News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Nov. 13
I spent Election Night with hundreds of students gathered at Spelman College, along with faculty, staff, administrators, alumnae, and city leaders to await the results of our historic presidential election. It was a remarkable evening in which we collectively reflected on the achievements of the past, the success of the present, and the hopes for the future.
Civil rights icon Rev. Joseph Lowery powerfully described the 2008 election process as a “transformational moment in which the United States is being reborn,” a moment in which the politics of fear and division was giving way to the politics of hope and inclusion. When the announcement of Sen. Barack Obama’s victory came, the cheers and tears in the swell of the largely African-American crowd at Spelman were mirrored in the faces captured by news broadcasters at the multi-racial, multi-ethnic, and multi-generational gatherings in Grant Park in Chicago, Times Square in New York, and at the gates of the White House in Washington. Surely it was a night to remember. Regardless of political affiliation, we can all take pride in the high level of student engagement in this year’s election and relish the social significance to this and every generation of the success of President-elect Obama, the first African-American man to overcome this most symbolic of racial barriers, just 40 years after Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. articulated his dream that one day his children – Barack Obama’s generation – would be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin.
According to a recent Gallup poll reported in the weekend edition of USA Today, most Americans (67 percent) do indeed express pride in this collective accomplishment. Even those who did not vote for Obama indicated their excitement about the advance in race relations that his victory represents, recognizing that he was able to garner support from every region in the country. But from the beginning of his campaign, it was the Millennial generation (perhaps forever now to be known as Generation O) that provided a surge ofsupport, voting 2-1 in his favor in the election, and turning out in high numbers for him early in the primaries, before he achieved front-runner status.
Despite the widespread pro-Obama activism among very diverse groups of college students, several ugly campus incidents just before and after the election stand in stark contrast to the rising spirit of racial unification. The hanging of an effigy of Barack Obama at the University of Kentucky, the appearance of a noose on a tree at Baylor University, the dumping of a dead bear plastered with Obama posters at Western Carolina University and the post-election Facebook posting by a University of Texas at Austin student of a call for “all the hunters to gather up, we have a #$%&er in the white house” are just four which all hearken back to a time of overt racial violence and hatred. How can such incidents be understood at this transformative moment?
Are they simply, as some have suggested, random adolescent pranks without racial or political motivation? Certainly immature thoughtlessness shaped by a lifetime of exposure to stereotypical images and cultural messages that reinforce notions of white supremacy and black inferiority is part of the explanation. But history suggests that there is more to it than that. In every period of great social change, there has been a backlash – often violent – in response.
A shifting paradigm generates anxiety – even psychological threat – for those who feel the basic assumptions of society changing in ways they can no longer predict. Twenty-seven percent of the recent Gallup poll respondents said the results of the election “frightened” them. Some of that fear is perhaps related to disagreement with Obama’s policies or related concerns. But for some small segment, perhaps like those involved in the campus incidents, the fear may be related to an unvoiced and maybe even unconscious recognition that the racial calculus of our society has been changed by the election, a change that threatens the position of privilege white people have occupied for so long. Such a sense of threat can lead to irrational, potentially violent behavior, and of course, the fear of such violence is underscored by the not-so-distant history of brutality and murder which accompanied the struggle for civil rights (including voting rights) in our nation. Such acts are like severe birthing pains – painful contractions which no one wants – yet they are signs of something new emerging.
Certainly the election of 2008 changed a fundamental narrative in American culture. That narrative has been replayed on television and in movies and in politics throughout all of our lives. It can be summed up in this way: In a heroic struggle, after all the twists and turns of the plot line, the white guy (usually the blond) wins. The black guy, if there is one, is usually eliminated from the story before the end. Today the story has a new ending. We can no longer predict the winner based on race (and perhaps, soon, not even on gender.) The election of 2008 and the victory of Barack Obama mean that anyone with talent, drive and a great game plan can win. That new possibility makes for a much better story and a much better society.
Yet as we collectively get used to the new narrative, how should we respond to what I interpret as campus expressions of fear? We need to seize the teachable moment. Illuminate the pattern of violence associated with movements of social change, so when incidents threatening in tone and content occur, they can be understood by all in a meaningful social and historical context. Maintain a posture in which hateful incidents are never allowed to take place unchallenged – and provide opportunities for more speech, more dialogue about how various groups of students are experiencing the social changes we are all witnessing. Lift up the power of cross-racial coalitions, a power we have just witnessed in the election of Barack Obama. We should not rush past the significance of the great example of effective team building across lines of difference that we have just witnessed. It is a powerful example of 21st century leadership, one too rarely seen in our history but essential for our future. We should use it fully as a model for our students. Something new was born on Election Night. We have the responsibility and opportunity to nurture it on our campuses.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
“just 40 years after Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. articulated his dream that one day his children – Barack Obama’s generation – would be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin.”
A dream mocked by affirmative action. How can the author of “Can We Talk About Race?” avoid talking about the pernicious effects of racial preferences in a piece such as this, particularly one that uses MLK’s famous expression?
Curious, at 8:25 am EST on November 13, 2008
Thank you for such a timely and well stated commentary on this situation. I think you have given us a reminder of how best to deal with any challenging situations that arise on our campuses. It is all about teachable moments, isn’t it?
Margaret, at 8:25 am EST on November 13, 2008
In response to Curious:Sounds like Tatum’s essay triggered a little anger for you. The (partial) fulfillment of King’s vision—Obama’s election—isn’t mocked by Affirmative Action (I presume that is what you reference via coded language, i.e., “racial preference”)—they were made possible by it. Clearly, you disagree. That’s okay. But do note that your anger and the emotions that underlie it are precisely what Tatum was pointing to when she spoke of the anxiety felt by many when the racial calculus shifts. These anxieties are expressed in myriad ways: through hanging effigies, nooses on trees, dead bears, Facebook entries, and comments posted on the pages of Inside Higher Ed.
JoAnne, Asst Director Marketing & PR at Holyoke Community College, at 12:30 pm EST on November 14, 2008
I had some things to say, but, after reading her article for the third time it dawned on me that I could actually hear her breath as she gasped for joy, and then I could see her wagging finger when she ticked off anecdotes of idiocy by bigots.
What else do we expect from someone who tries to psychoanalyze something which is not even a solo entity?
I am one of those 67% who are proud of our country for doing the inevitable. But, I am not one of that group of people who are excited. I am merely one of those who are warily keeping an eye on our national security, now in the hands of a naive politico.
I hope I’m wrong, but I refused to drink the Kool-Aid.
DFS, at 4:55 pm EST on November 17, 2008
The reference to the Baylor incident needs to be corrected in light of the following statement made last week:
“Baylor University Interim President David Garland said Thursday that a rope found in a tree on election night was a makeshift swing and not a noose, as originally suspected.”
Please see:
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/cont.../14/11142008wacbaylorraceupdate.html
Gary Pavela, at 7:50 pm EST on November 18, 2008
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Western Carolina University, a constituent institution of the University of North Carolina, announces its search for the new ... see job
Faculty/TA Development Position: CRLT Assistant Director see job
Join one of the finest regional universities in the nation. James Madison University, home to 18,000 + students, welcomes you ... see job
George Fox University seeks a Director of Multicultural Student Programs to work primarily with our undergraduate students. see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Nestled in a beautiful valley in the western Southern Tier of New York State, Alfred State College has a long tradition of ... see job
Nestled in a beautiful valley in the western Southern Tier of New York State, Alfred State College has a long tradition of ... see job
Kudos to Dr. Tatum!
Kudos to Dr. Tatum for so articulately crystalizing both the challenge and the opportunity associated with this momentous transformation for America. This critique should propel both higher education and K-12 institutions to lead this dialogue that will help shape the cross-cultural perspectives and minds of the present generation of American youth. We have an opportunity here to repair the social divide in America that has been fostered by the “red-blue political debate.” Dr. Tatum provides us with an excellent roadmap on how to get started!
Arlethia, Special Assistant to the President for External Affairs at Kennesaw State University, at 7:55 am EST on November 13, 2008