testify!
  • Posted by Eleanor Janega at University College London on September 4, 2007 at 2:35am EDT
  • Add to this clever and insightful article these words of wisdom from Prof. Snoop Dogg:
    "Now, that, I got me some Seagram's gin
    Everybody got they cups, but they ain't chipped in
    Now this types of shit, happens all the time
    You got to get yours but fool I gotta get mine"
    Remember, while it's good to help colleagues and chime in with ideas from time to time; remember you have to keep your personal intellectual property just that – personal.

  • I did my own version a few years ago...
  • Posted by John Bachir on September 4, 2007 at 7:35am EDT
  • http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2004/06/28/the-ten-business-commandments/

  • Mixed Metaphors
  • Posted by Cassandra , Prophetess at Oracle o Delphi on September 4, 2007 at 3:05pm EDT
  • I think the application of BIG's commandments as the metaphorical source for describing the new professor's job is more or less apt. Here we see the crack dealer compared to the idea teacher; implicit in this analogy is the metaphor "Ideas Are Commodities, Products, or Resources." This is a common metaphor, usually unnoticed in everyday speech:

    - There's a market for good ideas.
    - Your idea is worthless.
    - Universities crank out new ideas all the time.
    - I'll never buy that idea.
    - This idea needs to be refined and smoothed out.
    - Don't waste your thoughts on rock and roll.
    - Let's pool our ideas.
    - I've run out of ideas.

    We need metaphors grounded in our embodied experiences to make sense of more abstract realms.

    But the limits to the entailments of this metaphor are exposed by the Professor's struggle to apply #4: Know you heard this before, never get high on your own supply. He blows it on this one, trying to turn it into "be yourself", keep your personae distinct, blah blah blah. Whatever. Stick to the metaphor, Prof! There's better stuff here.

    On the street, there are two good reasons why you don't smoke the crack you're selling. First, it cuts into your profits. Really, this applies to all businesses. Don't consume your inventory. It's there to make a profit, not to make a happy. Second, that shit will fuck up your business judgment.

    In academia, you don't have to worry about exhausting your inventory. It's a renewable resource, so to speak. You can sell the same idea over and over again, to countless students, and you'll still have that idea in inventory to sell again. Rather, you need to make sure that you have sufficient inventory to get through an entire semester, or you'll be consigned to the mini-course dustbin along with massage therapy and wine tasting. Overall, this is more akin to "don't blow your whole wad in one shot" than it is to not getting high on your own supply.

    The real danger in academia isn't with consumption per se, but getting high on those brainy notions, especially if you're teaching philosophy. There is the danger of becoming intoxicated with one's own ideas and descending into a pit of solipsistic narcissism. To prevent becoming high on your own idea supply, keep yourself apprised of the works of others. Most importantly, submit to peer review. Nothing can be more sobering.

  • Tools
  • Posted by James Enki , Has a REAL job on September 5, 2007 at 3:05am EDT
  • Wow, either there are a lot of readers on this site with an ironic sense of humor or a number of professors and students with huge ego's and no sense of humor are posting comments.

    My advice is to take whatever criticism you can. I have been able to observe a number of academic departments and their faculty and frankly, by and large I am disappointed by the performances of the professors as educators, administrators and mentors.

    Also, take the sticks out of your ass.

  • Posted by Akio , alum at U of C on September 5, 2007 at 5:15am EDT
  • I hope none of the priggish naysayers are in English, else I have no idea how they'd manage to work their way through "Catcher In The Rye," much less Shakespeare, without having some sort of profanity-induced panic attack. God help us all if they hand you Freud.

    Been to a Zizek lecture recently? He makes jokes about feces and references "The Aristocrats" (if you were offended by this don't look it up). Metaphor and humor are excellent teaching tools, which some of you clearly have neglected, and the pedagogical effectiveness of each comes not merely from the source material but the use of it.

    That is to say, if you can learn about business from Sun Tzu and Machiavelli, you can learn about academia from Biggie and Makaveli.

  • Posted by Mister K , Teacher at CA on September 5, 2007 at 8:55pm EDT
  • This article was great...then again, I'm a 26 year old teacher

    Biggie and education? Who knew?

    How about Jay-Z?

    "When the grass is cut, the snakes will show."

    Plenty of backstabbing and gossip behind closed doors between educators...

  • Posted by Jane on September 6, 2007 at 5:50am EDT
  • "I am very happy to be here!" Well done Mr. Ford, this truly connects real world to the ivory tower or tower of terror more like, especially the way some academics be actin'. Even though the advice springs from hip hop and may come off a little crude (for the older ones) how dare they think they are better than Biggie's wisdom? I agree Biggie may have not come on up like we did (finishing high school or college), but he still played the same game and has words of advice to share. Word is born yo! IHE: keep articles like this coming. Thank you.

  • Posted by Tunde on September 7, 2007 at 1:20pm EDT
  • Dear Hip-Hop,

    Welcome home.

    Love,
    non-pretentious, open-minded humankind.

  • Failed societies
  • Posted by max on September 8, 2007 at 6:35pm EDT
  • I do not take advice form failed societies. In this context, that is hip hop "culture" and academia.

  • Posted by Shayne , Post-soul generation at Tulane on September 18, 2007 at 5:35pm EDT
  • We academics of the first generation of hip-hop better known as the post-soul era are especially pleased with your creative use of one of the greatest artists of our generation to make your relevant points. Please ignore the haters. You know most professors are geeks and nerds so they just don't get it (that's why their students are bored stiff during their lectures and that's why our classes are always full :) The cool ones appreciate your creativity.

    Peace,

  • WTH!!
  • Posted by Lucas on December 5, 2007 at 3:40am EST
  • oh come on everyone!!! get over yourselves. this person did an excellent job at realating biggie's rappin to academics. and truthfully i think it was tight as hell. get of your high horse people! all your racism is making me sick. biggie was one of the best rappers alive and yall could some somethin from him! just listen sometime.

  • well said!
  • Posted by Andrew on April 8, 2008 at 11:20am EDT
  • Very keen interpretation...although on #8 he meant weight as in large quantities of crack rather than what you said...but very nice nonetheless.