Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

What to Measure and Reward at Community Colleges

At a time when postsecondary education is a requirement for an increasing number of U.S. jobs, community colleges provide broad access to higher education, enrolling nearly half of the nation’s undergraduates. But is access enough? Fewer than half of degree-seeking community college students achieve their goals. Do we want merely to get students to attend college, or are we committed to seeing them through to graduation?

One might think that states, in order to reap the economic benefits of a more educated workforce, would offer incentives for more students to complete their education. But most states link their support of community colleges to enrollment levels, not to student progress or success. Public funding rewards getting students into the college, independent of whether any given student is achieving his or her educational goal or is on the road to dropping out.

Over the years, a number of states have experimented with financial incentives based on performance measures like graduation rates; but a newly approved program in Washington state takes a bold and different approach. The State Board for Community and Technical Colleges decided that institutions might be more motivated to improve performance by rewards for student progress past key “momentum points,” as well as for completion. Under the new plan, Washington will reward community and technical colleges for every student who achieves particular research-based benchmarks leading up to and including graduation.

Washington’s community and technical colleges will receive extra money for students who earn their first 15 and first 30 college credits, earn their first 5 credits of college-level math, pass a pre-college writing or math course, make significant gains in certain basic skills tests, earn a degree or complete a certificate. Colleges also will be rewarded for students who earn a GED through their programs. All of these benchmarks are important accomplishments that help propel students forward on the road of higher education.

Washington State’s Student Achievement Initiative rewards its colleges for helping students continue moving forward regardless of where they start or how far they may be from attaining their educational goals. Successful students take many intermediate steps between enrollment and graduation, each accomplishment building a foundation for future success. Washington state’s plan recognizes the importance of supporting students as they achieve these intermediate milestones and rewards colleges for doing so. A student who is unable to pass a pre-college math course, for example, cannot continue on to college-level work, much less earn a degree.

We know there are key points along students’ educational journeys where they may be more likely to discontinue or postpone their studies. Students who are underprepared for college-level work are less likely to graduate than their peers who move directly into college classes, for example. However, an analysis of data from Achieving the Dream: Community Colleges Count, a national initiative to help more community college students succeed, shows that students who successfully completed any developmental course in their first semester were actually more likely than their peers to persist and succeed. Washington’s plan seeks to focus colleges’ attention on some of these key educational turning points and improve the odds of success at each step.

Knowing that the success of the Student Achievement Initiative depends upon buy-in at the institutional level, from CEOs down to classroom faculty, the State Board pursued an inclusive design process and is reaching out to every college in the state. During the design phase, presidents, trustees, business and civic leaders, faculty representatives and others — both supportive and skeptical — were consulted. In the current year, when the new system will be tested before full implementation, video conferences have been held with faculty members, administrators, and other staff at every college.

This incentive program is a good fit in Washington, which is among 15 states across the country participating in the Achieving the Dream initiative. Participating colleges make five specific commitments, which align well with Washington’s new benchmarks. The colleges pledge to increase the percentage of students who complete developmental courses, complete introductory college courses, complete any courses they take with a “C” or better, re-enroll from one academic term to the next, and earn certificates and degrees. For each commitment, colleges analyze data to measure their progress with support and guidance from the initiative.

Currently, six of Washington’s 34 community and technical colleges participate in Achieving the Dream and can serve as a learning laboratory for the entire system. The state’s incentive plan gives colleges the freedom to figure out how best to improve their students’ success rates, and being able to learn from peers who have already analyzed the effectiveness of various strategies will help them make more informed decisions.

Washington isn’t the only state where such an incentive system can work. With more than 80 participating colleges, Achieving the Dream provides an existing support network for efforts to improve student success rates. And offering student success incentives need not be confined to Achieving the Dream states. More states should implement similar programs, altering incentives in ways that will compel colleges to action. With so many students in community colleges and so many of today’s jobs requiring higher-level skills, it just makes sense.

George R. Boggs is president and CEO of the American Association of Community Colleges. Marlene B. Seltzer is president and CEO of Jobs for the Future. Both of their groups are among nine national organizations working together as part of Achieving the Dream: Community Colleges Count.

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

The Missing Measure

There is one very important measure of success that is missing — the transfer student. Many community college students take a few courses and transfer those courses to a 4-year institution without achieving a certificate or degree at the CC. They may do so as part of a dual-credit arrangement between their high school and the CC, but enroll in a 4-year after HS. They may be enrolled in a 4-year and take a course at the CC because it fits their schedule, or they would rather take Physics 101 in a class of 30 students as opposed to a lecture hall of 300 students. They may take a summer course at the CC back at home that will transfer to the 4-year they will return to in the fall. All of these students demand the same level of advising and other student services.

Also missing is an open time frame. Few CC students acheive a certificate or degree in one or two years — or five or six years. When I first came to work at my CC, I met a man who I had known in HS. He went to work in a local factory right after HS graduation. It was one of the top factory jobs in the area, but he was unhappy, so he enrolled at the CC to become a heating and air conditioning technician. I asked him how long he had been taking classes, and he said “10 years.” I eventually watched him walk across the stage and accept his associate’s degree. I ran into him at our HS reunion. He’s working at a local HVAC firm and loves it.

Where does he fit into this funding model?

Tom McCool, at 8:25 am EST on February 25, 2008

While Washington State’s benchmarks are noble, will they work? CC initiatives are great PR, touted by coveys of administrators and others; mosts founder on the shoals of funding, and demonstrate ignorance of conditions in the classroom.In major universities, developmental English courses cap enrollments between 10 and 15, or 20; how many CCs have caps lower than 25? Them that have, get support, them that don’t get benchmarks! CC funding mechanisms like California’s WSH/FTE goal of 525/1 make such benchmark-driven programs hollow. When pressured, developmental English teachers—especially the hordes of “at will” part-timers wanting to preserve next semester’s load—could “pass” their students on, but will the reward be meaningful? Will they ever make it past the next benchmark, which might be 15 units or Freshman Comp? Just another example of bean counters and EdDs making points without knowing the real game, which is taking students from where they are to where they should be, and that’s an expensive proposition that no one wants to recognize, even fund. And the percentage of administrator-allocated funds to measure such benchmarks will increase, paralleling the increase of the portion of instruction by part-timers and class sizes!

Lynn Fauth, Professor of English at Oxnard College, at 10:05 am EST on February 25, 2008

The community college offers many roads for education. Yes, a large percentage of our students do come in with the goal of graduating with a degree. However, we also have many students who return to school for self-fullfillment or to increase their knowledge in one area. For example, a student that works in event planning took a course in marketing to better understand this aspect. We also have elderly people from the community taking classes to “keep my mind sharp". I would encourage Washington to remember that the community college has many roles in the community.

Ellie Sweet, Instructor, at 10:05 am EST on February 25, 2008

Life Long Learning

Perhaps we should also consider the 85 year old grandmother who only came to get her computer skills up to the level of her 6 year old granddaughter. The grandmother probably did not have “graduate” as a goal. We need to insure that we consider all the reasons why students attend community colleges.

Dan Tahtinen, Instructor at Olney Central College, at 1:55 pm EST on February 25, 2008

The problem I see here is they are rewarding education just for the sake of education. Students come to us for job advancement. You do not need a degree to get a great welding job. You need great welding skills. Our students leave for the job market as soon as they have the skill needed. Not when they get the degree. When the economy is down, people go to school. As the economy goes up, people go to work.

Greg

Greg, at 5:50 pm EST on February 26, 2008

Community College Goals

Dan Tahtinen hit the nail on the head. Many of the people who take CC classes are not planning to graduate from CC or even a four year school — they are just taking a class to get some specific skill or knowledge.

Kevin, Undergraduate, at 6:10 pm EST on February 26, 2008

As a voice from a Washington Community College that is also one of Washington State’s Achieving the Dream colleges, I would like to respond to comments from , first Tonm Cool, “Missing Measure,” and then Lynn Faith.

Tom, because Washington’s Student Acheivement Initiative awards points to college’s for student achievments that occur long before transfer (passing to higher Adult Basic Education levels, completing developmental courses in English and math, earning students’first 15 college level credits, earning the students’ first 30 college level credits, completing college level math requirements, and completing a degrees and certificate—points are awarded for the same student each time one of these these thresholds is crossed), the Student Achievement Initiative does a great job of recognizing what college’s really accomplish, even for students who transfer prior to graduation.

Lynn, because the Student Achievement and Achieving the Dream initiatives provide real incentives to colleges to increase the numbers of students who successfully progress through developmental courses, it is likely that participating colleges will respond as our college has, shifting resources to expand developmental course offerings and implementing strategies to improve the effectiveness of these offerings, in order meet initiative outcomes. My view is that these outcomes encourage community colleges to do what is also the right thing—i.e., meet the educational needs of the students who most typically come to us.

Susan Mitchell, Tacoma Community College, at 6:40 pm EST on February 26, 2008

In deciding what to measure amd reward at the community college, discerning the intent of the student is the key. As has been pointed out in previous commnents, folks come to the CC for many reasons. If we can accurately record why they are coming, we can determine whether they succeeded. Determing success, however, cannot be solely a function of grades as also mentioned above. Measuring success appropriately will require adequate measurement of student and program level learning outcomes.

Rex C Peebles, Vice President of Instruction at Midland College, at 11:40 am EST on March 3, 2008

You are all correct...

Not only deciding what to measure, but is there always going to be improvement? We were “penalized” in state funds because our students did not show improvement...but there scores were among the top scores in the state. (Different group of students showing no significant improvement, but maintaining a high standard. My interpretation was we are doing a good job. The state however did not agree.

Second, related article to the right discusses 2 types of part-time students. Just as the gentleman mentioned above, because of life issues, it will take longer for some students to finish, and those married or single woman with children are among our students. Maybe having an older average age is why our nursing students are sought after. Many of them get everything done that they can before they start the 2 year allied health program. For them to walk across the stage with a diploma and a greater chance of passing their nursing boards should be rewarded...not criticized. Some did it in 2 years, and some more, but many of them do it living on a shoestring, handling major family crises and responsibilities, and working at least part-time (20 hours a week), and many full time. I teach a class I would not want to take and have both a full time job and a busy family life, and yet, every semester I have excellent motivated students doing that and often being among my best students.

Mary Jaeger, Dr., at 2:40 pm EDT on April 2, 2008

Total Service Toward Retention & Success

Measuring enrollment should be secondary to the measurement of the retention, success, and eventual graduation of the community college student. Too much emphasis is placed on enrollment figures which does nothing to truly measure the success of the student or the institution. As educational institutions, we should be bending over backwards to recruit, retain, support, and graduate students. Recruiting involves topics for further discussion, but in discussing retention, support, and graduation; our community colleges must become focused with a devotion that transcends all barriers. Barriers such as low pay, politics, long working hours, student behaviors and educational levels, etc. cannot deter us from retaining and graduating our students. We must concentrate on retention through a renewed focus from our faculty, staff, and administration on totally meeting our students’ needs regardless of how difficult they may be! Our academic advisors, student support staff, and faculty must necessarily be vigilant in this endeavor because they have the most direct contact with students. In meeting our students’ needs we must help them overcome their academic, mental, emotional, or social deficiences through recommending and following through on remediation, tutoring, counseling, and support services available to students. As soon as we recognize or are confronted with these deficiencies, our immediate response should be pro-active, supportive, understanding, and devoted to helping that student overcome any barriers affecting their educational pursuits. If this involves helping them access financial aid services, housing needs, remediation through student support services, obtaining textbooks and materials, keeping up with their course work, educating them on being a successful student, supporing them in their technical needs, or simply listening to their problems or concerns; then that is exactly what we should do and do beyond their expectations. “Service First and Always,” should be the driving force in all we do as educators involving our relationships with our students.Thus if we serve our students needs and concentrate on focusing their attention on being successful academically, then retention and graduation rates can improve and with their improvement can come increased enrollment, a secondary concern. We as educators owe improving the success and graduation of our students not only to the student for their future success and satisfaction, but to ourselves. This being important because we are assisting in the development of future leaders and citizens responsible for our future well-being in the form of economics, health, access to social services, and satisfaction for our lives as we grow older.

George Pate, Instructional Technology Specialist at Northwest Miss. Community College, at 5:20 pm EDT on September 14, 2008

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to What to Measure and Reward at Community Colleges

or search for jobs directly.

Associate Provost for Experiential Learning & International Engagement
Wittenberg University

Wittenberg University invites applications for the new position of Associate Provost for International Engagement and ... see job

Associate Academic Dean II
DeVry University

As one of the largest degree-granting higher education systems in North America, DeVry University provides high-quality, ... see job

Associate Dean for Research and Extension
NC State University

Join the Pack! A community with nearly 8,000 faculty and staff, and 30,000 students. NC State is one of the largest employers ... see job

Director, Workplace Learning Resource Center
Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District

Under the direction of the Cuyamaca College Dean of Instruction, this position will manage the operational and programmatic ... see job

Department Administrator III
Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Founded in 1898, and affiliated with what is now New York-Presbyterian Hospital since 1927, Weill Cornell Medical College ... see job

Simulation Center Director, School of Medicine- Bahamas
Ross University

Ross University School of Medicine Bahamas campus, located on the beautiful island of Grand Bahama, invites applications for ... see job

Campus Solutions Consulting — PeopleSoft Financials
CedarCrestone

Consulting Opportunities! Take your career to the next level with CedarCrestone. see job

Dean of Learner Engagement
Johnson County Community College

A career at Johnson County Community College is more than a job. We believe it’s important to invest in our employees and ... see job

Associate Academic Officer
University of North Carolina School of the Arts

The University of North Carolina School of the Arts (UNCSA), a constituent campus of the University of North Carolina with ... see job

Chair of Organizational Leadership
Northern Kentucky University

Northern Kentucky University’s College of Arts and Sciences invites applications from dynamic and distinguished ... see job