News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Nov. 1, 2007
Adam may not need blogging right now, but even he admits that the community he has as a graduate student is transitory — contingent upon a certain group of students sharing an institutional affiliation in a particular historical moment — and perhaps all the more vibrant for being so.
I have a similar community in Irvine: I speak regularly with Joseph Kugelmass, another contributor to The Valve, and our conversations as frequently turn to things we’ve read and written online as they do formal professional matters. Our conversations straddle two mediums; but someday soon, when he’s sporting tenure at an Ivy and I’m adjuncting my way up and down the California coast, we’ll still be able to keep half our current dynamic intact. I’m not talking about pointless Facebook update — there may be a benefit to knowing that a Simpsons rerun left a fellow Americanist craving Cherry Garcia, but I doubt it’s intellectual. I’m talking about a regular engagement with each other’s intellectual concerns — everything from the pains of preparing for the job market to the theoretical implications of an interpretive move you’re not sure you should’ve made — all communicated in a medium able to accommodate everything from idle chatter to earnest manifesto.
Over the past three years, I’ve learned what it’s like to write in a way most academics never have: namely, for an audience. If this seems like a simple point, that’s because it is. Nor is it one of those profoundly simple points, either: it’s straight simple. When a blogger sits down to slave on her dissertation, article, or book, she doesn’t turn her back on the public sphere. Because in the end, the public sphere is us.
I’m talking about the communities we currently have, only five years in the future, when we’re scattered around the country, unable to communicate face-to-face, but still connected, still intellectually intimate, because we’ll still regularly be engaged with each other’s thoughts. But I’m not only talking about us. There’s no reason our community needs to consist solely of people we knew in grad school. Why not write for people who don’t already how you think about everything? Why not force yourself to articulate your points in such a way that strangers could come to know your thought as intimately as your friends from grad school do?
The informal publishing mechanisms available online can facilitate such communication so long as bloggers write for an audience informally. Senior faculty might continue to orient their scholarly production to the four people whose scholarly journals don’t pile up in the corner of the living room, slowly buried beneath unpaid bills and unread New Yorkers. Whether they know it or not, bloggers write for an audience larger than the search committees we hope to impress. They have already started eye-balling the rest of the world, asking themselves how they can communicate with it without seeming to pander to it. By and large, this approach works. To draw from my own recent experience:
In the first week of October, I presented at the American Literature Association’s Symposium on Naturalism. My talk went well enough, but the conference itself was surreal: two tenured faculty members — both of whom wrote books I wish I’d written at institutions that would never consider hiring me — two tenured faculty members independently introduced themselves to me and acknowledged that they’ve read my blog, Acephalous, for quite some time. Flattering, but hardly surreal. However, they then told me that they almost didn’t introduce themselves because they were, and I quote, “intimidated.”
Tenured faculty intimidated by a graduate student. These professors obviously put some weight into what I’ve written on Acephalous and The Valve. So I turned to my audience for feedback, and one of my commenters made the obvious point: I have commenters. Most scholars don’t. They have people they need to impress and tenure files to fill; but I have sustained intellectual engagement with hundreds of people. As one member of it wrote: “In the land of the people who work on things only three people will ever read, the schlub with a somewhat popular blog is king.”
Perhaps, but I don’t want to sound like one of Adam’s blog triumphalists, because I consider the power of blogs to be supplementary and concrete: they provide atomized intellectuals a way to meet and remain in contact with fellow sufferers and their ideas. More importantly, they ensure you’re not forgotten.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
“Senior faculty might continue to orient their scholarly production to the four people whose scholarly journals don’t pile up in the corner of the living room, slowly buried beneath unpaid bills and unread New Yorkers.”
Ain’t it da truth! In my case, the bills do get paid and are never with the pile of New Yorkers, NYRBs, NYTBRs, AARP mags (hey, you can join when you turn half a century), CHEs, Three Penny Reviews, American Scholars, Ed Researchers, Ed Theories, AERJs, and even my own journal…if I put bills in that pile, I would have had my power cut off by now.
A. G. Rud, Purdue University, at 10:47 am EDT on November 1, 2007
This is a great take on blogging Scott. I would add that in my community college English department a group of us have managed to become closer and more intellectually engaged with each other through blogging. Blogs can supplement the communities we already have. And so often, we’re not even interested in what our colleagues are doing. Through my colleagues blogs, I know that one is finishing a manuscript in poetry and submitting it; another recently won a state writing award; and yet another colleague attended a writing center conference. Rushed hallway chats and department meetings don’t allow for the kind of social and intellectual engagement that we’ve found through blogging.
Jason Pickavance, Assistant Professor at Salt Lake Community College, at 2:25 pm EDT on November 1, 2007
What I have found is that it is a great place to learn how to get very complex ideas out and to evolve them from dense philosophical speak to prose that is much easier to digest.
It has also crafted a series of connections with others that would not occur in a professional society or conference, and is a great way to join and build communities around ideas.
In Travels in Hyperreality Umberto Eco noted how odd it was that American intellectuals were almost chided for engaging in public discourse. As the Web 2.0 continues to infect the intellectual media it seems that it is making a good space for the public intellectual.
More of that kind of content needs to exist in the web of ideas to counter the proliferation of those ideas that are irrational and uninformed — dripping with fallaciousness.
Drew, MAC, at 3:45 am EDT on November 2, 2007
I’m struck by the way in which academic disciplines seem to produce somewhat different blogging cultures. I haven’t formalized this impression yet, but it seems to me that some disciplines will translate better into blogging than others, and each will translate a bit differently.
And I think that any generalizations about academic blogging which don’t take this into account are destined to produce lots of people saying “But....”
Jonathan Dresner, at 7:05 am EDT on November 2, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
San Bernardino Community College District EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Position Information Posting Number 080218 Title Senior ... see job
Mount Wachusett Community College seeks an IT professional with high level database and programming skills to work within the ... see job
Technical Support Specialist The Technical Support Specialist will be responsible for computer equipment and software ... see job
Description of Job Duties: Administers, develops and maintains a comprehensive web site and continuity among ... see job
The MEASURE Evaluation Project in the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill is a ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
Northeastern University, founded in 1898 and located in Boston, is a private research university that is a leader in ... see job
Salem State College is an equal opportunity / affirmative action employer. Persons of color, women and persons with ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
Bennett College is a small, private, historically Black liberal arts college for women. As a United Methodist Church-related ... see job
Academic Blogging & Public Intellectuals
Scott, This is, indeed, an interesting look at blogging, especially in the light of the helpful article by Adam Kotsko in this same Inside issue. I’m recommending to our entire faculty to read both of your articles. A couple of things jump out—the way Adam frames the blog world, and your comments about key scholars being intimidated. There indeed are key blogs, and those new tend to stumble into them. The intimidation factor is in line with Mark Prensky’s wonderful insights on digital natives, esp. his advice for veteran professors to ask their students for help with such things instead of going to workshops. This is somewhat in conflict with your approach to having a workshop of five successful bloggers—though this seems to be a helpful approach. Personally, I find Insidehighered discussions about as helpful as any blogs. As for me, the value of blogging is discovering brilliant minds that think systematically, and personally I enjoy those with a wide range of applications. The entire concept of Public Intellectual becomes more tangible. Keith Drury’s Tuesday’s Column (with 10s of thousands of hits) is such a column. www.TuesdayColumn.com. In fact, see his recent “Big Blog Bust” piece, and note he T-shirt pictured ("More people read this T-Shirt than my Blog"). Granted, many would find several of his entries outside their interests because he’s a practical theologian—outside my field, too—but his thoughts and mind are fresh. It’s like walking to hear Abelard, but doing so on a keyboard. I agreed to blog for Paxton Media as the Accidental Author, but only after seeking serious counsel from Keith. I suppose much like your workshop with the five bloggers, it was a necessary step. Among his tips were not to pay attention to the number of respondents. If you find yourself driven by the number of comments—it’s time to shut down. He told me, “I’ve often seen people take on controversial subjects just to generate responses. . . ” Instead, stay focused on your interests and your voice. Also, although a prolific author, he sees blogging as practice. He is very systematic in how he approaches it, and from his blog he gleans ideas and perspective for his books. However, like Wikinomics and The World Is Flat, the blogs do not write the book—also a caution by those authors. I recall a couple years back being quoted on Drury’s blog and receiving a flood of emails (after one sentence on his blog). Another time I was speaking west of Atlanta and a professor drove over five hours because of citation on Drury’s blog. In short, people with well connected dendrites have a wonderful outlet, especially if they have a Drury perspective. It also goes without saying that both of these blog articles today are from graduate students—perhaps a statement in and of itself. BTW, I find your site engaging, free flowing, and good for an occasional check of one of the “pulse points” of the academy. Not data points, but pulse points, and for that I thank both you and Adam. Appreciate these articles as I stand on my chair slapping my keyboard in applause for Inside’s tandem (or bookend) approach to this subject by having both of you in the same issue. Sincerely, Thanks for this/these articles. Hope your defense goes well. JP
Jerry Pattengale, AVP for Scholarship and Grants at Indiana Wesleyan University, at 11:25 am EDT on November 1, 2007