Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

The University’s ‘Mad Men’

October 17, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

“A brand that captures your mind gains behavior. A brand that captures your heart gains commitment.' -- Scott Talgo, Brand Strategist

***

For most academics, the idea of selling the university is suspect. Those who are involved in university marketing are thought of like the characters on the cable television series “Mad Men” -- slightly shady characters who promise the world to their clients, then deliver slogans and images for mass consumption. Money spent on college marketing is derided by many professors as waste -- lost resources for faculty salaries, travel budgets, or at least some new chalk for classrooms.

However, university marketing offices are the key to many important university functions, and getting to know that office and its leadership can give you a new perspective on how universities operate. It can also give you, as a faculty member or administrator, some new ideas on how to effectively get your own message out.

While faculty and university administrators are not going to become professional marketers, the need for greater marketing of colleges, departments and even individual faculty is growing in importance. For faculty and administrators, the skills of marketing are becoming vital. While university programs and initiatives should not be driven by marketing, faculty and administrators would do well to work at tightening up their message, using more emotion in their appeals, and trying to be more relentless about getting the word out. Colleges and universities do not lack for good programs, but often lack the next step -- getting the word out about their areas of excellence.

My own adventures in marketing began because I was trying to reach parents and students in our area. Working on a federally funded project that involves outreach to local schools, I knew first-hand that it is difficult to get a message out and be heard in the crowded, noisy media market place. So when I was asked to help our marketing office with a new program to connect with parents through radio, I jumped at the opportunity. That partnership between Eastern Michigan University and WWJ radio created Education Minute, a daily one-minute program of tips for parents on how to help their child succeed in school.

Working with our associate vice president for marketing on this project and possible expansions of it has taught me some lessons about how to get a message across in the media.

First, unlike academic prose, the message needs to be succinct and clear. Every sentence and paragraph I initially wrote for Education Minute was deemed too long, too complex, too many ideas. As an academic, there is almost nothing that comes out of my mouth that does not contain commas, colons and semi-colons. Messages to market a university or program are much more straightforward -- subject, verb, object, punctuation, and I have had to learn to tighten and punch up my prose.

Second, marketing work draws on emotion far more than academic work. People who work in marketing and branding traffic in feelings, not abstract ideas. When taping a segment for a video on parenting, I needed to state why Eastern Michigan was involved in parenting programs. I wanted to give some statistics about graduation rates, but the producer wanted more emotion -- what does it feel like to be a parent today? What are the fears? What are the hopes? The message needed less intellect, more gut to play on television.

I also learned that you need to be persistent in marketing your work. The media market place is a chaotic, loud place, and most professors are not used to attracting attention to themselves. But that is exactly what is expected in marketing -- you and your product need to be out front, making noise. Marketing rewards those who make the phone call, send the e-mail, pitch the deal, shake a lot of hands and press their case to decision makers.

Marketing also provides faculty with a different view of the university. Marketing is a business, and is not ashamed to say so. It is driven by numbers -- enrollment, market share, and competition. Unlike faculty members, the people who sell the university to students live and die by the numbers. If a professor loses 10 percent of his or her class, it means less grading; if a marketer faces a loss of 10 percent of customers, it is a job-threatening crisis.

So while it is true that university marketing departments routinely do pitch meetings, write slogans, and craft emotionally manipulative messages, there is a method to their madness. Most of what marketers do at universities is try to come up with clear, understandable selling points for the university and then take those to the public.

As universities are routinely under fire for not serving their students and the public adequately, faculty and administrators will need to pick up some lessons in how to get the word out about the good they are doing, if only out of self-defense.

Russell Olwell is an associate professor of history and director of the Gear Up program at Eastern Michigan University.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The University’s ‘Mad Men’

  • Posted by Ted Coutilish , AVP, Marketing at EMU on October 17, 2008 at 8:55am EDT
  • Russ, great job on stating your points in a succinct, clear and easy-to-understand way. Marketing needs more people like you.
    Signed,
    EMU's "Mad Man"

  • Importance of Marketing
  • Posted by Wilbur Bubba Beauregard on October 17, 2008 at 8:55am EDT
  • Indeed!

  • Enlightening experience?
  • Posted by Edward Hershey , Director of Communications at SEIU Local 503 on October 17, 2008 at 11:05am EDT
  • If spending time in the communications office will make profs more focused and less prolix, more passionate and less mired in detail, more persistent and less reticent, and more in touch with economic realities, then maybe a stretch with the campus flack should be part of the pre-tenure process!

  • Posted by Rex Whisman on October 17, 2008 at 5:00pm EDT
  • Russell,
    I think you captured the essence of the challenges and opportunities of engaging the academic community in the brand development process. When given the chance to have a dialogue with one another people in the administrative and academic areas understand that they actually have much in common. Nicely done!

  • I agree with Dir. Hershey
  • Posted by DFS on October 17, 2008 at 5:05pm EDT
  • Faculty would benefit from life in the real world.

  • Ethical limits?
  • Posted by Old Prof on October 17, 2008 at 7:50pm EDT
  • Are there great and honorable university marketing people out there? Of course. Are there slimy PR toads out there? Of course. How do we tell them apart?

    Here's a question that faculty often wonder about: Will you say anything your paymasters tell you to say? If the AD tells you to write something that makes the corrupt sports program and the arrest records of the players look lily white, will you say, "Right away, boss!" If the Business Affairs office tells you to write a piece for the paper saying that there's nothing wrong with kicking old people out of their homes and taking their property by eminent domain, will you say, "Right away, boss!" If the Med School wants you to extol the virtues of a psychiatrist under investigation for drug company kickbacks, will you say, "Right away, boss!"

    There are some university marketing people doing this sort of thing every day. If you're one of them, you're a toad, and I wouldn't want my name associated with you in any way, even if (especially if) it was to promote my work. I'd think more highly of the marketing department if it would go public with some of the things it has refused to promote on ethical grounds (if there are any).

  • real world?
  • Posted by DanielintheLionsDen on October 18, 2008 at 9:20am EDT
  • I am all for promoting academic values in every possible venue, and not opposed to working with marketing officials. However, the idea that "ad men" better know the "real world" than the professors strikes me as absurd. The university marketing officials at my university are often involved in suppressing facts and spinning lies, and that should not be acceptable practice for any university officials. It certainly isn't for faculty.

  • do your job, and I'll do mine
  • Posted by RJS on October 18, 2008 at 3:30pm EDT
  • So professors should never write a sentence long enough to require punctuation? This is one of the many absurd suggestions in this article that make plain exactly why scholars and admen won't ever get along: they have opposite jobs. Professors tell the truth for a living, whereas admen lie for a living. No doubt we need a marketing department, but I want them as far away from my scholarship as possible.

  • Easy on the stereotypes
  • Posted by Jay on October 20, 2008 at 10:00am EDT
  • "Professors tell the truth for a living and admen tell lies." Come on. Transparency is the key to any solid marketing effort. Marketing folks look at what it is that makes an institution strong, unique or attractive to prospective students then employ the language necessary to get that point across. Remember, once students get to your college they will know right away whether you are truthful in your job and if not, kiss your retention rate good bye along with your reputation among prospective students, who are dialed-in enough to recognize BS when they see it. Lies and spin are for marketing tobacco and political candidates...education does not need such tactics because unlike products that can harm you in the long run, an education cannot kill you, cannot make you impotent or have any other side effects, and it does not depreciate in value.

  • Whoa!!! Combining business with academia
  • Posted by Derek on October 20, 2008 at 12:11pm EDT
  • You surprised, as well as elated me. I believe that some business concepts, such as marketing, need to be integrated with academia. This is especially true for the 80% of lesser known, but great colleges across the U.S. This concept is similar to other businesses, let's say an artist. An artist needs to worry and concentrate on the art they are creating - not necessarily how to market it - but they generally understand the need. But let's give this task primarily to others to concentrate on.

    Academia, I believe, is similar. It's good for the colleges, and as long as the marketing message is clear and true, then what does the length of the message matter. There exists a solid relationship between the academic and the marketer, and the marketer serves the academic so that they can continue to concentrate on providing a good education - like the artist concentrates on their art.

    I recently found a site that appears to help colleges with this concept. It appears to allow colleges the ability to match with students searching for colleges in a completely unbiased manner. It rids itself of pushing a college on a student arbitrarily. Plus, colleges can place their "message" as a video on the site that only interested students can view. It might help, and I thought I'd share.

  • Great Article
  • Posted by Voltaire Santos Miran , Chief Operating Officer on October 21, 2008 at 11:35am EDT
  • Thank you for this! I'm both a partner in a firm that develops communications for colleges and universities and a partner to a faculty member, so this issue coms up routinely. What I'd add to the discussion is that, in this day and age, I think the biggest challenge for colleges and universities is present themselves authentically. Fact is that prospective students are using the web--social networking sites, college sites, google--to research institutions, and they place a lot of value on third-party assessments. In this sort of environment, what institutions say MUST match up to the actual experience that current students and alumni have. Promises made, need to be kept.

  • From one of the "Lions"
  • Posted by DFS on October 21, 2008 at 8:30pm EDT
  • Well, Daniel o' the Den, you will always be in that "Den" as long as you construct the Straw Man Argument.

    The use of the term "real world" did not imply that "only" ad men understood the real world.

    The director was merely stating that one of you delicate faculty types might actually gain something by observing something from a different perspective.

    No wonder you feel threatened. In the real world, they expect "results."

  • Posted by Flip Wilson Phillips on October 24, 2008 at 12:05pm EDT
  • I hate to say to all of you learned curmudgeons that the author is simply saying that one must consider the audience, purpose, and medium when promoting programs, but it seems from all of this "righteous" indignation littering the discussion board that putting a fine point on the matter is necessary.

    The butts that fill your class seats (and the Joe Sixpacks--'cuse me, Plumbers--who pay for the tuition, either directly or through their taxes) are not impressed with how impressed you and your colleagues are with each other. The point in presenting programs and faculty to the public is to make a meaningful connection between what the institution offers and the community it serves. That community extends beyond your professional conferences, folks.

    Sneer down from your ivory towers all you want, but this is an age of accountability in ALL areas of higher education. No one minds if you want to study 18th-century footwear or some other minutiae, but you better make it resonate or the scrutiny will kill your institution--and perhaps your faculty line.

    MAKE IT MATTER!

  • Flip
  • Posted by DFS on October 24, 2008 at 4:35pm EDT
  • There were 12 comments prior to yours here.

    Of these 12, I see that 4 were in disagreement with your viewpoint: OldProf, DanielintheLionsDen, RJS, and Jay.

    I don't think that we are "impressed" with each other. In fact, I believe we are commenting in opposition to each other.

    While I agree that there must be a "meaningful connection between what the institution offers and the community it serves," there must ultimately remain some basic core of knowledge and wisdom in spite of the capricious new marketed trends which continually appear. After all, shouldn't the college fulfill its first role as a repository of knowledge?

    I must then take the term curmudgeon as a compliment.

    Thank you.